[request-sponsor] CR 6890550

2009-10-13 Thread Masayuki Murayama
I'm sorry if it is not a right mailing list for the issue.

I'm the submitter of CR6890550 below. The responsible engineer of the cr
commented that further tests would be required to add the new PCI device
id to bfe driver. I'd like to do what are required, and to send the result,
but there is no mail address to contact the engineer.

 Should I request for sponsor here, or is there another way?

My SCA is OS0107

regards,

Masayuki Murayama

- Original Message -
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:02:58 -0600 (MDT)
From: bugmail-sender at Sun.COM
Subject: CR 6890550 Updated, User 1-5Q-6307 now responsible engineer, P3
 driver/bfe bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device
To: undisclosed-recipients:;


*Synopsis*: bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device

Due to a change requested by User 1-5Q-6307,
User 1-5Q-6307 is now the responsible engineer for:

CR 6890550 changed on Oct 12 2009 by User 1-5Q-6307

=== Field  === New Value = === Old Value 
=

DescriptionNew Note  
 
Responsible Engineer   User 1-5Q-6307  
 
Status 3-Accepted  1-Dispatched  
 
== === ==
=

 
*Change Request ID*: 6890550

*Synopsis*: bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device

  Product: solaris
  Category: driver
  Subcategory: bfe
  Type: Defect
  Subtype: 
  Status: 3-Accepted
  Substatus: 
  Priority: 3-Medium
  Introduced In Release: 
  Introduced In Build: 
  Responsible Engineer: User 1-5Q-6307
  Keywords: opensolaris

=== *Description* ===
=
Category
   solaris/driver (Hardware Support - Devices/Drivers)
Sub-Category
   bfe
Description
   As bfe driver for broadcom bcm4401 fast ethernet nic in snv124
supports only pci14e4,970c device, my bcm4401 based pci add-on card, which pc
i vendor/device id is pci14e4,4401, is not detected right after snv124
installation.
pci14e4,4402 and pci14e4,170c are also known as ids for the bcm4401 nic.
So bfe should support these three devices too, I think
Frequency
   Always
Regression
   No
Steps to Reproduce
   Just install snv124, then see /etc/driver_aliases.
So, following command failed.
 ifconfig bfe0 plumb
Expected Result
   The lines below should be also included in /etc/driver_aliases right after
opensolaris installation.
  bfe pci14e4,4401
  bfe pci14e4,4402
  bfe pci14e4,170c
Actual Result
   installing snv124, there is an entry for bfe below in /etc/driver_aliases
bfe pci14e4,970c
Error Message(s)
   N/A
Test Case
   N/A
Workaround
   do following for my nic card
 update_drv -a -i pci14e4,4401 bfe
Additional configuration information
   the node information in the output of prtconf -v for my bcm4401 based pci
add-on card:
Node 0x1d
assigned-addresses:  82040810..febfc000..
2000
reg:  00040800.....02040810.0
000...2000
compatible: 'pci14e4,4401.14e4.8401.1' + 'pci14e4,4401.14e4.8
401' + 'pci14e4,8401' + 'pci14e4,4401.1' + 'pci14e4,4401' + 'pciclass,02' 
+ 'pciclass,0200'
model:  'Ethernet controller'
power-consumption:  0001.0001
devsel-speed:  
interrupts:  0001
max-latency:  
min-grant:  
subsystem-vendor-id:  14e4
subsystem-id:  8401
unit-address:  '1'
class-code:  0002
revision-id:  0001
vendor-id:  14e4
device-id:  4401
name:  'pci14e4,8401'

*** (#1 of 2): 2009-10-12 13:58:28 GMT+00:00 User 1-F4SZV

I didn't have access to the hardware and that's the reason I didn't add those
 PCI-ID. If you access to the hardware, can you do basic testing and let me kn
ow the result?

*** (#2 of 2): 2009-10-12 16:54:05 GMT+00:00 User 1-5Q-6307


=== *Public Comments* ===
=

=== *Workaround* 
=

=== *Additional Details* 
=
Targeted Release: 
Commit To Fix In Build: 
Fixed In Build: 
Integrated In Build: 
Verified In Build: 
  See Also: 6882713, 6890551
  Duplicate of: 
  Hooks:
Hook1: 
Hook2: 
Hook3: 
Hook4: 
Hook5: 
Hook6: email address omitted
  Program Management: 
  Root Cause: 
  Fix Affects Documentation: No
  Fix Affects Localization: No

=== *History* ===
=
Date Submitted: 2009-10-12 13:58:27 GMT+00:00
Submitted By: User 1-F4SZV

Status ChangedDate 

[request-sponsor] Suspend 6436577

2009-10-13 Thread Jayakara Kini

Hi,

'useradd' is being redesigned.  The project team is taking over the CR.

Regards,
Kini

-- 
Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre
http://blogs.sun.com/jkini


[request-sponsor] Suspend 6436577

2009-10-13 Thread Sasidhar Kasturi
Hello Jayakara,
  Is there anyway in which I can contribute for this?

