Re: [Repeater-Builder] Side mounted DB-224 for omni coverage?

2005-08-15 Thread Jim B.
kc4fwc wrote:

 Hello Group,
 Have a dual antenna system for a 2M repeater.  Decibel DB-222 top 
 mounted, clears the tower and is oriented for omni-directional 
 coverage.  TX antenna is directly below and is side mounted on the 
 southwest side of the tower.  The antenna is a Celwave PD-340-3 with 
 dipoles oriented around the mast (omni).  It is mounted on the corner 
 (not the face) of Rohn 25-G and is a factory mount and top sway brace 
 from Decibel Products and they recommend this for side mounting DB-
 224's.  The mount lets the antenna extend around 22 inches from the 
 leg of the tower.
 
 I am noticing VERY significant deficiencies in TX coverage back 
 through the tower, even what I would estimate 8 to 10 dB.  In other 
 directions, it seems as if the coverage is as good as can be 
 predicted.
 
 I have heard someone mention that taking all four dipoles on the same 
 side of the mast and directing the elements straight into the tower 
 would create more of an omni pattern.  I can't remember if this was 
 for UHF or VHF.  I would like to eliminate any deep nulls, no more 
 than 3 dB down in any direction if possible.  Will turning all 
 elements towards the tower help my situation?

The issue is how far the antenna is from the tower. You need to be about 
one wavelength away from the tower to get close to an omni pattern from 
a side-mount. Doesn't matter if it's VHF, UHF, SHF, whatever.
Pointing the elements into the tower will give you something funky, 
depending on the shape of the tower and so on.
For a 2M repeater, push the antenna out about 5-6 feet from the tower.

-- 
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Side mounted DB-224 for omni coverage?

2005-08-12 Thread kc4fwc
Hello Group,
Have a dual antenna system for a 2M repeater.  Decibel DB-222 top 
mounted, clears the tower and is oriented for omni-directional 
coverage.  TX antenna is directly below and is side mounted on the 
southwest side of the tower.  The antenna is a Celwave PD-340-3 with 
dipoles oriented around the mast (omni).  It is mounted on the corner 
(not the face) of Rohn 25-G and is a factory mount and top sway brace 
from Decibel Products and they recommend this for side mounting DB-
224's.  The mount lets the antenna extend around 22 inches from the 
leg of the tower.

I am noticing VERY significant deficiencies in TX coverage back 
through the tower, even what I would estimate 8 to 10 dB.  In other 
directions, it seems as if the coverage is as good as can be 
predicted.

I have heard someone mention that taking all four dipoles on the same 
side of the mast and directing the elements straight into the tower 
would create more of an omni pattern.  I can't remember if this was 
for UHF or VHF.  I would like to eliminate any deep nulls, no more 
than 3 dB down in any direction if possible.  Will turning all 
elements towards the tower help my situation?












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Side mounted DB-224 for omni coverage?

2005-08-12 Thread Jamey Wright
We have done that here with a DB-224 and 3 DB-268s and we seem to have a
pretty good omni pattern.  These are side mounted on 6 ft stand-offs on a
Rohn 80 tower.

Jamey Wright
Systems Analyst
Morgan County EMCD 911
Decatur, Al
256-552-0911

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kc4fwc
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 4:08 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Side mounted DB-224 for omni coverage?

Hello Group,
Have a dual antenna system for a 2M repeater.  Decibel DB-222 top 
mounted, clears the tower and is oriented for omni-directional 
coverage.  TX antenna is directly below and is side mounted on the 
southwest side of the tower.  The antenna is a Celwave PD-340-3 with 
dipoles oriented around the mast (omni).  It is mounted on the corner 
(not the face) of Rohn 25-G and is a factory mount and top sway brace 
from Decibel Products and they recommend this for side mounting DB-
224's.  The mount lets the antenna extend around 22 inches from the 
leg of the tower.

I am noticing VERY significant deficiencies in TX coverage back 
through the tower, even what I would estimate 8 to 10 dB.  In other 
directions, it seems as if the coverage is as good as can be 
predicted.

I have heard someone mention that taking all four dipoles on the same 
side of the mast and directing the elements straight into the tower 
would create more of an omni pattern.  I can't remember if this was 
for UHF or VHF.  I would like to eliminate any deep nulls, no more 
than 3 dB down in any direction if possible.  Will turning all 
elements towards the tower help my situation?












 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Side mounted DB-224 for omni coverage?

