Re: About chromium packaging

2016-08-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Kevin Kofler  wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>  I don't understand why you keep repeating this. I'm sure we can
>> come-up with a patch to make the codec-lists a runtime configurable
>> thing, this is not rocket science.
>
> If you want to have a try at fixing this, look, e.g., at the member variable
> media::MimeUtil::allow_proprietary_codecs_, i.e., the way it is initialized
> (to a compile-time hardcoded value) and the way it is used (in several
> places).
>
> The right way would really be to remove the boolean variable (which only
> allows a binary all-or-nothing approach to patent-encumbered codecs)
> entirely and query for each individual codec at runtime. But then, you will
> likely be querying FFmpeg directly, whereas for Samsung's GStreamer backend
> (which is also affected by this issue, see
> https://github.com/Samsung/ChromiumGStreamerBackend/issues/16 ), one would
> have to query GStreamer directly instead. You would also likely be touching
> several code places related to codec support.
>
> A less invasive approach would simply try to initialize
> media::MimeUtil::allow_proprietary_codecs_ to a runtime-detected value.
>
> Kevin Kofler

You really only need to recompile libmedia.so, which is where the
codec whitelist exists. Both this and the libffmpeg.so library are
provided by the chromium-libs-media package. I'm not sure if it would
work with the system ffmpeg library without a patch, so you may need
to recompile specifically the libmedia.so and libffmpeg.so components
from the Chromium sources into a new chromium-libs-media-freeworld
package.

-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!


Re: Repository access denied

2016-08-09 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2016-08-09 at 10:52 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2016-08-09 10:48 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Morabity  m>:
> > 
> > 2016-08-09 10:39 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Morabity  > com>:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 2016-08-09 10:33 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Chauvet :
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Are you sure that you have not rewritten the history since the
> > > > module
> > > > creation ?
> > > > Are you using rfpkg import or have you just changed the remote
> > > > of a
> > > > pre-existing git repository ? (in which case you must merge
> > > > your
> > > > content on top of the initial commit).
> > > I've only used "rfpkg import", commited my first import and tried
> > > to push
> > > it, on master.
> > I don't know if you've just done something... But I've just retried
> > to
> > import my package and everything is OK now :)
> 
> No changes, but since there is a script running daily (and others
> every 10min, precisely to set ACLs), I may need to run it after a
> module creation.
> Please warn if such problem can be reproduced after a module
> creation.

About: 
"FATAL: W any free/tvheadend melmorabity DENIED by fallthru
(or you mis-spelled the reponame)
fatal: Could not read from remote repository."

github mirror also failed to update [1] (this new package).  

[1] https://github.com/rpmfusion/tvheadend 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.


Re: RPM Fusion pkgs is branched for f25

2016-08-09 Thread Michael Cronenworth

On 08/09/2016 04:52 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

@Michael,
Have you retried since your last attempt ?


I ran another push today and it worked. Thank you.


Re: RPM Fusion pkgs is branched for f25

2016-08-09 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2016-08-07 12:19 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Chauvet :
> 2016-08-07 4:12 GMT+02:00 Michael Cronenworth :
>> On 08/06/2016 05:00 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>>
>>> Please verify to checkout the f25 branch before to push content.
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately something didn't complete. I cannot push to the f25 branch.
>> Pkgdb shows I am approved.
>>
>> $ git push origin
>> Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
>> remote: FATAL: W refs/heads/f25 free/kodi mooninite DENIED by
>> refs/heads/f[0-9][0-9]
>> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/f25
>> To ssh://moonin...@pkgs.rpmfusion.org/free/kodi
>>  ! [remote rejected] f25 -> f25 (hook declined)
> Push to remote can be rejected if not rebased somehow, but if it's an
> ACL issue I will look tonight.
@Michael,
Have you retried since your last attempt ?

Thx



-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)


Re: Repository access denied

2016-08-09 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2016-08-09 10:48 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Morabity :
> 2016-08-09 10:39 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Morabity :
>>
>> 2016-08-09 10:33 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Chauvet :
>>>
>>> Are you sure that you have not rewritten the history since the module
>>> creation ?
>>> Are you using rfpkg import or have you just changed the remote of a
>>> pre-existing git repository ? (in which case you must merge your
>>> content on top of the initial commit).
>>
>> I've only used "rfpkg import", commited my first import and tried to push
>> it, on master.
>
> I don't know if you've just done something... But I've just retried to
> import my package and everything is OK now :)


No changes, but since there is a script running daily (and others
every 10min, precisely to set ACLs), I may need to run it after a
module creation.
Please warn if such problem can be reproduced after a module creation.

