Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-12 Thread Nate Duehr

On May 11, 2008, at 9:52 AM, n9wys wrote:

 Looks like you and I are in the minority, Brent.  I mentioned this  
 same cable about a week ago, and it went virtually “unnoticed”…  :-(

 Mark – N9WYS

 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of KF4TNP

 RG-393/U
 M17/127
 I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings to and  
 from each station since it has the dual silver shields, I don’t have  
 dissimilar metals to worry about.
 And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.
 Brent KF4TNP

I noticed, and want to get my hands on some for a future project...  
(GRIN).  Just had nothing to say about it... other than perhaps,  
Thanks for sharing!

--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]








Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-12 Thread Adam T. Cately
At 04:50 PM 5/11/08 -, you wrote:

   Are you sure you don't mean 'RG-223' there, Skipper-doo?

   I use a lot of this on my bench and home equipment, for the same
reasons the Skipp points out - it's cheap and effective.

   It's the same size (approximately) as RG-58, and uses mostly the same
connectors (occasionally I'll get a crimp connector collar that's a
little snug...)


One doesn't have to go high dollar overkill spec all the time. 
I'm also a fairly big fan of RG-233 Coax for many repeater 
system/equipment applications.  RG-233 seems to be the ignored 
step child of the coax family, which means it's not instant shark 
bait every time it pops up on Ebay and the surplus radio world 
market. 

I found a fairly decent price on some pre-made RG-233 Coax runs 
on Ebay: 

Cable Assembly RF Coax 7 ft RG-223/U N-Fe to SMA Male
Ebay Item number: 190175957842

My offer to the seller for 2/3 the asking amount was accepted and 
I now have a fair number of those lines in my collection at a 
much better than the $3.10 (Tessco) list price per foot. 

Not a bad deal if you want to take the plunge... 

cheers, 
skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com 



See you at Dayton! I'm the short chubby guy with red hair.


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Brent,
 I agree with Skipp, the LMR is not the cable i would recommend 
 in a duplex repeater install. If you want jumper coax, I only 
 use RG400 and it is a plenum rated silver plated with double 
 shield braid silver. Both Motorola and Kenwood systems use 
 this coax for there internal cableing inside the cabinet. I 
 yet have seen them use LMR coax. Spend the little extra for 
 good coax and you will find yourself much happier and not 
 searching for weird site problems. For the main feed line, you 
 can't get any better then Andrew's LDF coax for repeater installs. 







Yahoo! Groups Links





   - Adam - 

   

  



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-12 Thread n9wys
Nate,

I first became enlightened when someone gave me several lengths of RG-393
with type-N connectors already on it.  I used them in my first homebrew 900
machine, and then in my converted 900 MHz MSF5000 (although photos of the
station show RG-400 - taken during testing).  Once I did some research about
the cable, I decided this was the stuff I wanted in all my applications.
I'll spend the extra bucks to get the lengths I need made up for me.

Mark - N9WYS

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Nate Duehr

On May 11, 2008, at 9:52 AM, n9wys wrote:

 Looks like you and I are in the minority, Brent.  I mentioned this  
 same cable about a week ago, and it went virtually unnoticed.  :-(

 Mark - N9WYS

 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of KF4TNP

 RG-393/U
 M17/127
 I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings to and  
 from each station since it has the dual silver shields, I don't have  
 dissimilar metals to worry about.
 And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.
 Brent KF4TNP

I noticed, and want to get my hands on some for a future project...  
(GRIN).  Just had nothing to say about it... other than perhaps,  
Thanks for sharing!

--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-12 Thread skipp025

Sometimes skipper-don't type so well... yes I meant RG-223 
and the Ebay Auction Example I listed in that post should clearly 
indicate the coax to be RG-223.  Great and thanks for catching 
the typo. 

cheers, 
s. 

 Adam T. Cately [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 04:50 PM 5/11/08 -, you wrote:
 
Are you sure you don't mean 'RG-223' there, Skipper-doo?
 
I use a lot of this on my bench and home equipment, for the same
 reasons the Skipp points out - it's cheap and effective.
 
It's the same size (approximately) as RG-58, and uses mostly the same
 connectors (occasionally I'll get a crimp connector collar that's a
 little snug...)
 
