[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-24 Thread Bill


I hope you copy and paste, at least part of your posting to qrz and part of 
your book some day you will finish.  Your story parallels mine in many ways, I 
wish we could sit down some where for a beer all one afternoon, and I don't 
drink.  I too am looking for financially rewarding opportunities, now I sound 
like a politician.  I now shoot weddings hoping for a few pennies.
   The spectra also has a plug in module, no depotting required.  
.
.
jawjabillatl---bellsouth--net
.
bill
.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@... wrote:

 At 07:41 PM 11/22/09, you wrote:
 
 I think the Micor rx is a great idea.   Unless they came from a 900 
 micor rptr, they probably were used in paging or linking service, 
 making them the 5 khz variety,  The IF xtals could be changed for 
 the 2.5 khz modulation, but no flutter fighter or compandering 
 available like the msf series.
 
 You can look at the 900 MHz Maxtrac schematics you can
 download from the R-B Maxtrac page and you will see that
 the Hear Clear module has a very simple pinout. You could grab
 one from a dead 900 Mhz Maxtrac and mount it on perfboard
 and put it in line with the Micor receiver audio.
 
 I know that there is a way to dissolve the epoxy in a potted
 module like the Hear Clear in the Maxtrac and therefore allow
 you to disassemble it to the point where you could reverse
 engineer it back to a schematic, I just don't know what the
 chemical process is...
 
 And, Mike, yes I have contemplated an article that would detail the 
 procedure.  The first unit I did took about a week out of my life 
 and large fistful of hair.  The key ingredient to making the spectra 
 play rx on 902 is the software, it has to be hacked up so bad that 
 it will not work on any standard or ham units.
 
 Repeater-Builder won't offer software for download.
 You would have to write that part as a how-to-patch article.
 
 The rx front end is the worst and most time consuming part because 
 of it's tuning requirements.
 
 I can imagine.
 
 And after reading you qrz history, Mike, I plan to reincarnate as a 
 butterfly so I may follow you as you enjoy life.
 
 As I mentioned on QRZ, my folks had the interesting lives..  I've had some
 fun, but compared to my dad my life is pretty dull.  My mom has as many
 stories as my dad did, but I'm not going to tell any of them as most
 involve the behavior of patients or portray doctors as incompetent (one of
 her favorite lines was that doctors get to bury their mistakes, and
 don't even have to go to the funerals).
 
 On the other hand my dad used to comment that in the 1960s-1980s a
 4x5 camera in your hand was a passport to anywhere.  I watched him
 more then once get into areas he shouldn't have been in just by saying
 that  he had to shoot a photo from a balcony, or from a roof, etc..
 We are a long lived family - one sister lived to be over 100.  His smoking
 killed him at age 74.  If he was alive today and in reasonable health he'd
 still be shooting car photos for PM magazine or stomping through a foreign
 country for National Geographic, or...
 Maybe he'd get a phone call from Paramount Studios to be on a set at
 5am to shoot continuity photos, then go over to the Press Club to kick
 back in the bar with a scotch on the rocks, shmoozing with the politicians.
 I still remember how he caused a 180 degree change in attitude in one
 TV newsman on the topic of gun control - from rabid anti-gun to one that
 lobbied for field newsmen to be able to carry concealed.
 In the evenings or on the weekends he'd be writing his life story, two-finger
 typing on a Selectric with a cuppa joe on the desk next to him.
 
 Personally, at the moment I'm scrambling as I try to find a full time
 job - and that's not easy when you are over 50 and have only a 2-year
 degree (my dad fell off his camera platform in my junior year at college.
 I had to go to work to support the family. I never got back to school).
 
 I've been programming computers since 1974 (in assembly code,
 Fortran, C and newer languages such as Perl and Java). I wrote a
 real-time CP/M replacement that at one point was compiling a Fortran
 program, (yes, there was a Fortran for CP/M), playing Tic-Tac-Toe
 on the console and running a 7-port repeater controller all at the
 same time.  And doing it with 256K of RAM on a microprocessor
 that in theory only addresses 64K, and the memory mapping unit
 I wirewrapped could have handled a megabyte.
 I've been doing network support since the clients were Apple IIs and XTs
 and the circuit was a single twisted pair, at 1mb (look up Omninet).
 I worked on the prototype system for 128 and 512MB Token Ring, but
 that project was killed when 100mb Ethernet came out.
 And I've been working on 2-way radios since 1965.
 My signature is on the back of the Voyager 6 spacecraft antenna dish,
 along with every other person that worked on the project (interstellar
 graffiti?).  Likewise on the nameplates on the side 

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-24 Thread Bill



You and I need to talk (I type too slow).  I too have wanted a spectra on 220 
mhz.  Had not thought about the 1 pf cap trick.
.
bill
.
jawjabillatl---bellsouth---net
.
.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mel Swanberg wa6...@... wrote:

 Well, maybe I've actually managed to do something different... 
 
