Re: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-15 Thread Robert O'Brien



I appreciate the contributions on relevant films. My suggestion is a 
less obvious choice: Woody Allen's
"Sleeper" (1973). It is less obvious, but it strikes at political 
control and the inept revolutionaries. It does not deal 
specificallywith religion, for the future group characters deal with sense 
effects or with philosophical messy thinking. [A number of Woody Allen's films 
deal with being the Jewish child up, especially "Annie Hall" (1977) and "Oedipus 
Wrecks" in "New York Stories" (1989).]

By the way, "Becket" was first a play. Although it is a clear 
presentation for the law class, we should remember the play of "Becket" 
is, it seems to me, a misrepresentation of the history of the 
conflictof Henry II and Becketdisagree onwhether the trial for 
murder of two low clergy shouldbe controlled by the seculartrial or 
bythe court of the church. 

Bob O'Brien
NTMail K12 - the Mail Server for Education
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-12 Thread Rick Duncan
Here by the way is a very nice summary of Babylon 5 "The Believers" episode.

RickRick Duncan Welpton Professor of Law University of Nebraska College of Law Lincoln, NE 68583-0902"When the Round Table is broken every man must follow either Galahad or Mordred: middle things are gone." C.S.Lewis, Grand Miracle"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered."  --The Prisoner
		 Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page ___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-12 Thread Mark Tushnet




I read the summary Rick directed us to, and I'm a bit puzzled. The
doctor intervened in a situation where (the summary says) "there are
only two options--surgery or
death." As a result of the intervention, the alien boy's physical life
is preserved, but in the end his parents kill him because, as they put
it, "This was not our son. This was only a shell. There was
nothing to do but end the pain of the shell." What I'm puzzled about
is why Rick describes this outcome as a disaster. It turns out that
the (physical) outcome was death either way. And that death resulted
from the parents' acting on their beliefs at least as much as from the
surgeon's intervention. I suppose this might be described as a
disaster if one shared the parents' religious beliefs -- but, because
they are entirely fictional, I don't see how anyone could. It would be
different if some obviously bad consequences occurred by means other
than the parents' choices. One could describe the episode, as
summarized, as about free will and determinism, or about the bad
consequences of religious fanaticism. (One thing it's not about is the
bad consequences of government intervention, because the surgeon
refuses to comply with the government representative's direction not to
perform the surgery.)

Rick Duncan wrote:

  Here by the way is a
very nice summary of Babylon 5 "The Believers" episode.
  
  Rick
  
  
  
  
Rick Duncan 
Welpton Professor of Law 
University of Nebraska College of Law 
Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
  
"When the Round Table is broken every man must follow either Galahad or
Mordred: middle things are gone." C.S.Lewis, Grand Miracle
  
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or
numbered." --The Prisoner
   
   Start
your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
  

___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.



___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

RE: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-12 Thread Corcos, Christine








Bob Jarvis and I are editing a casebook on
law and film which Lexis will publish next year.



Christine Corcos
Associate Professor of Law
Faculty Graduate Studies Program Supervisor
Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University
Associate Professor, Women's and Gender Studies Program
LSU AM
W325 Law Building
1 East Campus Drive
Baton Rouge LA 70803
tel: 225/578-8327
fax: 225/578-3677
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-12 Thread AAsch




Understanding why the outcome of this Babylon 5 episode was a "disaster" 
actually teaches an important point about the free exercise clause, I think. 
Prof. Tushnet's analysis is almost purely utilitarian, noting that the outcome 
was death either way. But, making the outcome the same either way is actually 
instructive because it removes the utilitarian aspect. As the events of the 
episode unfold, the doctor violates his ethics as well as the personal autonomy 
and dignity of his patient and the parents. One need not share the religious 
beliefs of the fictional aliens to see the difference between the events in this 
episode and death with dignity as a deontological disaster.

By this analysis, by the way, I don't mean to endorse any particular 
position on parents' religious rights to refuse lifesaving medical treatment for 
their children...

Allen Asch
Star Trek and Babylon 5 fan


In a message dated 8/12/2005 11:11:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I read 
  the summary Rick directed us to, and I'm a bit puzzled. The doctor 
  intervened in a situation where (the summary says) "there are only two 
  options--surgery or death." As a result of the intervention, the alien 
  boy's physical life is preserved, but in the end his parents kill him because, 
  as they put it, "This was not our son. This was only a shell. There was 
  nothing to do but end the pain of the shell." What I'm puzzled about is 
  why Rick describes this outcome as a disaster. It turns out that the 
  (physical) outcome was death either way. And that death resulted from 
  the parents' acting on their beliefs at least as much as from the surgeon's 
  intervention. I suppose this might be described as a disaster if one 
  shared the parents' religious beliefs -- but, because they are entirely 
  fictional, I don't see how anyone could. It would be different if some 
  obviously bad consequences occurred by means other than the parents' 
  choices. One could describe the episode, as summarized, as about free 
  will and determinism, or about the bad consequences of religious 
  fanaticism. (One thing it's not about is the bad consequences of 
  government intervention, because the surgeon refuses to comply with the 
  government representative's direction not to perform the surgery.)Rick 
  Duncan wrote:
  
Here by the way is a very nice 
summary of Babylon 5 "The Believers" episode.

