[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 8620

2010-06-14 Thread ajc

r8620 | ajc | 2010-06-14 13:14:35 -0400 (Mon, 14 Jun 2010) | 1 line
Changed paths:
   M /trunk/webcit/groupdav_propfind.c

* Wrapped ifdef around variables to prevent them from turning up as warnings



[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 8621

2010-06-14 Thread ajc

r8621 | ajc | 2010-06-14 13:20:13 -0400 (Mon, 14 Jun 2010) | 1 line
Changed paths:
   M /trunk/webcit/static/webcit.css

* remove ie5-mac hack



[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 8622

2010-06-14 Thread ajc

r8622 | ajc | 2010-06-14 14:03:19 -0400 (Mon, 14 Jun 2010) | 1 line
Changed paths:
   M /trunk/webcit/static/webcit.css

* Some fixes to make the banner work in IE7.  Still need to optimize things a 
bit, and I dread testing this with IE8 to find out how badly it fucks it up.



[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 8613

2010-06-14 Thread davew
Sorry been away a while.  

The context re-work branch has most of this already done. You're basically
repeating what I've done.  

MasterCC still exists but only until we make the modules use the newer
method. Ofcourse we need to merge that branch in first.  

   
  Tue Jun 08 2010 17:30:41 EDT from   dothebart @ Uncensored  Subject:
Citadel commit log: revision 8613



i'd like to get rid of masterCC as much as possible, since its accessed from
several threads at once which could jam up log messages...  



  

  

 

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 8613

2010-06-14 Thread dothebart



Mo Jun 14 2010 15:10:54 EDT von   davew @ Uncensored  Betreff: Citadel commit log: revision 8613

Sorry been away a while.
The context re-work branch has most of this already done. You're basically repeating what I've done.
MasterCC still exists but only until we make the modules use the newer method. Ofcourse we need to merge that branch in first.
 

Tue Jun 08 2010 17:30:41 EDT from   dothebart @ Uncensored  Subject: Citadel commit log: revision 8613

i'd like to get rid of masterCC as much as possible, since its accessed from several threads at once which could jam up log messages...




Ah, ok. I already had the sneaking suspicion that this could be the case...
I just needed that part so a StrBuf could be used for the logging, and isn't accessed from several places at once...
So right now most of the lines are done by a per thread buf, only some require a malloc.
I guess we can go with your state once we get beyound 7.80...




[Citadel Development] Re: Citadel commit log: revision 8613

2010-06-14 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
Not to worry, we're just about to 7.80 -- I fixed most of the remaining IE
problems today, and hopefully will have everything tested with all browsers
and ready for release by the end of the week.  Then we can branch 7.8x-stable
and start working on Citadel 8.