Re: KDE 4.8.5 tarballs available
On Thursday 02 August 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote: kdepim-runtime has an issue as well: Hi Scott, -#add_subdirectory( calendarsearch ) +add_subdirectory( calendarsearch ) it was intentionally disabled: Author: Sergio Martins iamser...@gmail.com Date: Wed Jul 4 10:46:13 2012 +0100 Don't build calendarsearch agent. It was never completed. (cherry picked from commit 849830f2a933399d0a4d4dc6525ef94ba3e6d341) Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.5 tarballs available
On Friday 03 August 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote: I got through the rest of the packages without issue, so I think it's just kdepim-runtime and l10n that need updating and we're ~ready. Hi, I've fixed kde-l10n-da and kde-l10n-pl: b062732d0a0847a04a9860455eb9e3c5 kde-l10n-da-4.8.5.tar.xz c6c9e056aa90d75dbc6130e32bbef762 kde-l10n-pl-4.8.5.tar.xz I think we're ready to go. will enable syncing now, we can announce tomorrow morning. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.5 tarballs available
On Monday 30 July 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote: On Monday, July 30, 2012 07:54:56 PM Dirk Mueller wrote: Hi, I have packaged up the current KDE/4.8 branches as KDE 4.8.5 tarballs and uploaded it to the usual location, which hopefully resolves all the regressions in 4.8.4. I am a bit late, as I was busy and then sickleaving last week, so the release is delayed until we get positive feedback from interested packagers that the release looks good. I think the kdemultimedia tarball is missing. Hi Scott, thanks, I've uploaded it now. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.5 tarballs available
Hi, I have packaged up the current KDE/4.8 branches as KDE 4.8.5 tarballs and uploaded it to the usual location, which hopefully resolves all the regressions in 4.8.4. I am a bit late, as I was busy and then sickleaving last week, so the release is delayed until we get positive feedback from interested packagers that the release looks good. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.5 planning
Hi, I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5 release. Does anyone have suggestions for a release plan? I would like to do tagging either tomorrow morning or in the last July week, as I'm on vacation in between. Any preference? Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
More final KDE 4.8.4 tarballs
Hi, of course once you think they're final, they don't compile anymore: fdae8b516f4fc9e0025e2f316dad5709 kdemultimedia-4.8.4.tar.xz fix doc installation path 17f0bd3c55884c27cd7e1bb85eb9901f kdepim-4.8.4.tar.xz fix compile failure after picking up the kmail fixes Sorry, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: final KDE 4.8.4 tarballs
On Thursday 07 June 2012, Eric Hameleers wrote: The others tarballs are fine. I have the same error. Hi, fixed with the new tarball I announced earlier today. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for delaying 4.8.4 request
On Monday 04 June 2012, Kevin Kofler wrote: Not including this patch will mean not having fstab support until 4.9 (since we won't have 4.8.5). Why aren't we doing .5 releases anymore? Those .5 releases have always been welcome when they were done (which went back and forth). I also don't see a good reason for skipping them: With a monthly release cycle, why leave 2 months between the .4 and .0 releases? I think the .5 releases really need to come back! Hi Kevin, I'm fine with doing a .5 release when there is need for it, for me it is not a lot of effort. I was not involved in the #kde-release-team discussion that decided this (see release-team@ mailing list archive) so I don't really know what the reasons were. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kdelibs and Qt version dependency
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: On May 19, Dawit Alemayehu commited a change that uses QSslConfiguration::testSslOption that is only available in Qt 4.8 This means that both kdelibs 4.8.4 and kdelibs 4.9 now depend in Qt 4.8 instead Qt 4.7 Hi Albert, thanks for noticing. I confirmed the issue and I can confirm that 4.8.3 compiled fine with Qt 4.7. a) Do you think it makes sense to change our Qt required version from Qt 4.7 in kdelibs 4.8.3 to Qt 4.8 in kdelibs 4.8.4 ? I think for kdelibs 4.8.4 we should make the dependency on Qt 4.8 optional. can we ifdef the change for Qt 4.8? is there a way to fallback ? b) Do you think kdelibs 4.9 should depend in Qt 4.8 or not? I'd be in favor of that change. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for delaying 4.8.4 request
On Wednesday 06 June 2012, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote: http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs/7f8c750541790de5a380409466cf07cfe19c3651 which caused a regression. So when Sebas has sent Dawit's patch it'll be ready to go. Hi Anne-Marie, thanks a lot! Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.8.80 is out
On Monday 04 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Good job everyone! Hi Albert, thanks. it seems you accidentally tagged the KDE/4.8 branch in kdelibs to v4.8.80 ? git describe v4.8.80-19-gc1f6c39 Could you please double check that you tagged the KDE/4.9 branch on all related modules with the release tag? Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[kdelibs/KDE/4.8.x] kio/kio: Fix build for Qt 4.8
Git commit 3425961d216b629214fd1d32e905219f4de2ef71 by Dirk Mueller, on behalf
of Sebastian Kügler.
Committed on 06/06/2012 at 16:02.
Pushed by mueller into branch 'KDE/4.8.x'.
Fix build for Qt 4.8
Patch by Annma
CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org
M +16 -4kio/kio/tcpslavebase.cpp
http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs/3425961d216b629214fd1d32e905219f4de2ef71
diff --git a/kio/kio/tcpslavebase.cpp b/kio/kio/tcpslavebase.cpp
index 480dd04..3101bff 100644
--- a/kio/kio/tcpslavebase.cpp
+++ b/kio/kio/tcpslavebase.cpp
@@ -363,11 +363,14 @@ int TCPSlaveBase::connectToHost(const QString host,
quint16 port, QString* erro
the SSL handshake, then that combination will be cached using KIO's
internal
meta-data mechanism in order to speed up future connections to the same
host.
