[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225634934 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} --- End diff -- Yes, but I don't think it's meant for also building images for tests. Can you create a separate script under `resource-managers/kubernetes/docker/src/test/scripts`? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user ifilonenko commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225631577 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} --- End diff -- It is a docker image builder, so it seems to be an appropriate place. Especially, since itâs the first stage in our integration tests. But am open to opinions. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user ifilonenko commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225630500 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- The strategy of using this âpersonalâ image is purely because the HDFS nodes: (kdc, nn, dn) themselves require hadoop-2.7.3.tgz. Unless that can be packaged in the distribution, in which case it would be trivial to build, pulling is easier. I am open for opinions on building strategies. The dockerfile in question can be found here: https://github.com/ifilonenko/hadoop-kerberos-helm/blob/master/Dockerfile --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user erikerlandson commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225625939 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- I had also discussed concerns re: pulling a "personal" image w/ @ifilonenko - I'd prefer some other solution here. Docker build seems plausible, but it would be best if it can be done once per test run for efficiency reasons --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225620898 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- @ifilonenko why do you need to pull that image here? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user liyinan926 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225618723 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} --- End diff -- While, it's quite odd to add a Dockerfile here just for testing purpose. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225619385 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- In fact, `FROM` has the same problem here. What I mean was including the whole docker file from `ifilonenko/hadoop-base`. Although this is a test script, I was surprised that Apache Spark depends on a personal repo officially. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225617789 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- Thanks. Got it, @felixcheung . --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225615864 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- I comment on this earlier... https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#issuecomment-427617701 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225614226 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- Isn't the explicit pull unnecessary? Trying to build the new Kerberos image which is `FROM` this will implicitly pull it anyway --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225611762 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- What about using `docker build` here instead? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608#discussion_r225611252 --- Diff: bin/docker-image-tool.sh --- @@ -71,18 +71,29 @@ function build { --build-arg base_img=$(image_ref spark) ) - local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/Dockerfile"} - local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} - local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + local BASEDOCKERFILE=${BASEDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/Dockerfile"} + local PYDOCKERFILE=${PYDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/python/Dockerfile"} + local KDOCKERFILE=${KDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/test/dockerfiles/spark/kerberos/Dockerfile"} + local RDOCKERFILE=${RDOCKERFILE:-"$IMG_PATH/main/dockerfiles/spark/bindings/R/Dockerfile"} + # Spark Base docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark) \ -f "$BASEDOCKERFILE" . + # PySpark docker build $NOCACHEARG "${BINDING_BUILD_ARGS[@]}" \ -t $(image_ref spark-py) \ -f "$PYDOCKERFILE" . + # The following are optional docker builds for Kerberos Testing + docker pull ifilonenko/hadoop-base:latest --- End diff -- Ur, this looks a little bit too personal. is this okay for Apache Spark? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark pull request #22608: [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integr...
GitHub user ifilonenko opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608 [SPARK-23257][K8S][TESTS] Kerberos Support Integration Tests ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This fix includes just the integration tests for Kerberos Support ## How was this patch tested? This patch includes a single-noded pseudo-distributed Kerberized Hadoop cluster for the purpose of testing Kerberos interaction. The Keytabs are shared with Persistent Volumes and communication happens all within the same Kubernetes cluster. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ifilonenko/spark SPARK-25152-e2e-tests Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22608.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #22608 commit 31fc536103538543cd7e114cf737b2712cfec15c Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-09-27T00:41:21Z initial commit commit 9bfa86a947b4ff764762fe27b356480a6e957baa Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-09-29T01:55:31Z initial work on secure-hdfs integration testing commit 77ea92a0c1303f7b4c7dd4a6131e49e691b19b84 Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-09-29T02:06:42Z small fix commit 761254c3d4bdd1b35e707077acf0a70defc88ea9 Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-09-29T03:02:11Z fixed issue of docker building commit 6e3966fbc98809a962bd9cbd589266d9b8b95834 Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-09-29T03:04:16Z fixes and organizations commit 776617dc5328a7a88afde854240d750efd52959f Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-09-29T17:42:42Z traits and polymorphosim commit 7f1ccb6451d53f04d46263f7bb7e81211bfb809f Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-09-30T07:39:19Z polymorphism fixes and generuc class types commit 3ab4358787e5cfb0de289f963122b7f22108fc36 Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-10-01T05:28:03Z working test cases (just need clusterrolebindings) commit cfe799033139251df44e584ab06b699cb437ed11 Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-10-02T07:40:28Z small changes with addition of old tests commit 54316ba4fbc5ec7b46184d01f6404bd26d3c0f5d Author: Ilan Filonenko Date: 2018-10-02T07:48:26Z bring back sparkr --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org