[Bug 6597] Review request: compat-ffmpeg5 - Digital VCR and streaming server
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6597 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6891] Review request: makemkv - DVD and Blu-ray to MKV converter
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6891 --- Comment #4 from Jonathon Hyde --- (In reply to Mohamed El Morabity from comment #2) Thank you for taking the time to review my work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6891] Review request: makemkv - DVD and Blu-ray to MKV converter
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6891 --- Comment #3 from Jonathon Hyde --- (In reply to Mohamed El Morabity from comment #1) Sorry about the SRPM, that was my mistake to go for the first filehost I found on ddg without even bothering to read the front page, the one thing I didn't put much effort into. The link expired the moment I closed the connection, not sure why but that's how they do things. Anyways I'll use https://file.io/zH4FKGrM4WZm for now, it should last 2 weeks this time. Alright I fixed the license tag as well as the provides entries and the description, almost everything you listed. The updated spec should be available from the same link. For the jre-1.8.0 dependency, that may be true that any version of Java should work(Mike, the developer, did make this known to me via email), I decided to leave the recommends as that version because I am very confident it will work without breaking from updates. The requirement for java is only to execute and display disk menus, which all use Java 1.8(or Java 8? The versioning feels weird to me). To add, newer or different versions of Java do break disk menus entirely at least with VLC and libbluray/libdvdcss. I did want to test this further with makemkv specifically, but I simply haven't gotten around to it. Java 8 is still in LTS see here: https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/java-se-support-roadmap.html. I suppose it'll be best to switch it for now, then fix it later depending on my testing? I was also under the impression that the full jre provided audio support? I didn't really want to split up the bin and oss tars into different specs, because I included mmccextr and mmgplsrv in the makemkvcon subpackage, and those are both from the oss package not the bin package. Although that suggestion is worth considering, I'll think it over but you're probably right, it does actually solve a few problems. For now, they'll stay merged as one spec. As for the appdata issue, I've heard of that before but I don't actually know anything about it, so that'll be the only thing I haven't fixed yet. I'm not sure when I'll be able to find time to read up on it and fix it. As a side note, when I build with mock with the fedora-39-x86_64-rpmfusion-free config, it registers the buildRequires entries as requires when I run rpm -q --requires makemkv-1.17.6-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm. Perhaps I made some mistake in my spec? I can't seem to identify the cause of this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6891] Review request: makemkv - DVD and Blu-ray to MKV converter
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6891 --- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity --- One more thing... Since you also provide a GUI application, you should include an AppData file for it: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6891] Review request: makemkv - DVD and Blu-ray to MKV converter
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6891
Mohamed El Morabity changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pikachu.2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Hello,
thanks for packaging MakeMKV. Here is an informal review.
I can't retrieve your src.rpm BTW, from the link you provided.
About licensing:
The EULA states that redistribution is allowed "in it original unmodified
form", with special exception for Linux packaging: "In addition, as a special
exception, you may extract and repackage Linux-specific part of the Software
for the purpose of creating a distribution-specific package, as long as program
files and this license remain unchanged". This should comply with the
requirements for rpmfusion-nonfree.
EULA also mentions that: "The java application in file blues.jar is licensed
under GNU GPL", followed by the GPLv2 full license.
The "oss" tarball bundles some libraries:
- libmatroska is LGPL-2.1-or-later
- libeml is LGPL-2.1-or-later
- libdvdnav + libdvdread is GPL-2.0-or-later
As well as some code, licensed under OpenSSL license, taken from OpenSSL.
Please update the License tag. Don't forget also to report bundled libraries as
follows in your libs subpackage (versions detected from the headers):
Provides: bundled(libdvdnav) = 6.1.1
Provides: bundled(libdvdread) = 6.1.2
Provides: bundled(libebml) = 1.3.10
Provides: bundled(libmatroska) = 1.5.2
About rpmlint issues:
> makemkv.src: E: description-line-too-long
Please ensure your descriptions are wrapped to 80 characters per line. This is
mandatory, for legibility.
See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_summary_and_description
> makemkv-libs.x86_64: E: shared-library-not-executable
Just make them executable after deployment:
%install
[...]
%make_install
chmod 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.so.*
About dependencies:
> Requires: qt5-qtbase-gui
Useless, since the GUI is compiled and dynamically linked to Qt5. The RPM
automatic dependency generator will handle this for you. Please drop this line.
> Recommends: jre-1.8.0
"Recommends" is OK here. But do you really need this specific (old) Java
version? According to the MakeMKV website: "MakeMKV can use any version of
Java" (see https://www.makemkv.com/bdjava/). Any supported JRE should be OK
then.
Moreover, is the full JRE is needed? A headless flavour shouldn't be OK (I
don't think BD+ support requires graphics bits). java-headless is maybe more
appropriate here.
BTW:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Java/#_buildrequires_and_requires
> Suggests: ffmpeg-libs
Useless too. The shared libs in the libs subpackage are compiled and linked
against ffmpeg. Dependencies are already computed, as said above.