-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)


Re: Repository access denied

2016-08-09 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
2016-08-09 10:39 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Morabity :

> 2016-08-09 10:33 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Chauvet :
>
>> Are you sure that you have not rewritten the history since the module
>> creation ?
>> Are you using rfpkg import or have you just changed the remote of a
>> pre-existing git repository ? (in which case you must merge your
>> content on top of the initial commit).
>>
> I've only used "rfpkg import", commited my first import and tried to push
> it, on master.
>
I don't know if you've just done something... But I've just retried to
import my package and everything is OK now :)


Re: Repository access denied

2016-08-09 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
2016-08-09 10:33 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Chauvet :

> Are you sure that you have not rewritten the history since the module
> creation ?
> Are you using rfpkg import or have you just changed the remote of a
> pre-existing git repository ? (in which case you must merge your
> content on top of the initial commit).
>
I've only used "rfpkg import", commited my first import and tried to push
it, on master.


Re: Repository access denied

2016-08-09 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2016-08-08 18:51 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Morabity :
...
> Hello,
>
> I have the same problem when trying to push:
>
> FATAL: W any free/tvheadend melmorabity DENIED by fallthru
> (or you mis-spelled the reponame)
> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Are you sure that you have not rewritten the history since the module creation ?
Are you using rfpkg import or have you just changed the remote of a
pre-existing git repository ? (in which case you must merge your
content on top of the initial commit).


Thx



-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)


Re: [PATCH 1/2] Set Makefile and prepare round.sh

2016-08-09 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2016-08-09 3:36 GMT+02:00 Sérgio M. Basto :
> round.sh, now generate config against mock devel git version, where we have
> the new f25-configs .
>
> Signed-off-by: Sérgio M. Basto 
> ---
>  Makefile |  2 +-
>  round.sh | 14 ++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  mode change 100644 => 100755 round.sh
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 495bff8..51500b5 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -VERSION = 24.0
> +VERSION = 25.0
>
>  default: release-free release-nonfree release-kwizart
>
> diff --git a/round.sh b/round.sh
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> index dd31211..cbf95d7
> --- a/round.sh
> +++ b/round.sh
> @@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
>  #!/bin/sh
>
>  ARCHES="i386 x86_64 aarch64 armhfp ppc ppc64 ppc64le s390x"
> -FVERSION="23 24 rawhide"
> +FVERSION="23 24 25 rawhide"
>  REPOS="rpmfusion_free rpmfusion_nonfree kwizart"
> +#cd .. ; git clone https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/mock.git ; cd mock
> +#git checkout devel
> +etc_mock=../mock/etc/mock
> +#to old config uncomment next line
> +#etc_mock=/etc/mock
>
>
>  for arch in $ARCHES ; do
> @@ -18,12 +23,13 @@ for arch in $ARCHES ; do
>#fi
>if [ $fver = rawhide ] ; then
>  flavour=rawhide
> -ffver=25
> +ffver=26
>fi
> -  if [ ! -f /etc/mock/fedora-${fver}-${arch}.cfg ] ; then
> +  if [ ! -f ${etc_mock}/fedora-${fver}-${arch}.cfg ] ; then
> +echo "doesnt exit ${etc_mock}/fedora-${fver}-${arch}.cfg"
>  continue
>fi
> -  cp /etc/mock/fedora-${fver}-${arch}.cfg fedora-${fver}-${arch}-${repo}.cfg
> +  cp ${etc_mock}/fedora-${fver}-${arch}.cfg 
> fedora-${fver}-${arch}-${repo}.cfg
>sed -i -e "s|^\"\"\"||g" fedora-${fver}-${arch}-${repo}.cfg
>cat rpmfusion-free-$flavour-template >> fedora-${fver}-${arch}-${repo}.cfg
>if [ ! "$repo" = rpmfusion_free ] ; then
> --
> 2.5.5
Good to me, please go ahead.

Thx