*/
+
QSslConfiguration sslConfig = d-socket.sslConfiguration();
+#if QT_VERSION = 0x040800
const bool isSslCompressionDisabled =
sslConfig.testSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression);
const bool shouldSslCompressBeDisabled =
config()-readEntry(LastUsedSslDisableCompressionFlag,
isSslCompressionDisabled);
sslConfig.setSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression,
shouldSslCompressBeDisabled);
-
+#endif
+
const int lastSslVerson = config()-readEntry(LastUsedSslVersion,
static_castint(KTcpSocket::SecureProtocols));
KTcpSocket::SslVersion trySslVersion =
static_castKTcpSocket::SslVersion(lastSslVerson);
KTcpSocket::SslVersions alreadyTriedSslVersions = trySslVersion;
@@ -409,29 +412,37 @@ int TCPSlaveBase::connectToHost(const QString host,
quint16 port, QString* erro
if (d-autoSSL) {
SslResult res = d-startTLSInternal(trySslVersion, sslConfig,
3 /*30 secs timeout*/);
if ((res ResultFailed) (res ResultFailedEarly)) {
+#if QT_VERSION = 0x040800
if
(!sslConfig.testSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression)) {
sslConfig.setSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression,
true);
continue;
}
+#endif
if (!(alreadyTriedSslVersions KTcpSocket::SecureProtocols)) {
trySslVersion = KTcpSocket::SecureProtocols;
alreadyTriedSslVersions |= trySslVersion;
+#if QT_VERSION = 0x040800
sslConfig.setSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression,
false);
+#endif
continue;
}
if (!(alreadyTriedSslVersions KTcpSocket::TlsV1)) {
trySslVersion = KTcpSocket::TlsV1;
alreadyTriedSslVersions |= trySslVersion;
+#if QT_VERSION = 0x040800
sslConfig.setSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression,
false);
+#endif
continue;
}
if (!(alreadyTriedSslVersions KTcpSocket::SslV3)) {
trySslVersion = KTcpSocket::SslV3;
alreadyTriedSslVersions |= trySslVersion;
+#if QT_VERSION = 0x040800
sslConfig.setSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression,
false);
+#endif
continue;
}
}
@@ -449,11 +460,12 @@ int TCPSlaveBase::connectToHost(const QString host,
quint16 port, QString* erro
setMetaData(QLatin1String({internal~currenthost}LastUsedSslVersion),
QString::number(trySslVersion));
}
-
+#if QT_VERSION = 0x040800
if (sslConfig.testSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression)
!shouldSslCompressBeDisabled) {
setMetaData(QLatin1String({internal~currenthost}LastUsedSslDisableCompressionFlag),
QString::number(true));
}
+#endif
return 0;
}
Q_ASSERT(false);
@@ -568,10 +580,10 @@ TCPSlaveBase::SslResult
TCPSlaveBase::TcpSlaveBasePrivate::startTLSInternal (KTc
//setMetaData(ssl_session_id, d-kssl-session()-toString());
//### we don't support session reuse for now...
usingSSL = true;
-
+#if QT_VERSION = 0x040800
kDebug(7027) Trying SSL handshake with protocol: version
, SSL compression ON:
sslConfig.testSslOption(QSsl::SslOptionDisableCompression);
-
+#endif
// Set the SSL version to use...
socket.setAdvertisedSslVersion(version);
___
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.8.80 is out
On Wednesday 06 June 2012, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: Could you please double check that you tagged the KDE/4.9 branch on all related modules with the release tag? There is no 4.9 branch in kdelibs. At least not yet. Ah, d'oh. okay, that explains it. Well, now we have the mess completed. IMHO we should create a KDE/4.9 and move Sebastian Truegs nepomuk branch merge there. then we can also bump the Qt requirements. For now I created a KDE/4.8.x branch without the merge and will create v4.8.4 from it. We can also use it for cherry-picking KDE 4.8.5 fixes if needed. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
final KDE 4.8.4 tarballs
Hi, in order to respin kdelibs tarball I had to create a KDE/4.8.x branch to cherry-pick the right patches,took some time. Now we're complete: fc50a6ff95843925ec4d6e12ebce7f3c kdemultimedia-4.8.4.tar.xz - doc/ fixes. af1ff1da6f1fbd5eab18fdd57282f5c1 kdepim-4.8.4.tar.xz - kmail crash fix fc1911379365eaaf5d6aa0759259cce8 kde-workspace-4.8.4.tar.xz - ksysguard cpu accounting fix 83e0de7d22d07503da9cf2e2ff7cea43 kdelibs-4.8.4.tar.xz - Qt 4.7.x compile fix - regression fix in upower support of solid (2404110) - fstab handling fixes (63ccc43) these are all changes compared to the initial mail. Planned announcement is in 24 hours, unless there is feedback about new issues. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Request for delaying 4.8.4 request
On Monday 04 June 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote: I'm waiting until Bensi reviews it on reviewboard, it is simple enough to review it in 5min so I don't think review is in process. Hi Alex, can we ping Bensi ? I don't know his contact address, did we try other means to reach him? If we can get it reviewed in time we can pick it up. Oh, also the patch fix a crash by avoid hitting an ASSERT, I was actually fixing that on the first place. Hmm, that sounds good at least. I don't wnat to promise that I can take a look at it myself since I likely won't have time. what would be the worst impact if we introduce a regression with the fix? I'm not very familiar with the risk attached to just picking up the fix. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.4 tarballs (try#1)
Hi, just finished uploading the first set of 4.8.4 tarballs. Suggested release is Wednesday next week. Let release-team@/kde-packager know about urgent issues or compile problems. TIA, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.3 tarballs uploaded (first part)
On Monday 30 April 2012, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: The kdemultimedia git repositories are *broken*, and the conversion rules are in the process of being fixed. Please release kdemultimedia from the SVN KDE/4.8 branch. The git repositories were locked after the brokenness was noticed, so there were even some kmix fixes done on the SVN branch and not on the git repos. Hi Nicolas, ah, okay. that makes everything a lot easier. regenerated tarball from SVN instead: d31072ec8fafef89dc469bf6c09ba836 kdemultimedia-4.8.3.tar.xz Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.3 tarballs uploaded (first part)
Hi, I just finished uploading the first part of KDE 4.8.3 tarballs. Known issues: - the re-assembled kdemultimedia tarball does not compile - kde-l10n is still generating. I'm on a business trip tomorrow so I'll only have internet access in the evening. I'll try to upload the rest and the fixes asap. Any help with kdemultimedia is appreciated. the script is in kde- common/release/setup-kdemultimedia.sh TIA, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Fwd: kdepim-runtime bugfix for 4.8.2
On Saturday 31 March 2012, Allen Winter wrote: Dirk, Is it too late oto include this fix for kdepim-runtime in 4.8.2? I'll include it. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: BUG 297272
On Tuesday 03 April 2012, Thomas Lübking wrote: W/o wanting to be nasty (rather nervous), has http://commits.kde.org/kde-workspace/a5c8eca4759d1aace9fc265fef2b7ebb88ca36 90 been picked or will it be picked for the official 4.8.2 release? Hi, I've picked it up for the 4.8.2 release. TIA, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.8.2 today?
On Tuesday 03 April 2012, Will Stephenson wrote: I'm not aware of any showstopper issues for a 4.8.2 today, I assume we'll announce it later this afternoon. Hi Will, in fact there are two show stopper issues and I'm currently respinnign the tarballs. We will do the announcement tomorrow. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.2 tarball final respins
Hi, I've updated the following two tarballs: ac3b7c787813ff0d1b47b6ec9d888773 kdepim-runtime-4.8.2.tar.xz a725122bc968cce959fd2dfe3ef552ff kde-workspace-4.8.2.tar.xz one is a crash fix in kalarm, the other one an important fix in kwin. Tentative announcement is tomorrow afternoon. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Stepping down as release coordinator for KDE 4.9+
On Friday 30 March 2012, Jonathan Riddell wrote: Shame to see you go but thanks for stepping down gracefully. I would be interested in helping but I think it's a bit of a conflict of interest when distro people make tars for distros so I wouldn't be the best candidate. Well, on the other side it also shortens the path for possible fixes, and having interest in good, stable releases is not really a conflict of interest for a release coordinator. So I think thats okay. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On Friday 30 March 2012, Rex Dieter wrote: kde-base-artwork-4.8.2 installs the same ksplash theme that already comes with kde-workspace. Looks like creating that separate kde-base-artwork tarball was a mistake (happened in 4.8.1 too, which also differred from 4.8.0) Yes, kde-base-artwork was accidentally in the svn-tarball list still. I've removed it from there now (and deleted the generated tarball on ftp). Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On Saturday 31 March 2012, Andrea Scarpino wrote: Maybe you want to add this commit: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kde- baseapps/konsole/repository/revisions/bf3e57e94b54c1c4337d7960e0fda0ef98156 451 Is a workaround to the font issue with Qt 4.8 (KDEBUG#280896) Hi, I've added it. I've also updated kdesdk to fix the permission issues: a47a7a28ba48e5553bdb610c548a32dd kdesdk-4.8.2.tar.xz c63b525e94a0e7e1753ea3d9dbff6970 konsole-4.8.2.tar.xz Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Stepping down as release coordinator for KDE 4.9+
Hi, Well, the day had to come. I realize that my focus is meanwhile on many other tasks, and I don't have enough time and attention to follow KDE 4.9.x development. I can finish the 4.8.x series, but I would like to hand the work for 4.9.x and beyond over to somebody else. Any volunteers appreciated. I can help with understanding the current scriptcollection and documenting things to get a new person up to speed. Volunteers appreciated! Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: adding kwebkitpart to KDE SC
On Sunday 25 March 2012, David Faure wrote: 2) ask Dirk to add it to the SC releases from 4.9 and in the future Are there scripts in svn where we can add this ourselves, to prevent the let's hope dirk reads this situation? :-) The scripts are as usual in /trunk/kde-common/release, and dirk reads this :-) it seems there are no objections. what are the version numbers for kwebkitpart? Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kdepim and kdepim-runtime version strings in KDE SC 4.8.1
On Thursday 15 March 2012, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: @Dirk While at this, do you use some script that makes whole 'tagging foo' or it's based around invoking git command directly? (I know there was one in kde-common/release for svn released stuff) Those are still the scripts that are used, they have code for git as well. Someone could work on automating updating version strings on tagging if one knew where to start. I've added a sanity check to avoid that this error happens again, now it will bail out on generation. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
Hi, I just finished uploading the 4.8.2 tarballs. they're xz only for now. I've created them with pixz(1) meanwhile, so that they're build within reasonable amount of time. I've shortly tested it, and all xz variants I have available seem to be able to handle those files just fine. Let me know if you find a problem with that approach. Also, please mail release-team@kde.org about any issues you find as blocking for this release. the plan is to release them tuesday or wednesday next week. TIA, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
kdepim 4.8.1 tarball updated
Hi, I updated kdepim with the fixes from laurent: a41cbe225817f00ade3da2c49ee43d6a kdepim-4.8.1.tar.bz2 b6437783b3d7aa06701a5c3280164a68 kdepim-4.8.1.tar.xz We will release this tomorrow late as 4.8.1. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.1 tarballs uploaded
Hi, just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.8.1 tarballs. As usual, please speak up if there are any blocking issues. I have added a set of .xz tarballs under sources/xz. Those are identical with the bzip2 version, just being recompressed. I appreciate any feedback on those. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: New Languages for KDE 4.8.1 (bis)
On Sunday 26 February 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Please Dirk, make sure to package Indonesian (id) for KDE 4.8.1 since they have achieved 100% essentials in the stable branch. P.S: Yes this is in addition to he and ug that i sent yesterday Hi Albert, All 3 added. Thanks! Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.0 tarballs (try#2)
On Monday 23 January 2012, Frank Reininghaus wrote: if it's not too late yet, it would be awesome if you could include 84a9cc4bf6e9decc4c102102c4b04162369eb0fe in kde-baseapps. It fixes a recent regression in Dolphin which breaks toggling the selection state of an item via Control+click. Sorry for the trouble! This regression was my fault, and it was only reported today. Before I do anything else with Dolphin's source, I really will write unit tests for Dolphin's selection functionality to make sure that such stupid regressions don't happen again ;-) HI Frank, does not sound severe enough. I'll forward it to the packagers to include, and we'll have a 4.8.1 anyway, so don't worry. I'm sorry that it was too late to include it for this round ;/ Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.0 tarballs (try#2)
On Monday 23 January 2012, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Please let me know if there are any further issues. Can you update ark-4.8.0.tar.bz2 to SHA-1 0e67d6db9e7a5a0f90fcacaee11042b89b79d96b, per http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-release-teamm=132725946524817w=2 ? Yes, thanks for the reminder. also there was a request for kgpg: e705235a81a198564c067bdfcb29ef10 ark-4.8.0.tar.bz2 7c757f10db719f6e16cc8bb70f67504e kgpg-4.8.0.tar.bz2 Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Include commit in KDE 4.8.0
On Friday 20 January 2012, Dario Freddi wrote: I just fixed a logic error in the battery applet. The commit is 3919480e78c9b8854ce6e17f5ecbfbc009d40fef on kde-workspace's 4.8 branch, and it would be awesome to have it in 4.8.0. Sorry for the annoyance. Hi Dario, included. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.0 tarballs (try#2)
Hi, I've updated the following tarballs: 19f40e351df9db3d434a5a579fe7e529 kde-workspace-4.8.0.tar.bz2 8f941417152fd2ae9e5130cf0426a95e kdepim-runtime-4.8.0.tar.bz2 502216fe546ee87b7bb66f2da5599417 kdepim-4.8.0.tar.bz2 3e1ea1d5f56eb87c0c305d941ac414c0 kdepimlibs-4.8.0.tar.bz2 Please let me know if there are any further issues. Thanks! Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.0 tarballs (try#1)
On Monday 23 January 2012, Allen Winter wrote: Dirk, please add the following commits to the 4.8.0 release: kdepim-runtime = eeff6887bf794e27c7992a78b39645d41336d68 kdepim = 9cfd09b1c1f8d7473264d13ddc5c5cfb041d2d7e kdepimlibs = 749d79dbabb11ac0c197b3c7f672e8328ade300f All hubbed to the current 4.8 branch. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8.0 tarballs (try#1)
On Wednesday 18 January 2012, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: I didn't even smoketest them yet, but I just finished generating and uploading the first set of 4.8.0 tarballs. Please report any blocker issues or compilation issues either to kde-packager or release-team You really, really need to fix your scripts :) kdeaccessibility and kdeutils are traditionally missing. Hi, they are split into subtarballs now, following git module split. I only preserve tarball splitting over minor releases (aka if there are further git splits with 4.8.1 or 2, then I will reassmble the tarballs to make it seamless). It has been that way from the start in the 4.8 series. I'm sorry, I can not maintain two sets of tarballs, it is just too much time that I don't have. If anyone wants to step up and integrates the rebuilding into the script set we have (trunk/kde-common/release) then I'm happy to use it. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Additional commit for 4.8.0 in KWin
On Thursday 19 January 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Hi all, over the last days we investigated a regression in KWin causing high CPU usage. The problem exists in the combination of any effect animating closing windows and a window being closed before it became visible at all. In such a case the effects would trigger repaints till KWin gets restarted. This strange situation can be triggered by opening Amarok. Today Philipp finally identified the root cause and fixed it with d07964e0af95911a97c3f474b694570cb279878c [1] We think that this fix is important enough to be included into the 4.8.0 release even after tagging and would appreciate if the release team could take care of it. Hi Martin, sure, thanks for letting me know. the updated tarball is uploaded: cd921fa05bdf6e599f12389bc2318cf4 kde-workspace-4.8.0.tar.bz2 Thanks! Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Fwd: [kdelibs/KDE/4.8] kdecore/network: KTcpSocket: forward encryptedBytesWritten from QSslSocket.
On Friday 06 January 2012, Kevin Ottens wrote: I'd just like to point out that it is a very important improvement which allows to fix some quite long standing issues with KIMAP and the Akonadi IMAP resource. Should drastically improve the stability of the IMAP stack (of course there's corresponding commits in kdepim-runtime and kdepimlibs). All changes from KDE/4.8 branch are taken, so it should be in. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kde-base-artwork
On Friday 06 January 2012, Jonathan Riddell wrote: kde-base-artwork has been added in RC 2. I'm having people worried that after a release candidate might be too late to rename a module, I'd think adding one is more likely to be a problem. This module has no COPYING file and most problematic its files overlap the contents of kde-workspace. I'm not sure what the purpose of it is that is not already served by kde-workspace. Hi Jonathan, sorry, I will remove it again. I am packaging the content in kde-workspace instead for packagers. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8.0 tarballs (try#1)
Hi, I didn't even smoketest them yet, but I just finished generating and uploading the first set of 4.8.0 tarballs. Please report any blocker issues or compilation issues either to kde-packager or release-team TIA, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kde-4.7.95 's startkde still sets MALLOC_CHECK_
On Friday 30 December 2011, Rex Dieter wrote: For better or worse, seems that our kde-4.8rc1 (aka 4.7.95) startkde still sets MALLOC_CHECK_ , so we're likely seeing a few more crashes than usual. commit bae4852ff4a56a26fc8709aa829d80cb45070959 Author: Dirk Mueller muel...@kde.org Date: Tue Dec 20 23:57:20 2011 +0100 remove MALLOC_CHECK_ debug stuff from release branches Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8 RC2 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
Hi, I've just finished uploading the RC2 tarballs. Syncing is not yet enabled,but I'm doing a first test build. The state yesterday looked pretty good. Let me know if you have any issues that would block a fast release tomorrow. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: it is supposed to happen with a plugin, yes. that has not yet been implemented. what is in the branch right now is code that can be built if ksecretservice is available. which means right now to make it work one needs to build kdelibs, ksecreteservice, then kdelibs again. Ugh, build cycles are a bad idea. what needs to be done to get it out the buildcycle? can we include it in kdelibs/experimental perhaps? Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Valentin Rusu wrote: I suppose you took the contents of the ksecrets repository. If I'm correct, then you got the right tarball. Yes, I branched master into KDE/4.8 and took that branch. This repo has all the ksecretsservice components and as Aron explained kdelibs will load these components using a plug-in logic. That logic is not yet implemented though. Okay, still some time left over vacation season? ;-) Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta1 tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Monday 21 November 2011, Christoph Cullmann wrote: just a question: Which branch/tag is used for the kdelibs part that are located in the kate.git. E.g. the kate subdir. Atm I see there only KDE 4.7.x tags and a 4.7 branch. I guess its to late to have there a 4.8 branch created? The KDE/4.8 branch exists now in the kate repository. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: 4.7.4 and/or beta2 additional fix
On Friday 02 December 2011, Torgny Nyblom wrote: I just (too late for the tagging unfortunately) push a fix for leaking Bcc content when sending mails to master and KDE/4.7 branches. The fix is in commits: master: 0875ca055322fd94962ed473be0a41854e17373a KDE/4.7: 468b955ec785d8dca94ae00aa982d6d1b0a86410 Please consider if these should be included in the tags. Hi Torgny, sorry, this came too late. What repository is it supposed to be in anyway? I can't seem to find this git hash to check if it was included anyway. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: There is no ksecrets tarball, and there is no ksecrets KDE/4.8 branch either, as far as I remember Valentin asked for it to be included in 4.8 and it passed review correctly. (adding Valentin just to confirm) Hi, as far as I can see, the discussion on release-team was inconclusive. Do you suggest to include it as a seperate tarball, but not include the kde-runtime ksecretservicesd ? The suggestion was around including it in regular kdelibs and kde-runtime, which is why I stopped thinking about it further.. I think now that the KDE/4.8 branches exist, it would be better to merge the daemon into kde-runtime and add ksecrets as a dependency for kde-runtime. Let me know if I should include ksecrets as a seperate tarball. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote: kde-l10n generation is still running, will upload them later today. uploaded as well. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: There is no ksecrets tarball, and there is no ksecrets KDE/4.8 branch either, as far as I remember Valentin asked for it to be included in 4.8 and it passed review correctly. (adding Valentin just to confirm) http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-utils-develm=131847823604336w=2 It looks like neither the kdelibs things are in nor the is the branch ksecretsservice from kwallet merged. I don't see that it makes sense to include the ksecrets tarball for now. As the discussion was inconclusive on k-c-d, I think we should reconsider it for the next milestone. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: As the discussion was inconclusive on k-c-d, I think we should reconsider it for the next milestone. That's far from what i remember, as far as I remember there were lots of changes asked for and Valentin met them all. Ok, then I created the ksecrets tarball. we can anyway reconsider this for RC2 if it should not be included. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Tags for recent releases are missing in the git repositories of kdelibs and kde-workspace
On Tuesday 13 December 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: May I please also ask for the 4.7.4 tags?! 4.7.4 tags have been pushed. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: git and artworks issues
On Tuesday 20 December 2011, Davide Bettio wrote: As every year some artworks are changed according to the new default desktop background. This year I noticed some problems: 1) kdm and ksplash default theme is part of kde-workspace. I need to update both, but if I do that I will have to commit about 20/30 MiB of PNGs making git clones bigger. Thats life, you need to push it there. We can decide to move it to other places after 4.8.0, but now it is a bit too late. 2) I need to update kdeui/about backgrounds, but If I do that I will change backgrounds also for the KDE 4.7 branch. There are two possibilities: a) create a kdelibs KDE/4.8 branch for this purpose. (plus the patch to make kdelibs 4.7 actually look like KDE 4.8, which I currently apply to the tarballs only (in kde-common/release/make-kdelibs-4.8.diff) b) add a tarball of artwork that I need to unpack in kdelibs prior to creating the actual release tarball to kde-common/release/* as well) For me, it would make most sense to create a KDE 4.8 branch in kdelibs, but I would like to have more input before I create the branch. Any opinions on this matter? Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: git and artworks issues
On Tuesday 20 December 2011, Davide Bettio wrote: I'm sorry to discuss this thing now, but I've seen all the new artworks recently. Anyway the point is that everything will remain in kde-workspace history forever so moving it away at that point will not decrease space usage I know, but it is 4 days before holiday season and I need to get RC1 out, because I'll be offline tomorrow (I don't know why the release was scheduled on such an inconvenient time, but so be it). We can do it correctly for KDE 4.10 or 5.0, but I need the artwork in *now*. . I think that fixing this issue today is the best thing to do. I would like to create kde-base-artworks for that kind of stuff. Perfectly fine with that if you can do it *now* and not break anything and make it all work smoothly. As I think that is a too short notice, lets do it for 5.0. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE/4.8 branch created
Hi, As a preparation of KDE 4.8 RC1 I've created a KDE/4.8 branch for all released modules except for kdelibs, where I'm waiting for feedback if creating a 4.8 branch makes sense for just one patch (see other mail today). Please remember that from now on, any change that should be part of KDE 4.8.0 must be pushed to the KDE/4.8 branch. (for those modules that are in SVN, a /branches/KDE/4.8/* tree has been created). The only exception that exists (as usual) is kde-l10n ,which is still taken from /trunk/l10n-kde4 until 4.8.0 release. so nothing changes for translators so far. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: git and artworks issues
On Tuesday 20 December 2011, Davide Bettio wrote: On Tuesday 20 December 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote: Perfectly fine with that if you can do it now and not break anything and make it all work smoothly. As I think that is a too short notice, lets do it for 5.0. I do it now. could you please do it in /branches/KDE/4.8/kde-base-artwork instead and let me know once it is in? Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: git and artworks issues
On Tuesday 20 December 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: I know, but it is 4 days before holiday season and I need to get RC1 out, because I'll be offline tomorrow (I don't know why the release was scheduled on such an inconvenient time, but so be it). I'll apply the same rule you applied to Davide and say that if you did not find the release date convinient you should have commented when the schedule was posted, not months after. As I said, so be it. I can do it today, as I reserved me time to do it today. I can not wait until XYZ is in though because I'll be offline then. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: git and artworks issues
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Davide Bettio wrote: Ok, I've done everything except kdeui/about thing. What are we going to do? Are we going to create KDE/4.8 or what? there is a KDE/4.8 branch in kdelibs now, please push it there and let me know when done. Thanks! Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8 RC1 (4.7.95) tarballs uploaded (try#1)
Hi, just finished creating the KDE 4.8 RC1 tarballs. as usual please report blocking issues directly to release-team@kde.org and/or kde-packa...@kd.eorg. Release is supposed to be ASAP, as soon as we confirmed that they build successfully. kde-l10n generation is still running, will upload them later today. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Fwd: Frozen master
On Thursday 15 December 2011, Ivan Čukić wrote: A couple of us from plasma/kwin team are wondering when the KDE/4.8 branch is planned to be introduced so that we can start merging new stuff into to master? I plan to do that along with the RC1 tag which is planned for tomorrow. The second, personal inquiry regarding libkactivities: If it is not going to be in the following few days, may I create a KDE/4.8 tag in libkactivities from the current master, to be used for the release, and consider the master to be unfrozen? I would rather prefer if that is not the case, but I'll look out and try to deal with that situation somehow. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE RC1 / 4.8 branch tomorrow
Hi, are we good with RC1 tagging tomorrow ? I would create 4.8 branch in all modules but kde-l10n (as usual) and tag from the 4.8 branch. TIA, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta2 (4.7.90) tarballs uploaded
On Sunday 04 December 2011, Dominik Haumann wrote: Still doing some basic testing on it, please let me know if you find any issues. again the question from where the Kate sources come from: there is no 4.8 branch in the kate.git module. Is it from master? you can see the mapping in /trunk/kde-common/release/modules.git Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta2 (4.7.90) tarballs uploaded
On Saturday 03 December 2011, Andrea Scarpino wrote: Everything built fine here, except the akonadi bindings, but this seems already known: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283677 Hi, I've included the fix in the updated tarball: cbe681491bf4962ddd5fd89fbf286c4b smokegen-4.7.90.tar.bz2 Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta2 (4.7.90) tarballs uploaded
On Saturday 03 December 2011, Philip Muskovac wrote: Thanks for the tars, but shouldn't Beta2 be 4.7.85 and RC1 4.7.90? Hi Philip, hmm, interesting idea, I did not notice that we used .9x for RCs. I simply switched to 90 because there are definitely less than 10 weeks until 4.8.0 release, and hence less than 10 releases. That was the soft rule that I used for defining a release number. I can keep that in mind for the future to reserve .9x for RCs. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.4 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On Monday 05 December 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote: Can you please upload the kde-l10n tarballs? They are still missing. Sigh, thanks for the reminder. uploaded! Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.4 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
On Friday 02 December 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote: Ehhhm, kdeaccessibility and kdeutils are missing. Hi, Uploaded now. That would be the 3rd time these two are absent... Dirk can you please update your scripts? The whole mess of reassembling tarballs from splitted git trees is not very well integrated. I'll try to improve that. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8 Beta2 (4.7.90) tarballs uploaded
Hi, just finished uploading the Beta2 tarballs. I've applied a small patch to kdelibs to make it look like a 4.8 version, although it is taken from 4.7 branch. Still doing some basic testing on it, please let me know if you find any issues. Thanks! Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: New Language for KDE 4.7.4
On Thursday 24 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Please Dirk, make sure to package Sinhala (si) for KDE 4.7.4 since they have achieved 100% essentials in the stable branch. Hi Albert, I've added si to the list of languages for 4.7.4 Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.7.4 tarballs (try#1) uploaded
Hi, just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.7.4 tarballs. As usual, please speak up if there are any blocking issues. kde-l10n generation is still running, will come later tomorrow morning after some sleep. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta1 tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Wednesday 23 November 2011, nlecure...@mandriva.com wrote: when packaging with kde i found a little pb with powerdevilui.so, here is my review: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103212/ if by chance one of you can tell me if i can commit. Hi, thanks for the patch. I think the maintainer should review it. I don't consider it a blocking issue with Beta1, lets work on a solution with Beta2. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta1 tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, nlecure...@mandriva.com wrote: There is this blocking issue for 4.8 Beta1: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=287212 Thanks, I agree. I've pushed a new tarball to ftp: d9e265d5ba134ffd73c5c0f6038a97b0 kde-workspace-4.7.80.tar.bz2 Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.8 Beta1 tarballs uploaded (try#1)
On Sunday 20 November 2011, Andrea Scarpino wrote: kdelibs installs: /usr/lib/libkactivities.so - libkactivities.so.5 /usr/lib/libkactivities.so.5 - libkactivities.so.5.7.0 /usr/lib/libkactivities.so.5.7.0 thanks. thats easy. removing experimental/libkactivities from kdelibs: 473b0d090e8f68d62c8e1d11dbdc187b kdelibs-4.7.80.tar.bz2 Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.8 Beta1 tarballs uploaded (try#1)
Hi, just finished uploading the 4.8 Beta1 tarballs (all except l10n). Let me know if you find any issues, I have not yet tested them. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.3 tarballs uploaded
On Monday 31 October 2011, Andrea Scarpino wrote: I suggest to revert this commit[1] as it causes this bug[2] [1] http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kde- workspace.gita=commitdiffh=8d59876457387d1c72ca3626ae2d267adf100014 [2] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285347 Hi Andrea, thanks for letting me know! I think the right fix was pushed already to the branch, so I just ref'ed to that revision instead: f65eafd8d1a48a16be272d5383b3e22a kde-workspace-4.7.3.tar.bz2 Release announcement is delayed until tomorrow. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.3 tarballs uploaded
On Friday 28 October 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote: Two tarballs are missing: kdeaccessibility and kdeutils. Please add those to the set ASAP. added. And the kde-l10n files, need to be generated still I assume? also uploaded now. All built fine for me. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.7.3 tarballs uploaded
Hi guys, sorry for the late upload, I'm travelling and have a very bad connection. I just finished uploading 1sst try of KDE 4.7.3 tarballs. Please let me (and kde-packa...@kde.org) know about any major issues with them. Targetted release date is tuesday or wednesday. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.2 (try#1) uploaded
On Wednesday 05 October 2011, Alberto Villa wrote: it built fine on freebsd. is there any idea on the release date? just to understand if it can match our own schedule (it's a matter of days before we freeze our repo) We plan to push the announcement out today. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.2 (try#1) uploaded
On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote: Thanks for finally uploading the l10n tarballs, but still missing are kdeutils and kdeaccessibility. Could you upload those too please? Sure, thanks for the reminder: 1669d5179e339ebc2d88502c7af050d3 kdeaccessibility-4.7.2.tar.bz2 ea7888ad0752009b427065ceedc9e265 kdeutils-4.7.2.tar.bz2 Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.7.2 (try#1) uploaded
Hi, I just finished uploading KDE 4.7.2 tarballs. Unlike previous tarballs, these have been consistently taken from KDE/4.7 branch in git. Let me know of any issues (my own build is still running). kde-l10n is still being generated and will be uploaded in ~ 3 hours. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.1 tarballs (try #1)
On Tuesday 06 September 2011, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Hmm, this was fixed in trunk (r1245243 in svn, 719d91b in git) but somehow didn't make it to the 4.7 branch while still in SVN. I've cherry-picked the change to the 4.7 branch (a000143), things should work when Dirk rerolls the tarball. Hi, awesome, I've respinned the tarball: 5deb07003fc0a44605e82f8e2df00a29 sources/kdeutils-4.7.1.tar.bz2 We've delayed the announcement of 4.7.1 until tomorrow, please give this new tarball a test! Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7.1 tarballs (try #1)