> Requires: /usr/bin/ffmpeg
I really don't think makemkvcon directly calls the ffmpeg binary. It is linked
to ffmpeg libs:
$ ldd ./makemkvcon | grep libav
libavutil.so.58 => /lib64/libavutil.so.58 (0x7fe47360)
libavcodec.so.60 => /lib64/libavcodec.so.60 (0x7fe47220)
You can remove this useless dependency.
BTW since makemkvcon binaries are only available for x86/x86_64 and
arm/aarch64, you should reflect supported archs in your spec file, using
"ExclusiveArch":
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} %{arm} x86_64 %{arm64}
The package provided prebuilt binaries, so you added "%global debug_package
%{nil}" to disable debuginfo generation. You should also disable binary
stripping (so that binaries are not modified, to conform the EULA):
%global __strip /bin/true
Unfortunately, this will also disable debuginfo generation for the compiled
bytes (libs + GUI). Maybe it would be worth splitting the "bin" the "oss"
components into two separate SPEC files, to avoid it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6891] New: Review request: makemkv - DVD and Blu-ray to MKV converter
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6891
Bug ID: 6891
Summary: Review request: makemkv - DVD and Blu-ray to MKV
converter
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: All
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
Reporter: siliconwaf...@trilbyproject.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siliconwaffle/makemkv/main/makemkv.spec
SRPM: https://get.station307.com/T94vXAtrAt3/makemkv-1.17.6-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: MakeMKV is your one-click solution to convert video that you own
into free and patents-unencumbered format that can be played everywhere.
MakeMKV is a format converter, otherwise called "transcoder". It converts the
video clips from proprietary (and usually encrypted) disc into a set of MKV
files, preserving most information but not changing it in any way. The MKV
format can store multiple video/audio tracks with all meta-information and
preserve chapters. There are many players that can play MKV files nearly on all
platforms, and there are tools to convert MKV files to many formats, including
DVD and Blu-ray discs.
Additionally MakeMKV can instantly stream decrypted video without intermediate
conversion to wide range of players, so you may watch Blu-ray and DVD discs
with your favorite player on your favorite OS or on your favorite device.
This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it includes
makemkvcon which is commercial, closed source software and is bound to a EULA.
rpmlint outputs:
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/makemkv-1.17.6-1.fc39.src.rpm
=
rpmlint session starts
=
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
makemkv.src: E: spelling-error ('transcoder', '%description -l en_US transcoder
-> trans coder, trans-coder, transponder')
makemkv.src: E: spelling-error ('decrypted', '%description -l en_US decrypted
-> encrypted')
makemkv.src: W: invalid-license GuinpinSoft Inc EULA
makemkv.src: E: description-line-too-long MakeMKV is your one-click solution to
convert video that you own into free and patents-unencumbered format that can
be played everywhere. MakeMKV is a format converter, otherwise called
"transcoder". It converts the video clips from proprietary (and usually
encrypted) disc into a set of MKV files, preserving most information but not
changing it in any way. The MKV format can store multiple video/audio tracks
with all meta-information and preserve chapters. There are many players that
can play MKV files nearly on all platforms, and there are tools to convert MKV
files to many formats, including DVD and Blu-ray discs.
makemkv.src: E: description-line-too-long Additionally MakeMKV can instantly
stream decrypted video without intermediate conversion to wide range of
players, so you may watch Blu-ray and DVD discs with your favorite player on
your favorite OS or on your favorite device.
1 packages and 0 specfiles
checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings, 5 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.5 s
For the two spelling errors, I chose to ignore them because 1. The description
that contains them is copy/pasted directly from makemkv.com and 2. They are
technically not even misspellings, I found them in online dictionaries.
As for the invalid license, that's just the name of the EULA which bounds users
of the software, perhaps I'm supposed to use the term 'commercial' or
'proprietary', however I have not found any documentation that would lead me to
believe that using the name of the EULA is invalid. Also, from what I've read
on the makemkv forum, upstream wishes that the EULA be acknowledged very
plainly to users since the packaging process bypass the agreement to the EULA
phase of installation in order to automate the process.
For the description being too long, I chose to ignore this because it still
builds just fine in mock and because to break the description up into smaller
bits wouldn't look very clean, it's just messy and I believe it to be
unnecessary(but perhaps I am wrong and it is really necessary).
rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-39-x86_64/result/makemkv-libs-1.17.6-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
[Bug 6881] Review Request: libquicktime-freeworld - FAAD2, FFmpeg and x264 plugins for libquicktime library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881 --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libquicktime-freeworld/libquicktime-freeworld.spec SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libquicktime-freeworld/libquicktime-freeworld-1.2.4^20240202git2213b76-1.fc39.src.rpm * Sun Mar 03 2024 Dominik Mierzejewski - 1.2.4^20240202git2213b7-1 - use currently recommended snapshot versioning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6881] Review Request: libquicktime-freeworld - FAAD2, FFmpeg and x264 plugins for libquicktime library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881 --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #1) > Why yet another freeworld package ?! > Specially as this one only is relevant for one dependency mjpegtools and > others deps are not the top most modern software. So that nobody complains that moving package to Fedora is taking away some features. It was an easy one, too, so it was a minimal effort. > I wish the multimedia SIG could be better at enhancing missing dependencies > from vlc such as decklink or aribb support No idea what you're talking about. If something is missing in the VLC package, please open a ticket and we'll take a look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6881] Review Request: libquicktime-freeworld - FAAD2, FFmpeg and x264 plugins for libquicktime library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Why yet another freeworld package ?! Specially as this one only is relevant for one dependency mjpegtools and others deps are not the top most modern software. I wish the multimedia SIG could be better at enhancing missing dependencies from vlc such as decklink or aribb support rather than wasting my time to even bother look at that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6881] Review Request: libquicktime-freeworld - FAAD2, FFmpeg and x264 plugins for libquicktime library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6881] New: Review Request: libquicktime-freeworld - FAAD2, FFmpeg and x264 plugins for libquicktime library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881 Bug ID: 6881 Summary: Review Request: libquicktime-freeworld - FAAD2, FFmpeg and x264 plugins for libquicktime library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: domi...@greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libquicktime-freeworld/libquicktime-freeworld.spec SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libquicktime-freeworld/libquicktime-freeworld-1.2.4-1.20240202git2213b76.fc39.src.rpm Description: This package contains the FAAD2, FFmpeg and x264 plugins for libquicktime. Why not in Fedora? The above codecs have not been cleared for inclusion in Fedora and the libquicktime package is being moved to Fedora without them (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267127). Fortunately, the plugin architecture here means we can just build the missing codecs and drop then in the correct place. FAS: rathann -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from leigh scott --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 5321 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 --- Comment #7 from leigh scott --- (In reply to amidevous from comment #5) > but with my psychological problems I could never learn > already the only language I speak and understand is French > so to begin with, your documentation should already be in French because the > translators do not all translate correctly > and even there I would still need a person who speaks French who can explain > to me in a different way and probably even several times everything that I > cannot understand > > not to mention that I have a lot of problems following my psychological > problems in my personal life with all this I would never have the time > necessary to keep a package up to date > > especially when I find myself in a closed center without any internet access > for several weeks > > All I'm asking is absolutely not to make the package myself. > > but someone who has already packaged it for you will take care of it > > it's still serious to have to detail private and personal problems to ask > that a member of your team be responsible for creating a package containing > a very small library > > moreover this request I am not making it only for myself > > but for everyone because currently everyone who wants to install the > widevine library in chromium to be able to watch Netflix videos must do it > manually > > which is disturbing for the world without exception > > so please, out of respect for this request, please keep it open so that your > packagers who already have your validation can see it and decide for > themselves whether or not they wish to create and maintain this package. > > THANKS If you reopen this issue I will ban you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5321] Review Request: widevine-cdm - Widevine DRM browser plugin
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5321 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amidev...@gmail.com --- Comment #35 from leigh scott --- *** Bug 6864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 amidev...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #5 from amidev...@gmail.com --- but with my psychological problems I could never learn already the only language I speak and understand is French so to begin with, your documentation should already be in French because the translators do not all translate correctly and even there I would still need a person who speaks French who can explain to me in a different way and probably even several times everything that I cannot understand not to mention that I have a lot of problems following my psychological problems in my personal life with all this I would never have the time necessary to keep a package up to date especially when I find myself in a closed center without any internet access for several weeks All I'm asking is absolutely not to make the package myself. but someone who has already packaged it for you will take care of it it's still serious to have to detail private and personal problems to ask that a member of your team be responsible for creating a package containing a very small library moreover this request I am not making it only for myself but for everyone because currently everyone who wants to install the widevine library in chromium to be able to watch Netflix videos must do it manually which is disturbing for the world without exception so please, out of respect for this request, please keep it open so that your packagers who already have your validation can see it and decide for themselves whether or not they wish to create and maintain this package. THANKS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 Dan Horák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC||d...@danny.cz Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Dan Horák --- There is no magic free workforce that fulfils users' wishes. But anyone can learn and become the packager for the content they are missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 --- Comment #3 from amidev...@gmail.com --- for me what is indicated on your Contributors page is Chinese you command line which are giving the rpmfusion-packager-setup rfpkg ... I understand absolutely nothing about this if you look closely it's not me and create this project I only forked to add the paths that were missing in the find-chromium.sh file and add support for windows but with this system the installation and updating of the library remains manual as everyone is currently in bash So what I'm asking is that a member of your team this package loads the library so that it can be updated automatically -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 amidev...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #2 from amidev...@gmail.com --- except that I'm not a packer myself What I'm asking is that someone on your team is in charge of this compaction -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from leigh scott --- The 'review request' process is for new packages that you are going to submit and maintain. https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 amidev...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/amidevou ||s/chromium-widevine/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6864] New: add chromium-widevine
