Re: Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

[daniel . forumsmail]

Thank you for all your efforts and also that you try to keep on! You have 
my sympathy and understanding for not mentioning anything about something 
concerning the concept of a timeframe!


Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2018 19:23:09 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:18 PM > 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> would you maybe have had the possibility to look into a rpm for EPEL7? 
>> (not sure about either grammar or EPEL naming ... i think i am asking for 
>> something i can install via yum :)[...]
>>
> Getting this working on RHEL/CentOS 7 is something I very much want to do, 
> but please understand that I do this in my spare time. I'm not paid to work 
> on ReviewBoard at all. I have ReviewBoard 3.0 now available in Fedora 28 
> and I am looking into getting it working on EPEL 7, but I won't commit to 
> any particular timeframe, sorry.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:18 PM  wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
>
> would you maybe have had the possibility to look into a rpm for EPEL7?
> (not sure about either grammar or EPEL naming ... i think i am asking for
> something i can install via yum :)
>
> I was just asking something in a different thread which got a nice and
> comprehensive reply by Christian Hammond ... also concerning a RB 3.x for
> yum ... quoting from (
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reviewboard-dev/2MuigbF_-X8/wU-aPDPKBgAJ)
>
>
>> For c), I'm not sure of the current status there. This is not a Review
>> Board issue exactly, but rather a packaging issue, which I think is being
>> solved now? Basically, we need some older versions of some modules for very
>> good reasons I don't want to go into at the moment (various
>> compatibility... things...) and this makes packaging a bit harder. I think
>> that's being addressed through a new modular packaging system in Fedora.
>> Stephen can go into details more.
>>
>
> This quote is about helping Reviewboard 3.x being made available for
> Redhat rpm yum stuff ... as he mentioned that you might comment on that,
> i'd like to take the opportunity to ask you about it :)
>
> Sadly, i am just a consumer and probably not versed enough to be helpful
> concerning your plea for help in supporting this kind of backporting stuff
> that is needed to make RB 3.x available via EPEL.
>
> I tried to install RB in a newer Version  by following the instructions
> using pip but that lead to just a bunch of errors that i could not
> comprehend ... after that unsuccessful attempt i had the machine get
> reverted to previous "untouched" state and afterwards installed the rpm for
> 2.5.17 ... and now, like stated, i am thumbing my nose at all those nice
> stuff that is coming in with the 3.x releases :o)
>
>
Getting this working on RHEL/CentOS 7 is something I very much want to do,
but please understand that I do this in my spare time. I'm not paid to work
on ReviewBoard at all. I have ReviewBoard 3.0 now available in Fedora 28
and I am looking into getting it working on EPEL 7, but I won't commit to
any particular timeframe, sorry.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

[daniel . forumsmail]

Hi Stephen,

would you maybe have had the possibility to look into a rpm for EPEL7? (not 
sure about either grammar or EPEL naming ... i think i am asking for 
something i can install via yum :)

I was just asking something in a different thread which got a nice and 
comprehensive reply by Christian Hammond ... also concerning a RB 3.x for 
yum ... quoting from 
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/reviewboard-dev/2MuigbF_-X8/wU-aPDPKBgAJ)
 

> For c), I'm not sure of the current status there. This is not a Review 
> Board issue exactly, but rather a packaging issue, which I think is being 
> solved now? Basically, we need some older versions of some modules for very 
> good reasons I don't want to go into at the moment (various 
> compatibility... things...) and this makes packaging a bit harder. I think 
> that's being addressed through a new modular packaging system in Fedora. 
> Stephen can go into details more.
>

This quote is about helping Reviewboard 3.x being made available for Redhat 
rpm yum stuff ... as he mentioned that you might comment on that, i'd like 
to take the opportunity to ask you about it :)

Sadly, i am just a consumer and probably not versed enough to be helpful 
concerning your plea for help in supporting this kind of backporting stuff 
that is needed to make RB 3.x available via EPEL.

