[Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 --- Comment #23 from Akarshan Biswas --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #22) > Test with a scratch build before spreading next src-rpm. I'm really sorry. That was my fault. Now this will work 100%. I was testing in clang so I added the dependency in clang not in gcc. now I have added it universally. It's was just a linker error. Updated spec file: https://gitlab.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/raw/master/chromium-vaapi.spec Updated SRPM: https://github.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/releases/download/68.0.3440.106/chromium-vaapi-69.0.3497.81-1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 --- Comment #22 from Antonio Trande --- Test with a scratch build before spreading next src-rpm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 --- Comment #21 from Akarshan Biswas --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #20) > + export 'CXXFLAGS= -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fpermissive' > + CXXFLAGS=' -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fpermissive' > > CXX flags are not set (line #505 > https://gitlab.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/blob/master/chromium-vaapi. > spec#L508) > > Compiling fails with > > FAILED: gn > g++ -O3 -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections -Wl,-strip-all > -static-libstdc++ -Wl,--as-needed -o gn -Wl,--start-group tools/gn/gn_main.o > base.a gn_lib.a -Wl,--end-group -ldl -lpthread > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status It a dependency error. Newer version of chromium 69 requires libstdc++-static package as a build dependency. I should have added this. Let me verify. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 --- Comment #20 from Antonio Trande --- + export 'CXXFLAGS= -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fpermissive' + CXXFLAGS=' -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fpermissive' CXX flags are not set (line #505 https://gitlab.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/blob/master/chromium-vaapi.spec#L508) Compiling fails with FAILED: gn g++ -O3 -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections -Wl,-strip-all -static-libstdc++ -Wl,--as-needed -o gn -Wl,--start-group tools/gn/gn_main.o base.a gn_lib.a -Wl,--end-group -ldl -lpthread /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++ collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |anto.tra...@gmail.com |mfusion.org | Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #19 from Antonio Trande --- I'm reviewing your package but you'll need a sponsor anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 --- Comment #18 from Akarshan Biswas --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #17) > Please, provide direct links to latest "raw" spec file and srpm package. Raw/direct links: Spec file https://gitlab.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/raw/master/chromium-vaapi.spec Updated SRPMS: https://github.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/releases/download/68.0.3440.106/chromium-vaapi-69.0.3497.81-1.fc28.src.rpm Thanks :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||4993 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 [Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com Blocks||2, 30 --- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande --- Please, provide direct links to latest "raw" spec file and srpm package. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 --- Comment #16 from Akarshan Biswas --- Updated spec file:https://gitlab.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/blob/master/chromium-vaapi.spec Updated binary file:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WwYr-FJcaWUd36bkrhcWYy2D2R2pVZ8E @All Please do a review. Thnx :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: [libopenshot-audio/el7] (4 commits) ...Add missing patch
So, after a good deal of flailing around getting caught up on the specifics of this "python3-only builds on epel7" plan, and how it would need to be executed, I finally have package build sources and .specs for python3-sip and python3-qt5 committed to (respectively): https://github.com/ferdnyc/el7-python3-sip https://github.com/ferdnyc/el7-python3-qt5 el7-python3-sip started as the python3-sip branch of your rpms/sip fork @ src.fedoraproject, but I ended up making fairly extensive changes (more on that in a moment). el7-python3-qt5 started from the contents of python-qt5-5.10-3.fc28.src.rpm. They're even both built for EPEL7 in COPR, with python3-sip used for python3-qt5: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ferdnyc/python3-sip/ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ferdnyc/python3-qt5/ (I'm about to submit a new python3-qt5 build, though, so that'll be several minutes at least.) I don't have an EL7 machine to test them on, but I built the packages locally for F28 x86_64, uninstalled the distro packages (forcibly via `rpm -e --nodeps`), and installed these. An openshot-2.4.2.rpm built and run using the new python3-qt5 launched and ran fine. So, I'm hopeful the same would be true of the EPEL7 builds in COPR. Of course, COPR doesn't help with getting openshot@rpmfusion packaged for EPEL7, so what are the next steps? Getting them into the official EPEL7 repos? Or into rpmfusion-el7-free? (Not sure what help I can be on the official side, I'm not even a Fedora packager yet. I did have my first package reviewed and approved, but haven't had a chance to arrange sponsorship and take the next steps.) *A note about the packaging* As I said, I started with your SIP fork, and started out keeping the .spec files as close as possible to the original python2/3 dual builds. But once