Regards,
Sasidhar Kasturi,
Phone: +91-916-012-3002
Blog: http://skasturi.wordpress.com/
--
Arise, Awake, Stop not till the goal is reached.
--




On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Jayakara Kini Jayakara.Kini at sun.comwrote:


 Hi,

 'useradd' is being redesigned.  The project team is taking over the CR.

 Regards,
 Kini

 --
 Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre
 http://blogs.sun.com/jkini

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20091013/d6170592/attachment.html


[request-sponsor] CR 6890550

2009-10-13 Thread Garrett D'Amore
Masayuki Murayama wrote:
 I'm sorry if it is not a right mailing list for the issue.

 I'm the submitter of CR6890550 below. The responsible engineer of the cr
 commented that further tests would be required to add the new PCI device
 id to bfe driver. I'd like to do what are required, and to send the result,
 but there is no mail address to contact the engineer.

  Should I request for sponsor here, or is there another way?

 My SCA is OS0107
   

If you run the tests (specifically we need a good NICDRV run), then I'll 
be happy to sponsor your changes.

- Garrett

 regards,

 Masayuki Murayama

 - Original Message -
   
 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:02:58 -0600 (MDT)
 From: bugmail-sender at Sun.COM
 Subject: CR 6890550 Updated, User 1-5Q-6307 now responsible engineer, P3
 driver/bfe bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device
 To: undisclosed-recipients:;


 *Synopsis*: bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device

 Due to a change requested by User 1-5Q-6307,
 User 1-5Q-6307 is now the responsible engineer for:

 CR 6890550 changed on Oct 12 2009 by User 1-5Q-6307

 === Field  === New Value = === Old Value 
 
 =
   
 DescriptionNew Note  
 
  
   
 Responsible Engineer   User 1-5Q-6307  
 
  
   
 Status 3-Accepted  1-Dispatched  
 
  
   
 == === ==
 
 =
   
 
 *Change Request ID*: 6890550

 *Synopsis*: bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device

  Product: solaris
  Category: driver
  Subcategory: bfe
  Type: Defect
  Subtype: 
  Status: 3-Accepted
  Substatus: 
  Priority: 3-Medium
  Introduced In Release: 
  Introduced In Build: 
  Responsible Engineer: User 1-5Q-6307
  Keywords: opensolaris

 === *Description* ===
 
 =
   
 Category
   solaris/driver (Hardware Support - Devices/Drivers)
 Sub-Category
   bfe
 Description
   As bfe driver for broadcom bcm4401 fast ethernet nic in snv124
 supports only pci14e4,970c device, my bcm4401 based pci add-on card, which pc
 
 i vendor/device id is pci14e4,4401, is not detected right after snv124
   
 installation.
 pci14e4,4402 and pci14e4,170c are also known as ids for the bcm4401 nic.
 So bfe should support these three devices too, I think
 Frequency
   Always
 Regression
   No
 Steps to Reproduce
   Just install snv124, then see /etc/driver_aliases.
 So, following command failed.
 ifconfig bfe0 plumb
 Expected Result
   The lines below should be also included in /etc/driver_aliases right after
 opensolaris installation.
  bfe pci14e4,4401
  bfe pci14e4,4402
  bfe pci14e4,170c
 Actual Result
   installing snv124, there is an entry for bfe below in /etc/driver_aliases
 bfe pci14e4,970c
 Error Message(s)
   N/A
 Test Case
   N/A
 Workaround
   do following for my nic card
 update_drv -a -i pci14e4,4401 bfe
 Additional configuration information
   the node information in the output of prtconf -v for my bcm4401 based pci
 add-on card:
Node 0x1d
assigned-addresses:  82040810..febfc000..
 
 2000
   
reg:  00040800.....02040810.0
 
 000...2000
   
compatible: 'pci14e4,4401.14e4.8401.1' + 'pci14e4,4401.14e4.8
 
 401' + 'pci14e4,8401' + 'pci14e4,4401.1' + 'pci14e4,4401' + 'pciclass,02' 
 + 'pciclass,0200'
   
model:  'Ethernet controller'
power-consumption:  0001.0001
devsel-speed:  
interrupts:  0001
max-latency:  
min-grant:  
subsystem-vendor-id:  14e4
subsystem-id:  8401
unit-address:  '1'
class-code:  0002
revision-id:  0001
vendor-id:  14e4
device-id:  4401
name:  'pci14e4,8401'

 *** (#1 of 2): 2009-10-12 13:58:28 GMT+00:00 User 1-F4SZV

 I didn't have access to the hardware and that's the reason I didn't add those
 
  PCI-ID. If you access to the hardware, can you do basic testing and let me kn
 ow the result?
   
