Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor (mobile) spur

2005-07-01 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 12:07 PM 6/30/05, you wrote:

Aarggh!  I've pulled out most of my hair on this one!  To
revisit something I asked about several months ago... I'm
still having a problem with my UHF Micor mobile converted
to repeater.

It is a T34RTA3000AA with power set at 20 watts.  It is on
444.000 (T), 449.000 (R) and is producing a spur at
444.910.  The spur is clean, stable,  and has good
modulation, sounds identical to the main carrier.

I have retuned the exciter filter per the book several
times.  No change.

One trick that I have used...  the far end of the preselector
tune broader than the near end.  I've found that I get better
performance if I do the tuning then turn it around and tune
it again.  This lets the old far end adjustments become
the near end for the second pass through the procedure.

I swapped the KXN1024A channel element
for one on a different frequency (443.750T/448.750R) and
still had a spur 910 kHz above my carrier freq.  Finally I
tested both channel elements in a stock (unmodified) Micor
and STILL have a spur 910 kHz above the carrier frequency!

I lack equipment to accurately measure the spur power level,
but this spur is some 80 or so dB below the carrier level,
perhaps a bit more.  The manual specifies spurious and
harmonics below 85 dB so this MAY be within spec. but why
would it always spur 910 kHz above carrier freq.?  This
is an unacceptable level as it can be heard up to 5 miles
from the repeater on line of sight paths (and this is
causing a problem for some people).

What am I missing?  Is this normal behavior for a UHF Micor?
I have juggled some numbers around and can't see why this
would always be 910 kHz above the carrier freq.  Thought I
had a bad Micor until I found identical results in the
second one...

Any ideas?  Should I forget about asking why and just throw
cavities on the thing until I knock the spur down enough?

Put a test receiver on the spur frequency, and if the test
receiver desenses due to the true frequency then add a
cavity in line to knock down the true frequency.  Then go
poking around in the exciter and see if you can isolate it
to one stage.  I'll bet that you find a multiplier that a slight
touch in the adjustment kills the spur.  I had a Moto 63MHT
Motrac that had an intermittent spur on 147.775 when the
radio was on 146.220 ... I put it on an analyzer and found
that rocking one of the multiplier slugs just a hair cleaned
it right up. On the test set the clean spot was still inside
the top part of the peak... i.e. you'd never see a difference
between dirty and clean on the test set.

Like WB6VYZ used to say a picture tube is worth 20db of
clean any day.

Only frequently it's more than 20db.

Mike WA6ILQ 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor (mobile) spur

2005-07-01 Thread Neil McKie

  See below ... 

Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
 
 At 12:07 PM 6/30/05, you wrote:
 
 Aarggh!  I've pulled out most of my hair on this one!  To
 revisit something I asked about several months ago... I'm
 still having a problem with my UHF Micor mobile converted
 to repeater.
 
 It is a T34RTA3000AA with power set at 20 watts.  It is on
 444.000 (T), 449.000 (R) and is producing a spur at
 444.910.  The spur is clean, stable,  and has good
 modulation, sounds identical to the main carrier.
 
 I have retuned the exciter filter per the book several
 times.  No change.
 
 One trick that I have used...  the far end of the preselector
 tune broader than the near end.  I've found that I get better
 performance if I do the tuning then turn it around and tune
 it again.  This lets the old far end adjustments become
 the near end for the second pass through the procedure.
 
 I swapped the KXN1024A channel element
 for one on a different frequency (443.750T/448.750R) and
 still had a spur 910 kHz above my carrier freq.  Finally I
 tested both channel elements in a stock (unmodified) Micor
 and STILL have a spur 910 kHz above the carrier frequency!
 
 I lack equipment to accurately measure the spur power level,
 but this spur is some 80 or so dB below the carrier level,
 perhaps a bit more.  The manual specifies spurious and
 harmonics below 85 dB so this MAY be within spec. but why
 would it always spur 910 kHz above carrier freq.?  This
 is an unacceptable level as it can be heard up to 5 miles
 from the repeater on line of sight paths (and this is
 causing a problem for some people).
 
 What am I missing?  Is this normal behavior for a UHF Micor?
 I have juggled some numbers around and can't see why this
 would always be 910 kHz above the carrier freq.  Thought I
 had a bad Micor until I found identical results in the
 second one...
 
 Any ideas?  Should I forget about asking why and just throw
 cavities on the thing until I knock the spur down enough?
 
