Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-06-11 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
[...]
| Yes, views are an important step towards Filesystem-based cvs, see
| clearcase as an example.  Transaction infrastructure, substantially
url please?  Or I'll google.
| Currently we support atomic sets of fs operations, although this is
| immature code (meaning reiser4 works reliably but the api is still in
| progress, etc.).
I think this can actually be done in userland, outside (on top of) the
fs.  That's not the better way, just something practical for people who
don't want to wait for (or use) the new api.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=CA6N
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-06-10 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hans Reiser wrote:
| Pierre Etchemaite wrote:
|
| Le Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:21:58 -0500, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
| écrit :
|
|
|
| Good, then we don't have to immediately rewrite the wheel.  But I still
| would rather that we do this eventually.  My concept has the changes
| stored on the same partition, seems like it may be faster, and opens the
| door for a filesystem-based cvs.
|
|
| This phrase made me thing you might want to be aware of
| http://www.namesys.com/blackbox_security.html which got darpa funding
| recently
Looks cool, I sort of understand it, but what's it got to do with what I
said?  What phrase?  Filesystem-based cvs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=Wfv6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-06-10 Thread Hans Reiser
David Masover wrote:

Hans Reiser wrote:
| Pierre Etchemaite wrote:
|
| Le Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:21:58 -0500, David Masover 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a
| écrit :
|
|
|
| Good, then we don't have to immediately rewrite the wheel.  But I 
still
| would rather that we do this eventually.  My concept has the changes
| stored on the same partition, seems like it may be faster, and 
opens the
| door for a filesystem-based cvs.
|
|
| This phrase made me thing you might want to be aware of
| http://www.namesys.com/blackbox_security.html which got darpa funding
| recently

Looks cool, I sort of understand it, but what's it got to do with what I
said?  What phrase?  Filesystem-based cvs?
Yes, views are an important step towards Filesystem-based cvs, see 
clearcase as an example.  Transaction infrastructure, substantially 
present in reiser4 (see our (long) main page on reiser4 design, 
somewhere near the middle I think), is also an important component.  
Currently we support atomic sets of fs operations, although this is 
immature code (meaning reiser4 works reliably but the api is still in 
progress, etc.).


Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-06-09 Thread Pierre Etchemaite
Le Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:21:58 -0500, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :

 Good, then we don't have to immediately rewrite the wheel.  But I still
 would rather that we do this eventually.  My concept has the changes
 stored on the same partition, seems like it may be faster, and opens the
 door for a filesystem-based cvs.

Look for copy-on-write links (cow links for short) in archives, or with
Google; You'll find many hits, including a message from 2000 suggesting the
idea has been around since at least 1997...


Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-06-09 Thread Hans Reiser
Pierre Etchemaite wrote:
Le Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:21:58 -0500, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
 

Good, then we don't have to immediately rewrite the wheel.  But I still
would rather that we do this eventually.  My concept has the changes
stored on the same partition, seems like it may be faster, and opens the
door for a filesystem-based cvs.
   

This phrase made me thing you might want to be aware of 
http://www.namesys.com/blackbox_security.html which got darpa funding 
recently

Look for copy-on-write links (cow links for short) in archives, or with
Google; You'll find many hits, including a message from 2000 suggesting the
idea has been around since at least 1997...
 




Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-06-04 Thread Paul Wagland
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:27:27 +0300, Markus TXrnqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:03:14AM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 10:52, Timothy Webster wrote:
Does reiserfs4 include features to allow
vxfs like checkpoints
or netapps snapshots?
no
Can't the same functionality be created with device mapper though? At least
under linux anyway?
Cheers,
Paul


Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-06-04 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:10:05 +0200, Paul Wagland said:

 Can't the same functionality be created with device mapper though? At least
 under linux anyway?

You'd need 2 things:

1) *very* recent patched device mapper (I think patches for snapshot support
went by on LKML just day before yesterday or so).

2) You also need a suitable write-barrier interlock to the filesystem, to
basically force a flush-to-disk of all the incore data buffers, etc (basically,
you need to ensure that at the instant the snapshot is taken, the on-disk copy
is clean by fsck standards).

At that point, you can just have a utility that goes flush; snapshot; and go on
your way.



pgpMb3KdlRYDW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


snapshot, checkpoints

2004-05-27 Thread Timothy Webster
Does reiserfs4 include features to allow
vxfs like checkpoints 
or netapps snapshots?

Thanks in advance.
-tim




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 


Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-05-27 Thread Vladimir Saveliev
Hello

On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 10:52, Timothy Webster wrote:
 Does reiserfs4 include features to allow
 vxfs like checkpoints 
 or netapps snapshots?
 
no
 Thanks in advance.
 -tim
 
 
   
   
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://messenger.yahoo.com/
 



Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-05-27 Thread Markus Törnqvist
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:03:14AM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:

On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 10:52, Timothy Webster wrote:
 Does reiserfs4 include features to allow
 vxfs like checkpoints 
 or netapps snapshots?
no

I am not familiar with these mechanisms, would someone care to
ellaborate a bit?

I can't really even hazard a guess on what a filesystem snapshot
or checkpoint might be, but it sounds like a backup of the file system.
Or maybe just a journal state...

Thanks

-- 
mjt



Re: snapshot, checkpoints

2004-05-27 Thread Heinz-Josef Claes
Am Do, den 27.05.2004 schrieb Markus Törnqvist um 11:27:
 On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:03:14AM +0400, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
 
 On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 10:52, Timothy Webster wrote:
  Does reiserfs4 include features to allow
  vxfs like checkpoints 
  or netapps snapshots?
 no
 
 I am not familiar with these mechanisms, would someone care to
 ellaborate a bit?
 
 I can't really even hazard a guess on what a filesystem snapshot
 or checkpoint might be, but it sounds like a backup of the file system.
 Or maybe just a journal state...

Hi,
simply read these paragraphs:
http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3002.html#I34

-- 
Heinz-Josef Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
project: http://sourceforge.net/projects/storebackup
  - snapshot-like backup to another disk