 
 One doesn't have to go high dollar overkill spec all the time. 
 I'm also a fairly big fan of RG-233 Coax for many repeater 
 system/equipment applications.  RG-233 seems to be the ignored 
 step child of the coax family, which means it's not instant shark 
 bait every time it pops up on Ebay and the surplus radio world 
 market. 
 
 I found a fairly decent price on some pre-made RG-233 Coax runs 
 on Ebay: 
 
 Cable Assembly RF Coax 7 ft RG-223/U N-Fe to SMA Male
 Ebay Item number: 190175957842
 
 My offer to the seller for 2/3 the asking amount was accepted and 
 I now have a fair number of those lines in my collection at a 
 much better than the $3.10 (Tessco) list price per foot. 
 
 Not a bad deal if you want to take the plunge... 
 
 cheers, 
 skipp 
 skipp025 at yahoo.com 
 www.radiowrench.com 
 
 
 
 See you at Dayton! I'm the short chubby guy with red hair.
 
 
  k7pfj@ wrote:
  Hi Brent,
  I agree with Skipp, the LMR is not the cable i would recommend 
  in a duplex repeater install. If you want jumper coax, I only 
  use RG400 and it is a plenum rated silver plated with double 
  shield braid silver. Both Motorola and Kenwood systems use 
  this coax for there internal cableing inside the cabinet. I 
  yet have seen them use LMR coax. Spend the little extra for 
  good coax and you will find yourself much happier and not 
  searching for weird site problems. For the main feed line, you 
  can't get any better then Andrew's LDF coax for repeater installs. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
- Adam -





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread KF4TNP
RG-393/U
M17/127
I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings to and from each
station since it has the dual silver shields, I don't have dissimilar metals
to worry about.
And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.
Brent KF4TNP
 
 
 
 
  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of skipp025
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?
 
 I think the LMR400 is a double shielded with each shield 
 different metals. One braid and one foil. This is a no-no 
 for duplexed repeaters for the higher TX RF will generate 
 noise getting into receiver. 

Just to be clear... 

The dissimilar shield metals is the potential problem source, 
not the braid - foil combination. And notice I used the term 
potential problem source. It's not always automatic gremlin 
101 right out of the starting gate... Some years back I used 
a fairly large amount of LMR-400 feed line in various new radio 
 repeater system (applications) until I sourced more than an 
unacceptable number of antenna system train wrecks specific 
back to the LM-400 (and LMR-600) cable. 

Sometimes the problem took months and even years to develop... 
but from memory I've never had an installation of conventional 
antenna hard-line or coax feed sabotage a radio system like the 
many examples I've had to ferret out from or back to LMR-400. 

No more LMR-400 for me or any antenna system I'm involved 
with. 

The other cute dissimilar metal shielded coax problem is how 
physical cable movement can easily be a noise generator. There 
is a potential for LMR-400 coax moving in the wind to be noisy... 
and I have seen that demonstrated in an actual installation. 

cheers, 
skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com 
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread k7pfj
Hi Brent,

I agree with Skipp, the LMR is not the cable i would recomend in a duplex 
preeater install. If you want jumper coax, i only use RG400 and it is a plenum 
rated silver plated with double shield brade silver. Both Motorola and Kenwood 
systems use this coax for there internal cableing inside the cabinet. I yet 
have seen them use LMR coax. Spend the little extra for good coax and you will 
find yourself much happier and not searching for weird site problems. For the 
main feed line, you cant get any better then Andrew's LDF coax for repeater 
installs. 

Mike Mullarkey K7PFJ

-- Original message -- 
From: KF4TNP [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
RG-393/U
M17/127
I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings to and from each 
station since it has the dual silver shields, I don’t have dissimilar metals to 
worry about.
And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.
Brent KF4TNP







From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
skipp025
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

 I think the LMR400 is a double shielded with each shield 
 different metals. One braid and one foil. This is a no-no 
 for duplexed repeaters for the higher TX RF will generate 
 noise getting into receiver. 

Just to be clear... 

The dissimilar shield metals is the potential problem source, 
not the braid - foil combination. And notice I used the term 
potential problem source. It's not always automatic gremlin 
101 right out of the starting gate... Some years back I used 
a fairly large amount of LMR-400 feed line in various new radio 
 repeater system (applications) until I sourced more than an 
unacceptable number of antenna system train wrecks specific 
back to the LM-400 (and LMR-600) cable. 

