Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] The max lengthe of RPM package name is 66? (#974)
The java program create the RPM package with a spec file as input. It's hard to tell why it can't work as only the extraction by standard RPM command failed. Maybe I can debug the RPM source code to find why it reports the err then I can update the java code to meet the standard RPM extraction requirement. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/974#issuecomment-567823579___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] find-debuginfo.sh: speed up %dir generation (#975)
@ffesti pushed 1 commit. 96f5f40e9d584034863e14c6f62728f78507d361 Rename add_percent_dir to generate_percent_dir -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/975/files/efc38a7623f764f6b1e66b00c6ed83be18c1f6bb..96f5f40e9d584034863e14c6f62728f78507d361 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for reading BDB without the library (#980)
@mlschroe pushed 1 commit. 97092ae8be7ec0f02c8a4f833f65831625985b84 Add support for reading BDB without the library -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/980/files/042fdf6d8823ea2b3423134f23217f1d1f96d6e5..97092ae8be7ec0f02c8a4f833f65831625985b84 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Not all console_scripts entry points need pkg_resources from setuptools (#954)
Should be fixed with #973. Closing. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/954#issuecomment-567512834___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Not all console_scripts entry points need pkg_resources from setuptools (#954)
Closed #954. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/954#event-2897426024___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for reading BDB without the library (#980)
@mlschroe pushed 1 commit. 042fdf6d8823ea2b3423134f23217f1d1f96d6e5 Add support for reading BDB without the library -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/980/files/783e042b84a771719096bdc4be1ef833948055ec..042fdf6d8823ea2b3423134f23217f1d1f96d6e5 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for reading BDB without the library (#980)
mlschroe commented on this pull request. > @@ -594,6 +594,20 @@ AS_IF([test "$enable_ndb" = yes],[ ]) AM_CONDITIONAL([NDB], [test "$enable_ndb" = yes]) +#= +# Process --enable-bdb-ro +AC_ARG_ENABLE([bdb-ro], [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-ndb-ro (EXPERIMENTAL)],[enable the read-only Berkeley DB code])], No, copy'n'pasted from the ndb lines. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/980#discussion_r359870963___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for reading BDB without the library (#980)
Conan-Kudo requested changes on this pull request. I don't know how I feel about this, but... > @@ -594,6 +594,20 @@ AS_IF([test "$enable_ndb" = yes],[ ]) AM_CONDITIONAL([NDB], [test "$enable_ndb" = yes]) +#= +# Process --enable-bdb-ro +AC_ARG_ENABLE([bdb-ro], [AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-ndb-ro (EXPERIMENTAL)],[enable the read-only Berkeley DB code])], `--enable-ndb-ro` -> `--enable-bdb-ro` Freudian slip? ;) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/980#pullrequestreview-334640374___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for reading BDB without the library (#980)
This commit implements a slow read-only backend that allows accessing of BerkeleyDB databases without using the BerkeleyDB library. The code supports btree version 9 and hash version 8 and 9. There are two use cases for this: 1) Conversion of an existing BerkeleyDB to a different backend. 2) Allowing package scriptlets to do database queries while in a transaction that replaced rpm with a version that no longer links against BerkeleyDB. Currently prefix searching is not supported (but it would be easy to add). You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/980 -- Commit Summary -- * Add support for reading BDB without the library -- File Changes -- M configure.ac (14) M lib/Makefile.am (4) A lib/backend/bdb_ro.c (736) M lib/backend/dbi.c (3) M lib/backend/dbi.h (5) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/980.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/980.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/980 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] find-debuginfo.sh: speed up %dir generation (#975)
Ok, overall this looks like a much better solution that the original sed orgy. But the original code just adds those dir lines but keeps the file entries in place. This is kinda strange as the file entries are appended to the .new files in the lines right below. The new code only creates the dir entries. This looks more correct. But the name of the function and its comment should probably reflect that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/975#issuecomment-567446752___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] The max lengthe of RPM package name is 66? (#974)
No, the package name should not be limited. It looks like there is a bug in the code creating the lead. But it is hard to tell where exactly this is. If your Java program is creating the package directly without creating a spec file and then running rpmbuild I would advice checking the code that creates the lead in there. If it does create a spec it might be a bug in rpm 4.4.2 which is ancient and we won't fix anythin in there. But oyu can try to switch to rpm 4.4.2.3 which contains lots of bugfixes. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/974#issuecomment-567419141___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] The max lengthe of RPM package name is 66? (#974)
Thanks, Festi. In fact, I use a java program which to create RPM package, which refer to an old RPM API (RPM 4.4.2). I can use it to create a RPM package and use the standard RPM command to parser it, like rpm/rpm2cpio command. I meet the name length limit problem when create RPM package, then I try to set the name length to a larger one, it success. But it failed when I try to extract the package using standard rpm2cpio comand: error: rpm2cpio: illegal signature type error reading header from package cpio: premature end of archive Does the standard rpmbuild command with version 4.4.2 also have the name length limit? And how to solve the the backward compatibility on the latest rpm command? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/974#issuecomment-567397866___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