 Put a test receiver on the spur frequency, and if the test
 receiver desenses due to the true frequency then add a
 cavity in line to knock down the true frequency.  Then go
 poking around in the exciter and see if you can isolate it
 to one stage.  I'll bet that you find a multiplier that a slight
 touch in the adjustment kills the spur.  I had a Moto 63MHT
 Motrac that had an intermittent spur on 147.775 when the
 radio was on 146.220 ... I put it on an analyzer and found
 that rocking one of the multiplier slugs just a hair cleaned
 it right up. On the test set the clean spot was still inside
 the top part of the peak... i.e. you'd never see a difference
 between dirty and clean on the test set. 

  Could be the transmitter is going into self oscillation when the 
 adjustment is made.  Another good reason to bring your transmitters 
 (and receivers) into the frequency range you want to use them on. 

  You have a Motorola T63MHT - factory in 150.8 - 162 MHz?  You want 
 to use it at 146.46 MHz?  You really need to pad down the exciter 
 board to get there.  Ditto the Micor exciter board in the same 
 frequency range. 

  Neil - WA6KLA





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor (mobile) spur

2005-07-01 Thread Paul Kelley
On Friday 01 July 2005 04:56 am, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
 One trick that I have used...  the far end of the
 preselector tune broader than the near end.  I've found
 that I get better performance if I do the tuning then
 turn it around and tune it again.  This lets the old far
 end adjustments become the near end for the second
 pass through the procedure.

I have read that somewhere (or quite possibly I remember you 
having said it before!)   I did try this a couple of times.

 Put a test receiver on the spur frequency, and if the
 test receiver desenses due to the true frequency then add
 a cavity in line to knock down the true frequency.  Then
 go poking around in the exciter and see if you can
 isolate it to one stage.  I'll bet that you find a
 multiplier that a slight touch in the adjustment kills
 the spur. 

I have done that.  Unfortunately I can tune each stage as 
far as I want (up to the point - in either direction - that 
it kills the whole transmitter) and it makes no real change 
in the spur.

Paul  N1BUG





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor (mobile) spur (more test results)

2005-07-01 Thread Paul Kelley
I just spent another night poking around in this thing.

Sniffing around the transmitter with a receiver and very 
small probe antenna I am reasonably certain the spur is 
present at Q305 (exciter mixer) and all subsequent stages.

Using a general coverage receiver the fundamental output of 
the channel element (19.195833 MHz) seems free of spurs.  I 
realize the third harmonic of the channel element is 
selected by the filter but I have no receiver covering that 
range.

Similarly, the 16.7 MHz out of the offset oscillator seems 
OK.  There are some very weak (more than -100 dB) spurs 
above 16.7 but it is absolutely quiet at 15.790 which is 
what would be required to cause my +910 kHz spur.

So I suspect a problem in either the exciter mixer (Q305) or 
somewhere in the injection multipliers (Q101, 102, 103) on 
the receiver RF  IF board).  No amount of tuning or 
detuning these stages eliminates it.

It still seems odd that I have two Micors with an identical 
spur problem.

Any thoughts on what to try next?

Paul N1BUG





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] SyntorX T73 Repeater ???

2005-07-01 Thread n4rpd
We are currently using a portable repeater made from 2 T73 SyntorX's 
wired into a ICS Linker IIa controller.  The current to the PA for 
the TX is set down low to about 45W.  It works really well, although 
we had to install a couple of 12V fans on the heat sinks to keep um 
cool.  

The question is: we have tried several times to connect a local mic 
at the repeater with no success. If we plug the batwing mic into the 
TX side at J1103 of the control head, it will key the radio but no 
audio.  The controller audio-in is tapped into the mic-hi pin 11 of 
J1101 at the control head.  If we disconnect the controller from pin 
11, the batwing mic at J1103 works.  

We have tried installing a diode between the controller audio-in 
wire and pin 11, but then we get no audio into the TX from the 
controller, and yes the diode was facing the right way :-).  

Advice or suggestions??? 

73,
Rob N4RPD









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor (mobile) spur (more test results)

2005-07-01 Thread Paul Kelley
On Friday 01 July 2005 08:43 am, Dave VanHorn wrote:
 Any possibility that it's coming from the power supply,
 and not actually the amplifier at all?
 Do you get it when running from a battery?

Good thought.  I tried 3 different power supplies and 
finally a battery.  There is definitely something funny 
going on in the Micors.

Paul





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Micor (mobile) spur (more test results)

2005-07-01 Thread Dave VanHorn
At 08:03 AM 7/1/2005, Paul Kelley wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2005 08:43 am, Dave VanHorn wrote:
  Any possibility that it's coming from the power supply,
  and not actually the amplifier at all?
  Do you get it when running from a battery?

Good thought.  I tried 3 different power supplies and
finally a battery.  There is definitely something funny
going on in the Micors.

Ok, glad to rule that out. .  I've seen badly designed or broken 
switchers with significant HF noise on the output, and even linear 
supplies can do this.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???

2005-07-01 Thread k5oo

 
 Just curious if anyone had experience with this.
 
 Steve, KE4MOB

Hi Steve. I have found some rather high property ( 1000 ft HAAT) 
which I purchased myself. I have elected to avoid all the hastles of 
leasing and just built a weekend cabin up there and it houses an 
amateur repeater which I moved from a high tower previously at my 
house. Yes, it does make a GOOD field day site, especially for the 
VUF/UHF operations. I have just a 17 ft. pole now for an antenna 
mount but am going to install around  60-80 ft Rohn 25G when I get to 
it. I had to get a road dozed, gravel hauled, building, timber 
cleared, etc. 4 years later, it has made a good work project and the 
family is happy with the recreation aspects because we like the high 
country and bordering National Forrest. My advice is to own your own 
place and do with it as you please and build it up over time assuming 
there aren't neighbors with bad blood. It sounds like a good 
investment and likely is a chance of a lifetime. Another repeater 
that I helped a friend with for 13 years had to move 3 times because 
of small site changes that occurred. 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???

2005-07-01 Thread k5oo

 
 Just curious if anyone had experience with this.
 
 Steve, KE4MOB

Hi Steve. I have found some rather high property ( 1000 ft HAAT) 
which I purchased myself. I have elected to avoid all the hastles of 
leasing and just built a weekend cabin up there and it houses an 
amateur repeater which I moved from a high tower previously at my 
house. Yes, it does make a GOOD field day site, especially for the 
VUF/UHF operations. I have just a 17 ft. pole now for an antenna 
mount but am going to install around  60-80 ft Rohn 25G when I get to 
it. I had to get a road dozed, gravel hauled, building, timber 
cleared, etc. 4 years later, it has made a good work project and the 
family is happy with the recreation aspects because we like the high 
country and bordering National Forrest. My advice is to own your own 
place and do with it as you please and build it up over time assuming 
there aren't neighbors with bad blood. It sounds like a good 
investment and likely is a chance of a lifetime. Another repeater 
that I helped a friend with for 13 years had to move 3 times because 
of small site changes that occurred. 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] SyntorX T73 Repeater ???

2005-07-01 Thread Kris Kirby
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, n4rpd wrote:
 We are currently using a portable repeater made from 2 T73 SyntorX's 
 wired into a ICS Linker IIa controller.  The current to the PA for the 
 TX is set down low to about 45W.  It works really well, although we had 
 to install a couple of 12V fans on the heat sinks to keep um cool.

 Advice or suggestions??? 

Turn the transmitter power up to 55W; those PAs are only spec'd to operate 
at 55W - 100W. 

Don't really know about the audio problem. I haven't worked too much with 
X's in repeater setups.

--
Kris Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!
 This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland Security




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] DB4060 duplxer

2005-07-01 Thread Glen Briggs Aka KBØRPJ




can anyone help me find the tuning information for a DB4060 duplexer, i 
can't see, to find them anywhere on the net.. anyone got any ideas?





---
This message has passed an anti-virus scan using the avast! anti-virus system, 
database: 0526-4, 07/01/2005








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB4060 duplxer

2005-07-01 Thread Paul Kelley
On Friday 01 July 2005 03:22 pm, Glen Briggs Aka KBØRPJ 
wrote:
 can anyone help me find the tuning information for a
 DB4060 duplexer, i can't see, to find them anywhere on
 the net.. anyone got any ideas?

I think all that stuff disappeared from the web site when 
Andrew acquired Decibel Products.  I have a 2-page PDF file 
of the field tuning instructions for the DB4060 and 4062 
which I can email to you direct.  Let me see what folder I 
stuck that in.

Paul N1BUG





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???

2005-07-01 Thread mch
Listed where?

Joe M.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 2) the road to the site was listed as a township road





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???

2005-07-01 Thread pemeott



Hi,

The road was shown as a township road on the county highway map. The county assessor identifed the road to us as a "public road"..The road was shown on Mapquest. It had a street sign on it that matched the name of the road on the county map and Mapquest. The road ran straight up to the tower site.

ATT had built the road in 1954 when they originally built the site. The original site plan we received showed the access road. ATT used it for 50 years and paid for maintenance and gave free long-distance service to the land owner. They must have used the road for 50 years on nothing but a handshake agreement.