Sometimes the problem took months and even years to develop... 
but from memory I've never had an installation of conventional 
antenna hard-line or coax feed sabotage a radio system like the 
many examples I've had to ferret out from or back to LMR-400. 

No more LMR-400 for me or any antenna system I'm involved 
with. 

The other cute dissimilar metal shielded coax problem is how 
physical cable movement can easily be a noise generator. There 
is a potential for LMR-400 coax moving in the wind to be noisy... 
and I have seen that demonstrated in an actual installation. 

cheers, 
skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com 
 

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread n9wys
Looks like you and I are in the minority, Brent.  I mentioned this same
cable about a week ago, and it went virtually unnoticed.  :-(

 

Mark - N9WYS

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of KF4TNP



RG-393/U

M17/127

I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings to and from each
station since it has the dual silver shields, I don't have dissimilar metals
to worry about.

And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.

Brent KF4TNP

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of skipp025

 I think the LMR400 is a double shielded with each shield 
 different metals. One braid and one foil. This is a no-no 
 for duplexed repeaters for the higher TX RF will generate 
 noise getting into receiver. 

Just to be clear... 

The dissimilar shield metals is the potential problem source, 
not the braid - foil combination. And notice I used the term 
potential problem source. It's not always automatic gremlin 
101 right out of the starting gate... Some years back I used 
a fairly large amount of LMR-400 feed line in various new radio 
 repeater system (applications) until I sourced more than an 
unacceptable number of antenna system train wrecks specific 
back to the LM-400 (and LMR-600) cable. 

Sometimes the problem took months and even years to develop... 
but from memory I've never had an installation of conventional 
antenna hard-line or coax feed sabotage a radio system like the 
many examples I've had to ferret out from or back to LMR-400. 

No more LMR-400 for me or any antenna system I'm involved 
with. 

The other cute dissimilar metal shielded coax problem is how 
physical cable movement can easily be a noise generator. There 
is a potential for LMR-400 coax moving in the wind to be noisy... 
and I have seen that demonstrated in an actual installation. 

cheers, 
skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com  



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread skipp025
Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet? 

It's easy just to use some practical rule of thumb guidelines 
for coax runs. One doesn't have to use ultra over kill coax 
in every application. 

How long? - Length being enough to cause a loss, desired or 
otherwise (...and yes there is more than one case for a 
desired feed-line loss)

Does the size matter? - Does the diameter of the cable make it 
practical to fit the application and are the connectors fairly 
easy to deal with in both size and price?  Large RG-8 diameter 
size coax can become unwieldy in tight corner and space limited 
locations. 

Price? - Is the resultant purchase a good dollar to performance 
value and is the actual performance good enough for the 
application? 

One doesn't have to go high dollar overkill spec all the time. 
I'm also a fairly big fan of RG-233 Coax for many repeater 
system/equipment applications.  RG-233 seems to be the ignored 
step child of the coax family, which means it's not instant shark 
bait every time it pops up on Ebay and the surplus radio world 
market. 

I found a fairly decent price on some pre-made RG-233 Coax runs 
on Ebay: 

Cable Assembly RF Coax 7 ft RG-223/U N-Fe to SMA Male
Ebay Item number: 190175957842

My offer to the seller for 2/3 the asking amount was accepted and 
I now have a fair number of those lines in my collection at a 
much better than the $3.10 (Tessco) list price per foot. 

Not a bad deal if you want to take the plunge... 

cheers, 
skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com 



See you at Dayton! I'm the short chubby guy with red hair.


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Brent,
 I agree with Skipp, the LMR is not the cable i would recommend 
 in a duplex repeater install. If you want jumper coax, I only 
 use RG400 and it is a plenum rated silver plated with double 
 shield braid silver. Both Motorola and Kenwood systems use 
 this coax for there internal cableing inside the cabinet. I 
 yet have seen them use LMR coax. Spend the little extra for 
 good coax and you will find yourself much happier and not 
 searching for weird site problems. For the main feed line, you 
 can't get any better then Andrew's LDF coax for repeater installs. 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread skipp025

Hi Mark, 

Probably not ignored or unnoticed... but more related to how 
easy it is to find and of course the cost before applying at 
least some portions of the rules of thumb check list mentioned 
in my last post. 

