Re: Upgrade from 1.6.22 to 2.5.2 fails, using PostgreSQL / Ubuntu 12.04.4

2015-12-14 Thread Christian Hammond
I'm sorry, Oliver. With the holidays coming up and some premium support
stuff on my plate, I've had absolutely no time to look at this. I'll try
soon, but I'm so swamped.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Oliver Fasterling 
wrote:

> Hi Christian,
>
> Just checking in. Were the dumps that you requested helpful?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Oliver
>
>
> On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 10:47:57 AM UTC-6, Oliver Fasterling
> wrote:
>
>> Attached are the dumps you requested. Thank you for looking into this.
>>
>> Oliver
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 4:09:05 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi Oliver,
>>
>> This is definitely a different problem than the ones you found, but it is
>> strange.. The stored schema should have had some state in there for the new
>> FileDiffData table, but it's not there I guess.
>>
>> Can you send me a dump of the schema of your database (no content), and a
>> second dump containing the content of your django_project_version and
>> django_evolution tables?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
>> Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
>> Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Oliver Fasterling 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I attempted to upgrade our Reviewboard 1.6.22 to 2.5.2 (latest version).
>> I followed the steps documented in the upgrade guide, but failed with some
>> errors.
>>
>> I searched the mailing lists and found two articles which seem to match
>> the errors that I am getting.
>>
>> https://goo.gl/VSbjds
>>
>> https://goo.gl/EpoghP
>>
>> The first article seems to isolate the culprit as a discrepancy of the
>> engine type found on MySQL tables, where there is a mix of MyISAM and
>> InnoDB types. Normalizing these to a single type fixed the issue. Found a
>> few other articles with that suggest the same fix. However, we use
>> PostgresSQL. From my understanding, there is a single engine type in
>> postgresql, and so the fix above does not apply.
>>
>> The second article talks about a bug in the Django Evolution package. I
>> ran the update command, but it was a moot action since it had already
>> downloaded the most recent version during the full upgrade.
>>
>> I considered running an upgrade to an earlier version, like 2.0.x but
>> then I found more articles where the upgrade also fails for them.
>>
>> Any assistance would be much appreciated.
>>
>> The output of my upgrade is shown below.
>>
>>
>> root@reviewboard:~# easy_install -U ReviewBoard
>> Searching for ReviewBoard
>> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
>> Best match: ReviewBoard 2.5.2
>> Downloading https://
>> pypi.python.org/packages/2.7/R/ReviewBoard/ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.7.egg#md5=58b2dbe01761a1f3d398381130e75d26
>> Processing ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.7.egg
>> creating /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.
>> 7.egg
>> Extracting ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.7.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-
>> packages
>> Removing ReviewBoard 1.6.22.dev from easy-install.pth file
>> Adding ReviewBoard 2.5.2 to easy-install.pth file
>> Installing rbssh script to /usr/local/bin
>> Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin
>>
>>
>> Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.
>> 7.egg
>> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
>> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.9/
>> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/django-evolution/0.7/
>> Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
>> Searching for Whoosh>=2.6
>> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Whoosh/
>> Best match: Whoosh 2.7.0
>> Downloading https://
>> pypi.python.org/packages/source/W/Whoosh/Whoosh-2.7.0.zip#md5=7abfd970f16fadc7311960f3fa0bc7a9
>> Processing Whoosh-2.7.0.zip
>> Running Whoosh-2.7.0/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-
>> 0wY0qe/Whoosh-2.7.0/egg-dist-tmp-yeD4wW
>> warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory 'tests'
>> warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory 'benchmark'
>> warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory 'docs'
>> warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory 'files'
>> warning: no files found matching '*.py' under directory 'files'
>> warning: no files found matching '*.jpg' under directory 'files'
>> Adding Whoosh 2.7.0 to easy-install.pth file
>>
>>
>> Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Whoosh-2.7.0-py2.7.egg
>> Searching for Pygments>=1.6
>> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Pygments/
>> Best match: Pygments 2.0.2
>> Downloading https://
>> pypi.python.org/packages/source/P/Pygments/Pygments-2.0.2.tar.gz#md5=238587a1370d62405edabd0794b3ec4a
>> Processing Pygments-2.0.2.tar.gz
>> Running Pygments-2.0.2/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install
>> 

Re: RB 2.5 and Comment Categorization extension

2015-12-14 Thread Ken Erickson
Downloading
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/rbcommenttype/1.0/rbcommenttype-1.0.1-py2.7.egg#md5=a4738481f293d379ed9dfe0609a2d4d0
error: md5 validation failed for rbcommenttype-1.0.1-py2.7.egg; possible
download problem?


On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:17 PM David Trowbridge  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just pushed an update to the comment categorization extension which
> should fix the issue. Can you please try again?
>
> Thanks,
> -David
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:33 PM Ken Erickson  wrote:
>
>> I have the same problem (and it also was the same under 2.0.x version as
>> well before I upgraded to 2.5.2).
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 3:21:06 PM UTC-7, Paul Wolf wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm having problems getting this extension working on a new RB 2.5
>>> installation.  I'm able to install the extension, enable it, and configure
>>> some comment types.  However, when I go to add a review comment, the Type
>>> 'select' has no values.  I've tried restarting my server but that didn't
>>> help. Has anyone else had problems using this extension with RB 2.5?
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>
>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> -David
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/uXxkNePzSTs/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Upgrade from 1.6.22 to 2.5.2 fails, using PostgreSQL / Ubuntu 12.04.4

2015-12-14 Thread Oliver Fasterling
Hi Christian, 

Just checking in. Were the dumps that you requested helpful?

