Re: [Repeater-Builder] Legal radios for a repeater

[Kris Kirby]

On Mon, 31 May 2010, WD7F - John in Tucson wrote:
> Ah ha!  Now I have it...your job title explains the comment about Part 
> 90. de WD7F John in Tucson
> > For Part 90 use, something narrowband complaint because the deadline is 
> > a loomin'.

Well, spending $2000 now is usually cheaper than spending $500 now and 
$2000 later. Even if it takes three years to implement; swapping out a 
fleet of 100 - 2500 radios takes time. 

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
Disinformation Analyst

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Legal radios for a repeater

[WD7F - John in Tucson]

Ah ha!  Now I have it...your job title explains the comment about Part 90.
de WD7F
John in Tucson

- Original Message - 
From: "Kris Kirby" 
To: "terry dalpoas" 
Cc: 
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Legal radios for a repeater


> On Sat, 29 May 2010, terry dalpoas wrote:
>> I was asked the other day by a friend if you could use an older mobile 
>> (Micor, Mitrek, Mastr II and Exec) that has been duplexed for a 
>> repeater in GMRS, public safety, etc.  I told them that I was pretty 
>> sure it was legal since the transmitters are FCC type accepted and as 
>> long as they transmit a clean signal.  Was I correct on this?
> 
> For ham use, literally anything as long as it doesn't cause harmful 
> interference to other services.
> 
> For Part 90 use, something narrowband complaint because the deadline is 
> a loomin'.
> 
> --
> Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
> Disinformation Analyst

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Legal radios for a repeater

[Kris Kirby]

On Sat, 29 May 2010, terry dalpoas wrote:
> I was asked the other day by a friend if you could use an older mobile 
> (Micor, Mitrek, Mastr II and Exec) that has been duplexed for a 
> repeater in GMRS, public safety, etc.  I told them that I was pretty 
> sure it was legal since the transmitters are FCC type accepted and as 
> long as they transmit a clean signal.  Was I correct on this?

For ham use, literally anything as long as it doesn't cause harmful 
interference to other services.

For Part 90 use, something narrowband complaint because the deadline is 
a loomin'.

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
Disinformation Analyst

[Repeater-Builder] Legal radios for a repeater

[terry dalpoas]

I was asked the other day by a friend if you could use an older mobile (Micor, 
Mitrek, Mastr II and Exec) that has been duplexed for a repeater in GMRS, 
public safety, etc.  I told them that I was pretty sure it was legal since the 
transmitters are FCC type accepted and as long as they transmit a clean signal. 
 Was I correct on this?