 I've been adding a 1 pf chip cap (0603) between the oval shaped pad in the 
 filter, and the edge of the filter sectiont. One cap for each section. This 
 lowers the frequency down below 900, and then I use a dremmel with a sharp 
 bit to walk the filter back up in frequency. This is all done while watching 
 a sweep of the filter on a network analyzer. 
 
 I've not really attempted to narrow the BW of the filter at all, just shift 
 it down some.
 
 As to the VCO, that's where the conductive ink comes into play. Just dab some 
 in through the slotted window, no need to remove the cover. The microstrip 
 resonator needs to be about a 1/4 longer. The conductive ink pens work just 
 fine for that. 
 
 I have a web page up on converting the 406-433 spectras to 440 that has some 
 useful pictures on how I go about retuning the filters. Just add the 1 pf cap 
 to the process, and it's otherwise the same.
 
 http://mysite.verizon.net/res8teuc/Range1spectra/Range1Spectraver1.1.htm
 
 Maybe that, and my comments above, will prove helpful until I can put up a 
 similar article on the moving the 800 and 900 Spectras down. 
 
 My next project? See if I can get a VHF Spectra to receive on 220. 
 
 Mel - WA6JBD
 
 
  Well, you have me curious also, maybe
  I took the dark path for tuning the front end filters. 
  I had to resort to silver paint (not cheap), a grinder, and
  a little blood and guts to tune those puppies.  What's
  your story..
  .
  bill
  w4oo





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-24 Thread n4rqy
I was hoping to get info on putting a gm300 to the 220 mhz band so that I can 
take advantage of the channel steering capabilities of that radio as a remote 
base.

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

-Original Message-
From: Bill jawjabill...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:28:06 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's




You and I need to talk (I type too slow).  I too have wanted a spectra on 220 
mhz.  Had not thought about the 1 pf cap trick.
.
bill
.
jawjabillatl---bellsouth---net
.
.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mel Swanberg wa6...@... wrote:

 Well, maybe I've actually managed to do something different... 
 
 I've been adding a 1 pf chip cap (0603) between the oval shaped pad in the 
 filter, and the edge of the filter sectiont. One cap for each section. This 
 lowers the frequency down below 900, and then I use a dremmel with a sharp 
 bit to walk the filter back up in frequency. This is all done while watching 
 a sweep of the filter on a network analyzer. 
 
 I've not really attempted to narrow the BW of the filter at all, just shift 
 it down some.
 
 As to the VCO, that's where the conductive ink comes into play. Just dab some 
 in through the slotted window, no need to remove the cover. The microstrip 
 resonator needs to be about a 1/4 longer. The conductive ink pens work just 
 fine for that. 
 
 I have a web page up on converting the 406-433 spectras to 440 that has some 
 useful pictures on how I go about retuning the filters. Just add the 1 pf cap 
 to the process, and it's otherwise the same.
 
 http://mysite.verizon.net/res8teuc/Range1spectra/Range1Spectraver1.1.htm
 
 Maybe that, and my comments above, will prove helpful until I can put up a 
 similar article on the moving the 800 and 900 Spectras down. 
 
 My next project? See if I can get a VHF Spectra to receive on 220. 
 
 Mel - WA6JBD
 
 
  Well, you have me curious also, maybe
  I took the dark path for tuning the front end filters. 
  I had to resort to silver paint (not cheap), a grinder, and
  a little blood and guts to tune those puppies.  What's
  your story..
  .
  bill
  w4oo






[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-23 Thread Bill
Well, you have me curious also, maybe I took the dark path for tuning the front 
end filters.  I had to resort to silver paint (not cheap), a grinder, and a 
little blood and guts to tune those puppies.  What's your story..
.
bill
w4oo
.
.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mel Swanberg wa6...@... wrote:

 Hi Bill, 
 
 I'm quite curious as to what you ran into when you attempted this. I have one 
 working, and as far as the number of steps taken to make it operable on 902, 
 it was pretty simple. The only thing I left out in my short list was bringing 
 COR out. Did I miss something, or did I just get lucky? 
 
 As to it's suitability for high RF environments, probably no more or no less 
 than any other mobile grade receiver. I wouldn't put one on a hilltop without 
 good external filtering - especially in the 900 band. They're not an MSF, but 
 then, that's not the point. They're cheap, they're readily available, and 
 they can be made to work, probably better than a Maxtrac. 
 
 I've also converted 800 radios to receive on the input side of the 800 band 
 (806-828) with the exact same procedure - hack software, tune VCO lower, 
 retune filter. 
 
 There seems to be enough interest to warrant writing this up, so I'll get 
 going on that. 
 
