Re: Strange errors with 2.4.22 patches (from Chris) and bonnie++

2003-12-03 Thread Chris Mason
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 03:35, Jens Benecke wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 16:38, Jens Benecke wrote:
> > 
> >> b) bonnie++ on a (previously created) reiserfs partition (with
> >>mkreiserfs 3.6.6) exited with random "disk full" errors, although
> >>the disk was never full. This didn't happen before.
> >> (...)
> >> I would appreciate any help. Thank you! :-)
> > 
> > Ugh, the new block allocator isn't properly forcing a commit when an
> > allocation fails, so we don't reclaim blocks deleted in an uncommitted
> > transaction.  I thought this fix got pulled out of the suse kernel when
> > namesys and I pulled out the important bug fixes, but it got missed.
> > 
> > porting.
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> so... the worst-case impact on this bug is that reiserfs will report "disk
> full" when you still have some space available. Right? No data loss,
> corruption, or similar Bad Things(tm)?
> 
Correct.  I'll have a fix available today along with a remerge of data
logging and quota against 2.4.23.

> I have two servers here that are supposed to be deployed next week and use
> ReiserFS. I've had some bad issues with MySQL files becoming corrupted
> after a crash in the past so I'd really like to put these into production
> with data-logging patches.
> 
> btw, what are the patches that SuSE uses? IIRC, SuSE ships with data-logging
> enabled, right?
> 

SUSE ships data logging and the xattr patches, along with a few others.

-chris




Re: Strange errors with 2.4.22 patches (from Chris) and bonnie++

2003-12-02 Thread Jens Benecke
Chris Mason wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 16:38, Jens Benecke wrote:
> 
>> b) bonnie++ on a (previously created) reiserfs partition (with
>>mkreiserfs 3.6.6) exited with random "disk full" errors, although
>>the disk was never full. This didn't happen before.
>> (...)
>> I would appreciate any help. Thank you! :-)
> 
> Ugh, the new block allocator isn't properly forcing a commit when an
> allocation fails, so we don't reclaim blocks deleted in an uncommitted
> transaction.  I thought this fix got pulled out of the suse kernel when
> namesys and I pulled out the important bug fixes, but it got missed.
> 
> porting.

Hi Chris,

so... the worst-case impact on this bug is that reiserfs will report "disk
full" when you still have some space available. Right? No data loss,
corruption, or similar Bad Things(tm)?

I have two servers here that are supposed to be deployed next week and use
ReiserFS. I've had some bad issues with MySQL files becoming corrupted
after a crash in the past so I'd really like to put these into production
with data-logging patches.

btw, what are the patches that SuSE uses? IIRC, SuSE ships with data-logging
enabled, right?


-- 
Jens Benecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.hitchhikers.de - Europaweite kostenlose Mitfahrzentrale
http://www.spamfreemail.de - 100% saubere Postfächer - garantiert!
http://www.rb-hosting.de - PHP ab 9? - SSH ab 19? - günstiger Traffic