I tried to install RB in a newer Version  by following the instructions 
using pip but that lead to just a bunch of errors that i could not 
comprehend ... after that unsuccessful attempt i had the machine get 
reverted to previous "untouched" state and afterwards installed the rpm for 
2.5.17 ... and now, like stated, i am thumbing my nose at all those nice 
stuff that is coming in with the 3.x releases :o)

cheers 
Daniel


Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 18:57:52 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:10 AM > wrote:
>
>> For Reviewboard 2.x there's EPEL RPM packages available, I'm just 
>> wondering if Reviewboard is planning to make RPM packages available for 
>> version 3.0 as well.
>>
>>
> I've been working on it, but it's difficult because EPEL 7 has a lot of 
> packages that are very old and hard to update. (Also, EPEL has a policy 
> against replacing any package shipped by RHEL/CentOS).
>
> However, I *do* now have packages working against Fedora 28:  
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2018-d31893afa3
>
> It can be installed on F28 Beta by running the command:
> `dnf install @reviewboard:3.0`
>
> I'm hoping to get an update out to EPEL 7 at some point, but it's slow 
> going and my dayjob is coming down hard on me at the moment. For the time 
> being, I'm only committing to maintaining updates on the 2.5.x line.
>
> As always, anyone who would like to help me maintain these in Fedora/EPEL 
> should speak up.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

[Kirby Zhou]

Instead of EPEL RPM, maybe docker image is much more easy.
I am trying ikatson/reviewboard now, but it need some modification to use 
mysql.

On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 12:57:52 AM UTC+8, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:10 AM > wrote:
>
>> For Reviewboard 2.x there's EPEL RPM packages available, I'm just 
>> wondering if Reviewboard is planning to make RPM packages available for 
>> version 3.0 as well.
>>
>>
> I've been working on it, but it's difficult because EPEL 7 has a lot of 
> packages that are very old and hard to update. (Also, EPEL has a policy 
> against replacing any package shipped by RHEL/CentOS).
>
> However, I *do* now have packages working against Fedora 28:  
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2018-d31893afa3
>
> It can be installed on F28 Beta by running the command:
> `dnf install @reviewboard:3.0`
>
> I'm hoping to get an update out to EPEL 7 at some point, but it's slow 
> going and my dayjob is coming down hard on me at the moment. For the time 
> being, I'm only committing to maintaining updates on the 2.5.x line.
>
> As always, anyone who would like to help me maintain these in Fedora/EPEL 
> should speak up.
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM Stephen Gallagher <
step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:10 AM  wrote:
>
>> For Reviewboard 2.x there's EPEL RPM packages available, I'm just
>> wondering if Reviewboard is planning to make RPM packages available for
>> version 3.0 as well.
>>
>>
> I've been working on it, but it's difficult because EPEL 7 has a lot of
> packages that are very old and hard to update. (Also, EPEL has a policy
> against replacing any package shipped by RHEL/CentOS).
>
> However, I *do* now have packages working against Fedora 28:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2018-d31893afa3
>
> It can be installed on F28 Beta by running the command:
> `dnf install @reviewboard:3.0`
>

Oops, I should specify that this will only work from a Fedora 28 *Server
Edition* install at the moment, due to some incompatibility to updating via
PackageKit (used with Workstation).

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:10 AM  wrote:

> For Reviewboard 2.x there's EPEL RPM packages available, I'm just
> wondering if Reviewboard is planning to make RPM packages available for
> version 3.0 as well.
>
>
I've been working on it, but it's difficult because EPEL 7 has a lot of
packages that are very old and hard to update. (Also, EPEL has a policy
against replacing any package shipped by RHEL/CentOS).

However, I *do* now have packages working against Fedora 28:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2018-d31893afa3

It can be installed on F28 Beta by running the command:
`dnf install @reviewboard:3.0`

I'm hoping to get an update out to EPEL 7 at some point, but it's slow
going and my dayjob is coming down hard on me at the moment. For the time
being, I'm only committing to maintaining updates on the 2.5.x line.

As always, anyone who would like to help me maintain these in Fedora/EPEL
should speak up.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reviewboard 3.0 RPM availability

[sean]

For Reviewboard 2.x there's EPEL RPM packages available, I'm just wondering 
if Reviewboard is planning to make RPM packages available for version 3.0 
as well.

Regards,
Sean Molenaar

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.