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6864 Bug ID: 6864 Summary: add chromium-widevine Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: amidev...@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree please add chromium-widevine https://github.com/amidevous/chromium-widevine/ for automatic add widevine on chromium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6835] Sponsorship request for wiki: miika
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6835 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Group|Infrastructure | CC list accessible|1 |0 Blocks|30 | Reporter|1 |0 accessible|| Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|6835| Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6835 [Bug 6835] Sponsorship request for wiki: miika -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6835] Sponsorship request for wiki: miika
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6835 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Group||Infrastructure CC||lxt...@gmail.com, ||matth...@saou.eu Component|Review Request |Websites Version|Current |NA Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |kwiz...@gmail.com |mfusion.org | Product|Package Reviews |Infrastructure --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, we don't have a wiki account group wired to authorize our moinmoin wiki instance. Nor do we have a clean review process for content from other contributor. Best is to put what you need to change here and I will adapt. The way forward is probably to use the fedora wiki for that: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/set-nvidia-as-primary-gpu-on-optimus-based-laptops/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Miika Tuominen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||6835 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6835 [Bug 6835] Sponsorship request for wiki: miika -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6835] Sponsorship request for wiki: miika
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6835 Miika Tuominen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||30 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6835] New: Sponsorship request for wiki: miika
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6835 Bug ID: 6835 Summary: Sponsorship request for wiki: miika Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: miika.km.tuomi...@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free Hello. I'm interested in contributing to the wiki, and it seems I need to get a sponsor to be able to do that. I did not find any instructions on getting a sponsorship in order to edit the wiki (without submitting a package to be reviewed), but I figured creating a ticket here was the most rational way. I was interested in improving specifically the "Howto/Optimus/NVIDIA PrimaryGPU Support" section, since currently it has instructions for setting Nvidia as the primary GPU only on X11, but not wayland (which is the only supported display server anyway). The reason I consider this important information is because on laptops, you need to have Nvidia as the primary driver in order to use a second monitor. In the spirit of leaving the campground cleaner than I found it, I would also like to add instructions to the contributing page on how to edit the wiki, as it took a while for me to find out what I have to do. And I'm still not sure, since the wiki login claims I don't have correct credentials - maybe it will work when I join the "wikiedit" group. Feel free to ask any questions. Miika -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6819] Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Built for F38+. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6819] Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2 |4 --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Thank you. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4 [Bug 4] Tracker: Accepted packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6819] Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from leigh scott --- Processed. https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/vlc-plugins-freeworld.git/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6819] Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: * Package follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines + This is effectively a subset of Fedora's vlc package * Package builds and installs * Package licensing is correctly handled * No serious issues from rpmlint PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6819] Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |ngomp...@gmail.com |mfusion.org | Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6819] Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||6816 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6816 [Bug 6816] VLC moving to Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6819] Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6819] New: Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6819 Bug ID: 6819 Summary: Review Request: vlc-plugins-freeworld - AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: domi...@greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/vlc-plugins-freeworld/vlc-plugins-freeworld.spec SRPM: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/vlc-plugins-freeworld/vlc-plugins-freeworld-3.0.20-1.src.rpm Description: AAC, H.264, and HEVC codec plugins for VLC media player Why not in Fedora? The above codecs have not been cleared for inclusion in Fedora and the vlc package was moved to Fedora without them. FAS: rathann -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6796] Review request: neatvnc - a liberally licensed VNC server library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6796 Bob Hepple changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple --- I think perhaps I've been overly hasty with this - sway/wlroots is not in RHEL8 nor EPEL8 so let's forget this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6797] Review request: wayvnc - A VNC server for wlroots based Wayland compositors
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6797 Bob Hepple changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple --- I think perhaps I've been overly hasty with this - sway/wlroots is not in RHEL8 nor EPEL8 so let's forget this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6795] Review request: aml - Another Main Loop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 Bob Hepple changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Bob Hepple --- I think perhaps I've been overly hasty with this - sway/wlroots is not in RHEL8 nor EPEL8 so let's forget this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6795] Review request: aml - Another Main Loop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet --- This will be a long standing issue if we need to maintain ffmpeg deps only in el8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6795] Review request: aml - Another Main Loop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Thanks for getting in touch. This will be a long standing issue if we need to There is already a review for ffmpeg4 that could be introduced as a matching counterpart for our compatible ffmpeg in el8 branch (then we could rebase to 4.4). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248907 Unless we want to migrate to ffmpeg5+ there (but one need to verify the needed deps are present for el8) As requested on the ticket, there is a need for someone to take over the adaptation to provide a libavcdec-freeworld if a complement sub-package is needed. But as it's going, I prefer to advertise users to use dnf swap here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6795] Review request: aml - Another Main Loop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 --- Comment #4 from Bob Hepple --- aml is a dependency of neatvnc/wayvnc and is only used there AFAIK. I already added it as a EPEL8 branch in fedora before I discovered that wayvnc would not build in EPEL8 (because of ffmpeg). I can leave it there in EPEL8 but it's just a bit weird given that neatvnc and wayvnc need to be in fusion. neatvnc and wayvnc build fine in EPEL9 and fedora so this is just for EPEL8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6795] Review request: aml - Another Main Loop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 Sérgio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com --- Comment #3 from Sérgio Basto --- maybe is more simpler add ffmpeg to epel8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6795] Review request: aml - Another Main Loop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 Ian McInerney changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian.s.mciner...