On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 09:10:45AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-opencl-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
> >
> > lists pocl as FTBFS from reproducible test results ... which is correct
> > (it does FTBFS on armhf/arm64) but worthless information (so far it
> > never built successfully (due to testsuite failures) on !x86).
> >
> > Where can this be fixed? No, not on the pocl side :-)
>
> we can mark it with a special issue, which causes qa.debian.org to not
> display this ftbfs case. i'm about to enter a plane so I wont do it
> right now, but will do so later, unless someone else will do it til
> then.
However, I don't understand why, given that it seems quite clear to me
that nobody is working on a proper port, you haven't restricted the
architectures it can be built for.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
