Re: [RDBO] Manipulating `bitfield'

2006-01-02 Thread John Siracusa
On 1/2/06, Svilen Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am I missing something obvious? I can provide self-contained test upon 
 request.

I don't think you're missing anything obvious, but please do send or
post a self-contained test case and I'll investigate.

-John


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37alloc_id865op=click
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object


Re: [RDBO] Manipulating `bitfield'

2006-01-02 Thread Svilen Ivanov
2006/1/2, John Siracusa:
 Turns out there were some very dumb bugs in the bitfield accessor
 method maker.  I fixed them all (I hope!) and added a test to confirm
 the fix.  It's checked into CVS now.

 I might wait for a few more bugs to spool up before I release 0.61,
 but in the meantime a new version of
 Rose::DB::Object::MakeMethods::Generic is attached to this email.
 Install it and the bug should go away.

I tried it and it worked, thanks!

 Oh, and for your self-contained tests, it'd be convenient for me if
 you didn't name your test modules DB.pm and Base.pm.  The first
 conflicts with the Perl debugger package of the same name, and the
 second ends up conflicting with base.pm on non-case-sensitive file
 systems like HFS+ (which is what I run).  Thanks! :)

Sure, next time I'll prefix them with Svi:: :)

Regards, Svi


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37alloc_id865op=click
___
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object