@ieee.org --- Comment #2 from Ian McInerney --- Why does aml need to be in rpmfusion? It is already in the Fedora repositories, and it doesn't appear to have any problematic dependencies. If you need this for another package in EPEL, I'd recommend asking for a new EPEL branch in the main Fedora repositories instead of adding it here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6795] Review request: aml - Another Main Loop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 Bob Hepple changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 --- Comment #1 from Bob Hepple --- Add blocks 2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6796] Review request: neatvnc - a liberally licensed VNC server library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6796 Bob Hepple changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 --- Comment #1 from Bob Hepple --- Add blocks 2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6797] Review request: wayvnc - A VNC server for wlroots based Wayland compositors
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6797 Bob Hepple changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 --- Comment #1 from Bob Hepple --- Add Block #2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6797] New: Review request: wayvnc - A VNC server for wlroots based Wayland compositors
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6797 Bug ID: 6797 Summary: Review request: wayvnc - A VNC server for wlroots based Wayland compositors Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: bob.hep...@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC URL: http://bhepple.freeshell.org/wayvnc.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/wayvnc/0.7.2/1.fc39/src/wayvnc-0.7.2-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: This is a VNC server for wlroots based Wayland compositors. It attaches to a running Wayland session, creates virtual input devices and exposes a single display via the RFB protocol. The Wayland session may be a headless one, so it is also possible to run wayvnc without a physical display attached. Not in epel8 as wayvnc depends on ffmpeg - it is already in epel9 and fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6796] New: Review request: neatvnc - a liberally licensed VNC server library
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6796 Bug ID: 6796 Summary: Review request: neatvnc - a liberally licensed VNC server library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: bob.hep...@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC URL: http://bhepple.freeshell.org/neatvnc.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/neatvnc/0.7.1/1.fc39/src/neatvnc-0.7.1-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: This is a liberally licensed VNC server library that's intended to be fast and neat. Note: This is a beta release, so the interface is not yet stable. Not in epel8 as wayvnc depends on ffmpeg - it is already in epel9 and fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6795] New: Review request: aml - Another Main Loop
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6795 Bug ID: 6795 Summary: Review request: aml - Another Main Loop Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: bob.hep...@gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC URL: http://bhepple.freeshell.org/aml.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/aml/0.3.0/2.fc39/src/aml-0.3.0-2.fc39.src.rpm Description: Event loop handler developed for wayvnc (Wayland VNC server) and wlvncc (Wayland VNC client) - see https://github.com/any1 Not in epel8 as wayvnc depends on ffmpeg - it is already in epel9 and fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 3430] Review request: qtads - Multimedia interpreter for Tads games
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3430 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(val...@civ.zcu.cz | |) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 4634] Review request: kodi-peripheral-joystick - Kodi Joystick Report
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4634 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(wberr...@gmail.co | |m) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6125] Review request: Advanced linux driver for Xbox One Wireless Gamepad
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6125 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6126] Review request: Kernel module (kmod) for xpadneo
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6126 Bug 6126 depends on bug 6125, which changed state. Bug 6125 Summary: Review request: Advanced linux driver for Xbox One Wireless Gamepad https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6125 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6126] Review request: Kernel module (kmod) for xpadneo
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6126 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6126] Review request: Kernel module (kmod) for xpadneo
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6126 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Artem from comment #10) > Look like since 6.5 kernel (in Bodhi for f38 currently) we don't need > xpadneo anymore. Now vibration works over Bluetooth on my Xbox SX > controller. Probably the only useful thing which provides xpadneo is a > reporting battery status. Thanks for the feedback, closing the bug hence. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6126] Review request: Kernel module (kmod) for xpadneo
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6126 --- Comment #10 from Artem --- Look like since 6.5 kernel (in Bodhi for f38 currently) we don't need xpadneo anymore. Now vibration works over Bluetooth on my Xbox SX controller. Probably the only useful thing which provides xpadneo is a reporting battery status. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6756] [vcmi] Take over the ownership of the package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6756 trung...@ruby-journal.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6756] New: [vcmi] Take over the ownership of the package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6756 Bug ID: 6756 Summary: [vcmi] Take over the ownership of the package Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: trung...@ruby-journal.com CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free Package Change Request == Package Name: vcmi Updated RPMFusion Owners: runlevel5 Description: To take over the ownership of the vcmi package NOTE: Link to profile https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/packager/runlevel5/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6469] Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod - The driver for Intel IPU6 MIPI camera
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6469 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6731] Review request: kodi-game-libretro - Compatibility add-on for Kodi allowing Libretro cores as game add-ons
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6731 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6732] Review request: kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6732 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6732] kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6732 --- Comment #1 from jgoutin --- Note: The "kodi-game-libretro" (see #6731) package is useless alone. To be used it need Kodi plugins for liretro cores the user want to use. There is hundred of available libretro cores: https://kodi.wiki/view/Game_add-ons Eventually, it may be possible to build (and maintain) each of them for Fedora, but this will be an hard work task. This is why I propose this "kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository" package. This repository add-on give to the user the ability to download an exhaustive collection of already built Libretro core based on (generic linux) binaries provided directly by the libretro project upstream. Without this repository add-on, the user will have no game add-ons at all in the add-ons manager without extra work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6732] Review request: kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6732 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|kodi-game-libretro-buildbot |Review request: |-addons-repository - Kodi |kodi-game-libretro-buildbot |repository of game add-ons |-addons-repository - Kodi |based on the libretro |repository of game add-ons |buildbot binaries |based on the libretro ||buildbot binaries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6732] kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6732 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||30 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6731] Review request: kodi-game-libretro - Compatibility add-on for Kodi allowing Libretro cores as game add-ons