Thanks,

Oliver

On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 10:47:57 AM UTC-6, Oliver Fasterling 
wrote:
>
> Attached are the dumps you requested. Thank you for looking into this.
>
> Oliver
>
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 4:09:05 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Oliver,
>
> This is definitely a different problem than the ones you found, but it is 
> strange.. The stored schema should have had some state in there for the new 
> FileDiffData table, but it's not there I guess.
>
> Can you send me a dump of the schema of your database (no content), and a 
> second dump containing the content of your django_project_version and 
> django_evolution tables?
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
> Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Oliver Fasterling  
> wrote:
>
> I attempted to upgrade our Reviewboard 1.6.22 to 2.5.2 (latest version). I 
> followed the steps documented in the upgrade guide, but failed with some 
> errors.
>
> I searched the mailing lists and found two articles which seem to match 
> the errors that I am getting. 
>
> https://goo.gl/VSbjds
>
> https://goo.gl/EpoghP
>
> The first article seems to isolate the culprit as a discrepancy of the 
> engine type found on MySQL tables, where there is a mix of MyISAM and 
> InnoDB types. Normalizing these to a single type fixed the issue. Found a 
> few other articles with that suggest the same fix. However, we use 
> PostgresSQL. From my understanding, there is a single engine type in 
> postgresql, and so the fix above does not apply.
>
> The second article talks about a bug in the Django Evolution package. I 
> ran the update command, but it was a moot action since it had already 
> downloaded the most recent version during the full upgrade.
>
> I considered running an upgrade to an earlier version, like 2.0.x but then 
> I found more articles where the upgrade also fails for them.
>
> Any assistance would be much appreciated.
>
> The output of my upgrade is shown below.
>
>
> root@reviewboard:~# easy_install -U ReviewBoard
> Searching for ReviewBoard
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
> Best match: ReviewBoard 2.5.2
> Downloading https://
> pypi.python.org/packages/2.7/R/ReviewBoard/ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.7.egg#md5=58b2dbe01761a1f3d398381130e75d26
> Processing ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.7.egg
> creating /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.
> 7.egg
> Extracting ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.7.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-
> packages
> Removing ReviewBoard 1.6.22.dev from easy-install.pth file
> Adding ReviewBoard 2.5.2 to easy-install.pth file
> Installing rbssh script to /usr/local/bin
> Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin
>
>
> Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.2-py2.
> 7.egg
> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/Djblets/0.9/
> Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/django-evolution/0.7/
> Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> Searching for Whoosh>=2.6
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Whoosh/
> Best match: Whoosh 2.7.0
> Downloading https://
> pypi.python.org/packages/source/W/Whoosh/Whoosh-2.7.0.zip#md5=7abfd970f16fadc7311960f3fa0bc7a9
> Processing Whoosh-2.7.0.zip
> Running Whoosh-2.7.0/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-
> 0wY0qe/Whoosh-2.7.0/egg-dist-tmp-yeD4wW
> warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory 'tests'
> warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory 'benchmark'
> warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory 'docs'
> warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory 'files'
> warning: no files found matching '*.py' under directory 'files'
> warning: no files found matching '*.jpg' under directory 'files'
> Adding Whoosh 2.7.0 to easy-install.pth file
>
>
> Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Whoosh-2.7.0-py2.7.egg
> Searching for Pygments>=1.6
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Pygments/
> Best match: Pygments 2.0.2
> Downloading https://
> pypi.python.org/packages/source/P/Pygments/Pygments-2.0.2.tar.gz#md5=238587a1370d62405edabd0794b3ec4a
> Processing Pygments-2.0.2.tar.gz
> Running Pygments-2.0.2/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-
> MT7Fm3/Pygments-2.0.2/egg-dist-tmp-WGJV2n
> Removing Pygments 1.5 from easy-install.pth file
> Adding Pygments 2.0.2 to easy-install.pth file
> Installing pygmentize script to /usr/local/bin
>
>
> Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Pygments-2.0.2-py2.7.egg
> Searching for pycrypto>=2.6
> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/pycrypto/
> Best match: pycrypto 2.6.1
> Downloading https://
> pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pycrypto/pycrypto-2.6.1.tar.gz#md5=55a61a054aa66812daf5161a0d5d7eda
> Processing pycrypto-2.6.1.tar.gz
> 

Re: RB 2.5 and Comment Categorization extension

2015-12-14 Thread David Trowbridge
Hi,

I just pushed an update to the comment categorization extension which
should fix the issue. Can you please try again?

Thanks,
-David

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:33 PM Ken Erickson  wrote:

> I have the same problem (and it also was the same under 2.0.x version as
> well before I upgraded to 2.5.2).
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 3:21:06 PM UTC-7, Paul Wolf wrote:
>>
>> I'm having problems getting this extension working on a new RB 2.5
>> installation.  I'm able to install the extension, enable it, and configure
>> some comment types.  However, when I go to add a review comment, the Type
>> 'select' has no values.  I've tried restarting my server but that didn't
>> help. Has anyone else had problems using this extension with RB 2.5?
>> Thanks.
>>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-- 
-David

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.