Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.
Comment #5 on issue 658 by chipx86: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 This usually indicates that the revision is wrong. How was the diff generated, and what repository type? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.
Comment #6 on issue 658 by manjunath.shiva: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 diff is generated on UNIX and copied from screen to windows and that was the problem. Now he tried did an ftp and it worked. With the Review Baord 1.0 facing some problem for new request in two places. I am opening a new ticket shortly. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.
Comment #7 on issue 658 by chipx86: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 But how was the diff generated? What tool, parameters? Copying from screen to windows will break things. I assume you mean copy/paste. That won't necessarily get the right control characters (tabs, same type of newlines, etc). You will need to transfer the file directly. You also should look into using post-review, which will make life a lot easier. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.
Comment #8 on issue 658 by manjunath.shiva: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 diff was generated using cvs diff -u amuoci.c amuoci.diff on UNIX. Here use made a mistake of copy/paste from UNIX shell to Windows. Now it worked after ftp. Sure, I will take a look into post-review and propose to our team hear. Thanks for the tip! -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.
Comment #9 on issue 658 by manjunath.shiva: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 I tried with latest post-review version 0.8. The problem is we do have post- review.exe so we need to use UWIN / MKS / Cigwin to run this script on Windows. It would have been good if we have a post-review.exe stand alone application so user can use it here. I have no problem of using without exe but others are not comfortable. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.
Comment #10 on issue 658 by chipx86: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 Ah yeah, that's a potential problem for now. However, I do plan to get a post-review.exe into the next release. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1181 in reviewboard: Wrong content of search-cron.conf after installation
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1181 by msu...@redhat.com: Wrong content of search-cron.conf after installation http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1181 What version are you running? ReviewBoard-1.0 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? installation What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. install ReviewBoard (RB) on Linux 2. create new sit in /www/spacewalk-reviewboard and url will be /spacewalk/reviews 3. check /www/spacewalk-reviewboard/conf/search-cron.conf What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Actuall content: # Incremental indices every 10 minutes 0,10,20,30,40,50 * * * * /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.pyc manage /www/spacewalk-reviewboard index # Do a full index once a week on Sunday at 2am * 2 * * 0 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.pyc manage /www/spacewalk-reviewboard index -- --full Expected content: # Incremental indices every 10 minutes 0,10,20,30,40,50 * * * * python /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py manage /www/spacewalk-reviewboard index # Do a full index once a week on Sunday at 2am * 2 * * 0 python /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py manage /www/spacewalk-reviewboard index -- --full What operating system are you using? What browser? Debian Please provide any additional information below. Please note missing on first line. Pyc is not runnable by default. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1182 in reviewboard: Apache configuration file is misconfigured, if RB do not goes to root.
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1182 by msu...@redhat.com: Apache configuration file is misconfigured, if RB do not goes to root. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1182 What version are you running? 1.5 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? installation What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. install ReviewBoard (RB) on Linux 2. create new sit in /www/spacewalk-reviewboard and url will be /spacewalk/reviews 3. check /www/spacewalk-reviewboard/conf/apache-modpython.conf What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Location and Alias directives use /, whereas there obviously should be /spacewalk/reviews What operating system are you using? What browser? Debian -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1182 in reviewboard: Apache configuration file is misconfigured, if RB do not goes to root.
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #1 on issue 1182 by chipx86: Apache configuration file is misconfigured, if RB do not goes to root. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1182 This is actually by design in order to support some existing setups and older versions of Django. We may move away from this at some point, but for now, it's intentional. The default configuration of Review Board expects to own the subdomain, and then the site root is calculated at runtime. You're always free to modify the generated configuration files. The reason for this is that before, Django was unable to work in subdomains without some hacks. We put some stuff in place to allow working in subdomains, and changing our way of doing it now would break existing installs that rely on our workarounds. Moving away from that is going to be a larger effort. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1183 in reviewboard: Viewing diff in review request causes traceback involving memcache
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1183 by chipx86: Viewing diff in review request causes traceback involving memcache http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1183 Definitely never seen that before. Any chance you can provide us with a diff that reproduces this problem for our unit tests? Ideally, provide a dummy repository with some files, and a diff against that, so we can bundle it and make sure this doesn't happen again. If it even is in our control. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