 Mel - WA6JBD
 
  
  Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle
  more than the three items listed that need to be
  done
  For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx
  for that purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work
  have pay dirt...
  If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable
  in high rf environment, I will work with them
  to...git-er-done... I currently have two 900 spectras in a
  sales catalog bag with wide duplexer and controller to
  operate on any one of the eighty channels 902-903 and
  927-928.  All that's needed is twelve volts and
  antenna.
  .
  Bill
  w4oo
  jawjabill--
  bellsouth-
  net





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-23 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 07:41 PM 11/22/09, you wrote:

I think the Micor rx is a great idea.   Unless they came from a 900 
micor rptr, they probably were used in paging or linking service, 
making them the 5 khz variety,  The IF xtals could be changed for 
the 2.5 khz modulation, but no flutter fighter or compandering 
available like the msf series.

You can look at the 900 MHz Maxtrac schematics you can
download from the R-B Maxtrac page and you will see that
the Hear Clear module has a very simple pinout. You could grab
one from a dead 900 Mhz Maxtrac and mount it on perfboard
and put it in line with the Micor receiver audio.

I know that there is a way to dissolve the epoxy in a potted
module like the Hear Clear in the Maxtrac and therefore allow
you to disassemble it to the point where you could reverse
engineer it back to a schematic, I just don't know what the
chemical process is...

And, Mike, yes I have contemplated an article that would detail the 
procedure.  The first unit I did took about a week out of my life 
and large fistful of hair.  The key ingredient to making the spectra 
play rx on 902 is the software, it has to be hacked up so bad that 
it will not work on any standard or ham units.

Repeater-Builder won't offer software for download.
You would have to write that part as a how-to-patch article.

The rx front end is the worst and most time consuming part because 
of it's tuning requirements.

I can imagine.

And after reading you qrz history, Mike, I plan to reincarnate as a 
butterfly so I may follow you as you enjoy life.

As I mentioned on QRZ, my folks had the interesting lives..  I've had some
fun, but compared to my dad my life is pretty dull.  My mom has as many
stories as my dad did, but I'm not going to tell any of them as most
involve the behavior of patients or portray doctors as incompetent (one of
her favorite lines was that doctors get to bury their mistakes, and
don't even have to go to the funerals).

On the other hand my dad used to comment that in the 1960s-1980s a
4x5 camera in your hand was a passport to anywhere.  I watched him
more then once get into areas he shouldn't have been in just by saying
that  he had to shoot a photo from a balcony, or from a roof, etc..
We are a long lived family - one sister lived to be over 100.  His smoking
killed him at age 74.  If he was alive today and in reasonable health he'd
still be shooting car photos for PM magazine or stomping through a foreign
country for National Geographic, or...
Maybe he'd get a phone call from Paramount Studios to be on a set at
5am to shoot continuity photos, then go over to the Press Club to kick
back in the bar with a scotch on the rocks, shmoozing with the politicians.
I still remember how he caused a 180 degree change in attitude in one
TV newsman on the topic of gun control - from rabid anti-gun to one that
lobbied for field newsmen to be able to carry concealed.
In the evenings or on the weekends he'd be writing his life story, two-finger
typing on a Selectric with a cuppa joe on the desk next to him.

Personally, at the moment I'm scrambling as I try to find a full time
job - and that's not easy when you are over 50 and have only a 2-year
degree (my dad fell off his camera platform in my junior year at college.
I had to go to work to support the family. I never got back to school).

I've been programming computers since 1974 (in assembly code,
Fortran, C and newer languages such as Perl and Java). I wrote a
real-time CP/M replacement that at one point was compiling a Fortran
program, (yes, there was a Fortran for CP/M), playing Tic-Tac-Toe
on the console and running a 7-port repeater controller all at the
same time.  And doing it with 256K of RAM on a microprocessor
that in theory only addresses 64K, and the memory mapping unit
I wirewrapped could have handled a megabyte.
I've been doing network support since the clients were Apple IIs and XTs
and the circuit was a single twisted pair, at 1mb (look up Omninet).
I worked on the prototype system for 128 and 512MB Token Ring, but
that project was killed when 100mb Ethernet came out.
And I've been working on 2-way radios since 1965.
My signature is on the back of the Voyager 6 spacecraft antenna dish,
along with every other person that worked on the project (interstellar
graffiti?).  Likewise on the nameplates on the side of both Viking landers
on Mars.

Personnel people have little check boxes on their evaluation forms and
if you don't have that little check box marked Y then you can't do the
job - regardless of the fact that you have DONE that job, and excelled
at it. It doesn't matter, if each little check box isn't marked Y then
your resume never gets to the hiring manager - it gets tossed in the
round file instead.

I was one of 12 people that kept 86 locations on the network in the
southern half of California for a Fortune 5 company - 9,000 users
and over 300 servers, but last week a different companies HR weenie
told me that if I didn't have a certificate from 

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-23 Thread Mel Swanberg
Well, maybe I've actually managed to do something different... 

I've been adding a 1 pf chip cap (0603) between the oval shaped pad in the 
filter, and the edge of the filter sectiont. One cap for each section. This 
lowers the frequency down below 900, and then I use a dremmel with a sharp bit 
to walk the filter back up in frequency. This is all done while watching a 
sweep of the filter on a network analyzer. 

I've not really attempted to narrow the BW of the filter at all, just shift it 
down some.

