Hi, On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:53:43AM +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> However, a better alternative would be for flatpak to consume the > upstream version as a git submodule (that gets dist:ed with the > tarball). That is what flatpak does with some other external > dependencies. Sometimes it even has a both a --use-system switch and > a git submodule fallback. > > Does that seem realistic? I don't have any experience with using git submodules, but I assume that is a vote for debugedit being its own small project. It also sounds like an ideal setup to do continious integration testing by simply update the submodule and run the flat-builder testsuite to make sure the debugedit submodule didn't break anything. > If you have issues setting up flatpak-builder tests, reach out to me. I will once I setup the buildbot, it probably is something to do with the gpg setup. error: Unknown option --token-type=0 Thanks, Mark _______________________________________________ Rpm-ecosystem mailing list Rpm-ecosystem@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-ecosystem
