Re: dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:31:35 CET, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:01:49 CET, Andreas Sturmlechner > va > escriure: > > On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cidwrote: > > > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is > > > unmaintained, who is going to do releases? > > > > Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as > > blogilo. > > Ok, if it's broken and noone seems to care about it lets drop it. > > I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in > case they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC. Noone disagreed so dropped. Cheers, Albert > > Cheers, > Albert
Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
Am Sonntag, 12. November 2017, 20:33:49 CET schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > My suggestions: > > Broken -> unmaintained > * blogilo > > Not needed -> unmaintained > * jovie > * kaccessible > * ksaneplugin > > No commit for years -> unmaintained > * kremotecontrol > * kppp > * kfilereplace > > Want to release on their own -> extragear > * kstars > > Some activity but no KF5 port -> extragear > * kopete > * kscd Just in case it might have been missed: Once this has been decided, please do not forget to update sysadmin/repo- metadata as needed (cmp. "Moving Projects" at https://cgit.kde.org/sysadmin/repo-metadata.git/about/ ) Mentioning as I was wondering right now why blogilo was still listed on CI, until I realized that the repo is still listed as kde/pim project in repo- metadata, so CI decided on keeping it (despite no info from build-metadata, asking CI maintainers about that curiousity). Cheers Friedrich
Re: dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
In data lunedì 13 novembre 2017 00:31:35 CET, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:01:49 CET, Andreas Sturmlechner > va > escriure: > > On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cidwrote: > > > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is > > > unmaintained, who is going to do releases? > > > > Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as > > blogilo. > > Ok, if it's broken and noone seems to care about it lets drop it. > > I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in case > they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC. The only commit I did recently was removing the LSM file (!). Apart from that, libkface is one of the many digikam-ware stuff around, i.e. things that either digikam people want to control fully (but without cring much about non-digikam usages), or that they stop caring once digikam stops using it. Since the case here is the latter, just drop it from Applications (where it should not have been part, to begin with). -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
IIRC my commit was just to fix issue that I hit when packaging it on our distribution. If it is going to be moved to unmaintained then I have no issue with that. On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 3:31 PM Albert Astals Cidwrote: > El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:01:49 CET, Andreas > Sturmlechner va > escriure: > > On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is > > > unmaintained, who is going to do releases? > > > > Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as > > blogilo. > > Ok, if it's broken and noone seems to care about it lets drop it. > > I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in > case > they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC. > > Cheers, > Albert >
Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Albert Astals Cidwrote: > My suggestions: > > Broken -> unmaintained > * blogilo > > Not needed -> unmaintained > * jovie > * kaccessible > * ksaneplugin > > No commit for years -> unmaintained > * kremotecontrol > * kppp > * kfilereplace > > Want to release on their own -> extragear > * kstars > > Some activity but no KF5 port -> extragear > * kopete > * kscd > > Comments? This all seems perfectly reasonable from my perspective (the KStars change has been actioned already even) > > Cheers, > Albert Cheers, Ben
Re: dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
In data lunedì 13 novembre 2017 00:31:35 CET, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in > case they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC. No objections on my side. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
dropping libkface from KDE Applications - was - Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
El dilluns, 13 de novembre de 2017, a les 0:01:49 CET, Andreas Sturmlechner va escriure: > On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cidwrote: > > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is > > unmaintained, who is going to do releases? > > Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as > blogilo. Ok, if it's broken and noone seems to care about it lets drop it. I've CC'ed the 4 people that have made any commit in the last 4 years in case they want to object, you have until this thursday at 23:59 UTC. Cheers, Albert
Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
On 12 November 2017 at 23:57, Albert Astals Cidwrote: > I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is unmaintained, > who is going to do releases? Maybe I don't understand either, I'm fine with it going the same way as blogilo.
Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
El diumenge, 12 de novembre de 2017, a les 23:37:11 CET, Andreas Sturmlechner va escriure: > On 12 November 2017 at 20:33, Albert Astals Cidwrote: > > My suggestions: > If it's not too late, I propose to move libkface to extragear, considering > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377425 > > and > > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2016-July/009641.html I don't understand why you want to move it to extragear if it is unmaintained, who is going to do releases? Cheers, Albert > > It has been struggling to keep up with newer OpenCV releases for two > years, and is broken again since >=3.2 (almost one year). KPhotoAlbum > is the only rdep, where it is off by default already. > > Regards, > Andreas
Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
On 12 November 2017 at 20:33, Albert Astals Cidwrote: > My suggestions: If it's not too late, I propose to move libkface to extragear, considering https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377425 and https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2016-July/009641.html It has been struggling to keep up with newer OpenCV releases for two years, and is broken again since >=3.2 (almost one year). KPhotoAlbum is the only rdep, where it is off by default already. Regards, Andreas
Re: What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
> No commit for years -> unmaintained > * kremotecontrol Yes. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
What to do with the repos we don't ship anymore in KDE Applications 17.12
My suggestions: Broken -> unmaintained * blogilo Not needed -> unmaintained * jovie * kaccessible * ksaneplugin No commit for years -> unmaintained * kremotecontrol * kppp * kfilereplace Want to release on their own -> extragear * kstars Some activity but no KF5 port -> extragear * kopete * kscd Comments? Cheers, Albert