Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm should not use short gpg key ids in messages (Issue #2403)
> Well, anything which parses this output and makes use of it is broken. I > shouldn't be using short ids for anything, particularly not in a script. So I > think it's entirely reasonable to just change the output. Unfortunately, we can't afford to do that. There are config management tools and layered package managers that parse RPM's output. And we have the model of "it's stable unless documented otherwise". So we have to work with that. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2403#issuecomment-1454895024 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] GPG key interpreted as PGP key (Issue #2410)
Closed #2410 as completed. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2410#event-8666192273 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] GPG key interpreted as PGP key (Issue #2410)
Certainly; thus no issue in the traditional sense. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2410#issuecomment-1454761223 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] GPG key interpreted as PGP key (Issue #2410)
OpenPGP (sometimes just abbreviated as PGP, the first OpenPGP implementation before there was OpenPGP) is an IETF standard. gpg is an implementation of the OpenPGP standard. Sometimes people call OpenPGP certificates and keys GPG certificates and keys, because GPG is a well-known implementation. Does that answer your question? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2410#issuecomment-1454750642 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] GPG key interpreted as PGP key (Issue #2410)
Hello. A **non-manually** created fake RPM package is reported as follows ``` $ rpm -qi gpg-pubkey-5323552a-6112bcdc | awk 'NF' | sed -n '1,17p;$p' Name: gpg-pubkey Version : 5323552a Release : 6112bcdc Architecture: (none) Install Date: Sat Nov 5 11:14:03 2022 Group : Public Keys Size: 0 License : pubkey Signature : (none) Source RPM : (none) Build Date : Tue Aug 10 20:52:28 2021 Build Host : localhost Packager: Fedora (37) Summary : Fedora (37) public key Description : -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: rpm-4.18.0 -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- ``` Despite the mention _gpg_ as part of the package name and what it is suggesting to us and indicating to the running OS, it is interpreted as _PGP_. What could cause that misinterpretation? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2410 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
