Re: Contributors page on wiki

[Xavier Lamien]

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:04 PM Andrea Musuruane  wrote:

> We have lost the Contributors page again due to spammers.
>
> Moreover, as Paul already noted, the wiki is now full of spam:
> http://rpmfusion.org/LastFewChanges
>
> Bye,
>
> Andrea
>
>
The wiki has been mostly cleaned up.

However, if you guys can do a double check see if everything is back to
normal, that would be really helpful.
In the mean time, account creation has been disabled while validating the
cleanliness.
Also, I updated the badContent regex list and TextCha to prevent amap such
a spam.

Let us know of anything that might look weird since

Thanks,

Re: Wiki main page needs to list F21 packages

[Xavier Lamien]

Added.

On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 3:08:38 PM Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 01/07/2015 06:12 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  The wiki main page probably needs updating to show F21 packages (and
  drop F18 and F19) in the Browse available packages section -- I've
  heard people in Linux fora assuming there are no F21 builds yet because
  of the information currently shown there.

 I'll happily do this, but I need to be added to the ACLs for the main page.

 Wiki username: JonathanDieter

 Jonathan

Re: Volunteering to help out as a sysadmin

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@gmail.com wrote:

 So, as a result of the earlier problems we had with wiki defacement, I'm
 volunteering to help out as an RPM Fusion sysadmin.  I'm happy to do
 whatever work needs to be done, whether it's simple, like setting up SSL
 for the config page in the wiki, or more difficult, like helping switch us
 over to git+koji.

 In my $dayjob, I work as a sysadmin for a school in Beirut, Lebanon, where
 we run Fedora on most of our desktops.  I have set up and maintained a koji
 system for the school for the last four years, and I also wrote the
 yum-presto plugin that (at least in older Fedora releases, it's built into
 yum in newer releases) enables the use of deltarpms in Fedora.  I've been
 involved with Fedora for the last seven years, and have been peripherally
 involved with RPM Fusion on at least a few occasions, and have provided
 hosting for a few users going through the RPM Fusion package review process.

 If you have any questions for me, please ask.

 Jonathan



Hey Jonathan,
Stop by #rpmfusion-admin on IRC and I'll manage to get you in.

-- 
Xavier.t

Re: musuruan is not in ACL for rpms/pushover/F-15

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Xavier Lamien
 laxat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 
 
  On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Hi,
 I tried to update pushover in CVS but I don't have the commit
  rights for the F-15 branch.
 
  Can someone please fix this?
 
  Done.

 Now I have another problem. The F-15 branch wants to be tagged as the
 devel branch:

 $ make tag build
 cvs tag  -c pushover-0_0_3-1_fc15
 ERROR: The tag pushover-0_0_3-1_fc15 is already applied on a different
 branch
 ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches
 pushover-0_0_2-2_fc14:devel:musuruan:1275147047
 pushover-0_0_2-2_fc13:F-13:musuruan:1275147171
 pushover-0_0_2-2_fc12:F-12:musuruan:1275147281
 pushover-0_0_3-1_fc15:devel:musuruan:1306775108
 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed
 cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first!
 make: *** [tag] Errore 1


You should be able to make build now.


 I suspect the problem lays in the devel branch (it should be tagged
 _fc16). Can you have a look at this too? Thanks!


You gonna have to make tag fiist against new dist.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: musuruan is not in ACL for rpms/pushover/F-15

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,
I tried to update pushover in CVS but I don't have the commit
 rights for the F-15 branch.

 Can someone please fix this?


 Done.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Outage Notification: 2011-03-01 - Update

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Xavier Lamien
laxat...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:

 There will be an outage starting on tomorrow morning 2011-03-01, 08:00 -
 11:00 UTC .

 To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto


 Affected Services:
 CVS (including cvsview)
 FAS
 Database
 Build System
 Wiki
 Bugzilla
 dns
 puppet

 Unaffected Services:
 MirrorManager



 Reason for Outage:
 We will be moving the servers (VM only) to a another physical host.
 That should take around 5 or 10min between servers but we prefer to take
  some window to test that everything will be back online and work fine.


 Contact Information:

 #rpmfusion-admin in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to
 track the status of this outage.


All services has been back online except Jarod's builder which's
having hardware issue (hard-drive) and led him to stop plague on his server.

Please, wait untill we announce the end of this outage to request new jobs
on build system.

Thanks,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Outage Notification: 2011-03-01

[Xavier Lamien]

There will be an outage starting on tomorrow morning 2011-03-01, 08:00 -
11:00 UTC .

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto


Affected Services:
CVS (including cvsview)
FAS
Database
Build System
Wiki
Bugzilla
dns
puppet

Unaffected Services:
MirrorManager



Reason for Outage:
We will be moving the servers (VM only) to a another physical host.
That should take around 5 or 10min between servers but we prefer to take
 some window to test that everything will be back online and work fine.


Contact Information:

#rpmfusion-admin in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to
track the status of this outage.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Key problem with rpmfusion free

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Olivier Cédric cedric.oliv...@free.frwrote:

 Cédric Olivier


You should be able to checkout again.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Key problem with rpmfusion free

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Olivier Cédric cedric.oliv...@free.frwrote:

 Hello,

 I have got a problem when trying to checkout common and others from
 rpmfusion-free:

 $ echo $CVSROOT
 :ext:cq...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free
 $ cvs co common
 ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
 cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
 any)
 $ ssh -v cq...@cvs.rpmfusion.org
 OpenSSH_5.4p1, OpenSSL 1.0.0c-fips 2 Dec 2010
 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
 debug1: Applying options for *
 debug1: Connecting to cvs.rpmfusion.org [195.10.6.64] port 22.
 debug1: Connection established.
 debug1: identity file /home/builder/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
 debug1: identity file /home/builder/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
 debug1: identity file /home/builder/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
 debug1: identity file /home/builder/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
 ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host

 Is there something I can do to solve this problem ?