2005-08-12 Thread James
I think you would need Decibels 5 foot (60) off the tower side mount to 
make a reasonably true omni pattern out of that.

kc4fwc wrote:

Hello Group,
Have a dual antenna system for a 2M repeater.  Decibel DB-222 top 
mounted, clears the tower and is oriented for omni-directional 
coverage.  TX antenna is directly below and is side mounted on the 
southwest side of the tower.  The antenna is a Celwave PD-340-3 with 
dipoles oriented around the mast (omni).  It is mounted on the corner 
(not the face) of Rohn 25-G and is a factory mount and top sway brace 
from Decibel Products and they recommend this for side mounting DB-
224's.  The mount lets the antenna extend around 22 inches from the 
leg of the tower.

I am noticing VERY significant deficiencies in TX coverage back 
through the tower, even what I would estimate 8 to 10 dB.  In other 
directions, it seems as if the coverage is as good as can be 
predicted.

I have heard someone mention that taking all four dipoles on the same 
side of the mast and directing the elements straight into the tower 
would create more of an omni pattern.  I can't remember if this was 
for UHF or VHF.  I would like to eliminate any deep nulls, no more 
than 3 dB down in any direction if possible.  Will turning all 
elements towards the tower help my situation?












 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 


  





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Side mounted DB-224 for omni coverage?

2005-08-12 Thread Russ Stafford
Here is how my DB-224 was done.
You mount it one wave length off the tower
at the transmit frequency. Point all four
dipoles at the tower. Funny how it works 
but it will give you near omni for a pattern.
This is in the standard antenna placement
book for RF engineering.
It works well. I have four in our network like 
this. 1 two meter and 3 222 MHz repeaters.
Good luck and 73,
Russ, W3CH

- Original Message - 
From: kc4fwc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:08 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Side mounted DB-224 for omni coverage?


 Hello Group,
 Have a dual antenna system for a 2M repeater.  Decibel DB-222 top 
 mounted, clears the tower and is oriented for omni-directional 
 coverage.  TX antenna is directly below and is side mounted on the 
 southwest side of the tower.  The antenna is a Celwave PD-340-3 with 
 dipoles oriented around the mast (omni).  It is mounted on the corner 
 (not the face) of Rohn 25-G and is a factory mount and top sway brace 
 from Decibel Products and they recommend this for side mounting DB-
 224's.  The mount lets the antenna extend around 22 inches from the 
 leg of the tower.
 
 I am noticing VERY significant deficiencies in TX coverage back 
 through the tower, even what I would estimate 8 to 10 dB.  In other 
 directions, it seems as if the coverage is as good as can be 
 predicted.
 
 I have heard someone mention that taking all four dipoles on the same 
 side of the mast and directing the elements straight into the tower 
 would create more of an omni pattern.  I can't remember if this was 
 for UHF or VHF.  I would like to eliminate any deep nulls, no more 
 than 3 dB down in any direction if possible.  Will turning all 
 elements towards the tower help my situation?






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Side mounted DB-224 for omni coverage?

2005-08-12 Thread Dave Baughn
Probably mounting it further away from the tower will reduce the nulls. Turning 
the dipoles all one direction into the tower has the effect of directionalizing 
the pattern and pointing it into the null. When you directionalize, you get 
about 9 db gain toward the direction of the dipoles and loose 3 db the other 
way (you still have an average of 6 db). So if you turn the dipoles all toward 
the tower, you should reduce the null by 3 db but you also reduce coverage in 
the other direction by 3 db, assuming everything else remains the same. The 
gain off the sides will not change much and just interpolate in between. I 
would try it because such a big difference between transmit and receive can be 
very annoying. 

For short towers (less than 500 feet or so), I prefer to use the top antenna 
for receive since it is more irritating to be able to hear the repeater and not 
get in than vice-versa.

Dave Baughn
Director of Engineering
The University of Alabama
Center for Public Television and Radio
Box 870150
Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
205.348.8622 cell 205-310-8798
NEW EMAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/12/05 04:08PM 
Hello Group,
Have a dual antenna system for a 2M repeater.  Decibel DB-222 top 
mounted, clears the tower and is oriented for omni-directional 
coverage.  TX antenna is directly below and is side mounted on the 
southwest side of the tower.  The antenna is a Celwave PD-340-3 with 
dipoles oriented around the mast (omni).  It is mounted on the corner 
(not the face) of Rohn 25-G and is a factory mount and top sway brace 
from Decibel Products and they recommend this for side mounting DB-
224's.  The mount lets the antenna extend around 22 inches from the 
leg of the tower.

I am noticing VERY significant deficiencies in TX coverage back 
through the tower, even what I would estimate 8 to 10 dB.  In other 
directions, it seems as if the coverage is as good as can be 
predicted.

I have heard someone mention that taking all four dipoles on the same 
side of the mast and directing the elements straight into the tower 
would create more of an omni pattern.  I can't remember if this was 
for UHF or VHF.  I would like to eliminate any deep nulls, no more 
than 3 dB down in any direction if possible.  Will turning all 
elements towards the tower help my situation?












 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/