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6731 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||6732 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6732 [Bug 6732] kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6732] kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6732 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||6731 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6731 [Bug 6731] Review request: kodi-game-libretro - Compatibility add-on for Kodi allowing Libretro cores as game add-ons -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||6732 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6732 [Bug 6732] kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6732] New: kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6732 Bug ID: 6732 Summary: kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository - Kodi repository of game add-ons based on the libretro buildbot binaries Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: jgou...@pm.me CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free spec: - https://github.com/JGoutin/fedora_packages/blob/main/kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository/kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository.spec src.rpm: https://github.com/JGoutin/fedora_packages/blob/main/kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository/kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository-1.0.1-1.fc38.src.rpm description: This Kodi repository provides libretro cores game add-ons. Theses add-ons are build using directly binaries from the Libretro buildbot (https://buildbot.libretro.com) and are updated on a weekly basis. Why not in Fedora: -- This package depends on "kodi" from RPMFusion-Free RPMlint: rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 3 kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository.src: W: strange-permission kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository.spec 600 kodi-game-libretro-buildbot-addons-repository.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 badness; no-documentation: Documentation from upstream is only about repository generation build documentation + real-time status of add-ons provided by the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||6731 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6731 [Bug 6731] Review request: kodi-game-libretro - Compatibility add-on for Kodi allowing Libretro cores as game add-ons -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6731] Review request: kodi-game-libretro - Compatibility add-on for Kodi allowing Libretro cores as game add-ons
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6731 jgoutin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||30 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6731] New: Review request: kodi-game-libretro - Compatibility add-on for Kodi allowing Libretro cores as game add-ons
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6731 Bug ID: 6731 Summary: Review request: kodi-game-libretro - Compatibility add-on for Kodi allowing Libretro cores as game add-ons Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org Reporter: jgou...@pm.me CC: rpmfusion-package-rev...@rpmfusion.org namespace: free This is my first package for Fedora and for RPMFusion. I am not yet sponsored. spec: - https://github.com/JGoutin/fedora_packages/blob/main/kodi-game-libretro/kodi-game-libretro.spec src.rpm: https://github.com/JGoutin/fedora_packages/blob/main/kodi-game-libretro/kodi-game-libretro-20.1.0-1.fc38.src.rpm description: This Kodi add-on provides a wrapper that allows Libretro cores to be loaded as Kodi game add-ons. Libretro cores are shared libraries that use the Libretro API, so the wrapper is responsible for translating function calls between the Libretro API and the Game API. Why not in Fedora: -- This package depends on "kodi" from RPMFusion-Free RPMlint: rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 3 kodi-game-libretro.src: W: strange-permission kodi-game-libretro.spec 600 kodi-game-libretro.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 badness no-documentation: Documentation from upstream is only build documentation. But, added the Kodi help wiki for games in "metainfo.xml" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 5164] Review request: stansoft - A text-based financial accounting system
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5164 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|domi...@greysector.net |rpmfusion-package-review@rp ||mfusion.org --- Comment #41 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Stepping down from review. My apologies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #25 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Looks like Nicolas built this for F36+, so closing. Thanks everyone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6468] Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod-common - The necessary module configuration for akmod-intel-ipu6
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468 --- Comment #12 from Kate Hsuan --- Hi Nicolas, (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #11) > (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #10) > > (In reply to Kate Hsuan from comment #9) > ... > > > What do you think about my first plan? > > > > Since the "Provides: intel-ipu6-kmod-common" is already part of > > ipu6-camera-bins I think that adding the Requires there makes sense. So +1 > > from me for this plan. > > Looks fine, is this implemented ? > Is everything fine in latest release ? > Can this Review be closed ? > > Thanks for the work done. I have not pushed the change to git. After I finish this, I will close this bz. Thank you -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6468] Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod-common - The necessary module configuration for akmod-intel-ipu6
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #10) > (In reply to Kate Hsuan from comment #9) ... > > What do you think about my first plan? > > Since the "Provides: intel-ipu6-kmod-common" is already part of > ipu6-camera-bins I think that adding the Requires there makes sense. So +1 > from me for this plan. Looks fine, is this implemented ? Is everything fine in latest release ? Can this Review be closed ? Thanks for the work done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #24 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #23) > Repo requested: https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/requests/914 Processed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #23 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Repo requested: https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/requests/914 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2 |4 --- Comment #22 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Thanks for the review. Yes, I'll change the BuildRequires: to ffmpeg-devel, accordingly, and change the Release, too. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4 [Bug 4] Tracker: Accepted packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6468] Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod-common - The necessary module configuration for akmod-intel-ipu6
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468
--- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to Kate Hsuan from comment #9)
> Hi Folks,
>
> Let me describe the current dependency settings:
>
> ipu6-camera-bins:
> Provides: intel-ipu6-kmod-common = %{version}
>
> ipu6-camera-bins-firmware:
> ivsc-firmware:
>
> ipu6-camera-hal:
> Requires: ipu6-camera-bins
>
> gstreamer1-plugins-icamerasrc:
> Requires: ipu6-camera-hal
>
> v4l2-relayd:
> Requires: v4l2loopback
>
> My first plan is shown as follows:
> Add the Requires to ipu6-camera-bins.
