[Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef - A music player with cue sheet support
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829 --- Comment #24 from starws vsncn...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 12:12:22 CET --- New spec file with some minor bugfixes and improvements. Tested on deadbeef 0.5.1/fedora 16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef - A music player with cue sheet support
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829 starws vsncn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #733 is|0 |1 obsolete|| --- Comment #25 from starws vsncn...@gmail.com 2011-11-24 12:13:36 CET --- Created attachment 765 -- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=765 deadbeef spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: libdvdcss 1.2.11
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote: FWIW, I'd love to see this in RPM Fusion and would be willing to review it. I know there's some history behind the fact that it's not in right now, but I don't know any of the history, so I don't know if it's still applicable. If you want to see the whole thread, start here: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/002428.html I'd be willing to maintain it but I'm not sure if anyone's changed their minds yet... Richard
Re: libdvdcss 1.2.11
On 24.11.2011 14:28, Xavier Bachelot wrote: [...] Food for though, let's discuss. You didn't mention the IMHO two most important points. They are mentioned somewhere in the mailing list archives, but for the sake of the discussion I'll mention them quickly here: What influence will shipping libdvdcss in RPM Fusion have 1) on the contributor base 2) working together with other parties To give examples of what I mean. On 1): Some people might avoid contributing to RPM Fusion if libdvdcss is in the repos. I could for example imagine that having libdvdcss in the repos might be a problem for contributors that work for a Linux distributor we all know. But sure, other might like RPM Fusion more if it ships libdvdcss and start contributing. IOW: it's a trade off. On 2) It never happened, but I once had hoped somebody could work out a deal with Adobe to get permission to ship the flash-plugin in RPM Fusion. I'd imagine having libdvdcss in the free repo could be a problem when talking about such a deal with Adobe. Enough said Cu knurd
Re: libdvdcss 1.2.11
W dniu 24.11.2011 15:01, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: On 24.11.2011 14:28, Xavier Bachelot wrote: [...] Food for though, let's discuss. You didn't mention the IMHO two most important points. They are mentioned somewhere in the mailing list archives, but for the sake of the discussion I'll mention them quickly here: What influence will shipping libdvdcss in RPM Fusion have 1) on the contributor base 2) working together with other parties To give examples of what I mean. On 1): Some people might avoid contributing to RPM Fusion if libdvdcss is in the repos. I could for example imagine that having libdvdcss in the repos might be a problem for contributors that work for a Linux distributor we all know. But sure, other might like RPM Fusion more if it ships libdvdcss and start contributing. IOW: it's a trade off. On 2) It never happened, but I once had hoped somebody could work out a deal with Adobe to get permission to ship the flash-plugin in RPM Fusion. I'd imagine having libdvdcss in the free repo could be a problem when talking about such a deal with Adobe. Enough said Cu knurd The more important question is what do we really gain by moving libdvdcss from livna. It only needs an update every few years it seems, so does it really matter where it is housed? Julian
Re: libdvdcss 1.2.11
On 11/24/2011 04:21 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: The more important question is what do we really gain by moving libdvdcss from livna. It only needs an update every few years it seems, so does it really matter where it is housed? Julian I would be fine with libdvdcss in Livna, but please go back to the message that started this thread : we don't know who's the maintainer for this package and who can sign packages in Livna. Without an answer to this 2 questions, the conclusion might be drawn that Livna is actually dying and libdvdcss needs a new home. This new home might or might not be RPM Fusion, hence the current discussion. Regards, Xavier
Re: libdvdcss 1.2.11
W dniu 24.11.2011 16:28, Xavier Bachelot pisze: On 11/24/2011 04:21 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: The more important question is what do we really gain by moving libdvdcss from livna. It only needs an update every few years it seems, so does it really matter where it is housed? Julian I would be fine with libdvdcss in Livna, but please go back to the message that started this thread : we don't know who's the maintainer for this package and who can sign packages in Livna. Without an answer to this 2 questions, the conclusion might be drawn that Livna is actually dying and libdvdcss needs a new home. This new home might or might not be RPM Fusion, hence the current discussion. Regards, Xavier Well, I'd say the bigger problem would be to find someone who still remembers how to use livna svn :) Julian
[Bug 2017] Review request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 --- Comment #2 from Mattia Meneguzzo hal8...@hotmail.it 2011-11-24 16:38:13 CET --- (In reply to comment #1) Have you already been sponsored in Fedora? If so, I don't think you need a separate RPM Fusion sponsor. If not, I'm not sure how it works if you aren't sponsored in Fedora and only maintain RPM Fusion packages. No, I haven't been sponsored in Fedora yet. Looks good. I'll try to review, but can't promise when. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: [Bug 2017] Review request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell
Richard Shaw wrote: Sponsorship can happen on RPM Fusion first, as was the case for me, but it's not common. The reason it's not common is that Fedora does not automatically recognize RPM Fusion sponsorship the way RPM Fusion recognizes Fedora sponsorship, so you end up having to go through another sponsorship process at least formally to get sponsored in Fedora (whereas getting sponsored in RPM Fusion once you're sponsored in Fedora is just a matter of telling the admins Hey, I'm already sponsored in Fedora and I want to maintain package XYZ in RPM Fusion, can you please mark my account as sponsored?). Kevin Kofler
Re: libdvdcss 1.2.11
On 2011/11/24 8:28 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 11/24/2011 01:52 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Dieterjdie...@lesbg.com wrote: FWIW, I'd love to see this in RPM Fusion and would be willing to review it. I know there's some history behind the fact that it's not in right now, but I don't know any of the history, so I don't know if it's still applicable. If you want to see the whole thread, start here: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/002428.html I'd be willing to maintain it but I'm not sure if anyone's changed their minds yet... Richard [snip] It might worth noting that RPM Fusion distribute libaacs and there was no real discussion on the legal aspect although I explicitely mentionned this point as well as the status of libdvdcss. AFAIK libaacs is a different case because the AACS implementation is based on a freely available specification [1]. I believe it has the capability to decode commercial discs given a key, but this key is not distributed in the package. This is unlike libdvdcss, which contains the code to actually crack the encryption and decode CSS-encryped DVDs which is what makes distributing it legally questionable in many countries. [1] http://www.videolan.org/developers/libaacs.html
