Re: Issue 1072 in reviewboard: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board
Comment #40 on issue 1072 by yunshan.di: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1072 From the release notes, it seems the subverion https issue is gone. but after i installed the latest RB1.5 Beta1, then add a subversion repository, the error prompt: Please correct the error below. A repository was not found at the specified path. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1072 in reviewboard: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board
Comment #42 on issue 1072 by yunshan.di: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1072 a subdirectory of inside a repository example: https://svnserver/xxx_rep/xxx_proj -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1072 in reviewboard: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board
Comment #43 on issue 1072 by chipx86: HTTPS Subversion repositories don't work with Review Board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1072 That's likely the problem. You must point to the very top of the Subversion repository. Subdirectories will cause problems. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1530 in reviewboard: error running post-review
Comment #4 on issue 1530 by hbetts3: error running post-review http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1530 That fixed the issue. Better documentation of windows requirements would have prevented this. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 1542 in reviewboard: postreview.py unhandled exception, line 659
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1542 by richardt: postreview.py unhandled exception, line 659
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1542
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What version are you running?
March 5th nightly of RBTools.
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
N/A
What steps will reproduce the problem?
It seems to be related to the handling of non-ascii characters in a
supposedly ASCII text file. We have a file, 'tinystr.cpp' from the TinyXML
distribution. postreview.py seems to choke when encoding the line
THIS FILE WAS ALTERED BY Tyge Løvset, 7. April 2005.
Specifically on the 'o' in Lovset. This is obviously not an ascii
character. I'm currently removing this code from my source control, which
is why I'm seeing this error now.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
It would be nice if:
1) The file post-reviewed anyway.
And at the very least I would expect
2) The rest of the files post-review, and I get a warning about this one,
and what exactly is wrong with it, along with (hopefully) a notice on the
review board server's website that the file changed and could not be
posted.
The text of the stack is (note that this is running in pdb):
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
p:\sa\ss\toolchain\python\export\2.6\2.6.2f0\tools\win32\i386\lib\pdb.py
, line 1283, in main
pdb._runscript(mainpyfile)
File
p:\sa\ss\toolchain\python\export\2.6\2.6.2f0\tools\win32\i386\lib\pdb.py
, line 1202, in _runscript
self.run(statement)
File
p:\sa\ss\toolchain\python\export\2.6\2.6.2f0\tools\win32\i386\lib\bdb.py
, line 368, in run
exec cmd in globals, locals
File string, line 1, in module
File postreview.py, line 2809, in module
main()
File postreview.py, line 2791, in main
submit_as=options.submit_as)
File postreview.py, line 2497, in tempt_fate
parent_diff_content)
File postreview.py, line 506, in upload_diff
review_request['id'], fields, files)
File postreview.py, line 625, in api_post
return self.process_json(self.http_post(path, fields, files))
File postreview.py, line 600, in http_post
content_type, body = self._encode_multipart_formdata(fields, files)
File postreview.py, line 659, in _encode_multipart_formdata
return content_type, content.encode('utf-8')
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xf8 in position
818872: ordinal not in range(128)
What operating system are you using? What browser?
I'm running postreview.py on Windows 7.
Please provide any additional information below.
This error did not happen with an older version of RBTools (I had reviewed
adding this code to our source code control earlier, when we were thinking
about using it). I upgraded to this one to get a couple of other fixes,
but ran into this instead.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1542 in reviewboard: postreview.py unhandled exception, line 659
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 1542 by chipx86: postreview.py unhandled exception, line 659 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1542 The change that caused this has been reverted in a more recent nightly. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1530 in reviewboard: Windows post-review documentation should tell how to install diff.exe
Updates: Summary: Windows post-review documentation should tell how to install diff.exe Status: Confirmed Labels: -Type-Support -Priority-Medium Type-Defect Priority-High Component-Docs Milestone-Release1.5 Comment #5 on issue 1530 by chipx86: Windows post-review documentation should tell how to install diff.exe http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1530 Agreed. In the future, we'll likely not need GNU diff, but for now... -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