We could not claim "adverse possession" as the chain of "adverse use" had been broken (for2 years)when American Tower purchased the site and did not stake an immediate claim on use of the road. The road owner had blocked access to the road (with large concrete blocks).

Paul Emeott K0LAV

-- Original message --  Listed where?   Joe M.   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) the road to the site was listed as a township roadYahoo! Groups Links   * To visit your group on the web, go to:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/   * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/








  
  





  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [Repeater-Builder] Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???

2005-07-01 Thread mch
Hmmm... the road was built on private property (hence a private road),
yet was listed on the map as a county road. Interesting dilemma.

No, you can't prove reverse posession, but it sounds like you should be
able to prove if it's a township road if there is a number assigned to
it on the county map. Ask the township road foreman or supervisors.

Did the TWP ever maintain the road? (plow in winter - put gravel down -
etc). If so, it is either a township road OR theft of property/services
by the land owner. Maybe you can 'return the favor' for the hastle he
caused you.

All in all, it sounds like they mistakenly put a towmship road number on
a private road. In my area, they won't even put a street sign on a
private road for identification for emergency services.

Joe M.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???

2005-07-01 Thread Kris Kirby
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, mch wrote:
 All in all, it sounds like they mistakenly put a towmship road number on 
 a private road. In my area, they won't even put a street sign on a 
 private road for identification for emergency services.

There's a pretty good chance that if you push it, you'll win. In TX you 
most definately will.

--
Kris Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!
 This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland Security




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???

2005-07-01 Thread Chuck Kelsey
I'm thinking so too. Ask your attorney. If local government recognizes it as 
a road -- it's a road. A private property owner can't close it off.

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: Kris Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???


 On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, mch wrote:
 All in all, it sounds like they mistakenly put a towmship road number on
 a private road. In my area, they won't even put a street sign on a
 private road for identification for emergency services.

 There's a pretty good chance that if you push it, you'll win. In TX you
 most definately will.

 --
 Kris Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!
 This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland Security





 Yahoo! Groups Links






 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] DB4060 Duplexer Tuning

2005-07-01 Thread Eric Lemmon
Glen,

Contact Andrew Customer Service at 800-255-1479 and ask for the tuning
instructions for a DB4060 Duplexer.  Have a FAX number ready, because
most of the legacy tech data is not in PDF that can be emailed.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

Glen Briggs Aka KBØRPJ wrote:

Can anyone help me find the tuning information for a DB4060 duplexer?...






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Antenex CWB440SC UHF antenna

2005-07-01 Thread mdnosliw
I recently purchased a Antenex broadband UHF antenna to use with 110w 
mobile Spectra. I mounted the antenna in the center of my Jeep
Cherokee roof and fed the shielded NMO mount with RG-400. 

I get about 20 watts reflected pwr and 80 fwd, not so good. I talked 
with Antenex and was told no cutting is required. 

Well I guess it is broadband and the swr is bad all across the band.

Anyone have any experience with this type of antenna?


Mark
KB1IOZ 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Chance of a Lifetime (kinda OT)???

2005-07-01 Thread Laryn Lohman
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 and three phase power.  (A former FM Broadcast site.) 
 
 I now have a respectable repeater site. 
 
   Works for me, 
 
   Neil - WA6KLA 

Neil, you feedin' some of that three phase power to the final of your
repeater??  !!

Laryn K8TVZ







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Antenex CWB440SC UHF antenna

2005-07-01 Thread Eric Lemmon
Mark,

If your Jeep has a fiberglass or plastic roof, you are missing a ground
plane for that antenna.  Adhesive copper or aluminum sheeting is
available from several suppliers for creating a ground plane.  If the
roof is metal, the rust-inhibiting coating on the underside may be
preventing a good electrical contact between the mount and the sheet
metal.  Check to make certain that the contact spring in the center of
the NMO fitting on the antenna is making good contact with the button on
the mount.  Finally, try a different NMO mount and feedline.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

mdnosliw wrote:

 I recently purchased a Antenex broadband UHF antenna to use with 110W
 mobile Spectra. I mounted the antenna in the center of my Jeep Cherokee
 roof and fed the shielded NMO mount with RG-400.

 I get about 20 watts reflected pwr and 80 fwd, not so good. I talked
 with Antenex and was told no cutting is required.  Well I guess it is
 broadband and the swr is bad all across the band.

 Anyone have any experience with this type of antenna?

 Mark
 KB1IOZ






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/