RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Moto Pulsar 120 (IMTS phone war stories)

2007-03-27 Thread Gary Schafer
I have a TLD-1100 vhf rcc unit in my garage somewhere. I used to use it many
years ago on the local rcc.
Are these things worth anything?

I think I also have an old motrac vhf radio that I had on rcc before that. I
bolted a duplexer on the top of it and made it full duplex and turned the
power down so it didn't fry the final. Worked pretty good!

73
Gary  K4FMX

 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Repeater-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Milt
 Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:50 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Moto Pulsar 120 (IMTS phone war
 stories)
 
 If it was a copper colored square channel element, then the radio should
 have been about 2ft long, 6high, and 15 wide and weighed enough to
 eliminate the need for the extra couple of sandbags in the trunk in the
 winter.  TLD-1100 comes to mind but that was the VHF version.  Based on a
 Motrac, the VHF units still used 3 tubes to get up to 50 watts before the
 duplexing filter.  The UHF  was solid state and ran about 18-20 watts out.
 They were very popular with the telephone company folks around MD.
 
 Then there were the people who discovered they could make a mint by
 packaging an old TLD-1100 radio with new fancy looking control head
 
 Pulsar 120's and Pulsar II's were the same box as I recall, just different
 control heads.  Very nice radios.
 
 Milt
 N3LTQ
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:39 PM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Moto Pulsar 120 (IMTS phone war stories)
 
 
 I don't remember if it was the Pulsar 120 or not but I did indeed
  build a repeater in the late 70's, based on a Pulsar. One channel
  element (square copper as I remember) and a 5 mHz 1st IF made it a
  piece of cake. It worked surprisingly well for what it was. As this
  was in SoCal where UHF splits are upside down (low in, high out ham
  repeaters), the Pulsar was a natural.
 
  The biggest problem was that it used germanium RF devices.
  Fortunately for us, there was a MSS nearby to keep us stocked in
  those devices (which was needed!).
 
  Ken
  
 --
  President and CTO - Arcom Communications
  Makers of the world famous RC210 Repeater Controller and accessories.
  http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
  Coming soon - the most advanced repeater controller EVER.
  Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
  we offer complete repeater packages!
  AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
  http://www.irlp.net
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Moto Pulsar 120 (IMTS phone war stories)

2007-03-26 Thread skipp025
Great to see someone describe the Pulsar well.  They came into 
the SF Motorola Service Station well through the 80's. I don't 
remember ever having to really repair one other than small stupid 
user things and some control reprogramming. 

Built like a fort with a pretty neat internal duplexer hams used 
to get fooled  excited about using it for amateur repeater work. 
No cigar big boy... 

I used to say they were a hybrid style of Mocom 70 just because they 
looked a bit like a Mocom 70 and had the same quality of construction. 
The Mocom 70 and the Pulsar are probably of the same design 
generation or familiy. 

To make you cry I'll say I can't remember how many of the Pulsars 
we trashed when Motorola Recon wouldn't even pay the freight fees 
to Recon (where they would crush them) upon customer trade in. 

Speaking of IMTS Radios... we also saw and serviced a number of 
Harris phones, which made very easy repeater conversions. The Harris 
UHF units had a really nice internal duplexer... call it a flat 
pack but it was more a mini cigar box size and it works great for 
Amateur Aps.  

A rush of memories flood back to those days. I can actually remember 
a few RCA, GE, Harris, Aerotron IMTS phones... oh boy, what joy. 
The phones were an easy service ticket... the #$* taxi cabs right 
behind them were the stinky cluster of the morning.. a whole line 
of them out the door.  All the drivers with great attitudes. 

cheers, 
s. 



 nj902 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Pulsar mobile phone is not a 1969 product, they were produced 
 from the late 1970's through the 1980's.
 
 These drawer units make good raw materials for building repeaters.  
 They can be had for next to nothing or even for free, so you can 
 build a complete repeater for lunch money.  Much of the circuitry 
 is of the same vintage as Micor.  The PA's are continuous duty - 
 after all, a duplex phone transmitter is active for the duration 
 of a phone call - no PTT.
 
 Also, these are synthesized radios- but the nifty thing is that 
 there is no microprocessor - the synthesizer loop is programmed 
 with a diode matrix.  Once you master the logic - you can move 
 it to other frequencies - and without spending a dime to have 
 channel elements re-rocked.  [these units actually do have a 
 microprocessor for the supervisory logic - but we remove that 
 for amateur repeater applications]
 
 They do have a fixed offset from TX to RX.  Since that offset is 
 5 MHz at UHF, those can be a full duplex link or repeater in one 
 box.  For VHF, it would be easier to use two drawers since there 
 is only one VCO. Also, there is no squelch circuit so you will 
 need an audio or squelch gate board from a Micor or a squelch 
 circuit like the one from Link.
 
 Finding a manual is necessary for a successful project.
 
 The drawer unit will have a model number such as T1739 or T1839 
 [A,B,C,D, etc.]  This will help tell what band the unit is and what 
 book to look for.  You can also open it and look for assembly 
 numbers that begin with TLD or TLE to determine the band.




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Moto Pulsar 120 (IMTS phone war stories)

2007-03-26 Thread Ken Arck
I don't remember if it was the Pulsar 120 or not but I did indeed 
build a repeater in the late 70's, based on a Pulsar. One channel 
element (square copper as I remember) and a 5 mHz 1st IF made it a 
piece of cake. It worked surprisingly well for what it was. As this 
was in SoCal where UHF splits are upside down (low in, high out ham 
repeaters), the Pulsar was a natural.

