Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Return to Tralla La or: RPM in C++ (Discussion #2983)
For what it's worth, I'm excited about the transition to C++, because as a C++ programmer, I feel much more comfortable working my way through and cleaning things up leveraging the things I know well. So I'm looking forward to this! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2983#discussioncomment-8953488 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm --import does not replace old keys with new keys (Issue #2577)
Workaround for Chrome found: > there is difrent URL and GPG key paths on Fedora repo file than what i found > online and editing the google-chrome.repo on details down i can layer google > chrome and dont get any gpg signature errors and this is tested on F39 > silverblue and F40 beta silverblue > > ```[google-chrome] > name=google-chrome > baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/$basearch > enabled=1 > gpgcheck=1 > gpgkey=https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub > ``` > > also at first installation […] edit the repo file and take gpg check 0 > install chrome and then put gpg check back to 1 and again all works so i > guess using default repo files are still valid, but on first install gpg > check need to be off and after that seems fine again to use via: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/google-chrome-failed-update-due-to-signature-not-ok/83540/38 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2577#issuecomment-2027229021 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
