Re: Review board stopped working after OS upgrade

[noreply optimize]

Also, pip is using python 2.7 only. I just ran one command and got below 
output.

python -m pip --version
pip 20.3.4 from /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip (python 2.7)

On Thursday, 16 November, 2023 at 10:02:06 pm UTC+5:30 noreply optimize 
wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> I tried to install six, but its not working and I am getting below error. 
> Any suggestions what should I do at this point ?
> I already checked and found that there was no special command used to 
> install six.
>
> DEPRECATION: Python 2.7 reached the end of its life on January 1st, 2020. 
> Please upgrade your Python as Python 2.7 is no longer maintained. pip 21.0 
> will drop support for Python 2.7 in January 2021. More details about Python 
> 2 support in pip can be found at 
> https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/development/release-process/#python-2-support 
> pip 21.0 will remove support for this functionality.
> WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=4, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
> status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
> aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
> WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=3, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
> status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
> aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
> WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=2, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
> status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
> aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
> WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=1, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
> status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
> aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
> WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=0, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
> status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
> aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
> ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement six (from 
> versions: none)
> ERROR: No matching distribution found for six
>
> On Wednesday, 15 November, 2023 at 10:34:19 am UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge 
> wrote:
>
>> You should be able to just use "pip install six". I don't know exactly 
>> how Ubuntu 18 is set up, so if that's not working one thing to check is 
>> that "pip" corresponds to python 2.7. There may be a specific pip2.7 
>> command that you need to use.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:17 AM noreply optimize <
>> noreply...@promaxsaas.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Can anyone help me to fix above errors and make review board working ?
>>>
>>> On Monday, 13 November, 2023 at 4:34:39 pm UTC+5:30 noreply optimize 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi David,

 Could you please help me to fix above error ? I tried to install six / 
 upgrade paramiko using pip, but no luck.

 On Friday, 10 November, 2023 at 4:14:10 pm UTC+5:30 noreply optimize 
 wrote:

> I ran the command pip list and found below differences.
>
> Ubuntu 18 (working VM) Ubuntu 20 (non-working VM)
>
> ReviewBoard 2.0.27 ReviewBoard 2.0.27 
> setuptools  39.2.0 setuptools  39.2.0
> six 1.11.0 six missing
> RBTools 0.7.11 RBTools 0.7.11
> paramiko2.10.2 paramiko2.10.2
>
> six has been missing. How to install it ?
>
> On Friday, 10 November, 2023 at 2:55:13 am UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge 
> wrote:
>
>> If installed via pip, you should be able to use "pip list" to see 
>> what version you have.
>>
>> From the errors, it seems like the "paramiko" library was upgraded to 
>> a version that depends on "six", but "six" is not installed. I'd suggest 
>> looking through the paramiko release notes and installing whatever 
>> version 
>> was before that dependency was added.
>>
>> 2.0.27 is very old at this point. Obviously your priority is getting 
>> things back up and running, but I'd suggest upgrading to a modern 
>> version 
>> when you can.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 2:05 PM noreply optimize <
>> noreply...@promaxsaas.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Before OS upgrade it was  2.0.27. After upgrading OS, I am unable to 
>>> browse to review board site where version can be seen. Is there any 
>>> command 
>>> to check currently installed version ? If it's not upgraded, it should 
>>> be  
>>> 2.0.27.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, 9 November, 2023 at 9:21:53 pm UTC+5:30 David 
>>> Trowbridge wrote:
>>>
 What version of Review Board are you running?

 David

 On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:51 AM noreply optimize <
 noreply...@promaxsaas.com> wrote:

Re: Review board stopped working after OS upgrade

[noreply optimize]

Hi David,

I tried to install six, but its not working and I am getting below error. 
Any suggestions what should I do at this point ?
I already checked and found that there was no special command used to 
install six.

DEPRECATION: Python 2.7 reached the end of its life on January 1st, 2020. 
Please upgrade your Python as Python 2.7 is no longer maintained. pip 21.0 
will drop support for Python 2.7 in January 2021. More details about Python 
2 support in pip can be found at 
https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/development/release-process/#python-2-support 
pip 21.0 will remove support for this functionality.
WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=4, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=3, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=2, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=1, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=0, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None, 
status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connection 
aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement six (from 
versions: none)
ERROR: No matching distribution found for six

On Wednesday, 15 November, 2023 at 10:34:19 am UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge 
wrote:

> You should be able to just use "pip install six". I don't know exactly how 
> Ubuntu 18 is set up, so if that's not working one thing to check is that 
> "pip" corresponds to python 2.7. There may be a specific pip2.7 command 
> that you need to use.
>
> David
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:17 AM noreply optimize <
> noreply...@promaxsaas.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Can anyone help me to fix above errors and make review board working ?
>>
>> On Monday, 13 November, 2023 at 4:34:39 pm UTC+5:30 noreply optimize 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Could you please help me to fix above error ? I tried to install six / 
>>> upgrade paramiko using pip, but no luck.
>>>
>>> On Friday, 10 November, 2023 at 4:14:10 pm UTC+5:30 noreply optimize 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 I ran the command pip list and found below differences.

