[Rpm-ecosystem] Is there anything I can do to help zchunk reviews along?

[Jonathan Dieter]

Pull requests to enable zchunk support in librepo, libsolv, dnf, libdnf
 and createrepo_c are at:

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/librepo/pull/127
https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/pull/270
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1107
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/pull/478
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/createrepo_c/pull/92

I'd love to get these merged and properly tested in time for Fedora
29's change code complete deadline (August 28), but I'm not sure how
reasonable that is.  If it is achievable, I need to get the change
proposal done in the next few days, otherwise I'll punt to Fedora 30.

Thanks Neal for looking at all of these patches, and Colin and Igor for
your comments and suggestions.  Is there anything I can do to help
these PRs reach a mergeable state, or do I just need to wait for
further reviews?

Jonathan


___
Rpm-ecosystem mailing list
Rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Required version of rpm?

[Miroslav Suchý]

Dne 27.6.2018 v 19:56 Jeff Johnson napsal(a):
> The core problem is that the depsolver used by mock must be using 
> bindings/libraries that implement rich dependencies, as well as metadata 
> parsers that can represent rich dependencies.

Mock itself does not have any depsolving library or such capability. Everything 
is handled by YUM/DNF. The use-case of
install F28 on EL7 is probably lost as no one is going to add any new feature 
to YUM. But it is not not late to add it
to DNF/libdnf to handle future problems of installing e.g., F42 on EL8 :)

Miroslav
___
Rpm-ecosystem mailing list
Rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem