Re: Issue 1630 in reviewboard: Authentication fields disabled
Comment #2 on issue 1630 by foldleft: Authentication fields disabled http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1630 Nope no js errors but OTOH there isn't that much js to begin with. I guess it's a server side thing. Do you have any dependency detection that will disable the fields if the dependencies are missing? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1641 in reviewboard: Required LDAP OPT_REFERRALS option
Comment #2 on issue 1641 by bryan.weingarten: Required LDAP OPT_REFERRALS
option
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1641
FAQ #13 from http://www.python-ldap.org/faq.shtml
Basically we require turning off chasing referrels for our ldap client to
work.
The line to turn off referrals just goes immediately after each
ldapo.initialize().
I'm sure many people would not require or want this, so it's best to add
this as an
option to Disable referrals in the LDAP settings. I don't know anything
about LDAP
either. LDAP in Review Board was not working for me and I had to
experiment with
python-ldap and a lot of googling to figure this out. Then when I looked
at Review
Board code, it was obvious that it was missing this one line of code. When
I added
it, Review Board was able to successfully authenticate for us.
Q: My script bound to MS Active Directory but a a search operation results
in an
exception ldap.OPERATIONS_ERROR with the diagnostic messages text In order
to
perform this operation a successful bind must be completed on the
connection..
What's happening here?
A: When searching from the domain level MS AD returns referrals (search
continuations) for some objects to indicate to the client where to look for
these
objects. Client-chasing of referrals is a broken concept since LDAPv3 does
not
specify which credentials to use when chasing the referral. Windows clients
are
supposed to simply use their Windows credentials but this does not work in
general
when chasing referrals received from and pointing to arbitrary LDAP servers.
Therefore per default libldap automatically chases the referrals internally
with an
anonymous access which fails with MS AD.
So best thing is to switch this behaviour off:
l = ldap.initialize('ldap://foobar')
l.set_option(ldap.OPT_REFERRALS,0)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 1642 in reviewboard: Non-intuitive error message when typoing a git repo path
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1642 by Karrde712: Non-intuitive error message when typoing a git repo path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1642 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? ReviewBoard 1.5beta1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? Admin interface What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Create a new git repository 2. Enter a nonexistent path in the Path: box What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I would expect to see No such directory or at least Not a git repository. What I actually see in the red error bar: django.utils.functional.__proxy__ object at 0x2af2d3efbb10 What operating system are you using? What browser? ReviewBoard server: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Client: Firefox 3.6.3 on Fedora 13 Please provide any additional information below. It was very difficult to determine what the actual error was. I only realized by accident that I was mistyping the path. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1642 in reviewboard: Non-intuitive error message when typoing a git repo path
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1642 by chipx86: Non-intuitive error message when typoing a git repo path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1642 What version of Django is on there? I can't reproduce this problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1642 in reviewboard: Non-intuitive error message when typoing a git repo path
Comment #2 on issue 1642 by Karrde712: Non-intuitive error message when typoing a git repo path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1642 Django 1.1.1, python-djblets 0.5.9 django-evolution 0.0 svn r164 Python 2.4.3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1642 in reviewboard: Non-intuitive error message when typoing a git repo path
Comment #3 on issue 1642 by Karrde712: Non-intuitive error message when typoing a git repo path http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1642 Specifically, I entered /srv/git/rhq.git when the correct path would have been /srv/git/rhq/rhq.git I don't know if that makes a difference. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 1643 in reviewboard: /
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1643 by nickatuship: / http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1643 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? What's the URL of the page containing the problem? What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? What operating system are you using? What browser? Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1643 in reviewboard: /
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 1643 by trowbrds: / http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1643 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