Rick


___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

RE: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-11 Thread Roman P. Storzer



There's Becket (1964).



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas 
LaycockSent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:49 AMTo: Law 
 Religion issues for Law AcademicsSubject: FW: Feature films on 
church and state

Anyone have a good ideaon this query from my 
librarian: 


Doug, are you aware of any movies dealing 
with separation of church and state? I can't think of 
anything but Inherit the Wind,The Courageous Mr. 
Penn,Hitchcock's I Confess (sanctity of the confessional), 
and A Man for all Seasons. 

Douglas 
Laycock

University of Texas Law 
School
727 E. Dean Keeton St.
Austin, TX 78705
 512-232-1341 
(phone)
 512-471-6988 
(fax)
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-11 Thread Ann Althouse
How about the great Ken Russell film "The Devils"?I haven't seen it in a long while, and some people hate it, but it was once on my personal top five list. Here's the IMDB description: "Cardinal Richelieu and his power-hungry entourage seek to take control of pre-rennaisance France, but need to destroy Father Grandier - the priest who runs the fortified town that prevents them from exerting total control. So they seek to destroy him by setting him up as a warlock in control of a devil-possessed nunnery, the mother superior of which is sexually obsessed by him. A mad witch-hunter is brought in to gather evidence against the priest, ready for the big trial." http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066993/plotsummaryIt's quite something. Not for all tastes!AnnOn Aug 11, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Douglas Laycock wrote: Anyone have a good idea on this query from my librarian:      Doug, are you aware of any movies dealing with separation of church and state?    I can't think of anything but Inherit the Wind, The Courageous Mr. Penn, Hitchcock's I Confess (sanctity of the confessional), and A Man for all Seasons.    Douglas Laycock University of Texas Law School 727 E. Dean Keeton St. Austin, TX  78705    512-232-1341 (phone)    512-471-6988 (fax)___To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.eduTo subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlawPlease note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others. ___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

RE: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-11 Thread Skip L'Heureux



There have been a couple of episodes of the TV series of 
"The Practice" and "Law and Order" -- each in the last few 
years.


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Also: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Visit our Web site at http://www.QueensChurches.org/

Rev. N. J. L'Heureux, Jr.
Executive Director
Queens Federation of Churches
86-17 105th Street
Richmond Hill, New York 11418-1597
Voice (718) 847-6764
FAX (718) 847-7392





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas 
LaycockSent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:49 AMTo: Law 
 Religion issues for Law AcademicsSubject: FW: Feature films on 
church and state

Anyone have a good ideaon this query from my 
librarian: 


Doug, are you aware of any movies dealing 
with separation of church and state? I can't think of 
anything but Inherit the Wind,The Courageous Mr. 
Penn,Hitchcock's I Confess (sanctity of the confessional), 
and A Man for all Seasons. 

Douglas 
Laycock

University of Texas Law 
School
727 E. Dean Keeton St.
Austin, TX 78705
 512-232-1341 
(phone)
 512-471-6988 
(fax)
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

RE: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-11 Thread Rick Garnett


Dear all,
Laurence Olivier starred in a 1961 film version of Graham Greene's
Power and the Glory. And, One Man's Hero
(1999), starring Tom Berenger, is about the San Patricios (Irish-American
soldiers who deserted during the Mexican-American war). 
Rick 
At 10:56 AM 8/11/2005, Roman P. Storzer wrote:

There's Becket
(1964).


From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Douglas Laycock
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:49 AM
To: Law  Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: FW: Feature films on church and state

Anyone have a good idea on this
query from my librarian: 

Doug, are you aware of any movies dealing with separation of church and
state?  I
can't think of anything but Inherit the Wind, The Courageous
Mr. Penn, Hitchcock's I Confess (sanctity of the
confessional), and A Man for all Seasons. 

Douglas Laycock
University of Texas Law School
727 E. Dean Keeton St.
Austin, TX 78705
 512-232-1341 (phone)
 512-471-6988 (fax)
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see

http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that
are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can
(rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.



___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Re: Feature films on church and state

2005-08-11 Thread Steven Jamar
I suppose "The Three Musketeers" is a bit over the top for this.I'm sure there's a good Henry VIII film too, though Becket serves this aspect well, it seems.On Aug 11, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Douglas Laycock wrote: Anyone have a good idea on this query from my librarian:      Doug, are you aware of any movies dealing with separation of church and state?    I can't think of anything but Inherit the Wind, The Courageous Mr. Penn, Hitchcock's I Confess (sanctity of the confessional), and A Man for all Seasons.    Douglas Laycock University of Texas Law School 727 E. Dean Keeton St. Austin, TX  78705    512-232-1341 (phone)    512-471-6988 (fax)___To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.eduTo subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlawPlease note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.  --  Prof. Steven D. Jamar                               vox:  202-806-8017 Howard University School of Law                     fax:  202-806-8567 2900 Van Ness Street NW                   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Washington, DC  20008   http://www.law.howard.edu/faculty/pages/jamar/  "Politics hates a vacuum.  If it isn't filled with hope, someone will fill it with fear."  Naomi Klein  ___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.