Much of what many surplus equipment builders use is directly 
related to what we find cheap, easy and good enough to make 
the application properly play.

cheers,
skipp 

 n9wys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Looks like you and I are in the minority, Brent.  I mentioned 
 this same cable about a week ago, and it went virtually 
 unnoticed.  :-(
 Mark - N9WYS
 
  
  On Behalf Of KF4TNP
  RG-393/U
  M17/127
 
  I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings 
  to and from each station since it has the dual silver shields, 
  I don't have dissimilar metals to worry about.
  
  And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.
  Brent KF4TNP




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread n9wys
That's true too, Skipp. 

Hope to bump into you at Dayton, since we've talked on the phone and via
e-mail!  It'll be nice to put a face to the keyboard/phone voice!  ;-)
I'll look hard around the Brat vendor for sure!!

BTW - I'll at least be wearing a tag with my callsign.

Mark - N9WYS

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of skipp025

Hi Mark, 

Probably not ignored or unnoticed... but more related to how 
easy it is to find and of course the cost before applying at 
least some portions of the rules of thumb check list mentioned 
in my last post. 

Much of what many surplus equipment builders use is directly 
related to what we find cheap, easy and good enough to make 
the application properly play.

cheers,
skipp 

 n9wys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Looks like you and I are in the minority, Brent.  I mentioned 
 this same cable about a week ago, and it went virtually 
 unnoticed.  :-(
 Mark - N9WYS
 
  
  On Behalf Of KF4TNP
  RG-393/U
  M17/127
 
  I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings 
  to and from each station since it has the dual silver shields, 
  I don't have dissimilar metals to worry about.
  
  And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.
  Brent KF4TNP



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread Eric Lemmon
Brent,

RG-393 cable is definitely good stuff.  The Mil-Spec can be downloaded here:
www.dscc.dla.mil/Downloads/MilSpec/Docs/MIL-DTL-17/mil17ss127.pdf

Looking in the TESSCO catalog, I don't see any connectors listed for RG-393,
which is a little bit smaller in diameter than RG-213.  I suppose connectors
intended for RG-213 could be used in a pinch, but I'd be concerned about the
impedance bump caused by using a mismatched connector.  I'm not saying there
are no connectors made for RG-393, only that they may be hard to find.
Where did you find connectors made for your cable?

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KF4TNP
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 6:14 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?

RG-393/U

M17/127

I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings to and from each
station since it has the dual silver shields, I don't have dissimilar metals
to worry about.

And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.

Brent KF4TNP

 

 

 

 



From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of skipp025
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?

 

 I think the LMR400 is a double shielded with each shield 
 different metals. One braid and one foil. This is a no-no 
 for duplexed repeaters for the higher TX RF will generate 
 noise getting into receiver. 

Just to be clear... 

The dissimilar shield metals is the potential problem source, 
not the braid - foil combination. And notice I used the term 
potential problem source. It's not always automatic gremlin 
101 right out of the starting gate... Some years back I used 
a fairly large amount of LMR-400 feed line in various new radio 
 repeater system (applications) until I sourced more than an 
unacceptable number of antenna system train wrecks specific 
back to the LM-400 (and LMR-600) cable. 

Sometimes the problem took months and even years to develop... 
but from memory I've never had an installation of conventional 
antenna hard-line or coax feed sabotage a radio system like the 
many examples I've had to ferret out from or back to LMR-400. 

No more LMR-400 for me or any antenna system I'm involved 
with. 

The other cute dissimilar metal shielded coax problem is how 
physical cable movement can easily be a noise generator. There 
is a potential for LMR-400 coax moving in the wind to be noisy... 
and I have seen that demonstrated in an actual installation. 

cheers, 
skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com 

 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread no6b
At 5/11/2008 08:52, you wrote:

Looks like you and I are in the minority, Brent.  I mentioned this same 
cable about a week ago, and it went virtually unnoticed   :-(



Mark N9WYS



From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of KF4TNP

RG-393/U

I have a hardline to antenna jumper that's RG-393.  It's good stuff, just 
don't see it often at the swap meets.  RG-214  RG-223 are the usual finds.

 yes stay away from the TYPE stuff at all costs for duplexed lines.  I 
think every RG-214 jumper  bought that says that is either copper or 
tinned braid.  OK for radio to duplexer connections but no good for 
duplexed connections (on or after the duplexer T).

Bob NO6B



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread KF4TNP
Eric,
The connectors I have for the 393 are from Times Microwave. Times
Recommended the use of the below LMR4oo connectors.
 
TC-400-716MC and the TC-400-716FC
7/16 Din male and female
 
TheType N connectors are
Times TC-400-NFC-BH Female connectors and Amphenol 82-209-1006 
Male Time TC-400-NMC-RA
 
Brent KF4TNP
 
 
 
 
 
 
  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 1:09 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?
 
Brent,

RG-393 cable is definitely good stuff. The Mil-Spec can be downloaded here:
www.dscc.dla.mil/Downloads/MilSpec/Docs/MIL-DTL-17/mil17ss127.pdf

Looking in the TESSCO catalog, I don't see any connectors listed for RG-393,
which is a little bit smaller in diameter than RG-213. I suppose connectors
intended for RG-213 could be used in a pinch, but I'd be concerned about the
impedance bump caused by using a mismatched connector. I'm not saying there
are no connectors made for RG-393, only that they may be hard to find.
Where did you find connectors made for your cable?

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of KF4TNP
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 6:14 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?

RG-393/U

M17/127

I use this cable in most runs in the transmitter buildings to and from each
station since it has the dual silver shields, I don't have dissimilar metals
to worry about.

And can handle 1.8kw @950Mhz it works out great.

Brent KF4TNP



From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of skipp025
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?

 I think the LMR400 is a double shielded with each shield 
 different metals. One braid and one foil. This is a no-no 
 for duplexed repeaters for the higher TX RF will generate 
 noise getting into receiver. 

Just to be clear... 

The dissimilar shield metals is the potential problem source, 
not the braid - foil combination. And notice I used the term 
potential problem source. It's not always automatic gremlin 
101 right out of the starting gate... Some years back I used 
a fairly large amount of LMR-400 feed line in various new radio 
 repeater system (applications) until I sourced more than an 
unacceptable number of antenna system train wrecks specific 
back to the LM-400 (and LMR-600) cable. 

Sometimes the problem took months and even years to develop... 
but from memory I've never had an installation of conventional 
antenna hard-line or coax feed sabotage a radio system like the 
many examples I've had to ferret out from or back to LMR-400. 

No more LMR-400 for me or any antenna system I'm involved 
with. 

The other cute dissimilar metal shielded coax problem is how 
physical cable movement can easily be a noise generator. There 
is a potential for LMR-400 coax moving in the wind to be noisy... 
and I have seen that demonstrated in an actual installation. 

cheers, 
skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com 
 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread Eric Lemmon
Brent,

Thanks for the feedback.  I found that RF Industries does have connectors
for RG-393/U, which they call Cable Group I.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KF4TNP
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 12:58 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?

Eric,

The connectors I have for the 393 are from Times Microwave. Times
Recommended the use of the below LMR4oo connectors.

 

TC-400-716MC and the TC-400-716FC

7/16 Din male and female

 

TheType N connectors are

Times TC-400-NFC-BH Female connectors and Amphenol 82-209-1006 

Male Time TC-400-NMC-RA

 

Brent KF4TNP



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-11 Thread KF4TNP
No Problem Eric,
 
 
  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:40 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?
 
Brent,

Thanks for the feedback. I found that RF Industries does have connectors
for RG-393/U, which they call Cable Group I.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of KF4TNP
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 12:58 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?

Eric,

The connectors I have for the 393 are from Times Microwave. Times
Recommended the use of the below LMR4oo connectors.

TC-400-716MC and the TC-400-716FC

7/16 Din male and female

TheType N connectors are

Times TC-400-NFC-BH Female connectors and Amphenol 82-209-1006 

Male Time TC-400-NMC-RA

Brent KF4TNP
 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-10 Thread Ron Wright


Jeff,

I think the LMR400 is a double shielded with each shield different 
metals.  One braid and one foil.  This is a no-no for duplexed repeaters 
for the higher TX RF will generate noise getting into receiver.  I 
recommend at least 1/2 heliax.  Know cost, but well worth the cost. 
7/8 even better, but with your 150 ft or so run 1/2 would be ok.


