[Bug 5473] Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

2019-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473

Nicolas Chauvet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  namespace|free|nonfree

--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet  ---
BSL, if it's not accepted in Fedora is likely to be considered as nonfree.
Please tell if you don't think it's appropriate.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


[Bug 5473] Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

2019-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473

--- Comment #3 from Vasiliy Glazov  ---
zerotier-one.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/sbin/zerotier-one
zerotier-one.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid
/usr/sbin/zerotier-one

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


[Bug 5473] Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

2019-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473

Vasiliy Glazov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |vasc...@gmail.com
   |mfusion.org |
  Flags||fedora-review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


[Bug 5473] Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

2019-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473

Vasiliy Glazov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vasc...@gmail.com
 Blocks||30


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request

2019-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30

Vasiliy Glazov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||5473


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473
[Bug 5473] Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


[Bug 5473] Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

2019-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473

--- Comment #2 from Artem  ---
Moved from Copr:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tim77/fedora/master/rpmbuild/SPECS/zerotier-one.spec

https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/zerotier-one-1.4.6-3.fc31.src.rpm

I'll remove ZeroTier content from Copr very soon. TY.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


[Bug 5473] Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

2019-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473

Gary Buhrmaster  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Gary Buhrmaster  ---
Packages in Fedora Copr must follow the same license/legal requirements as
Fedora packages.  If your package does not meet the Fedora licensing
requirements (which is why it was rejected from Fedora), you are expected to
remove it from Copr.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


[Bug 5473] New: Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth

2019-11-25 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473

Bug ID: 5473
   Summary: Review Request: zerotier-one - Smart Ethernet Switch
for Earth
   Product: Package Reviews
   Version: Current
  Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P1
 Component: Review Request
  Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
  Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
 namespace: free

Previous attempt in here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768452

This is useful app and IMHO nice to have it rpm fusion repos.
This is my first rpm fusion package.
Reason why not in Fedora repos: BSL license

Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/zerotier-one/fedora-31-x86_64/01094641-zerotier-one/zerotier-one.spec

SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/zerotier-one/fedora-31-x86_64/01094641-zerotier-one/zerotier-one-1.4.6-3.fc31.src.rpm

Description:
ZeroTier is a smart programmable Ethernet switch for planet Earth. It allows
all
networked devices, VMs, containers, and applications to communicate as if they
all reside in the same physical data center or cloud region.

This is accomplished by combining a cryptographically addressed and secure peer
to peer network (termed VL1) with an Ethernet emulation layer somewhat similar
to VXLAN (termed VL2). Our VL2 Ethernet virtualization layer includes advanced
enterprise SDN features like fine grained access control rules for network
micro-segmentation and security monitoring.

All ZeroTier traffic is encrypted end-to-end using secret keys that only you
control. Most traffic flows peer to peer, though we offer free (but slow)
relaying for users who cannot establish peer to peer connections.

The goals and design principles of ZeroTier are inspired by among other things
the original Google BeyondCorp paper and the Jericho Forum with its notion of
"deperimeterization."


Fedora Account System Username: atim

Working COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/zerotier-one/


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


Re: rfpkg trouble: "ImportError: No module named builtins"

2019-11-25 Thread Sérgio Basto
My fault you need install python2-future 


On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 22:00 +1100, David Timms wrote:
> Hi, I haven't used rfpkg for maybe 6 months. Have been using fedpkg
> with 
> success. I'm trying a number of commands with f29 rfpkg:
> ===
> rfpkg  clone  free/audacity-freeworld
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "/usr/bin/rfpkg", line 11, in 
>  load_entry_point('rfpkg==1.26.2', 'console_scripts', 'rfpkg')()
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-
> packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", 
> line 489, in load_entry_point
>  return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-
> packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", 
> line 2793, in load_entry_point
>  return ep.load()
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-
> packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", 
> line 2411, in load
>  return self.resolve()
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-
> packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", 
> line 2417, in resolve
>  module = __import__(self.module_name, fromlist=['__name__'],
> level=0)
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rfpkg/__init__.py", line
> 18, 
> in 
>  import rpmfusion_cert
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-
> packages/rpmfusion_cert/__init__.py", 
> line 18, in 
>  from builtins import str
> ImportError: No module named builtins
> ===
> It might be related to python3 v2, but I'm sure if that was the case
> I 
> wouldn't be the only one with an issue ?
> 
> Dave.
> ___
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- 
> rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 
> rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


