Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption

2004-06-08 Thread Mike Pugh


bredalrv1 wrote:
> Thanks Everyone for the help I appreciated it a lot sounds very 
> expensive for the Motorola SecureNet. I have Contacted Transcrypt 
> and they said That there SC20-DES Encryption Board would work 
> through a Repeater without having to install one on the Repeater 
> Site. just wanted to get your guys opinion on it. They said there is 
> as Secure as Motorola DES-XL?

It has been several years since I sold their stuff, so my memory is a 
bit fuzzy, but Transcrypt has several layers of scrambling that range 
from simple audio inversion, all the way to full blown digital audio 
rolling code scrambling. They do nothing to the carrier, all of their 
products deal strictly with the audio. That, in a nut shell is the 
difference between "encryption" and "scrambling" They really are two 
separate things..

Advantages to scrambling?

1). All of their scrambled audio will pass through a "regular" repeater 
as they have told you, since the carrier remains exactly the same as far 
as the repeater is concerned.
2). They make their products for darned near every radio known to man. 
If you are integrating scrambling into an existing system, it makes it a 
lot easier to sell, since the customer does not have to throw away all 
of their radios and start over.
3). If you buy their higher tier product, they have some really neat 
features such as OTAR, radio stun, code reset, and a bunch more neat stuff.

One major thing to be aware of is that audio scrambling is a bit harder 
to "sync" up upon keyup than digital encryption. We're talking 
milliseconds here, but that delay can easily turn a radio transmission 
of "DON'T SHOOT" into "SHOOT". In 1999 when I sold their product to a 
large police department, I sent them a couple of demo radios for them to 
install demo boards into. From the beginning, all parties knew that we 
were talking about their highest (at the time) level of scrambler, I 
believe it was called the "460" as I recall. When they sent the demos 
back to me, we showed them around, and eventually made the sale. Later 
on, we discovered that they had sent the demos in with a much lower 
level of scrambler in them, because since they were demo'ing the radios, 
they wanted to demo a lower tier of scrambling, since it "synched up 
faster. We ended up programming delays into the system to accommodate 
the keyup time of the radio, the "sync up" time of the portable, and the 
MDC1200 unit ID packets which HAD to go first. All in all, they system 
worked well, and the PD was happy, but their expectations were 
originally to "go scrambled" and stay that way. With all of the extra 
overhead at the head of each transmission, they ended up staying in the 
clear most of the time unless they had something important to talk about 
that they didn't want on the scanners in the town...
> 
> Thanks Again
>  In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>>DVP is the lowest level of encryption DES/DVP were the 1st types. 
> 
> They found 
> 
>>that there was range problems and the "XL" versions came out. DVP 
> 
> was sold to 
> 
>>the general public, DES was only sold to government agencies. Both 
> 
> do not meet 
> 
>>the current government standards. A conventional repeater will not 
> 
> pass 
> 
>>either you need a "M" repeater setup for digital encryption.
>>
>>   Dale
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption

2004-06-07 Thread Maire Company
send me your email address and info on your plains and I will send you some
info.
thanks   John   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: "bredalrv1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 5:29 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption


> Thanks Everyone for the help I appreciated it a lot sounds very
> expensive for the Motorola SecureNet. I have Contacted Transcrypt
> and they said That there SC20-DES Encryption Board would work
> through a Repeater without having to install one on the Repeater
> Site. just wanted to get your guys opinion on it. They said there is
> as Secure as Motorola DES-XL?
>
> Thanks Again
>  In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > DVP is the lowest level of encryption DES/DVP were the 1st types.
> They found
> > that there was range problems and the "XL" versions came out. DVP
> was sold to
> > the general public, DES was only sold to government agencies. Both
> do not meet
> > the current government standards. A conventional repeater will not
> pass
> > either you need a "M" repeater setup for digital encryption.
> >
> >Dale
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption

2004-06-07 Thread Gregg Lengling
I've used them for Military Applications (ANG) and they work well.


Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57
Member:  ARRL, RSGB, RCA, WERA and ORC
 


-Original Message-
From: bredalrv1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:29 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption

Thanks Everyone for the help I appreciated it a lot sounds very 
expensive for the Motorola SecureNet. I have Contacted Transcrypt 
and they said That there SC20-DES Encryption Board would work 
through a Repeater without having to install one on the Repeater 
Site. just wanted to get your guys opinion on it. They said there is 
as Secure as Motorola DES-XL?

Thanks Again
 In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DVP is the lowest level of encryption DES/DVP were the 1st types. 
They found 
> that there was range problems and the "XL" versions came out. DVP 
was sold to 
> the general public, DES was only sold to government agencies. Both 
do not meet 
> the current government standards. A conventional repeater will not 
pass 
> either you need a "M" repeater setup for digital encryption.
> 
>Dale





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption

2004-06-07 Thread Gregg Lengling
Oops forgot to say with the base encoder you also have Over the Air
Rekeyingdefinitely a nice toy.


Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57
Member:  ARRL, RSGB, RCA, WERA and ORC
 


-Original Message-
From: bredalrv1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:29 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption

Thanks Everyone for the help I appreciated it a lot sounds very 
expensive for the Motorola SecureNet. I have Contacted Transcrypt 
and they said That there SC20-DES Encryption Board would work 
through a Repeater without having to install one on the Repeater 
Site. just wanted to get your guys opinion on it. They said there is 
as Secure as Motorola DES-XL?

Thanks Again
 In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DVP is the lowest level of encryption DES/DVP were the 1st types. 
They found 
> that there was range problems and the "XL" versions came out. DVP 
was sold to 
> the general public, DES was only sold to government agencies. Both 
do not meet 
> the current government standards. A conventional repeater will not 
pass 
> either you need a "M" repeater setup for digital encryption.
> 
>Dale





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption

2004-06-07 Thread bredalrv1
Thanks Everyone for the help I appreciated it a lot sounds very 
expensive for the Motorola SecureNet. I have Contacted Transcrypt 
and they said That there SC20-DES Encryption Board would work 
through a Repeater without having to install one on the Repeater 
Site. just wanted to get your guys opinion on it. They said there is 
as Secure as Motorola DES-XL?

Thanks Again
 In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DVP is the lowest level of encryption DES/DVP were the 1st types. 
They found 
> that there was range problems and the "XL" versions came out. DVP 
was sold to 
> the general public, DES was only sold to government agencies. Both 
do not meet 
> the current government standards. A conventional repeater will not 
pass 
> either you need a "M" repeater setup for digital encryption.
> 
>Dale





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[Repeater-Builder] Re: Question on Motorola encryption

2004-06-07 Thread Coy Hilton
What are you going to use it for? I cant remember but I think that 
the DVP would work through repeaters. As far as DES-XL I don't know. 
I'm versed in DES, as I designed a DES encreption/ decryption modem 
a few years ago for the military. The DES aproach is very likely a 
64 bit serial algorithem with a 128 bit key. You figure out how 
secure it is. I guess you would have to know how the encryption 
is done. I do. Take my word. It's very secure. Enough for the 
military to use.
73 AC0Y
  


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "bredalrv1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Hi, I would like to find out about Motorola Encryption products.
> there seems to be a lot of different models. Like DVP DES-XL and
> more which one would be the most Secure?. Also can they work on a
> Conventional Repeater?
> 
> Thanks





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/