At 122 ft HAAT you can get 30 miles to a mobile, but this is assuming 
flat terrain.  To an HT not unless one is on a mountain or air plane, 
hi.


However, your 3 db gain antenna is room for improvement.  If possible 
put up commercial grade 6 db like the DB224.  Might find one used.  They 
go for about $450 new.  3 db gain antenna for repeater is low.  Would 
improve tx and rx.  Some say only 3 db, but you will see notable 
difference.


With you running 100 W on TX I am sure the portables can hear the 
repeater, but trying to get back with 5 W 14 miles is pretty good. 
Installing the pre-amp will help, but only if the tx does not cause 
desense.  Might try turn power down to say 40 W.  Not necessary to run 
100 W when listening to 5 W HT.  However, if see little change with 
100/40 W then leave at 100 W.


You may be to the limit of your system and it may be working well and as 
good as one might expect.


The changes I recommend is improve antenna, 1/2 or larger heliax and 
install pre-amp.  Start with pre-amp.  If tx don't over power it you 
will see improvement and is easy addition.  Otherwise I think the 
equipment on the ground is good as is.


73, ron, n9ee/r


Ron Wright, N9EE

727-376-6575

MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS

Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL

No tone, all are welcome.




On Thu, May 8, 2008 at  9:07 PM, jstechnicalservice wrote:




Thanks, Ron
Here is more information on what we have. The HAAT is 122ft., we
currently have a Maxrad MFB-1503 3db antenna and LMR400 coax. We are
using a ST2 Midland at 110W and there is some type of older pre-amp
installed with no tag, but has 6db hand written on it. Any
suggestions for improvement will be appreciated but we do have a
limited budget, especially with the impending rebanding. We want the
high-band repeater in place for backup when this happens and also as
our primary for the time being.


Jeff,
To really give advice here what HAAT is your antenna.  At 100 ft

AGL 14 miles is about the expected range.  Still depends on your
terrain.


As for feedline I think the LMR400 is a double shielded coax with 2

different shield materials.  It has been found these generate noise
on the tx side from the high RF.  This would affect rcv.  Probably
good for rcv, but my standard is have nothing in a repeater that
causes problems.


I use either RG214 double shielded RG8 size and also 1/4 heliax.

Both give good shielding and with short pieces little loss.  Also
RG142 which is a double shielded RG58 size cable often silver
shield.  Motorola and others use this inside their equipment.


Never use double shielded cable with the 2 shields of different

material like 9913 or some of the LMR stuff.  Again the tx high RF
will generate noise.


73, ron, n9ee/r





From: jstechnicalservice [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Date: 2008/05/08 Thu PM 
12:30:30 CDT To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 
Best coax for short jumpers in

repeater cabinet?




I was hoping to get some opinions on the best coax to make jumpers

for

internal connections on a 152 Mhz public safety repeater. I'm

currently

using LMR400 and we can hit the repeater consistantly with a 5

watt

handheld at 14 miles. The problem is we sometimes need around 15

to 16.

I was hoping to improve performance as much as possible. Thanks
Jeff Skaggs Concord-Greene FD






Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 
repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.


 mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-10 Thread skipp025
 I think the LMR400 is a double shielded with each shield 
 different metals.  One braid and one foil.  This is a no-no 
 for duplexed repeaters for the higher TX RF will generate 
 noise getting into receiver. 

Just to be clear... 

The dissimilar shield metals is the potential problem source, 
not the braid - foil combination. And notice I used the term 
potential problem source. It's not always automatic gremlin 
101 right out of the starting gate...  Some years back I used 
a fairly large amount of LMR-400 feed line in various new radio 
 repeater system (applications) until I sourced more than an 
unacceptable number of antenna system train wrecks specific 
back to the LM-400 (and LMR-600) cable. 

Sometimes the problem took months and even years to develop... 
but from memory I've never had an installation of conventional 
antenna hard-line or coax feed sabotage a radio system like the 
many examples I've had to ferret out from or back to LMR-400. 

No more LMR-400 for me or any antenna system I'm involved 
with. 

The other cute dissimilar metal shielded coax problem is how 
physical cable movement can easily be a noise generator. There 
is a potential for LMR-400 coax moving in the wind to be noisy... 
and I have seen that demonstrated in an actual installation.  

cheers, 
skipp 
skipp025 at yahoo.com 
www.radiowrench.com 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-10 Thread Dave Gomberg

At 05:11 5/10/2008, Ron Wright wrote:
At 122 ft HAAT you can get 30 miles to a mobile, but this is 
assuming flat terrain.  To an HT not unless one is on a mountain or 
air plane, hi.


I routinely hit the Mt Vaca repeater (2m, 2900ASL) from a hilltop 
(780ASL) 50 miles away.   Most of the intervening terrain is 
relatively low.  Using 5w and a rubber duck on an Icom T7H.   So all 
you need is a good line of sight, even for a pretty long distance.




--
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco   NE5EE gomberg1 at wcf dot com
All addresses, phones, etc. at http://www.wcf.com/ham/info.html
- 

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-10 Thread skipp025
If you're hitting the 195 Vaca Repeater it probably has a 
number of active voting receivers in operation.  

If you're talking about the 147.000 Vaca Repeater... it normally 
has a single mountain top receiver. 

The 145.470 Vacaville Repeater can be operational using various 
combinations of single and multiple voting receivers.

All the mentioned repeaters use quite different antennas for 
quite different reasons. Sometimes repeater users might not 
know what we are doing up on the various mountain tops. And 
of course you're always welcome to ask and participate... 

cheers, 
skipp 

skipp025 at yahoo.com 

 Dave Gomberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At 05:11 5/10/2008, Ron Wright wrote:
 At 122 ft HAAT you can get 30 miles to a mobile, but this is 
 assuming flat terrain.  To an HT not unless one is on a mountain or 
 air plane, hi.
 
 I routinely hit the Mt Vaca repeater (2m, 2900ASL) from a hilltop 
 (780ASL) 50 miles away.   Most of the intervening terrain is 
 relatively low.  Using 5w and a rubber duck on an Icom T7H.   So all 
 you need is a good line of sight, even for a pretty long distance.




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-09 Thread jstechnicalservice

Thanks, Ron
Here is more information on what we have. The HAAT is 122ft., we 
currently have a Maxrad MFB-1503 3db antenna and LMR400 coax. We are 
using a ST2 Midland at 110W and there is some type of older pre-amp 
installed with no tag, but has 6db hand written on it. Any 
suggestions for improvement will be appreciated but we do have a 
limited budget, especially with the impending rebanding. We want the 
high-band repeater in place for backup when this happens and also as 
our primary for the time being. 




 Jeff,
 
 To really give advice here what HAAT is your antenna.  At 100 ft 
AGL 14 miles is about the expected range.  Still depends on your 
terrain.
 
 As for feedline I think the LMR400 is a double shielded coax with 2 
different shield materials.  It has been found these generate noise 
on the tx side from the high RF.  This would affect rcv.  Probably 
good for rcv, but my standard is have nothing in a repeater that 
causes problems.
 
 I use either RG214 double shielded RG8 size and also 1/4 heliax.  
Both give good shielding and with short pieces little loss.  Also 
RG142 which is a double shielded RG58 size cable often silver 
shield.  Motorola and others use this inside their equipment.
 
 Never use double shielded cable with the 2 shields of different 
material like 9913 or some of the LMR stuff.  Again the tx high RF 
will generate noise.
 
 73, ron, n9ee/r
 
 
 
 
 
 
 From: jstechnicalservice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/05/08 Thu PM 12:30:30 CDT
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Best coax for short jumpers in 
repeater cabinet?
 
 
 I was hoping to get some opinions on the best coax to make jumpers 
for 
 internal connections on a 152 Mhz public safety repeater. I'm 
currently 
 using LMR400 and we can hit the repeater consistantly with a 5 
watt 
 handheld at 14 miles. The problem is we sometimes need around 15 
to 16. 
 I was hoping to improve performance as much as possible. Thanks
 
 Jeff Skaggs
 Concord-Greene FD
 
  

 
 
 Ron Wright, N9EE
 727-376-6575
 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
 Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
 No tone, all are welcome.





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-09 Thread Mung Bungholio
Get rid of the LMR400 and replace it with some kind of hardline.

 

Vern

KI4ONW

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jstechnicalservice
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 9:08 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater
cabinet?

 


Thanks, Ron
Here is more information on what we have. The HAAT is 122ft., we 
currently have a Maxrad MFB-1503 3db antenna and LMR400 coax. We are 
using a ST2 Midland at 110W and there is some type of older pre-amp 
installed with no tag, but has 6db hand written on it. Any 
suggestions for improvement will be appreciated but we do have a 
limited budget, especially with the impending rebanding. We want the 
high-band repeater in place for backup when this happens and also as 
our primary for the time being. 

 Jeff,
 
 To really give advice here what HAAT is your antenna. At 100 ft 
AGL 14 miles is about the expected range. Still depends on your 
terrain.
 
 As for feedline I think the LMR400 is a double shielded coax with 2 
different shield materials. It has been found these generate noise 
on the tx side from the high RF. This would affect rcv. Probably 
good for rcv, but my standard is have nothing in a repeater that 
causes problems.
 
 I use either RG214 double shielded RG8 size and also 1/4 heliax. 
Both give good shielding and with short pieces little loss. Also 
RG142 which is a double shielded RG58 size cable often silver 
shield. Motorola and others use this inside their equipment.
 
 Never use double shielded cable with the 2 shields of different 
material like 9913 or some of the LMR stuff. Again the tx high RF 
will generate noise.
 
 73, ron, n9ee/r
 
 
 
 
 
 
 From: jstechnicalservice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/05/08 Thu PM 12:30:30 CDT
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Best coax for short jumpers in 
repeater cabinet?
 
  
 I was hoping to get some opinions on the best coax to make jumpers 
for 
 internal connections on a 152 Mhz public safety repeater. I'm 
currently 
 using LMR400 and we can hit the repeater consistantly with a 5 
watt 
 handheld at 14 miles. The problem is we sometimes need around 15 
to 16. 
 I was hoping to improve performance as much as possible. Thanks
 
 Jeff Skaggs
 Concord-Greene FD
 
  

 
 
 Ron Wright, N9EE
 727-376-6575
 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
 Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
 No tone, all are welcome.


 



[Repeater-Builder] Re: Best coax for short jumpers in repeater cabinet?

2008-05-09 Thread Wayne Leake
 Without looking at the rest of the replies, I will comment here on the 
cable you have. replace that LMR400 with heliax. LDF4050A or better, 
LDF5-50A or equivalent
 You can get a good eal on Heliax and connectors from:
http://www.surpluscoax.com/index.html
 The LDF5-50A is $2.55 per foot, less than 1/2 of the usual price for 
this cable, and their shipping charges are reasonable. Buy cable and 
connectors at the same time, and buy the correct connectors for the 
cable you buy. This alone will actually help on the receive, not to 
mention the transmit. Add a better antenna as well.

 I have not heard from them yet, but I may wind up helping the local 
VFD here get their system on the air.
 Not sure what they have in the vehicles, but the main base unit is an 
MTR2000 Motorla, and the tower is about 85 feet high (27 meters 
according to the information on the FCC web site). But not sure about 
the antennas or coax being used yet either. I will not look too deep 
till I know more.
 
 the use of cables like LMR400 is frowned on for repeater use, and may 
not do as well as even 1/2 Heliax can do. the 7/8 Heliax would be far 
better. I have 7/8 Heliax for use with my 440 repeater, and figure it 
will help me to have decent range, even though I won't have the antenna 
very high for the time being.

 in the cabinet, as others have mentioned, use a good double shieleded 
coax like RG142, RG214 or similar. Even tyhere, avoid the stuff with 
foil and braid mixed.

 YMMV

 Wayne WA2YNE


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, jstechnicalservice 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Thanks, Ron
 Here is more information on what we have. The HAAT is 122ft., we 
 currently have a Maxrad MFB-1503 3db antenna and LMR400 coax. We are 
 using a ST2 Midland at 110W and there is some type of older pre-amp 
 installed with no tag, but has 6db hand written on it. Any 
 suggestions for improvement will be appreciated but we do have a 
 limited budget, especially with the impending rebanding. We want the 
 high-band repeater in place for backup when this happens and also as 
 our primary for the time being.