As to the VCO, that's where the conductive ink comes into play. Just dab some 
in through the slotted window, no need to remove the cover. The microstrip 
resonator needs to be about a 1/4 longer. The conductive ink pens work just 
fine for that. 

I have a web page up on converting the 406-433 spectras to 440 that has some 
useful pictures on how I go about retuning the filters. Just add the 1 pf cap 
to the process, and it's otherwise the same.

http://mysite.verizon.net/res8teuc/Range1spectra/Range1Spectraver1.1.htm

Maybe that, and my comments above, will prove helpful until I can put up a 
similar article on the moving the 800 and 900 Spectras down. 

My next project? See if I can get a VHF Spectra to receive on 220. 

Mel - WA6JBD


 Well, you have me curious also, maybe
 I took the dark path for tuning the front end filters. 
 I had to resort to silver paint (not cheap), a grinder, and
 a little blood and guts to tune those puppies.  What's
 your story..
 .
 bill
 w4oo


  


[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread Bill



Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than the three 
items listed that need to be done
For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that purpose, 
however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf 
environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done... I currently have two 900 
spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide duplexer and controller to operate on 
any one of the eighty channels 902-903 and 927-928.  All that's needed is 
twelve volts and antenna.
.
Bill
w4oo
jawjabill--
bellsouth-
net
.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, James Adkins adkins.ja...@... wrote:

 I've done quite a bit with the Spectras; hacked the software, re-tuned the
 VCO after modifying, re-capped them, etc.  I think they're great radios.
 Just thought since it's difficult / impossible to get maxtrac filters, and
 knowing how good the Spectra receivers are, they'd be a nice alternative to
 go with a Motorola Nuc as a receiver.
 
 Not sure that there is COR present on the 15-pin accessory pin, but seems
 like when I looked at that before there wasn't.  I'm sure that can be found
 somewhere inside the rig, though.
 
 Can you e-mail me off the list with what you have?
 
 Thanks,
 
 James
 
 On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:35 PM, John Gleichweit
 smokeyb...@...wrote:
 
 
 
  I'll second the motion for a write-up. If you have high-rez pictures,
  that'll help even more. I have 2 900MHz A5 Spectras that I want to tweak
  into the 902 band.
 
  --
  John Smokey Behr Gleichweit FF1/EMT, CCNA, MCSE
  IPN-CAL023 N6FOG UP Fresno Sub MP183.5 ECV1852
  List Owner x10, Moderator x9 CalEMA 51-507
  http://smokeybehr.blogspot.com
  http://www.myspace.com/smokeybehr
 
  - Original Message 
   From: Mark n9...@... n9wys%40ameritech.net
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Sat, November 21, 2009 6:34:32 PM
   Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's
  
   Mel,
  
   Reference the write-up, PLEASE DO!!! There are others here who would be
   grateful for the knowledge (myself included).
  
   73,
   Mark - N9WYS
 
  
   -Original Message-
   From: 
   Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.comOn 
   Behalf Of wa6jbd
  
   I've managed to get 900 Spectras to receive in the 902 range. There are
   three steps, and it's not necessarily a 'beginner project'.
  
   1. Hack bandlimits to allow programming
  
   2. Modify VCO
  
   3. Retune front end filter.
  
   It's possible to meet or exceed rated performance after modification, but
   takes patience, a steady hand, and a network analyzer or spectrum
  analyzer
   and tracking generator.
  
   I'm toying with the idea of putting together an article on how to do it,
   complete with pictures it there is sufficient interest. In the meantime,
  I'd
   be happy to supply a description of what's involved to anyone who'd like
  to
   give it a try.
  
   Mel - WA6JBD
  
  
   --- In 
   Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com,
  James Adkins
   wrote:
   
Looking for anyone that's actually used a Motorola Spectra to RX on
   902.xxx
MHz for a repeater receiver
Has anyone on the list tried this? Looking for something besides the
standard maxtrac option.
--
James Adkins, KB0NHX
Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
   
Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
www.nixahams.net
   
The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness!
  (Well,
only $1.00 per month)
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 James Adkins, KB0NHX
 Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
 Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
 www.nixahams.net
 
 The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
 only $1.00 per month)





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:



Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than 
the three items listed that need to be done
For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that 
purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf 
environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...

What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and 
PL decode lines, etc.
The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF 
Link Receiver chassis has
it horizontal to take up less rack space.

I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide 
duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels 
902-903 and 927-928.  All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.

Want to do an article on it?

Mike WA6ILQ



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread James Adkins
A Micor receiver on 900 would be great!  I have never seen anything about
that, but haven't really considered it.  We use a Micor for our 145.270
machine, and used one on our 224.280 for quite a while.

I have a Micor aux receiver rack, anyone  have a 900 MHz receiver board for
sale?  Do they make a nice Micor helical pre-amp for 900 as well?

Thanks for the great idea, Mike.

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@gmail.comwrote:



 At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:

 Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
 the three items listed that need to be done
 For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
 purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
 If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
 environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...

