RPM Fusion update report 2020-02-26
RPM Fusion update report Section free: - Fedora 30 - Pushed to testing: zoneminder-1.34.3-1.fc30 Pushed to stable: Fedora 31 - Pushed to testing: zoneminder-1.34.3-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: Fedora 32 - Pushed to testing: HandBrake-1.3.0-7.fc32 avidemux-2.7.4-5.fc32 ffmpeg-4.2.2-3.fc32 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld-1.16.2-3.fc32 libheif-1.6.2-2.fc32 mythtv-30.0-17.20191226gita27754ae7f.fc32 vlc-3.0.9-32.fc32 x265-3.3-1.fc32 xpra-codecs-freeworld-3.0.6-3.fc32 zoneminder-1.34.3-1.fc32 Pushed to stable: EL 6 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 - Pushed to testing: zoneminder-1.34.3-1.el7 Pushed to stable: EL 8 - Pushed to testing: zoneminder-1.34.3-1.el8 Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: - Fedora 30 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 31 - Pushed to testing: dwarffortress-0.47.03-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-31-2 Fedora 32 - Pushed to testing: dfhack-0.47.03-1.alpha0.fc32 dwarffortress-0.47.03-1.fc32 Pushed to stable: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-32-0.4 EL 6 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5539] Review Request: qt-heif-image-plugin - Qt plugin for HEIF images
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5539
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GNU Lesser
General Public License (v3)". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/vascom/review-qt-heif-image-
plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description
[Bug 5539] Review Request: qt-heif-image-plugin - Qt plugin for HEIF images
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5539 --- Comment #6 from Yaroslav Sidlovsky --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ZaWertun/rpmfusion-qt-heif-image-plugin/master/qt-heif-image-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/ZaWertun/rpmfusion-qt-heif-image-plugin/raw/master/qt-heif-image-plugin-0.3.3-1.fc31.src.rpm --- +BuildRequires: cmake(Qt5) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Re: Hello to everyone!
Hi. I will sponsor you. I know Yaroslav as good software engineer, KDE and Qt specialist. вт, 25 февр. 2020 г. в 11:57, : > > Hello to everyone! > I'm Yaroslav Sidlovsky - software engineer from Russia, 33 y.o. > > I want to add qt-heif-image-plugin to the RPM Fusion repos. > This package will allow to see previews of HEIF-images for example in Dolphin > and see HEIF-images in the Gwenview. > > I need sponsor as it's my first rpmfusion package. > Package review can be found here - > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5539. > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Hello to everyone!
Hello to everyone! I'm Yaroslav Sidlovsky - software engineer from Russia, 33 y.o. I want to add qt-heif-image-plugin to the RPM Fusion repos. This package will allow to see previews of HEIF-images for example in Dolphin and see HEIF-images in the Gwenview. I need sponsor as it's my first rpmfusion package. Package review can be found here - https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5539. ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5539] Review Request: qt-heif-image-plugin - Qt plugin for HEIF images
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5539 Vasiliy Glazov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|30 | Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |vasc...@gmail.com |mfusion.org | Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Vasiliy Glazov --- I will review and sponsor you. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Vasiliy Glazov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|5539| Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5539 [Bug 5539] Review Request: qt-heif-image-plugin - Qt plugin for HEIF images -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5539] Review Request: qt-heif-image-plugin - Qt plugin for HEIF images
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5539 --- Comment #4 from Yaroslav Sidlovsky --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ZaWertun/rpmfusion-qt-heif-image-plugin/master/qt-heif-image-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/ZaWertun/rpmfusion-qt-heif-image-plugin/raw/master/qt-heif-image-plugin-0.3.3-1.fc31.src.rpm --- > rpmlint qt-heif-image-plugin.spec qt-heif-image-plugin-0.3.3-1.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