On Saturday 03 September 2011, Kevin Kofler wrote: In the past, the release was tagged first of all, and then any changes were merged into the tag (which SVN allows). In git, I guess the tag could simply be moved. (The server needs to allow tag moves, but it's a kde.org server, so surely it can be set up to meet KDE's needs!) The server yes, but not all the hundreds of checkouts all over the place. the tags in git will only be pushed when the tarballs are released. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.7.1 tarballs (try #1)
Hi, just finished uploading the first set of 4.7.1 tarballs. I have not yet been able to fully build them myself yet, given that my scripts failed early over night.. Anyway, I hope it works out. I have rebuilt kdeaccessibility and kdeutils from the modular git trees into the previous monolithic tarballs so that the tarball layout does not change between 4.7.x releases. If you know about any issues (unexptected changes in the tarball layout, or build issues, blocking bugs), please let me know. I'll try to respond on Sunday, currently travelling with limited internet. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: RFC: Release Management Going Forward
On Sunday 17 July 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote: It's still in the early phase, but it should work already. With these superbuilds, you can create e.g. a standalone source package for all of e.g. kdegraphics. When creating such a source package, you can/have to enter the git tag e.g. via cmake-gui, then the source package will be for this tag. Or, you can build all of kdegraphics in one go directly from git. how does that work? I set SB_PACKAGE_VERSION_NUMBER to v4.7.0, but it still checked out git master, which is completely wrong. how do I tell it to check out a specific tag instead? also, why are the subdirectory names completely different (capitalized instead of lower case like the fine grained tarballs)? why is there a Source/ subdir where the main subdir does not have a CMakeLists.txt, so that the usual cmake ; make; make install workflow does not work? is there a way to tell it to not run make install after every module? for packagers, the step of make and make install must be completely seperate. In this state I don't see that I can create monolithic tarballs from that method, I would prefer to run the old setup-kde*.sh scripts (from /trunk/KDE/kde-common/release). Anything I'm doing wrong here? I might have not grasped every part of the README. Any help appreciated. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Forgot to backport changes in kde-runtime
On Monday 25 July 2011, Vishesh Handa wrote: Could you guys please repackage kde-runtime? I've just backported the commits. for posterity, what commit(s) precisely? I've updated kde-runtime accordingly: c4e0fe5c417d276daf41fb07f816f584 kde-runtime-4.7.0.tar.bz2 Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kde-4.6.95
On Saturday 09 July 2011, Harry Miller wrote: I'm wondering where I can download the kdenetwork, kdemultimedia, and kdegraphics 4.6.95 tarballs at? I've got everything else but those. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Harry is there a problem with the files on ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/4.6.95/src? except that kdegraphics is meanwhile split in a few dozen tarballs, all of them are there as far as I can see. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.7 RC2 tarballs uploaded
Hi, just finished uploading 4.7 RC2 tarballs. these should be the final round before 4.7.0, please circle them widely. we'll release them as soon as there is positive feedback that they build properly and are complete. Please report any possible issues to relase-t...@kde.org TIA, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: [okular/4.6] /: bump version to 0.12.5
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Pino Toscano wrote: Dirk, please update mobipocket/4.6 to include also 6ab89608ce73af7c66640a4603e1f443eda691e1 which fixes the build within kdegraphics. Hi Pino, thanks a lot for fixing. I respinned the tarball: 9dd6475ab8432b528813ec7ec947b6c7 kdegraphics-4.6.5.tar.bz2 And I'll also update kde-l10n to include the build fix for -nl. I'll upload this now and plan for announcement tomorrow morning. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: [okular/4.6] /: bump version to 0.12.5
On Thursday 30 June 2011, Pino Toscano wrote: Git commit 5ad1dd2761a26acdd2576c6451356fec856d5793 by Pino Toscano. Committed on 30/06/2011 at 23:52. Pushed by pino into branch '4.6'. bump version to 0.12.5 Hi, I recreated kdegraphics tarball to include the right version of okular: 9054b67c661847e7b41c57a19492ade8 sources/kdegraphics-4.6.5.tar.bz2 Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: KDE 4.7 RC1 tarballs uploaded (try #2)
On Thursday 23 June 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote: just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.7 RC1 (4.6.90) tarballs, not well tested yet so far. Hi, ok, so that was completely bogus. I'm still learning the git basics it seems (never try to use git --mirror and clone -s if you don't know exactly how it works :-( ). I guess I should buy a bigger harddisk than trying to fit everything on one. So I uploaded a new set of tarballs. its all fresh, and it seems to build now. (Ive renamed the old dir to 4.6.90-broken, new one is 4.6.90). Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Release Team BoF at desktop summit
On Tuesday 21 June 2011, Sebastian Kügler wrote: And more. In order to get a room and timeslot, I'd need a co-host, basically one of your names to put next to mine, so there's at least somebody in case I don't make it. Whose name can I put down? Hi Sebas, I guess I should at least join the session, so feel free to add my name there. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: Further git migrations (and splits)
On Friday 17 June 2011, Nicolas Alvarez wrote: kdeutils and kdeaccessibility are pending migration to git. The conversion rules are already written. However, I see there's still debates about tarball layout, and that another 4.7 release may be near. I guess you mean another KDE 4.6 release. Yes, given the messup that happened with 4.6.4, we need to release 4.6.5 fairly soon. kdeutils is supposed to release with split tarballs (of course, the build system in 4.6 has been tweaked to also work as a monolithic tarball for the 4.6.5 release). Lets hope so. Are the branch names in those git modules at least consistent? I'm not sure what's the status of kdeaccessibility, I'll check now. Regarding your main question: we have both KDE 4.7.0 and 4.6.5 imminent. It seems the only sensible solution is to either delay the split until 4.7.0 is over (which is a pain because it means that I gotta collect the leaves for 4.7.1, which is supposed to be a minor release), or we need to do it before 4.7.0, essentially before RC1, which is however supposed to be done today. I see no easy solution. what is your timeline for the conversions? Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: [Kde-graphics-devel] kdegraphics 4.6.4 tarball contains the wrong okular
On Tuesday 14 June 2011, Maksim Orlovich wrote: kdebase-apps (kdebase tarball) also seems to not have 4.6.4 changes in nspluginviewer (which are rather critical, making it work with Flash 10.3) it seems kdebase-apps-4.6.4 is actually 4.6.3. Sigh, I guess I need to learn more of git. Is it good to wait until next week when 4.6.5 is to be done to clean that up or should we do an intermediate 4.6.4.1 release? Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: What to release from where?
