Re: Review Request 61066: Added 'process::workers'.

[Benjamin Mahler]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61066/#review181295
---


Fix it, then Ship it!




Have you considered having a test for this function?


3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/process.hpp
Line 545 (original), 545-548 (patched)


Can you comment on the const-ness of this? Right now it's fixed, but we've 
explored the idea of having it be dynamic, maybe explain that the current 
implementation uses a fixed size worker pool?

Might also be worth clarifying what a worker is? E.g. not the event loop 
thread.


- Benjamin Mahler


On July 24, 2017, 1:49 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61066/
> ---
> 
> (Updated July 24, 2017, 1:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Added 'process::workers'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/process.hpp 
> d40179f874754e00b58f271c401650138dc7d01c 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> b268cdad776a3ca2a87cbe60eb098bde2a70667c 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/benchmarks.cpp 
> 694a842e8e18d82ac551749a71764825ba7cb3a9 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61066/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Review Request 61066: Added 'process::workers'.

[Benjamin Hindman]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61066/
---

Review request for mesos.


Repository: mesos


Description
---

Added 'process::workers'.


Diffs
-

  3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/process.hpp 
d40179f874754e00b58f271c401650138dc7d01c 
  3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp b268cdad776a3ca2a87cbe60eb098bde2a70667c 
  3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/benchmarks.cpp 
694a842e8e18d82ac551749a71764825ba7cb3a9 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61066/diff/1/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Benjamin Hindman