Re: Review Request 71361: Added missing `return` statement in `Slave::statusUpdate`.

2019-08-25 Thread Gilbert Song

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71361/#review217426
---


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Gilbert Song


On Aug. 23, 2019, 5:57 a.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71361/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Aug. 23, 2019, 5:57 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Greg Mann, and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Previously, if `statusUpdate` was called for a pending task, it would
> forward the status update and then continue executing `statusUpdate`,
> which then checks if there is an executor that is aware of this task.
> Given that a pending task is not known to any executor, it would always
> handle it by forwarding status update one more time. This patch adds
> missing `return` statement, which fixes the issue.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 1d0ec9d2428c3ffa28ad3e960b74f171013cf0c2 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71361/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> `sudo make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Budnik
> 
>



Re: Review Request 71361: Added missing `return` statement in `Slave::statusUpdate`.

2019-08-23 Thread Qian Zhang

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71361/#review217400
---


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Qian Zhang


On Aug. 23, 2019, 8:57 p.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71361/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Aug. 23, 2019, 8:57 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Greg Mann, and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Previously, if `statusUpdate` was called for a pending task, it would
> forward the status update and then continue executing `statusUpdate`,
> which then checks if there is an executor that is aware of this task.
> Given that a pending task is not known to any executor, it would always
> handle it by forwarding status update one more time. This patch adds
> missing `return` statement, which fixes the issue.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 1d0ec9d2428c3ffa28ad3e960b74f171013cf0c2 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71361/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> `sudo make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrei Budnik
> 
>



Review Request 71361: Added missing `return` statement in `Slave::statusUpdate`.

2019-08-23 Thread Andrei Budnik

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71361/
---

Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Greg Mann, and Qian Zhang.


Repository: mesos


Description
---

Previously, if `statusUpdate` was called for a pending task, it would
forward the status update and then continue executing `statusUpdate`,
which then checks if there is an executor that is aware of this task.
Given that a pending task is not known to any executor, it would always
handle it by forwarding status update one more time. This patch adds
missing `return` statement, which fixes the issue.


Diffs
-

  src/slave/slave.cpp 1d0ec9d2428c3ffa28ad3e960b74f171013cf0c2 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71361/diff/1/


Testing
---

`sudo make check`


Thanks,

Andrei Budnik