Re: [reiserfs-list] correct version of reiserfs for 2.2.17
Yury == Yury Yu Rupasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yury There is also reiserfs-3.5.34 patch (without knfsd support) Yury against linux-2.2.16, that could be used probably with Yury linux-2.2.17 as well: Yury ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.2/testing/L-2.2.16-reiserfs-3.5.34-without-knfsd-support-patch.bz2 And note, I just found out the other day that there is a patch missing from 3.5.34 :- From: Anne Milicia [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [reiserfs-list] 2.2.19 reiserfs 3.5.32 oops and buffer-300: BAD when sync + umount race did not make it into 3.5.34 it seems. I added it myself after I realised it was missing after I kept getting buffer-300 errors even though I had upgraded to 3.5.34 (and couldn't at first understand why they were appearing) Sincerely, Adrian Phillips -- Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect. Reboot now? [OK]
[reiserfs-list] correct version of reiserfs for 2.2.17
I have taken over support for a machine running the 2.2.17 kernel with reiserfs 3.5.32 . We cannot upgrade to a later kernel at this time. I would like to know if this is the correct latest version of reiserfs that can be run with the 2.2.17 kernel. If this is not the correct reiser, which version should we be running on our machines. Also, is there any type of change listing that shows what fixes, etc are in the different reiserfs versions? Thanks,
Re: [reiserfs-list] correct version of reiserfs for 2.2.17
Cassandra == Cassandra Sewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Cassandra I have taken over support for a machine running the Cassandra 2.2.17 kernel with reiserfs 3.5.32 . We cannot upgrade Cassandra to a later kernel at this time. I would like to know Cassandra if this is the correct latest version of reiserfs Cassandra that can be run with the 2.2.17 kernel. If this is not Cassandra the correct reiser, which version should we be running Cassandra on our machines. Also, is there any type of change Cassandra listing that shows what fixes, etc are in the different Cassandra reiserfs versions? I don't understand why you cannot upgrade. 2.2.20 with 3.5.34 is a better bet than 2.2.17 and 3.5.32 as far as my own experience is concerned. Sincerely, Adrian Phillips -- Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect. Reboot now? [OK]
Re: [reiserfs-list] correct version of reiserfs for 2.2.17
Cassandra Sewell wrote: I have taken over support for a machine running the 2.2.17 kernel with reiserfs 3.5.32 . We cannot upgrade to a later kernel at this time. I would like to know if this is the correct latest version of reiserfs that can be run with the 2.2.17 kernel. If this is not the correct reiser, which version should we be running on our machines. Also, is there any type of change listing that shows what fixes, etc are in the different reiserfs versions? Thanks, There are 4 fixes for reiserfs-3.5.32 : ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.2/fixes-for-3.5.32/ To apply: Put all 4 *.dif to linux/fs/reiserfs directory, and perform : # patch -p0 file.c.dif # patch -p0 inode.c.dif # patch -p0 objectid.c.dif # patch -p0 symlink.c.dif It will convert your reiserfs-3.5.32 to reiserfs-3.5.33, but without knfsd support. There is also reiserfs-3.5.34 patch (without knfsd support) against linux-2.2.16, that could be used probably with linux-2.2.17 as well: ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.2/testing/L-2.2.16-reiserfs-3.5.34-without-knfsd-support-patch.bz2 Although, it is not tested with linux-2.2.17. Thanks, Yura.
Re: [reiserfs-list] correct version of reiserfs for 2.2.17
From: Adrian Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cassandra == Cassandra Sewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Cassandra I have taken over support for a machine running the Cassandra 2.2.17 kernel with reiserfs 3.5.32 . We cannot upgrade Cassandra to a later kernel at this time. I would like to know Cassandra if this is the correct latest version of reiserfs Cassandra that can be run with the 2.2.17 kernel. If this is not Cassandra the correct reiser, which version should we be running Cassandra on our machines. Also, is there any type of change Cassandra listing that shows what fixes, etc are in the different Cassandra reiserfs versions? I don't understand why you cannot upgrade. 2.2.20 with 3.5.34 is a better bet than 2.2.17 and 3.5.32 as far as my own experience is concerned. There is a much stronger reason to use 2.2.20, than it merely works better. There were two security holes involving ptrace in 2.2.17. These are fixed in 2.2.20. These allow a non-root user to gain root access. -- |\__/|\__/|\__ --= 8-) EHM =-- __/|\__/|\__/| \|| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP 8881EF59 | ||/ \ \ | __| -O #include stddisclaimer.h O- |__ | / / \___\_|/82 04 A1 3C C7 B1 37 2A E3 6E 84 DA 97 4C 40 E6\|_/___/