>
> Requires: ipu6-camera-bins-firmware
> Requires: ivsc-firmware
> Requires: gstreamer1-plugins-icamerasrc
> Requires: v4l2-relayd
> Requires: intel-ipu6-kmod
>
> Once we install the ipu6-camera-bins the firmware and akmod can also be
> installed.
>
> What do you think about my first plan?
Since the "Provides: intel-ipu6-kmod-common" is already part of
ipu6-camera-bins I think that adding the Requires there makes sense. So +1 from
me for this plan.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6468] Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod-common - The necessary module configuration for akmod-intel-ipu6
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468
--- Comment #9 from Kate Hsuan ---
Hi Folks,
Let me describe the current dependency settings:
ipu6-camera-bins:
Provides: intel-ipu6-kmod-common = %{version}
ipu6-camera-bins-firmware:
ivsc-firmware:
ipu6-camera-hal:
Requires: ipu6-camera-bins
gstreamer1-plugins-icamerasrc:
Requires: ipu6-camera-hal
v4l2-relayd:
Requires: v4l2loopback
My first plan is shown as follows:
Add the Requires to ipu6-camera-bins.
Requires: ipu6-camera-bins-firmware
Requires: ivsc-firmware
Requires: gstreamer1-plugins-icamerasrc
Requires: v4l2-relayd
Requires: intel-ipu6-kmod
Once we install the ipu6-camera-bins the firmware and akmod can also be
installed.
What do you think about my first plan?
Thank you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6469] Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod - The driver for Intel IPU6 MIPI camera
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6469 --- Comment #14 from Kate Hsuan --- Thank you for reviewing it. (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #13) > This package itself is good as is. But some package (icamerasrc or > intel-ipu6 ?) needs to have: > > Provides: intel-ipu6-kmod-common ipu6-camera-bins already provided "intel-ipu6-kmod-common". > Requires: intel-ipu6-kmod All the packages are necessary for the IPU6 camera. The dependency looks like this: gstreamer1-plugins-icamerasrc (requires)-> ipu6-camera-hal (requires)-> ipu6-camera-bins ipu6-camera-bins provides the basic libraries for plugins and applications. We could only place the kmod provide/reqiure setting in this package. > > Eventually you can enforce a version (if ever relevant) with >= > > Let's defer that question to > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468 Okay. Let's discuss it there. > > This package is APPROVED I'll submit the new package. Thank you :) > > But please only import it when the solution is found. Okay. Could I import the kmod package first? (rfpkg import) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6387] Review request: kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect - inputstream.ffmpegdirect for Kodi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6387 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com Blocks||6656 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6656 [Bug 6656] Package fails to install on Fedora 38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #20) > >> /usr/bin is in primary.xml. > >There is a need to uniform that across the distro. > I meant, some are using ffmpeg-free, others /usr/bin/ffmpeg, let's keep the > latter form. I generally try to stick to /usr/bin/ffmpeg and avoid hard dependencies on specific runtime library packages when I can on the Fedora side. I would appreciate it if RPM Fusion would do the same on their side. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet --- >> /usr/bin is in primary.xml. >There is a need to uniform that across the distro. I meant, some are using ffmpeg-free, others /usr/bin/ffmpeg, let's keep the latter form. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |kwiz...@gmail.com |mfusion.org | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #18) > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #17) ... > /usr/bin is in primary.xml. There is a need to uniform that across the distro. Fine with me then. This package is APPROVED. (you might need to switch to ffmpeg-devel to avoid ffmpeg-free-devel been masked by our package in koji). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #18 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #17) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #16) > > It is redundant. > > I would still consider an advantage if it could avoid to download the > optional filelist.*xz from repodata. /usr/bin is in primary.xml. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #16) > It is redundant. I would still consider an advantage if it could avoid to download the optional filelist.*xz from repodata. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #16 from Neal Gompa --- It is redundant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #13) > (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #12) > > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11) > > ... > > > That makes no sense, since OBS doesn't use ffmpeg for that. It only uses > > > ffmpeg for OpenH264, AV1, or hardware codecs (all of which are present in > > > ffmpeg-free). The x264 plugin uses libx264 directly. > > > > So please use ffmpeg-bin instead. (due to be implemented in fedora > > ffmpeg-free) And deal with any error gracefully. > > Thanks > > I will not implement another provides in ffmpeg-free. I already stated that > I'll revert back to "Requires: /usr/bin/ffmpeg" once this package lands, but > I cannot do that until this lands. Why not, using ffmpeg-bin will be a better way to describe /usr/bin/ffmpeg ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #14 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to leigh scott from comment #4) > Fedora ffmpeg isn't usable in rpmfusion for the same reason libheif needed > name changing. > > BuildRequires: ffmpeg-free-devel This should be fine to switch to ffmpeg-devel, since we only need it to make the OBS build scripts work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #13 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #12) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11) > ... > > That makes no sense, since OBS doesn't use ffmpeg for that. It only uses > > ffmpeg for OpenH264, AV1, or hardware codecs (all of which are present in > > ffmpeg-free). The x264 plugin uses libx264 directly. > > So please use ffmpeg-bin instead. (due to be implemented in fedora > ffmpeg-free) And deal with any error gracefully. > Thanks I will not implement another provides in ffmpeg-free. I already stated that I'll revert back to "Requires: /usr/bin/ffmpeg" once this package lands, but I cannot do that until this lands. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11) ... > That makes no sense, since OBS doesn't use ffmpeg for that. It only uses > ffmpeg for OpenH264, AV1, or hardware codecs (all of which are present in > ffmpeg-free). The x264 plugin uses libx264 directly. So please use ffmpeg-bin instead. (due to be implemented in fedora ffmpeg-free) And deal with any error gracefully. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #10) > I see little interest having openh264 dependency when we want to rely on the > ffmpeg maintained h264_builtin or x264 ones. > > If we can expect software to gracefully discard builtin h264 when not > available I see no reason why the same cannot be expected with openh264. > > Now if we want to enforce the x264 obs plugin when our ffmpeg-libs are used, > we can do that That makes no sense, since OBS doesn't use ffmpeg for that. It only uses ffmpeg for OpenH264, AV1, or hardware codecs (all of which are present in ffmpeg-free). The x264 plugin uses libx264 directly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet --- I see little interest having openh264 dependency when we want to rely on the ffmpeg maintained h264_builtin or x264 ones. If we can expect software to gracefully discard builtin h264 when not available I see no reason why the same cannot be expected with openh264. Now if we want to enforce the x264 obs plugin when our ffmpeg-libs are used, we can do that -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- (In reply to leigh scott from comment #5) [...] > We don't have permission to use cisco openh264 Everyone has permission to use the Cisco binaries: [...] Cisco provides an OpenH264 codec (as a source and a binary), which is their of implementation H.264 codec, and they cover all licensing fees for all parties using their binary. As long as the binary packages are downloaded from cisco's repo at https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/, we are covered by their license. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6469] Review request: intel-ipu6-kmod - The driver for Intel IPU6 MIPI camera
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6469 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |kwiz...@gmail.com |mfusion.org | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet --- This package itself is good as is. But some package (icamerasrc or intel-ipu6 ?) needs to have: Provides: intel-ipu6-kmod-common Requires: intel-ipu6-kmod Eventually you can enforce a version (if ever relevant) with >= Let's defer that question to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6468 This package is APPROVED But please only import it when the solution is found. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #8 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Sérgio Basto from comment #7) > (In reply to leigh scott from comment #5) > > We don't have permission to use cisco openh264 > > ??? so ask them No! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 Sérgio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com --- Comment #7 from Sérgio Basto --- (In reply to leigh scott from comment #5) > We don't have permission to use cisco openh264 ??? so ask them -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to leigh scott from comment #5) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3) > > (In reply to Vitaly Zaitsev from comment #1) > > > After this commit > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/obs-studio/c/ > > > 8a37c7d4190bd9c4e9b92378958742c941c2a4f2?branch=rawhide we need a complete > > > replacement for obs-studio-freeworld with proper Conflicts: obs-stutio. > > > > > > Please change your SPEC to provide a full replacement. Also please build > > > it > > > with ffmpeg-devel. > > > > This commit is temporary until this package lands in RPM Fusion. Right now > > obs-studio crashes unless there's an ffmpeg with openh264 support OR > > obs-studio-plugin-x264 is installed. > > We don't have permission to use cisco openh264 You should be able to consume the Fedora+Cisco repository for this? https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
[Bug 6645] Review Request: obs-studio-freeworld - Open Broadcaster Software Studio -- Freeworld plugins
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6645 --- Comment #5 from leigh scott --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3) > (In reply to Vitaly Zaitsev from comment #1) > > After this commit > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/obs-studio/c/ > > 8a37c7d4190bd9c4e9b92378958742c941c2a4f2?branch=rawhide we need a complete > > replacement for obs-studio-freeworld with proper Conflicts: obs-stutio. > > > > Please change your SPEC to provide a full replacement. Also please build it > > with ffmpeg-devel. > > This commit is temporary until this package lands in RPM Fusion. Right now > obs-studio crashes unless there's an ffmpeg with openh264 support OR > obs-studio-plugin-x264 is installed. We don't have permission to use cisco openh264 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