On Tuesday 21 June 2011, Frederik Schwarzer wrote: http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MovetoGit/Progress I hope I got the current status correctly. If not, feel free to comment here, make changes directly or hit me on IRC (icwiener). Hi Frederik, great, thanks a lot for that work, it makes it a lot more convenient for me. one small wish: could you please name the module/application after the git repo name? I have kde-wallpapers, oxygen-icons and kde-l10n missing from the list. my understanding is that kde-wallpapers is branched in SVN in branches/KDE/4.7 and taken from the branch. I'm not sure what to do with kde-wallpapers for KDE 4.6 at the moment though. oxygen-icons is supposed to be taken from trunk/kdesupport like usual. kde-l10n is currently taken from trunk/l10n-kde4 and will be switching over to ??? in the future / until KDE 4.7.0 release. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: What to release from where?
On Wednesday 22 June 2011, Dirk Mueller wrote: great, thanks a lot for that work, it makes it a lot more convenient for me. one small wish: could you please name the module/application after the git repo name? I've created this list now with the branch names to release from, attached and committed to /trunk/kde-common/release/modules.git Please review. Thanks, Dirk kdelibs KDE/4.7 kdepimlibs 4.7 kde-workspace KDE/4.7 kde-runtime KDE/4.7 kde-baseappsKDE/4.7 smokegenKDE/4.7 smokeqt KDE/4.7 smokekdeKDE/4.7 qyoto KDE/4.7 kimono KDE/4.7 pykde4 KDE/4.7 qtruby KDE/4.7 korundumKDE/4.7 perlqt KDE/4.7 perlkde KDE/4.7 blinken 4.7 cantor 4.7 kalgebra4.7 kalzium 4.7 kanagram4.7 kdepim 4.7 kdepim-runtime 4.7 kateKDE/4.7 kbruch 4.7 kgeography 4.7 khangman4.7 kig 4.7 kiten 4.7 klettres4.7 kmplot 4.7 kstars 4.7 ktouch 4.7 kturtle 4.7 kwordquiz 4.7 konsole KDE/4.7 libkdeedu 4.7 parley 4.7 rocs4.7 step4.7 marble kde-4.7 libkdcraw KDE/4.7 libkexiv2 KDE/4.7 libkipi KDE/4.7 libksaneKDE/4.7 kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer KDE/4.7 kdegraphics-thumbnailersKDE/4.7 kamera KDE/4.7 kgamma KDE/4.7 kcolorchooser KDE/4.7 gwenviewKDE/4.7 kolourpaint KDE/4.7 ksaneplugin KDE/4.7 ksnapshot KDE/4.7 kruler KDE/4.7 mobipocket 4.7 svgpart KDE/4.7 kdeplasma-addons4.7 kimono KDE/4.7 qyoto KDE/4.7 kross-interpreters KDE/4.7 okular 4.7 perlkde KDE/4.7 perlqt KDE/4.7 pykde4 KDE/4.7 korundumKDE/4.7 qtruby KDE/4.7 smokegenKDE/4.7 smokekdeKDE/4.7 smokeqt KDE/4.7 ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: RFC: Release Management Going Forward
On Wednesday 22 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Personally, I don't see how we can continue releasing both monolithic and split tarballs over a longer time, mostly due to work load reasons, unless I find a way to script this together (which I doubt..). What's stopping us from doing a script that does the release by just invoking one command? Nothing, really. it already exists: /trunk/kde-common/release. the problem is more that the long list of configurations you need to adopt for every release (version numbers, branch names, module lists, various l10n fixups) are constantly changing. The git conversion made this completely painful. I hope this is settling down in the future again. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
KDE 4.7 RC1 tarballs uploaded (try #1)
Hi, just finished uploading the first set of KDE 4.7 RC1 (4.6.90) tarballs, not well tested yet so far. this is the split build, and the l10n tarballs are still bulding. I'll spend some time on the superbuilds, or the consolidated tarballs tomorrow. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kdegraphics 4.6.4 tarball contains the wrong okular
On Tuesday 14 June 2011, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: /me guesses it's because of okular git branch names being inconsistent with the rest of kdegraphics (the rest uses KDE/4.x whle Okular goes with 4.x) or because the newest Okular tag is v4.6.1 in git repo.. I'm tagging the releaesed tarballs. Here in this case okular was built from svn, so it was tagged there. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: kdegraphics 4.6.4 tarball contains the wrong okular
On Friday 17 June 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: with 4.x) or because the newest Okular tag is v4.6.1 in git repo.. okular was taken from svn, simply because thats the way it used to be at the beginning when I tagged 4.6.2, and nobody told me that I should switch to the git version, so I didn't. the script which I use to reassemble the tarballs is in svn, /trun/kde- common/release/setup-kdegraphics.sh lemme understand, it is meanwhile expected that the okular git builds fine in a kdegraphics module again and that I should use the git tree now? Yeah, that explains why kdebase is broken too... Albert, what exactly is broken with kdebase? details please. I'm all for cleaning up my breakages but I can't work without details. Thanks, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Re: RFC: Release Management Going Forward
On Friday 10 June 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Yes, sure, but I'm away from this noon until Sunday evening. Is this needed already now for 4.7 ? I was hoping to have some more weeks to give it more testing and finish it. (it being the Superbuild CMakeLists.txt, which provide builds in old-style KDE modules or in the future maybe even an all-in-one build using CMakes ExternalProject feature). In git there is a repository superbuild now, but it's not yet done. Alex, can I make use of that now? I would like to tag RC1 tomorrow. For which modules is this right now ? kdesupport, kdegraphics, more ? kdeedu as well, kde-baseapps and kde-runtime. Greetings, Dirk ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