 What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
 They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
 PL decode lines, etc.
 The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
 Link Receiver chassis has
 it horizontal to take up less rack space.


 I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
 duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
 902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.

 Want to do an article on it?

 Mike WA6ILQ

  




-- 
James Adkins, KB0NHX
Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)

Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
www.nixahams.net

The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
only $1.00 per month)


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread James Adkins
I wonder, are the Micor receivers 2.5 kHz bandwidth or wideband.

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@gmail.comwrote:



 At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:

 Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
 the three items listed that need to be done
 For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
 purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
 If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
 environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...

 What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
 They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
 PL decode lines, etc.
 The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
 Link Receiver chassis has
 it horizontal to take up less rack space.


 I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
 duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
 902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.

 Want to do an article on it?

 Mike WA6ILQ

  




-- 
James Adkins, KB0NHX
Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)

Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
www.nixahams.net

The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
only $1.00 per month)


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread JOHN MACKEY
Micor 900 receivers at +/- 5 KC.

-- Original Message --
Received: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:31:31 PM PST
From: James Adkins adkins.ja...@gmail.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

 I wonder, are the Micor receivers 2.5 kHz bandwidth or wideband.
 
 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Mike Morris WA6ILQ
wa6...@gmail.comwrote:
 
 
 
  At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
 
  Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
  the three items listed that need to be done
  For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
  purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
  If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
  environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
 
  What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
  They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
  PL decode lines, etc.
  The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
  Link Receiver chassis has
  it horizontal to take up less rack space.
 
 
  I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
  duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
  902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
 
  Want to do an article on it?
 
  Mike WA6ILQ
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 James Adkins, KB0NHX
 Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
 Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
 www.nixahams.net
 
 The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
 only $1.00 per month)
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread James Adkins
Went to Repeater Builder, looks like the did make a 2.5 kHz 900 board.  Good
overview of the aux receivers and spectra tac receivers there.

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:46 PM, JOHN MACKEY jmac...@usa.net wrote:



 Micor 900 receivers at +/- 5 KC.


 -- Original Message --
 Received: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:31:31 PM PST
 From: James Adkins adkins.ja...@gmail.com adkins.james%40gmail.com
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

  I wonder, are the Micor receivers 2.5 kHz bandwidth or wideband.
 
  On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Mike Morris WA6ILQ
 wa6...@gmail.com wa6ilq%40gmail.comwrote:
 
  
  
   At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
  
   Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
   the three items listed that need to be done
   For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
   purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
   If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
   environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
  
   What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
   They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
   PL decode lines, etc.
   The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
   Link Receiver chassis has
   it horizontal to take up less rack space.
  
  
   I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
   duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
   902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
  
   Want to do an article on it?
  
   Mike WA6ILQ
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  James Adkins, KB0NHX
  Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
  Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
  www.nixahams.net
 
  The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness!
 (Well,
  only $1.00 per month)
 

  




-- 
James Adkins, KB0NHX
Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)

Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
www.nixahams.net

The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
only $1.00 per month)


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread MCH
They should be neither 2.5 kHz or Wideband FM (never heard of a wideband 
FM Micor).

They should be 11.0 kHz bandwidth - for 2.5 kHz deviation, although they 
could be 16.0 kHz bandwidth for 5.0 kHz deviation.

Joe M.

James Adkins wrote:
 
 
 I wonder, are the Micor receivers 2.5 kHz bandwidth or wideband.
 
 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@gmail.com 
 mailto:wa6...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
 
 At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
 
  Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
  the three items listed that need to be done
  For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
  purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
  If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
  environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
 
 What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
 They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
 PL decode lines, etc.
 The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
 Link Receiver chassis has
 it horizontal to take up less rack space.
 
 
  I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
  duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
  902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
 
 Want to do an article on it?
 
 Mike WA6ILQ
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 James Adkins, KB0NHX
 Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
 Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
 www.nixahams.net http://www.nixahams.net
 
 The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! 
 (Well, only $1.00 per month)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
 Version: 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.77/2520 - Release Date: 11/22/09 
 14:40:00
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread James Adkins
Just wanted to make sure they'd work with the Spectras, GTX's and other gear
already out there.

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:39 PM, MCH m...@nb.net wrote:



 They should be neither 2.5 kHz or Wideband FM (never heard of a wideband
 FM Micor).

 They should be 11.0 kHz bandwidth - for 2.5 kHz deviation, although they
 could be 16.0 kHz bandwidth for 5.0 kHz deviation.

 Joe M.


 James Adkins wrote:
 
 
  I wonder, are the Micor receivers 2.5 kHz bandwidth or wideband.
 
  On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Mike Morris WA6ILQ 
  wa6...@gmail.comwa6ilq%40gmail.com
  mailto:wa6...@gmail.com wa6ilq%40gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 
  At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
 
  Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
  the three items listed that need to be done
  For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
  purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
  If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
  environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
 
  What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
  They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
  PL decode lines, etc.
  The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
  Link Receiver chassis has
  it horizontal to take up less rack space.
 
 
  I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
  duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
  902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
 
  Want to do an article on it?
 
  Mike WA6ILQ
 
 
 
 
  --
  James Adkins, KB0NHX
  Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
  Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
  www.nixahams.net http://www.nixahams.net

 
  The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness!
  (Well, only $1.00 per month)
 
 
 
 
 
  --
 
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.709 / Virus Database: 270.14.77/2520 - Release Date:
 11/22/09 14:40:00
 

  




-- 
James Adkins, KB0NHX
Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)

Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
www.nixahams.net

The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
only $1.00 per month)


[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread Bill

I think the Micor rx is a great idea.   Unless they came from a 900 micor rptr, 
they probably were used in paging or linking service, making them the 5 khz 
variety,  The IF xtals could be changed for the 2.5 khz modulation, but no 
flutter fighter or compandering available like the msf series.  And, Mike, yes 
I have contemplated an article that would detail the procedure.  The first unit 
I did took about a week out of my life and large fistful of hair.  The key 
ingredient to making the spectra play rx on 902 is the software, it has to be 
hacked up so bad that it will not work on any standard or ham units.  The rx 
front end is the worst and most time consuming part because of it's tuning 
requirements.  And after reading you qrz history, Mike, I plan to reincarnate 
as a butterfly so I may follow you as you enjoy life.
.
Bill
w4oo
.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@... wrote:

 At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
 
 
 
 Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than 
 the three items listed that need to be done
 For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that 
 purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
 If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf 
 environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
 
 What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
 They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and 
 PL decode lines, etc.
 The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF 
 Link Receiver chassis has
 it horizontal to take up less rack space.
 
 I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide 
 duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels 
 902-903 and 927-928.  All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
 
 Want to do an article on it?
 
 Mike WA6ILQ





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread James Adkins
Which brings up another interesting question:

We are already using a 75w MSF-5000.  Could a Motorola Nucleus II paging
transmitter be used and the MSF-5000 receiver?   We're using an external
controller, S-COM 7330.  I don't see why one couldn't just wire up the RX
audio, COR and PL to the RX side and the NUC II to the PTT and TX audio
lines.

Thoughts?

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bill jawjabill...@yahoo.com wrote:




 I think the Micor rx is a great idea. Unless they came from a 900 micor
 rptr, they probably were used in paging or linking service, making them the
 5 khz variety, The IF xtals could be changed for the 2.5 khz modulation, but
 no flutter fighter or compandering available like the msf series. And, Mike,
 yes I have contemplated an article that would detail the procedure. The
 first unit I did took about a week out of my life and large fistful of hair.
 The key ingredient to making the spectra play rx on 902 is the software, it
 has to be hacked up so bad that it will not work on any standard or ham
 units. The rx front end is the worst and most time consuming part because of
 it's tuning requirements. And after reading you qrz history, Mike, I plan to
 reincarnate as a butterfly so I may follow you as you enjoy life.
 .
 Bill
 w4oo
 .

 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com,
 Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@... wrote:
 
  At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
 
 
 
  Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
  the three items listed that need to be done
  For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
  purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
  If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
  environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
 
  What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
  They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
  PL decode lines, etc.
  The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
  Link Receiver chassis has
  it horizontal to take up less rack space.
 
  I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
  duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
  902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
 
  Want to do an article on it?
 
  Mike WA6ILQ
 

  




-- 
James Adkins, KB0NHX
Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)

Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
www.nixahams.net

The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
only $1.00 per month)


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread James Adkins
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bill jawjabill...@yahoo.com wrote:




 I think the Micor rx is a great idea. Unless they came from a 900 micor
 rptr, they probably were used in paging or linking service, making them the
 5 khz variety, The IF xtals could be changed for the 2.5 khz modulation, but
 no flutter fighter or compandering available like the msf series. And, Mike,
 yes I have contemplated an article that would detail the procedure. The
 first unit I did took about a week out of my life and large fistful of hair.
 The key ingredient to making the spectra play rx on 902 is the software, it
 has to be hacked up so bad that it will not work on any standard or ham
 units. The rx front end is the worst and most time consuming part because of
 it's tuning requirements. And after reading you qrz history, Mike, I plan to
 reincarnate as a butterfly so I may follow you as you enjoy life.
 .
 Bill
 w4oo
 .

 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com,
 Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@... wrote:
 
  At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
 
 
 
  Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
  the three items listed that need to be done
  For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
  purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
  If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
  environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
 
  What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
  They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
  PL decode lines, etc.
  The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
  Link Receiver chassis has
  it horizontal to take up less rack space.
 
  I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
  duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
  902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
 
  Want to do an article on it?
 
  Mike WA6ILQ
 

  




-- 
James Adkins, KB0NHX
Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)

Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
www.nixahams.net

The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
only $1.00 per month)


[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread w6jk
I'm pretty sure they're wide band, but the Com Spec narrow band kit would 
probably fix that.

