fglrx for F10?
Hi! I see that there is still no fglrx driver available for F10. What's the current status? Thanks! Regards -- Richard Körber
[Bug 227] Review request: xmms2-freeworld - Plugins for XMMS2 that cannot be included in Fedora
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227 --- Comment #14 from NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 10:29:55 --- Well, It seems that the related mac package is nonfree. so It won't be enabled in the freeworld version I guess. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: fglrx for F10?
Current status is ATi still sucks. Nothing new. I was afraid I would hear that answer. ;-) On Phoronix somebody claims he has found a way to get the 8.12 driver working with F10. http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showpost.php?p=55104postcount=17 Maybe this is helpful? -- Richard Körber
[Bug 165] Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 12:12:35 --- (In reply to comment #4) Ah, that's a good idea :). I tried the above and got this in %doc, though: error: magic_file(ms, /var/tmp/cmus-2.2.0-2.fc9-root-konrad/usr/share/doc/cmus-2.2.0/examples) failed: mode 040755 cannot open `/var/tmp/cmus-2.2.0-2.fc9-root-konrad/usr/share/doc/cmus-2.2.0/examples' (No such file or directory) rpmbuild: rpmfc.c:1386: rpmfcClassify: Assertion `ftype != ((void *)0)' failed. Aborted There is a way, but now I'm not so sure that the way I advised you is better than yours. https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2001-November/msg00204.html * Why don't you use CONFIG_FFMPEG=y to have .wma support? Because as of ffmpeg 0.4.9-0.48.20080908.fc9 this feature doesn't compile. There are patches for these already on the net. For example, this one from Gentoo works: http://ftp.riken.go.jp/Linux/gentoo/media-sound/cmus/files/cmus-2.2.0-new-ffmpeg.patch * Why do you use both libmodplug and libmikmod since both are used to have .mod and .x3m support? I'm not familiar with .mod/.x3m, can you help me here? Mod and x3m are music file formats that originated on the Amiga. Both libraries provides the same functionalities. Therefore you only need to require one of the two. Configure is made to default use libmodplug, so I suggest you not to use libmikmod. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:59:19 +0100, Karel wrote: but the breakage isn't reported for Rawhide but for version 10 You're mistaken. Notice the repository ids as well as the message subject.
[Bug 227] Review request: xmms2-freeworld - Plugins for XMMS2 that cannot be included in Fedora
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227 NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #15 from NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 12:02:10 --- Package built with mock on F-10 x86 and F-9 x86_64. Tested at runtime on both arches, everything is fine. -- This package (xmms2-freeworld) is APPROVED -- -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
but the breakage isn't reported for Rawhide but for version 10 You're mistaken. Notice the repository ids as well as the message subject. argh, this drives me mad if I do make mockbuild in the devel directory I get qmmp-plugins- freeworld-0.2.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm within the email, there is qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.* which is in F-10 and the subject is ... development okay, I promise to try to sleep during nights and be awake during daytime, really sorry for the noise K.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
OMG, who stole my package? qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp = 0:0.2.2 [r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages qmmp.x86_64 0.2.2-1.fc10 installed Available Packages qmmp.i386 0.2.2-1.fc10 fedora ... but looking at the fedora repo mirror, http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ I see no qmmp package how is that possible? K.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:21:04 +0100, Karel wrote: OMG, who stole my package? qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp = 0:0.2.2 [r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages qmmp.x86_64 0.2.2-1.fc10 installed Available Packages qmmp.i386 0.2.2-1.fc10 fedora ... but looking at the fedora repo mirror, http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ I see no qmmp package how is that possible? Look again, it's there. In Rawhide, however, you upgraded qmmp to 0.2.3, which breaks the strict dependency in qmmp-plugins-freeworld.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386 requires qmmp = 0:0.2.2 [r...@dhcp-lab-227 mock]# yum list qmmp Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Installed Packages qmmp.x86_64 0.2.2-1.fc10 installed Available Packages qmmp.i386 0.2.2-1.fc10 fedora ... but looking at the fedora repo mirror, http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases /10/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/ I see no qmmp package how is that possible? Look again, it's there. Well, yes, if you do s/Fedora/Everything/ first ah, I see ... I was confused by my yum config - thanks for pointing this out but the question is, why it is reported as broken dependency then? In Rawhide, however, you upgraded qmmp to 0.2.3, which breaks the strict dependency in qmmp-plugins-freeworld. Karel build a 0.2.3 update for RPM Fusion; but the build is not yet pushed yet, as qmmp-plugins-freeworld was build against a new ffmpeg, which is not pushed because xine-lib-freeworld and some other important packages are not yet rebuild against it :-/ correct ... and the strict package version dependency is there because the libraries are missing version, so that I have to ensure consistency this way but the breakage isn't reported for Rawhide but for version 10 which includes qmmp-0.2.2-1.fc10 satisfying the dependency of qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.2.2-1.fc10 ... K.
[Bug 165] Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165
--- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 14:51:23
---
(In reply to comment #6)
OK, I have incorporated your suggestions into this set of spec/srpm:
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cmus.spec
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cmus-2.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm
You still have to resolve this problem:
* There is no compile output. Makefile must be patched to see it. This is a
blocking issue. A reviewer must see the output of what is happening when
building (for example, to see the CFLAGS).
Then:
* use %{name} and %{version} macros here:
Source0:http://mirror.greaterscope.net/cmus/cmus-%{version}.tar.bz2
Patch0:
http://ftp.riken.go.jp/Linux/gentoo/media-sound/cmus/files/cmus-2.2.0-new-ffmpeg.patch
Don't use the %{version} macro for the patch though. So you can reuse the same
patch in next releases, if it still applies.
* Do not use full URL for Patch0. This is just a mirror and it is not
guaranteed to work in the future. Just place a note that the patch comes from
Gentoo Bugzilla #218105.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 26] Review request: dvbcut - Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program streams
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26 --- Comment #16 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2008-12-16 14:16:07 --- (In reply to comment #15) this would not be required if the package would own that directory ... ;-) But I can't do that, can I, since on a real system that package would already be owned by another package (ie hicolor-icon-theme) ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 165] Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-16 12:41:31 --- OK, I have incorporated your suggestions into this set of spec/srpm: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cmus.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cmus-2.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 227] Review request: xmms2-freeworld - Plugins for XMMS2 that cannot be included in Fedora
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227 Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@leemhuis.info Blocks|33 | --- Comment #17 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2008-12-16 19:31:10 --- (In reply to comment #16) Package CVS request done -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On 15.12.2008 23:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote: Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :) +1 points. :) Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib blacklist? Nope. Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?) Don't think so, as http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development//x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11.i386.rpm (pushed on 2008-Dec-10) got properly multilibed. I'll take a closer look at the output during the next push and report back. CU knurd
[Bug 26] Review request: dvbcut - Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program streams
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26 --- Comment #18 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2008-12-16 14:33:08 --- (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #15) this would not be required if the package would own that directory ... ;-) But I can't do that, can I, since on a real system that package would already be owned by another package (ie hicolor-icon-theme) ? Exactly. You must require hicolor-icon-theme. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-12-15
On 16.12.2008 08:55, Kevin Kofler wrote: Neal Becker wrote: Oh, I get it. I had both x86_64 and i386 versions of freetype from F10. I guess freetype-freeworld is not an _upgrade_ of freetype, so yum install freetype-freeworld doesn't automatically grab both versions. It's not. It's an optional override for the library. See non-bug 235 for an explanation of the situation: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253 It would make sense to multilib it though. Is there some multilib whitelist in RPM Fusion? Thorsten? Anybody else who knows? It seems I'm missing something here; freetype-freeworld afaics gets multilibed: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-1.fc10.i386.rpm http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/10/x86_64/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc10.i386.rpm http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/10/x86_64/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm Or did I get something wrong? CU knurd
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:47:09 +0100, Thorsten wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote: Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :) +1 points. :) Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib blacklist? Nope. Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?) Don't think so, as http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development//x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11.i386.rpm (pushed on 2008-Dec-10) got properly multilibed. I'll take a closer look at the output during the next push and report back. 'rpmfusion_free-development' : 'file:///srv/local_repo/free/fedora/%s/%s/os/', Is this a symlink or a bind mount of /srv/rpmbuild? If not, it needs to be changed to point directly at the repository below /srv/rpmbuild. Similarly for the other repos.
[Bug 165] Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2008-12-17 02:38:28 --- * There is no compile output. Makefile must be patched to see it. This is a blocking issue. A reviewer must see the output of what is happening when building (for example, to see the CFLAGS). I don't see how this is a blocker nor why it warrants patching the makefile. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 165] Review Request: cmus - Ncurses-Based Music Player
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165
--- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2008-12-17 02:49:54 ---
Using %{name} and %{version} macros is not mandated. I use %{version} macros,
but prefer not to use %{name} especially when %{name} is longer than cmus
(what it evaluates to). I will fix the quiet makefile issue and fix what you
described w.r.t. the Patch0, but I don't think %{name} is needed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15
On 16.12.2008 19:47, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 15.12.2008 23:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:08:17 +0100, Julian wrote: Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :) +1 points. :) Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib blacklist? Nope. Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?) Don't think so, as http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development//x86_64/os/freetype-freeworld-2.3.7-2.fc11.i386.rpm (pushed on 2008-Dec-10) got properly multilibed. I'll take a closer look at the output during the next push and report back. faac was multilibed properly now; not sure why it didn't happen during the last push. CU knurd
