[Bug 2842] Review request: openssl-freeworld - Utilities from the general purpose cryptography library with TLS implementation
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Mendoza jeffmend...@live.com 2013-07-08 19:20:29 CEST --- Updated the srpm for F19. Rebased my changes on the base F19 openssl rpm. The spec is the same http://jm-workhorse.cloudapp.net/rpmfusion/openssl-freeworld/openssl-freeworld-1.0.1e-4.fc19.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #28 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-08 20:07:49 CEST --- Thanks for the help. I tried the dev version of fedora-review, fixed the %post and %postun command as recommended in the output of (try-)fedora-review and I get no further errors. rpmlint still throws an error about a non-executable file; this seems to be more of a setup.py issue than mine, but I added a find/chmod to fix it. Strictly speaking, I'm not even sure it's necessary, since I've never seen an issue with it when using Flowblade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #29 from Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com 2013-07-08 20:24:42 CEST --- Created attachment 1126 -- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1126 package versioning Hi, I suggest that you version yours change , like my patch does ,is much more readable. other suggestion is build src.rpm with rpmbuild, to .spec not have differences of .spec in src.rpm like this rpmbuild -bs flowblade.spec --define _sourcedir ../srpm-unpacked/ --define _srcrpmdir . you may define where is the SOURCES dir and where is wrote src.rpm . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
nVidia CUDA repository
Just a heads up - with the CUDA 5.5 RC release, nVidia is distributing cuda and the 319 binary driver as rpms via a yum repository. The repo rpm is here: http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/repos/fedora18/x86_64/cuda-repo-fedora18-5.5-0.x86_64.rpm which installs: /etc/yum.repos.d/cuda.repo: [cuda] name=cuda baseurl=http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/repos/fedora18/x86_64 enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/repos/GPGKEY As expected there are conflicts with the rpmfusion repository packages. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
[Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855 --- Comment #30 from Klaatu kla...@straightedgelinux.com 2013-07-09 00:37:24 CEST --- (In reply to comment #29) Created attachment 1126 [details] package versioning Hi, I suggest that you version yours change , like my patch does ,is much more readable. other suggestion is build src.rpm with rpmbuild, to .spec not have differences of .spec in src.rpm like this rpmbuild -bs flowblade.spec --define _sourcedir ../srpm-unpacked/ --define _srcrpmdir . you may define where is the SOURCES dir and where is wrote src.rpm . patch applied, new src rpm uploaded. spec: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec source rpm: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-4.fc18.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
