[request-sponsor] [6421535] [Patch - diff file] ns_none.xml should not disable nis server

2007-12-12 Thread ashwin
Hello

My SCA number is OS0144

I am sending the diff file for patch of the bug 6421535.

Changes have to be made in the file usr/src/cmd/svc/profile/ns_none.xml



--- ns_none.xml.origWed Dec 12 20:29:26 2007
+++ ns_none.xml Wed Dec 12 20:33:00 2007
@@ -45,9 +45,6 @@
service name='network/nis/client' version='1' type='service'
instance name='default' enabled='false'/
/service
-   service name='network/nis/server' version='1' type='service'
-   instance name='default' enabled='false'/
-   /service
service name='network/nis/passwd' version='1' type='service'
instance name='default' enabled='false'/
/service



Description :-
this file is used to disable services. But it should disable only nis
client and should not disable nis server.So the corresponding entry
has to be removed from the xml file.




-- 
Regards
Ashwin Bhat K S
3 year information technology
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KARNATAKA Surathkal
Sun campus ambassador
99644 98351
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 476 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20071212/73f35c3a/attachment.obj


[request-sponsor] Requesting sponsor for CR 4912090: pfzsh should exist

2007-12-12 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 04:18:15PM +0100, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
 
 
 I threw pfzsh together yesterday afternoon using the SFW framework, and
 would like to request a sponsor to evaluate my work and help me get it
 integrated.
 
 I note that the CR is currently assigned to Casper Dik and so he is
 CC'd, but I don't expect that he will necessarily volunteer for the job.
 
 A patch against a sfw-src-b79-20071129.tar.bz2 tree and an x86 package
 are available at http://cr.opensolaris.org/~ceri/cr/4912090/.
 
 
 While you could go ahead and implement this, I am actually working on a 
 different way of implementing this as part of the FGAP project.
 
 The new implementation does away with all the special code in the shells
 needed for pfexec and changes this to essentially become a property of a
 process and the kernel will perform the things needed for pfexec.
 
 This approach fixes many shortcomings of the current implementations:
 
   - no need to modify all the shells for what is essentially a
 Solaris specific function (free support for pftcsh, pfbash,
 pfksh93, pfzsh)
 
   - the ability to intercept exec's which are executed in the guts
 of another program (say /usr/lib/fs/ufs/mount rather than
 /usr/s/bin/mount) to further reduce risk
 
   - automatically inherit the property for subshells spawned from
 an editor, regardless of $SHELL settings
 
 
 In general, if a bug as a responsible engineer listed, that person is
 supposed to be working on the bug and working on it without contacting the
 RE first may very well lead to a duplication of effort.

That's cool; as I said, it was only a few hours yesterday afternoon
which I kind of enjoyed.  The new approach sounds cool; I'm
interested how it allows a user to stop exerting a profile but I'll
follow the mailing lists when they appear.

Cheers,

Ceri
-- 
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
  -- Moliere
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20071212/4d143ccc/attachment.bin


[request-sponsor] utility:sys_maintenance

2007-12-12 Thread Jayakara Kini


I'll sponsor this.

~Kini

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:26 -, Sasidhar Kasturi wrote:

}Respected Sir/Madam,
} Sorry.. I forgot to give my reference numebr in the previous mail
}...
}
}My reference number is: OS0173
}
} I am working on  Bug id:6436577 and understood the problem .. Able
}to reproduce the bug.. Find the problem and able to add code to solve it ..
}
}I had done some testing and its working fine .. I think i am ready to put
}back the code.. Please assign me a sponsor for further procedure..
}
}
}Thanking you,
}

-- 
Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre
http://blogs.sun.com/jkini



[request-sponsor] [6463379] sponsor request

2007-12-12 Thread Jayakara Kini

I'll sponsor this.

~Kini


On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:59 -, ashwin wrote:

}hello all
}
}I wish to work on the bug 6463379.
}
}Bug Description:
}
}
}Overenthusiastic error message in svccfg:
}svccfg can say
}svccfg: Refresh of
}svc:/milestone/sysconfig:svc:/milestone/sysconfig:default failed:
}entity not found.
}It means svc:/milestone/sysconfig:default .
}
}
}Additional string is being printed.The patch is as below.
}
}--- svccfg_libscf.c.orig   Wed Dec 12 20:38:52 2007
}+++ svccfg_libscf.cWed Dec 12 21:59:23 2007
}@@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@
}   (void) strcpy(name_buf, ?);
}
}   warn(gettext(
}-  Refresh of %s:%s failed: %s.\n), fmri,
}+  Refresh of %s failed: %s.\n),
}   name_buf, scf_strerror(scfe));
}   }
}   }
}
}I would like to request a sponsor to evaluate my work and help me get it
}integrated into the next build.
}
}
}My contributor agreement # is OS0144
}
}Thank You in advance.
}
}

-- 
Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre
http://blogs.sun.com/jkini



[request-sponsor] [6368560] request sponsor

2007-12-12 Thread Mike Kupfer
 Here is the patch for the bug 6368560
 
 Bug Description:
 extra backslashes in RB_PROTOTYPE

This bug is in code that Solaris gets from upstream developers.  The
team that owns the code in Solaris has said that they would prefer that
the fix happen upstream.  Solaris will get the fix the next time the
team synchronizes with the upstream code.

So I'm afraid this isn't really suitable for a fix through
request-sponsor.

sorry,
mike




[request-sponsor] 6634079

2007-12-12 Thread Mike Gerdts
John Plocher has offered to ARC-sponsor this CR for me[1].

6634079 man should take hints from PATH when MANPATH not set

Draft one-pager posted to opensolaris-code[2] and webrev is
available[3].  Initial discussion on this happened in another
thread[4].

1.http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-code/2007-December/006565.html
2.http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-code/2007-December/006683.html
3.http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mgerdts/manpath-from-path/
4.http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-code/2007-November/006390.html

Contributor ID is OS0018.

-- 
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/