Re: Build notifications are disabled from koji

2019-11-25 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Le lun. 11 nov. 2019 à 14:57, Nicolas Chauvet  a écrit :
>
> Le sam. 5 oct. 2019 à 14:56, Sérgio Basto  a écrit :
> >
> > On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 14:46 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > Because the build notification feature seems broken already with
> > > current koji, I've fully disabled it.
> > > This will prevent lot of failing notification tasks from the koji-hub
> > > (and hopefully reducing the admin stress on this topic).
> >
> > Fair enough :)
> >
> > What I'd like is have bodhi , to determinate what packages are pushed
> > to repos .
> Bodhi is yet another separate tool to support in our infra.
> I have already said that I'm not going to work on that myslef but
> would help any volunter to work on that topic.
> If one is interested in, please re-open and assign this bug to you:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3332
>
> > And a script to update bugzilla components owner and CC based on pdkdb
> > api [1]
> In-between, I've forked the pkgdb2 code into our rpmfusion-infra namespace.
> So for the record the pythons script that should handle pkgdb ->
> bugzilla synchronisation is
> https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/pkgdb2/blob/master/utility/pkgdb-sync-bugzilla
> Here is a bug to track this request:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5452
>
> I've put a sample pkgdb2 file so there is no need to test/run on the
> infra, but one should be able to run using it's own credentials.


FYI, here is the script been used by the current Fedora infra (it
relies on pagure, but maybe the bugzilla side code worth to look at):
https://pagure.io/Fedora-Infra/distgit-bugzilla-sync



-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


Re: rfpkg trouble: "ImportError: No module named builtins"

2019-11-25 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Le lun. 25 nov. 2019 à 12:01, David Timms  a écrit :
>
> Hi, I haven't used rfpkg for maybe 6 months. Have been using fedpkg with
> success. I'm trying a number of commands with f29 rfpkg:
> ===
> rfpkg  clone  free/audacity-freeworld
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "/usr/bin/rfpkg", line 11, in 
>  load_entry_point('rfpkg==1.26.2', 'console_scripts', 'rfpkg')()
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
> line 489, in load_entry_point
>  return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
> line 2793, in load_entry_point
>  return ep.load()
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
> line 2411, in load
>  return self.resolve()
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
> line 2417, in resolve
>  module = __import__(self.module_name, fromlist=['__name__'], level=0)
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rfpkg/__init__.py", line 18,
> in 
>  import rpmfusion_cert
>File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rpmfusion_cert/__init__.py",
> line 18, in 
>  from builtins import str
> ImportError: No module named builtins
> ===
> It might be related to python3 v2, but I'm sure if that was the case I
> wouldn't be the only one with an issue ?

I don't reproduce with rfpkg from f29.
using python2-2.7.17-1.fc29.x86_64 I can execute the  from builtins
import str from a python2 interpreter.




-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


Re: rfpkg trouble: "ImportError: No module named builtins"

2019-11-25 Thread Leigh Scott
Maybe downgrade rpmfusion-packager if you insist on using f29.

https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=8689
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


Re: rfpkg trouble: "ImportError: No module named builtins"

2019-11-25 Thread Leigh Scott
Try using F30+, F29 is EOL 26/11/19
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org


rfpkg trouble: "ImportError: No module named builtins"

2019-11-25 Thread David Timms
Hi, I haven't used rfpkg for maybe 6 months. Have been using fedpkg with 
success. I'm trying a number of commands with f29 rfpkg:

===
rfpkg  clone  free/audacity-freeworld
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/rfpkg", line 11, in 
load_entry_point('rfpkg==1.26.2', 'console_scripts', 'rfpkg')()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", 
line 489, in load_entry_point

return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", 
line 2793, in load_entry_point

return ep.load()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", 
line 2411, in load

return self.resolve()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", 
line 2417, in resolve

module = __import__(self.module_name, fromlist=['__name__'], level=0)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rfpkg/__init__.py", line 18, 
in 

import rpmfusion_cert
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rpmfusion_cert/__init__.py", 
line 18, in 

from builtins import str
ImportError: No module named builtins
===
It might be related to python3 v2, but I'm sure if that was the case I 
wouldn't be the only one with an issue ?


Dave.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org