'JK

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, James Adkins adkins.ja...@... wrote:

 I wonder, are the Micor receivers 2.5 kHz bandwidth or wideband.
 
 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@...wrote:
 
 
 
  At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
 
  Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
  the three items listed that need to be done
  For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
  purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
  If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
  environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
 
  What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
  They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
  PL decode lines, etc.
  The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
  Link Receiver chassis has
  it horizontal to take up less rack space.
 
 
  I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
  duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
  902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
 
  Want to do an article on it?
 
  Mike WA6ILQ
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 James Adkins, KB0NHX
 Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
 Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
 www.nixahams.net
 
 The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
 only $1.00 per month)





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-22 Thread Bill


Assuming you want only more power that the nuc offers, I would consider piping 
the rf out of the msf into the nuc pa leaving the msf rx/tx repeat path intact. 
 It would involve matching the rf power levels out/in and the pa control line 
to the msf pa control functioning.  The reverse is what i plan for a quantar
cage to msf vhf 350 watt pa (quantro idea).  Could be entertaining.
.
bill
w4oo
.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, James Adkins adkins.ja...@... wrote:

 Which brings up another interesting question:
 
 We are already using a 75w MSF-5000.  Could a Motorola Nucleus II paging
 transmitter be used and the MSF-5000 receiver?   We're using an external
 controller, S-COM 7330.  I don't see why one couldn't just wire up the RX
 audio, COR and PL to the RX side and the NUC II to the PTT and TX audio
 lines.
 
 Thoughts?
 
 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bill jawjabill...@... wrote:
 
 
 
 
  I think the Micor rx is a great idea. Unless they came from a 900 micor
  rptr, they probably were used in paging or linking service, making them the
  5 khz variety, The IF xtals could be changed for the 2.5 khz modulation, but
  no flutter fighter or compandering available like the msf series. And, Mike,
  yes I have contemplated an article that would detail the procedure. The
  first unit I did took about a week out of my life and large fistful of hair.
  The key ingredient to making the spectra play rx on 902 is the software, it
  has to be hacked up so bad that it will not work on any standard or ham
  units. The rx front end is the worst and most time consuming part because of
  it's tuning requirements. And after reading you qrz history, Mike, I plan to
  reincarnate as a butterfly so I may follow you as you enjoy life.
  .
  Bill
  w4oo
  .
 
  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com,
  Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6ilq@ wrote:
  
   At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote:
  
  
  
   Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than
   the three items listed that need to be done
   For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that
   purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt...
   If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf
   environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done...
  
   What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900?
   They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and
   PL decode lines, etc.
   The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF
   Link Receiver chassis has
   it horizontal to take up less rack space.
  
   I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide
   duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels
   902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna.
  
   Want to do an article on it?
  
   Mike WA6ILQ
  
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 James Adkins, KB0NHX
 Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
 Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
 www.nixahams.net
 
 The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
 only $1.00 per month)





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-21 Thread wa6jbd

I've managed to get 900 Spectras to receive in the 902 range. There are three 
steps, and it's not necessarily a 'beginner project'.  

1. Hack bandlimits to allow programming

2. Modify VCO

3. Retune front end filter. 

It's possible to meet or exceed rated performance after modification, but takes 
patience, a steady hand, and a network analyzer or spectrum analyzer and 
tracking generator. 

I'm toying with the idea of putting together an article on how to do it, 
complete with pictures it there is sufficient interest. In the meantime, I'd be 
happy to supply a description of what's involved to anyone who'd like to give 
it a try. 

Mel - WA6JBD




--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, James Adkins adkins.ja...@... wrote:

 Looking for anyone that's actually used a Motorola Spectra to RX on 902.xxx
 MHz for a repeater receiver
 Has anyone on the list tried this?  Looking for something besides the
 standard maxtrac option.
 -- 
 James Adkins, KB0NHX
 Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
 Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
 www.nixahams.net
 
 The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
 only $1.00 per month)





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-21 Thread Mark
Mel,

Reference the write-up, PLEASE DO!!!  There are others here who would be
grateful for the knowledge (myself included).

73,
Mark - N9WYS

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com  On Behalf Of wa6jbd

I've managed to get 900 Spectras to receive in the 902 range. There are
three steps, and it's not necessarily a 'beginner project'.  

1. Hack bandlimits to allow programming

2. Modify VCO

3. Retune front end filter. 

It's possible to meet or exceed rated performance after modification, but
takes patience, a steady hand, and a network analyzer or spectrum analyzer
and tracking generator. 

I'm toying with the idea of putting together an article on how to do it,
complete with pictures it there is sufficient interest. In the meantime, I'd
be happy to supply a description of what's involved to anyone who'd like to
give it a try. 

Mel - WA6JBD


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, James Adkins adkins.ja...@...
wrote:

 Looking for anyone that's actually used a Motorola Spectra to RX on
902.xxx
 MHz for a repeater receiver
 Has anyone on the list tried this?  Looking for something besides the
 standard maxtrac option.
 -- 
 James Adkins, KB0NHX
 Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
 
 Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
 www.nixahams.net
 
 The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
 only $1.00 per month)



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-21 Thread John Gleichweit
I'll second the motion for a write-up. If you have high-rez pictures, that'll 
help even more. I have 2 900MHz A5 Spectras that I want to tweak into the 902 
band. 

 -- 
John Smokey Behr Gleichweit FF1/EMT, CCNA, MCSE
IPN-CAL023 N6FOG UP Fresno Sub MP183.5 ECV1852
List Owner x10, Moderator x9 CalEMA 51-507
http://smokeybehr.blogspot.com
http://www.myspace.com/smokeybehr



- Original Message 
 From: Mark n9...@ameritech.net
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sat, November 21, 2009 6:34:32 PM
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's
 
 Mel,
 
 Reference the write-up, PLEASE DO!!!  There are others here who would be
 grateful for the knowledge (myself included).
 
 73,
 Mark - N9WYS
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com  On Behalf Of wa6jbd
 
 I've managed to get 900 Spectras to receive in the 902 range. There are
 three steps, and it's not necessarily a 'beginner project'.  
 
 1. Hack bandlimits to allow programming
 
 2. Modify VCO
 
 3. Retune front end filter. 
 
 It's possible to meet or exceed rated performance after modification, but
 takes patience, a steady hand, and a network analyzer or spectrum analyzer
 and tracking generator. 
 
 I'm toying with the idea of putting together an article on how to do it,
 complete with pictures it there is sufficient interest. In the meantime, I'd
 be happy to supply a description of what's involved to anyone who'd like to
 give it a try. 
 
 Mel - WA6JBD
 
 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, James Adkins 
 wrote:
 
  Looking for anyone that's actually used a Motorola Spectra to RX on
 902.xxx
  MHz for a repeater receiver
  Has anyone on the list tried this?  Looking for something besides the
  standard maxtrac option.
  -- 
  James Adkins, KB0NHX
  Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
  
  Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
  www.nixahams.net
  
  The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
  only $1.00 per month)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's

2009-11-21 Thread James Adkins
I've done quite a bit with the Spectras; hacked the software, re-tuned the
VCO after modifying, re-capped them, etc.  I think they're great radios.
Just thought since it's difficult / impossible to get maxtrac filters, and
knowing how good the Spectra receivers are, they'd be a nice alternative to
go with a Motorola Nuc as a receiver.

Not sure that there is COR present on the 15-pin accessory pin, but seems
like when I looked at that before there wasn't.  I'm sure that can be found
somewhere inside the rig, though.

Can you e-mail me off the list with what you have?

Thanks,

James

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:35 PM, John Gleichweit
smokeyb...@sbcglobal.netwrote:



 I'll second the motion for a write-up. If you have high-rez pictures,
 that'll help even more. I have 2 900MHz A5 Spectras that I want to tweak
 into the 902 band.

 --
 John Smokey Behr Gleichweit FF1/EMT, CCNA, MCSE
 IPN-CAL023 N6FOG UP Fresno Sub MP183.5 ECV1852
 List Owner x10, Moderator x9 CalEMA 51-507
 http://smokeybehr.blogspot.com
 http://www.myspace.com/smokeybehr

 - Original Message 
  From: Mark n9...@ameritech.net n9wys%40ameritech.net
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sat, November 21, 2009 6:34:32 PM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola Spectra 900's
 
  Mel,
 
  Reference the write-up, PLEASE DO!!! There are others here who would be
  grateful for the knowledge (myself included).
 
  73,
  Mark - N9WYS

 
  -Original Message-
  From: 
  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.comOn 
  Behalf Of wa6jbd
 
  I've managed to get 900 Spectras to receive in the 902 range. There are
  three steps, and it's not necessarily a 'beginner project'.
 
  1. Hack bandlimits to allow programming
 
  2. Modify VCO
 
  3. Retune front end filter.
 
  It's possible to meet or exceed rated performance after modification, but
  takes patience, a steady hand, and a network analyzer or spectrum
 analyzer
  and tracking generator.
 
  I'm toying with the idea of putting together an article on how to do it,
  complete with pictures it there is sufficient interest. In the meantime,
 I'd
  be happy to supply a description of what's involved to anyone who'd like
 to
  give it a try.
 
  Mel - WA6JBD
 
 
  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com,
 James Adkins
  wrote:
  
   Looking for anyone that's actually used a Motorola Spectra to RX on
  902.xxx
   MHz for a repeater receiver
   Has anyone on the list tried this? Looking for something besides the
   standard maxtrac option.
   --
   James Adkins, KB0NHX
   Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)
  
   Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
   www.nixahams.net
  
   The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness!
 (Well,
   only $1.00 per month)
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 

 




-- 
James Adkins, KB0NHX
Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN)

Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council
www.nixahams.net

The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - There is no charge for awesomeness! (Well,
only $1.00 per month)