 *** (#2 of 2): 2009-10-12 16:54:05 GMT+00:00 User 1-5Q-6307


 === *Public Comments* ===
 
 =
   
 === *Workaround* 
 
 =
   
 === *Additional Details* 
 
 =
   
Targeted Release: 
Commit To Fix In Build: 
Fixed In Build: 
Integrated In Build: 
Verified In Build: 
  See Also: 6882713, 6890551
  Duplicate of: 
  Hooks:
Hook1: 
Hook2: 
Hook3: 
Hook4: 
  

[request-sponsor] CR 6890550

2009-10-13 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Sorry, many engineers are so used to internal people getting bug updates with
visible e-mail addresses and the ability to update bugster directly that they
don't realize external users have neither and get e-mails they can't respond
to, with no clue who to contact to provide more information.

I've cc'ed the responsible engineer, Saurabh, on this e-mail, so you can
communicate further on this issue.

-Alan Coopersmith-   alan.coopersmith at sun.com
 Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering



Masayuki Murayama wrote:
 I'm sorry if it is not a right mailing list for the issue.
 
 I'm the submitter of CR6890550 below. The responsible engineer of the cr
 commented that further tests would be required to add the new PCI device
 id to bfe driver. I'd like to do what are required, and to send the result,
 but there is no mail address to contact the engineer.
 
  Should I request for sponsor here, or is there another way?
 
 My SCA is OS0107
 
 regards,
 
 Masayuki Murayama
 
 - Original Message -
 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:02:58 -0600 (MDT)
 From: bugmail-sender at Sun.COM
 Subject: CR 6890550 Updated, User 1-5Q-6307 now responsible engineer, P3
 driver/bfe bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device
 To: undisclosed-recipients:;


 *Synopsis*: bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device

 Due to a change requested by User 1-5Q-6307,
 User 1-5Q-6307 is now the responsible engineer for:

 CR 6890550 changed on Oct 12 2009 by User 1-5Q-6307

 === Field  === New Value = === Old Value 
 =
 DescriptionNew Note  
  
 Responsible Engineer   User 1-5Q-6307  
  
 Status 3-Accepted  1-Dispatched  
  
 == === ==
 =
 
 *Change Request ID*: 6890550

 *Synopsis*: bfe should support pci14e4,4401 device

  Product: solaris
  Category: driver
  Subcategory: bfe
  Type: Defect
  Subtype: 
  Status: 3-Accepted
  Substatus: 
  Priority: 3-Medium
  Introduced In Release: 
  Introduced In Build: 
  Responsible Engineer: User 1-5Q-6307
  Keywords: opensolaris

 === *Description* ===
 =
 Category
   solaris/driver (Hardware Support - Devices/Drivers)
 Sub-Category
   bfe
 Description
   As bfe driver for broadcom bcm4401 fast ethernet nic in snv124
 supports only pci14e4,970c device, my bcm4401 based pci add-on card, which pc
 i vendor/device id is pci14e4,4401, is not detected right after snv124
 installation.
 pci14e4,4402 and pci14e4,170c are also known as ids for the bcm4401 nic.
 So bfe should support these three devices too, I think
 Frequency
   Always
 Regression
   No
 Steps to Reproduce
   Just install snv124, then see /etc/driver_aliases.
 So, following command failed.
 ifconfig bfe0 plumb
 Expected Result
   The lines below should be also included in /etc/driver_aliases right after
 opensolaris installation.
  bfe pci14e4,4401
  bfe pci14e4,4402
  bfe pci14e4,170c
 Actual Result
   installing snv124, there is an entry for bfe below in /etc/driver_aliases
 bfe pci14e4,970c
 Error Message(s)
   N/A
 Test Case
   N/A
 Workaround
   do following for my nic card
 update_drv -a -i pci14e4,4401 bfe
 Additional configuration information
   the node information in the output of prtconf -v for my bcm4401 based pci
 add-on card:
Node 0x1d
assigned-addresses:  82040810..febfc000..
 2000
reg:  00040800.....02040810.0
 000...2000
compatible: 'pci14e4,4401.14e4.8401.1' + 'pci14e4,4401.14e4.8
 401' + 'pci14e4,8401' + 'pci14e4,4401.1' + 'pci14e4,4401' + 'pciclass,02' 
 + 'pciclass,0200'
model:  'Ethernet controller'
power-consumption:  0001.0001
devsel-speed:  
interrupts:  0001
max-latency:  
min-grant:  
subsystem-vendor-id:  14e4
subsystem-id:  8401
unit-address:  '1'
class-code:  0002
revision-id:  0001
vendor-id:  14e4
device-id:  4401
name:  'pci14e4,8401'

 *** (#1 of 2): 2009-10-12 13:58:28 GMT+00:00 User 1-F4SZV

 I didn't have access to the hardware and that's the reason I didn't add those
  PCI-ID. If you access to the hardware, can you do basic testing and let me kn
 ow the result?
 *** (#2 of 2): 2009-10-12 16:54:05 GMT+00:00 User 1-5Q-6307


 === *Public Comments* ===
 =
 === *Workaround* 
 =
 === *Additional Details*