Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add macro to force fsync() on close() (#187)
@pmatilai - I'd like to get something merged sooner rather than later. There are two options I see - (1) my patch (plus moving the parsing of the file into some static variable) or (2) @n3npq patch, but turning it off by default. Those are the two safe, clean, easy methods going forward. Can you weigh in here, so we can move forward? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/187#issuecomment-294570200___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Allow armsfp arches on armhfp ones (rhbz#1440974) (#199)
Note that technically you cannot mix armsfp with armhfp packages as they have different libc ABIs. I'm not sure if there is a better way to do this in RPM, though. As it is, though, at least the first commit in this PR is needed regardless, since it fixes the arch compatibility tree changes introduced in d7876d27dfc004303f4f421329d2d28693f92706. If there's a better way to do this as opposed to the second commit, I'm all ears. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/199#issuecomment-294473239___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