The biggest problem was that it used germanium RF devices. 
Fortunately for us, there was a MSS nearby to keep us stocked in 
those devices (which was needed!).

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of the world famous RC210 Repeater Controller and accessories.
http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
Coming soon - the most advanced repeater controller EVER.
Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
we offer complete repeater packages!
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Moto Pulsar 120 (IMTS phone war stories)

2007-03-26 Thread Milt
If it was a copper colored square channel element, then the radio should 
have been about 2ft long, 6high, and 15 wide and weighed enough to 
eliminate the need for the extra couple of sandbags in the trunk in the 
winter.  TLD-1100 comes to mind but that was the VHF version.  Based on a 
Motrac, the VHF units still used 3 tubes to get up to 50 watts before the 
duplexing filter.  The UHF  was solid state and ran about 18-20 watts out. 
They were very popular with the telephone company folks around MD.

Then there were the people who discovered they could make a mint by 
packaging an old TLD-1100 radio with new fancy looking control head

Pulsar 120's and Pulsar II's were the same box as I recall, just different 
control heads.  Very nice radios.

Milt
N3LTQ



- Original Message - 
From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:39 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Moto Pulsar 120 (IMTS phone war stories)


I don't remember if it was the Pulsar 120 or not but I did indeed
 build a repeater in the late 70's, based on a Pulsar. One channel
 element (square copper as I remember) and a 5 mHz 1st IF made it a
 piece of cake. It worked surprisingly well for what it was. As this
 was in SoCal where UHF splits are upside down (low in, high out ham
 repeaters), the Pulsar was a natural.

 The biggest problem was that it used germanium RF devices.
 Fortunately for us, there was a MSS nearby to keep us stocked in
 those devices (which was needed!).

 Ken
 --
 President and CTO - Arcom Communications
 Makers of the world famous RC210 Repeater Controller and accessories.
 http://www.arcomcontrollers.com/
 Coming soon - the most advanced repeater controller EVER.
 Authorized Dealers for Kenwood and Telewave and
 we offer complete repeater packages!
 AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
 http://www.irlp.net






 Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Moto Pulsar 120 (IMTS phone war stories)

2007-03-26 Thread Steve Bosshard (NU5D)

My first job in the business was as a service tech for an RCC.  We had a GE
IMTS terminal with hand wired 5th Selector Level stroger switches on the
direct inward dial trunks complete with sleeve lead control.  There were 4
selector switches, and one block on 1000 numbers.  In addition to the GE
IMTS terminal there was also a Motorola LO9DAL dial access paging terminal
that used code plan 'S'  The code plan determined which 2 groups of tones
were used in two tone sequential.  The pagers were Bell and Howell and KEL -
that used either alkaline or mercury batteries.

The IMTS system had about 20 T1433AE full duplex FACTS (fully automated car
telephone system) radios and control heads.  (there were fewer than 50
pagers in Temple, TX in 1975).   Drew about 2 amperes while idle.  Took a
channel element like you described (radio was similar to a Mocom 70) and ran
it up to about 40 watts VHF before it hit the varactor tripler and the
duplexer.

There was one Moto base station and one GE PRO series station - (we had only
3 channels to start with) I never will forget the day when it got so hot at
the site in Temple - south of Waco abt 30 miles that the plastic relay
covers on the Moto melted and kept the TX from keying - no isulation or
anything - just a tin shed on a hill top in a corn field.

When the stations were keyed via remote control phone line, the station
would change the load resistance to tell the terminal that it had come up to
full power, else there was a remote fail indicator at the terminal.

Next came the customer owned and maintained units - Moto Pulsars and GE /
Secode Mark 5 heads.  We also has some Secode DID1 terminals and VP1 control
heads, but these were on VHF with the TLD1100's.

Interesting, the TLD1100 also drew 2 amperes in standby, due to the 5894 PA
and driver tubes, not like the T1433AE with the all PNP transistor
supervisory logic pack.

All this for just $3.50 an hour just out of tech school.  1/2 a day
Saturdays at overtimeyou could almost make a living.

When I left the RCC in 1981 for a microwave / T1 transmission job at Centel
in 1981 there were 600 pagers and 40 some odd mobile phones.  We implemented
metered service in 1979 - cost went from $72.60 per month unlimited to the
same plus $0.20 per minute or portion there of.  I remember seeing some $300
phone bills - we got about 1/2 the rental phones back - and continued to
make the same revenue with 1/2 the equipment in the field.  Tone and voice
pagers were running $15 per month, and tone only were $9 per month.  Those
were the days.

Steve NU5D


We
On 3/26/07, Milt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


If it was a copper colored square channel element, then the radio should
have been about 2ft long, 6high, and 15 wide and weighed enough to
eliminate the need for the extra couple of sandbags in the trunk in the
winter.  TLD-1100 comes to mind but that was the VHF version.  Based on a
Motrac, the VHF units still used 3 tubes to get up to 50 watts before the
duplexing filter.  The UHF  was solid state and ran about 18-20 watts out.
They were very popular with the telephone company folks around MD.



--
Ham Radio Spoken Here.NU5D
Visit the Temple Ham Club Website
http://www.tarc.org
www.yahoogroups.com/group/Temple_arc
www.yahoogroups.com/group/60meter