I fully understood the requirement for python3-sip to be installable *alongside* the python2-only distro build *of a different version*, I tossed all that out. My thinking was: 1. The package and SRPM *names* even have to be different; I'm not sure how you'd even conditionalize that. 2. Both build subpackages (sip-macros, python-qt5-rpm-macros / python-qt5-doc) that are common to both the python2- and python3- paths; they don't perfectly segregate python2-* and python3-*, whereas my packages *must*. So, the specs differ significantly from the originals even on the Python3 build path. Subpackage names change, some contents get moved to different subpackages, etc. 3. I further modified some of the supplementary files used in the build. For instance, I removed the python2 fallback from those py*.sh wrapper scripts python-qt5.spec installs. (In fact, looking at it again now, those wrappers don't appear to make sense without a python2 fallback. I'll remove them entirely.) 4. My python3-sip-macros-4.19.8-5 uses a different filename ( macros.python3-sip) and different macro names (%_py3sip_api-*), so that it can be installed alongside sip-macros-4.14.6-4.el7.x86_64.rpm without conflicting 5. Because of #3, my python3-qt5.spec uses the %_py3sip_api_* macros instead of the standard ones. (It builds python3-qt5-rpm-macros with the usual names/location, mostly for convenience & since there's no python-qt5 on EPEL7 to conflict.) 6. Because SIP will be two entirely different releases, API versions, and macros, all installed simultaneously, it's unlikely any dependent spec could or WOULD generate python2- and python3- packages from the same build, regardless. So, polluting sip.spec and python-qt5.spec from the distro sources with conditionals for these special-case packages didn't make much sense to me (even if it's possible), and since there's no conceivable scenario where these will need to generate python2-compatible packages, I dropped the python2/dual-version build path(s) entirely. The conditionals for distro and python version are all gone, and these specs are suitable only for generating packages using python3 on EPEL7. If that was the wrong call, I'm open to suggestions on a good way to incorporate this into the common cross-distro .spec files. On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:04 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 10:27 -0400, FeRD wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:17 PM FeRD wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:30 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi Frank > > to build openshot on epel7, first we need python3-qt5 on it [1] > but as we have python2-qt5 in EL7 core, we need do a python3 only for > epel 7 , we need create a new package because src.rpm can't have the > same name ... > > [1] > https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/sergiomb/rpms/python-qt5/commits/master > > > Or maybe I didn't see, completely. Does the python3-qt5 package for el7 > need to go into rpmfusion, or over on the upstream side? (I guess what I'm > really asking would be: is there something I can do to make it available, > or do I just need to wait on it?) > > > Richard
[Bug 5015] Review request: ppsspp - A PSP emulator
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015 --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande --- SPEC file: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/ppsspp/ppsspp.spec SRPM file: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/ppsspp/ppsspp-1.6.3-2.fc28.src.rpm - Wayland on epel7 uses an unversioned libwayland-egl library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5015] Review request: ppsspp - A PSP emulator
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande --- This package is ready for fedora 28+ and el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5015] Review request: ppsspp - A PSP emulator
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fast.rizw...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande --- *** Bug 3111 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 3111] Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added namespace||free Resolution|EXPIRED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 5015 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5015] Review request: ppsspp - A PSP emulator
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5015] New: Review request: ppsspp - A PSP emulator
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015
Bug ID: 5015
Summary: Review request: ppsspp - A PSP emulator
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: All
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
Reporter: anto.tra...@gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
SPEC file: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/ppsspp/ppsspp.spec
SRPM file: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/ppsspp/ppsspp-1.6.3-1.fc28.src.rpm
PPSSPP - a fast and portable PSP emulator.
This package depends by ffmpeg.
$ rpmlint ppsspp-1.6.3-1.fc28.src.rpm
ppsspp.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch1: %{name}-armv7.patch
ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-1.6.3.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint ppsspp
ppsspp.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ppsspp.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary PPSSPPQt
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
El7 builds broken for missing CMake
Hello everyone. My scratch builds on el7-free repository are failing for missing 'Packages/c/cmake3-3.12.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm': http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/6968/256968/root.log -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
