Re: Freeze break: fix bug with Mutter and toolkit window positioning
Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Owen Taylor wrote: > >> Would like to push the patches: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736719 > >> > >> The bug they fix is fairly bad misbehavior with non-GTK+ apps, in > >> particular with Qt apps. > >> > >> They are pretty straightforward, and basically are reverting back to an > >> earlier version > >> of the code and I specifically tested that they also fix the original > >> problem with > >> VirtualBox. > >> > > > > +1 from me, anything that helps play nice with non-gtk+ apps for this > > release will be good from an engagement perspective. > > > > Second +1, with a cautionary note on the dangers of refactoring old > code like this, in particular when it affects interoperability with > other toolkits/wms, and we don't have sufficient automatic testing in > place... Hum, as Sri is not a release team member, here's a +1 to replace his :) Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break: fix bug with Mutter and toolkit window positioning
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Owen Taylor wrote: >> Would like to push the patches: >> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736719 >> >> The bug they fix is fairly bad misbehavior with non-GTK+ apps, in particular >> with Qt apps. >> >> They are pretty straightforward, and basically are reverting back to an >> earlier version >> of the code and I specifically tested that they also fix the original >> problem with >> VirtualBox. >> > > +1 from me, anything that helps play nice with non-gtk+ apps for this > release will be good from an engagement perspective. > Second +1, with a cautionary note on the dangers of refactoring old code like this, in particular when it affects interoperability with other toolkits/wms, and we don't have sufficient automatic testing in place... ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break: fix bug with Mutter and toolkit window positioning
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Owen Taylor wrote: > Would like to push the patches: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736719 > > The bug they fix is fairly bad misbehavior with non-GTK+ apps, in particular > with Qt apps. > > They are pretty straightforward, and basically are reverting back to an > earlier version > of the code and I specifically tested that they also fix the original problem > with > VirtualBox. > +1 from me, anything that helps play nice with non-gtk+ apps for this release will be good from an engagement perspective. sri ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Freeze break: fix bug with Mutter and toolkit window positioning
Would like to push the patches: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736719 The bug they fix is fairly bad misbehavior with non-GTK+ apps, in particular with Qt apps. They are pretty straightforward, and basically are reverting back to an earlier version of the code and I specifically tested that they also fix the original problem with VirtualBox. - Owen ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break request for epiphany
Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: > > We recently introduced a regression that makes ephy open two windows > when running in app mode, so every time you open a web app you end up > with two windows with the web app loaded. > > Patch is attached to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736922 Fine, approval 1 of 2. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break request: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733315
Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > This is a blocker bug, and the relevant branches in GTK+ and mutter have > been reviewed. The GTK+ patch diff formatting is a bit messy as gtk_window_realize was moved but Matthias said it's ok, so here's a second approval. And +1 for the mutter changes. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Code freeze exception for gnome-software
r-t approval 2 of 2. andre On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 12:15 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > +1 from me. > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Florian Müllner wrote: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736902 -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Freeze break request for epiphany
We recently introduced a regression that makes ephy open two windows when running in app mode, so every time you open a web app you end up with two windows with the web app loaded. Patch is attached to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736922 Thanks, -- Carlos Garcia Campos PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x523E6462 pgp84BbAuNxZ3.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Freeze break request: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733315
This is a blocker bug, and the relevant branches in GTK+ and mutter have been reviewed. -- Jasper ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Code freeze exception for gnome-software
+1 from me. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Florian Müllner wrote: > Hey, > > I'd like to request a freeze break for > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736902, which fixes an > issue with Software's app-folder dialog not closing(*). The patch is > straight-forward and obvious, and fixes a fairly annoying problem. > > -- Florian > > > (*) it turns out that unlike what the bug claims, the behavior is not > deterministic, e.g. the dialog closes correctly when the top of the > stack happens to be "falsey" > ___ > release-team@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions. ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
[gnome-photos] Created branch gnome-3-14
The branch 'gnome-3-14' was created pointing to: dfe679a... Added Nepali translation ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Code freeze exception for gnome-software
Hey, I'd like to request a freeze break for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736902, which fixes an issue with Software's app-folder dialog not closing(*). The patch is straight-forward and obvious, and fixes a fairly annoying problem. -- Florian (*) it turns out that unlike what the bug claims, the behavior is not deterministic, e.g. the dialog closes correctly when the top of the stack happens to be "falsey" ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell
Piñeiro wrote: > This bug: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736821 > > makes gnome-shell mostly inaccessible. The fix is trivial, and was > already reviewed and accepted by gnome-shell developers. > > Andre already give a 1/2 from release team on the bug. I could do the > same, but I guess that it would be strange to give a release-team vote > on an own bug. Ok, 2/2 Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Freeze break request for gnome-shell
This bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736821 makes gnome-shell mostly inaccessible. The fix is trivial, and was already reviewed and accepted by gnome-shell developers. Andre already give a 1/2 from release team on the bug. I could do the same, but I guess that it would be strange to give a release-team vote on an own bug. Best regards -- Alejandro Piñeiro ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Re: Permission to break hard code freeze - Support giflib-5.1.0
Martyn Russell wrote: > Hi all, > > Javier commented on this bug for GNOME 3.14 and I'm formally asking for > permission to release with the patch attached: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734351 Great; with Javier initial approval, consider this the second one. Fred ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
Permission to break hard code freeze - Support giflib-5.1.0
Hi all, Javier commented on this bug for GNOME 3.14 and I'm formally asking for permission to release with the patch attached: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734351 Thanks, -- Regards, Martyn Founder & Director @ Lanedo GmbH. http://www.linkedin.com/in/martynrussell ___ release-team@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