 Ubuntu 18 (working VM) Ubuntu 20 (non-working VM)

 ReviewBoard 2.0.27 ReviewBoard 2.0.27 
 setuptools  39.2.0 setuptools  39.2.0
 six 1.11.0 six missing
 RBTools 0.7.11 RBTools 0.7.11
 paramiko2.10.2 paramiko2.10.2

 six has been missing. How to install it ?

 On Friday, 10 November, 2023 at 2:55:13 am UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge 
 wrote:

> If installed via pip, you should be able to use "pip list" to see what 
> version you have.
>
> From the errors, it seems like the "paramiko" library was upgraded to 
> a version that depends on "six", but "six" is not installed. I'd suggest 
> looking through the paramiko release notes and installing whatever 
> version 
> was before that dependency was added.
>
> 2.0.27 is very old at this point. Obviously your priority is getting 
> things back up and running, but I'd suggest upgrading to a modern version 
> when you can.
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 2:05 PM noreply optimize <
> noreply...@promaxsaas.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Before OS upgrade it was  2.0.27. After upgrading OS, I am unable to 
>> browse to review board site where version can be seen. Is there any 
>> command 
>> to check currently installed version ? If it's not upgraded, it should 
>> be  
>> 2.0.27.
>>
>> On Thursday, 9 November, 2023 at 9:21:53 pm UTC+5:30 David Trowbridge 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What version of Review Board are you running?
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 8:51 AM noreply optimize <
>>> noreply...@promaxsaas.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi All,

 I have a Ubuntu 18 LTS machine running review board version 2.0.27 
 without any issues. Since, Ubuntu 18 has become EOL I upgraded the 
 machine 
 to Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS. As a result, all packages on machines including 
 python, php, mysql and other tools along with dependencies either have 
 been 
 upgraded or EOL 

Any pre-commit svn hook python script that checks for an approved review?

['ferna...@yahoo.es' via Review Board Community]

Hello,
I'm trying to implement a svn pre-commit hook script that checks whether 
this commit has been previously reviewed (ship-it) but without luck.
I looked at the script on 'A pre-commit svn hook that forces approved 
review to commit. | Review Request | Review Board 
' but the script does not 
work/compile.

I am sure this kind of script should be somewhere available. Anyone can 
help me?

Thanks and regards,
Fernando

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/9c62eb6f-8829-4c1d-b38e-e7641016568dn%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Unable to add Trello integration

['ferna...@yahoo.es' via Review Board Community]

Hi Christian,
I'm just wondering if this integration issue is solved in new 
'rbintegrations 3.1.1'. I've just installed it under 'Review Board 5.0.2', 
now I do get a field 'Trello cards' under Testing Done' but I'm not able to 
add any card. Any text (card title or URL to the card) I type in the 
'Trello cards' field disappears after pressing OK.
Just to clarify, I deleted the old Trello integration, I installed it back 
again and I created a new review...

Am I doing something wrong? Is the integration issue solved?

Thanks,
Fernando

On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 9:54:49 AM UTC+1 Guerrero, Fernando wrote:

> Great to hear! :)
> Fernando
>
> El vie., nov. 3, 2023 a 4:11, Christian Hammond
>  escribió:
>
> Hi Fernando,
>
> We have this fixed internally and will be getting a release out once we 
> address a couple of additional issues.
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:25 PM 'ferna...@yahoo.es' via Review Board 
> Community  wrote:
>
> Hello Christian,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply. That's what I was afraid of...
> Take a look at this:
>
> https://community.developer.atlassian.com/t/trello-tokens-are-getting-longer/62964
>
> Ok, looking forward to the fix.
> Regards,
> Fernando
>
> On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 4:21:13 AM UTC+2 Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Fernando,
>
> It does sound like a field length issue. We might need to make some 
> changes to the Trello integration. Let us look into this and see if we can 
> get a fix out for the next release.
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:07 AM 'ferna...@yahoo.es' via Review Board 
> Community  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are starting to use Review Board within my organization... We are 
> trying to integrate Trello within Review Board but it looks that it does 
> not work... According to the documentation, I should get a "Trello Cards" 
> field below the "Testing Done" field but no new field appears on a new 
> review request...
>
> I realize that when creating the Trello API Key, the token generated is 
> much longer (12 chars longer to be precise) than what I can paste on the 
> field "Trello API Token".
>
> Is there a problem with the length of the API tokens? Why the "Trello 
> Cards" field does not appear on a new review request?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Fernando
>
> -- 
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/7857acb7-a7e7-48cb-b5d0-da9bf4aa0cd6n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> 
> .
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
> -- 
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/1b151601-a576-46fc-ba38-9378dc2cc25cn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> 
> .
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
> -- 
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> --- 
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
> Google Groups "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/w6pwKrinOvI/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CAE7Vnd%3D2FB8k2%2BFsxtLmAO02vThpd9MO1rggUYPqJOMFYK%2BnjQ%40mail.gmail.com
>  
>