Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] lib/transaction: Don't SEGV in sync if a txn was failed (#319)

2017-09-11 Thread Panu Matilainen
Closed #319.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/319#event-1242722957___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] lib/transaction: Don't SEGV in sync if a txn was failed (#319)

2017-09-11 Thread Panu Matilainen
Fixed differently (cause instead of symptom) in commits 
9e65d6ee9ab851db5b5d4f0b390330abb6d38029 and 
7481f0ff15e4d639301fffbbe402a0d27ed02b93: number of transaction elements was 
the wrong condition for syncing, sync should only be done if transaction 
actually ran. The second commit ensures syncing doesn't depend on diskspace 
problem filter (but forgot to mention that particular reason in the commit 
message, doh)

Anyway, thanks for pointing this out.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/319#issuecomment-328445845___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] lib/transaction: Don't SEGV in sync if a txn was failed (#319)

2017-09-08 Thread Panu Matilainen
Right, it shouldn't crash. But disabled disk-space checking silently disabling 
sync is wrong too.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/319#issuecomment-328060578___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] lib/transaction: Don't SEGV in sync if a txn was failed (#319)

2017-09-07 Thread Colin Walters
I was actually testing a change to better handle `rpm -e atomic` on Fedora
Atomic Host, wondering why my patch was crashing, but in fact it was the
recently added sync code in master.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/319

-- Commit Summary --

  * lib/transaction: Don't SEGV in sync if a txn was failed

-- File Changes --

M lib/transaction.c (6)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/319.patch
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/319.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/319
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint