Re: [Repeater-Builder] Replacement Dual-Band Antenna......

2008-11-28 Thread Jim Brown
You may find that a lot better operation will be had with a VHF antenna used as 
a VHF/UHF dual band antenna.  The 1/2 wave VHF dipoles are 3/2 wave on UHF and 
a current feedpoint is the same point on the dipole on VHF as it is on UHF.

My experience has been on a DB-224 type antenna, but I suspect that other 
exposed dipole co-linear antennas would work the same.

Someone here on the group published a pattern on a vertical array of dipoles 
operated on the third harmonic with the wide spacing that would be in effect, 
and it showed many lobes in the vertical pattern.  But it did have one of those 
lobes at the 90 degree broadside elevation to the antenna, and other folks 
reported that they had operated the antenna this way.

I used a DB-224 as a 440 repeater antenna with a 2 meter remote base diplexed 
into the same antenna and was able to use it successfully for several years.  
The range of the 20 watt 440 repeater was about the same as the 2 watt 2 meter 
transmitter on that same antenna.

73 - Jim  W5ZIT

--- On Thu, 11/27/08, Mark Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Replacement Dual-Band Antenna..
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 27, 2008, 4:34 AM











Kevin,

Hey fellow trustee.  My name is Mark  (KB6SRT) and I am the trustee of two 
repeater systems in the Southern California area.  This is just a note to let 
you know that when we were strapped for money in our early years and we only 
had the uhf antenna, I used a Dodge-Phelps 8 bay, dual-eared folded dipole 
array for dual band operation and it worked well until we could get a decent  
dual band antenna.  Though it was a uhf antenna, it resonated on vhf well 
enough and had decent SWR to allow regular use.


The really nice thing about this dual-eared dipole is that it had folded dipole 
on BOTH sides of the pole (dual-eared) so the coverage was quite impressive and 
the input power was up to 250 watts.  So any loss in power was made up for with 
an amp.

 
Just a suggestion that it doesn't HAVE to be a dual band antenna.  Try 
resonating vhf off a uhf antenna.

Hope all works out for you and Happy Thanksgiving!



-- Mark Christian KB6SRT --
Trustee.  - FCARA
146.610 (-) pl 103.5-Echolink Node-44576
445.760 (-) pl 103.5-IRLP Node-3952
[EMAIL PROTECTED] com
 _ 




  


__.

 

















  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Replacement Dual-Band Antenna......

2008-11-28 Thread allan crites
Jim,
Perhaps you can explain to me why there is a propensity or misguided desire for 
hams to use antennas designed for the 2M ( or 150-160 MHz) range as radiators 
of RF energy at frequencies in the 440 MHz range.
Are there no people that realize that even though at 3X the designed 
fundamental operation frequency antennas have a substantial pattern break-up 
which results in diminished radiation in the desired direction, as indicated in 
your comments below of some 10 dB less, plus not considering the phase shift in 
the combining/matching harness in which will be a nightmare to achieve a 
realize able impedance match, not to mention the loss in benefits of the 
positioning of the dipole to the mounting pipe on exposed dipole antennas. 
Use of a fiber glass co-linear designed for 150 MHz at 440 MHz is a worse 
disaster. 
Or use of a 450 designed antenna at 2M.
 Why use an antenna with a 10 dB loss ? Better to use a radiating coax on the 
tower leg and spare the expense of the poor antenna performance if you want 
multi-band operation.
Even those so-called 2M - 450 mobile antennas are no bargain as the 
manufacturer does not dare publish the radiation patterns as no one would buy 
them if they knew of the poor performance. Does any one really believe there is 
no radiation from the 2M portion of a multi- band antenna when operated at 450 
? Or no radiation from the 450 portion of the antenna when operated at 2M?  And 
what is the phase relationship of the radiation on one band to another ? And 
how does it affect the radiation pattern of the other ?
 
WA9ZZU

--- On Fri, 11/28/08, Jim Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

From: Jim Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Replacement Dual-Band Antenna..
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 28, 2008, 8:03 AM










You may find that a lot better operation will be had with a VHF antenna used as 
a VHF/UHF dual band antenna.  The 1/2 wave VHF dipoles are 3/2 wave on UHF and 
a current feedpoint is the same point on the dipole on VHF as it is on UHF.

My experience has been on a DB-224 type antenna, but I suspect that other 
exposed dipole co-linear antennas would work the same.

Someone here on the group published a pattern on a vertical array of dipoles 
operated on the third harmonic with the wide spacing that would be in effect, 
and it showed many lobes in the vertical pattern.  But it did have one of those 
lobes at the 90 degree broadside elevation to the antenna, and other folks 
reported that they had operated the antenna this way.

I used a DB-224 as a 440 repeater antenna with a 2 meter remote base diplexed 
into the same antenna and was able to use it successfully for several years.  
The range of the 20 watt 440 repeater was about the same as the 2 watt 2 meter 
transmitter on that same antenna.

73 - Jim  W5ZIT

--- On Thu, 11/27/08, Mark Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] com wrote:

From: Mark Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Replacement Dual-Band Antenna. .
To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Thursday, November 27, 2008, 4:34 AM




Kevin,

Hey fellow trustee.  My name is Mark  (KB6SRT) and I am the trustee of two 
repeater systems in the Southern California area.  This is just a note to let 
you know that when we were strapped for money in our early years and we only 
had the uhf antenna, I used a Dodge-Phelps 8 bay, dual-eared folded dipole 
array for dual band operation and it worked well until we could get a decent 
dual band antenna.  Though it was a uhf antenna, it resonated on vhf well 
enough and had decent SWR to allow regular use.

The really nice thing about this dual-eared dipole is that it had folded dipole 
on BOTH sides of the pole (dual-eared) so the coverage was quite impressive and 
the input power was up to 250 watts.  So any loss in power was made up for with 
an amp.
 
Just a suggestion that it doesn't HAVE to be a dual band antenna.  Try 
resonating vhf off a uhf antenna.

Hope all works out for you and Happy Thanksgiving!



-- Mark Christian KB6SRT --
Trustee.  - FCARA
146.610 (-) pl 103.5-Echolink Node-44576
445.760 (-) pl 103.5-IRLP Node-3952
[EMAIL PROTECTED] com
 _ 

 













[Repeater-Builder] Replacement Dual-Band Antenna......

2008-11-27 Thread Mark Christian
Kevin,

Hey fellow trustee.  My name is Mark  (KB6SRT) and I am the trustee of two
repeater systems in the Southern California area.  This is just a note to
let you know that when we were strapped for money in our early years and we
only had the uhf antenna, I used a Dodge-Phelps 8 bay, dual-eared folded
dipole array for dual band operation and it worked well until we could get a
decent dual band antenna.  Though it was a uhf antenna, it resonated on vhf
well enough and had decent SWR to allow regular use.

The really nice thing about this dual-eared dipole is that it had folded
dipole on BOTH sides of the pole (dual-eared) so the coverage was quite
impressive and the input power was up to 250 watts.  So any loss in power
was made up for with an amp.

Just a suggestion that it doesn't HAVE to be a dual band antenna.  Try
resonating vhf off a uhf antenna.

Hope all works out for you and Happy Thanksgiving!


-- Mark Christian KB6SRT --
Trustee.  - FCARA
146.610 (-) pl 103.5-Echolink Node-44576
445.760 (-) pl 103.5-IRLP Node-3952
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_