Is/was  88.187.13.73 your IP?

It actually matches  with the time (6:40pm - 7:14pm) where you tried to
checkout from scm server.
From what I can see, you first tried to Authenticate yourself with user
builder which lead your IP to get black-listed from our infra.

thx,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Good bye, RPM Fusion!

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 On 01/29/2011 08:00 PM, Xavier Lamien wrote:



 On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Michael Schwendt 
 mschwe...@gmail.commailto:
 mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:

Some minutes ago I've removed my bugzilla account from the admin group.
Thanks, Matthias, for adding me a few years ago!

This also means I will no longer run the cron job that syncs the
owners.list files into bugzilla. Somebody else will need to take over.

It just doesn't work out any longer. owners.list is filling with
 invalid
email addresses again. And this time some of them are account names
instead of email addrs. My old messages about what could be done have
 not
resulted in any encouraging responses. Sure, I could look into needed
solutions myself and silently, but I believe in team-work and in
 motivating
collaboration. I also believe in people being brave enough to tell me
their opinion, even if they would only come up with a request for
 something
to be done as an improvement. There is no such activity at RPM Fusion.
Not limited to the bugzilla comps syncing.



 Just like other, I'm really sad to read this but I understand your point.
 There's really a gap in rpmfusion infra which need to be fix but not by
 only one person (that means me)

 What I can propose to other (including those who want to be involved
 _really_) as a 1srt step is to plan a irc meeting on #rpmfusion-admin to
 point out what is really going on
 with RPM Fusion infra.


 Such a meeting would be great start, we really need to get things moving.
 Also can you do anything
 about download1.rpmfusion.org being down, or is that outside of your
 control?


Yeah definitively outside of my control :(
I updated the bug ticket btw.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Good bye, RPM Fusion! (was: Re: Problem with infrastructure.)

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:

 Some minutes ago I've removed my bugzilla account from the admin group.
 Thanks, Matthias, for adding me a few years ago!

 This also means I will no longer run the cron job that syncs the
 owners.list files into bugzilla. Somebody else will need to take over.

 It just doesn't work out any longer. owners.list is filling with invalid
 email addresses again. And this time some of them are account names
 instead of email addrs. My old messages about what could be done have not
 resulted in any encouraging responses. Sure, I could look into needed
 solutions myself and silently, but I believe in team-work and in motivating
 collaboration. I also believe in people being brave enough to tell me
 their opinion, even if they would only come up with a request for something
 to be done as an improvement. There is no such activity at RPM Fusion.
 Not limited to the bugzilla comps syncing.



Just like other, I'm really sad to read this but I understand your point.
There's really a gap in rpmfusion infra which need to be fix but not by only
one person (that means me)

What I can propose to other (including those who want to be involved
_really_) as a 1srt step is to plan a irc meeting on #rpmfusion-admin to
point out what is really going on
with RPM Fusion infra.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Good bye, RPM Fusion! (was: Re: Problem with infrastructure.)

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Emmanuel Seyman 
emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr wrote:

 * Michael Schwendt [29/01/2011 18:08] :
 
  It just doesn't work out any longer. owners.list is filling with invalid
  email addresses again. And this time some of them are account names
  instead of email addrs.

 I'll ping Xavier and Nicolas on IRC about this monday morning.

 Emmanuel


Do You want to take over this?


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: UADE package for rpmfusion

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.orgwrote:

 On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 22:03 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
  If the package is really orphaned, I'd be willing to make a small effort
  at adopt it. Don't expect too much from me -- my time is really short,
  but I like uade.

 I'm now done, but I can't push to cvs. How do I request ACLs?


 Saw your request on bz. An cvsadmin will take care of it.


Thanks,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: problem uploading file

[Xavier Lamien]

2010/9/16 Karel Volný kvo...@redhat.com


 Hi,

 ...
  A bug or a mail to
  http://lists.rpmfusion.org/mailman/listinfo/rpmfusion-sysadmin
  seems to work better to get the attention of the sysadmins.

 I'm not subscribed, not sure if I can post there ... and all the
 sysadmins are reading this list, aren't they? :-)


No, This list is not design for such thing, really.
We don't pay the same attention to this list and could really miss such
issue.


   I do not consider myself one of them, but I fixed this, as I
  saw the new ufoai without the new data package in the push
  queue and thought it
 
  might be better to get this fixed rather sooner than later. So:
   - if the file needs to be placed into the lookaside cache by
   hand, it is this one:
  
   http://sourceforge.net/projects/ufoai/files/UFO_AI
   2.x/2.3/ufoai-2.3-data.tar
  
   (md5 08fa6d5c80231468c4d5e886600c8dcf)
 
  Manually uploaded. Never done this manually before, if it
  doesn't work let me know.

 yes it worked, thanks!

 K.

 --
 Karel Volný
 QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
 Red Hat Czech, Brno
 tel. +420 532294274
 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
 xmpp ka...@jabber.cz
 :: Never attribute to malice what can
 ::  easily be explained by stupidity.




-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Outage notification

[Xavier Lamien]

Hey,

There will be on outage during the next few hours on the following
hosts/services

Affected services:
--
RPM Fusion account system (FAS v2)

Unaffected services:
-
Buildsystem
CVS and cache
bugs system
config manager (puppet)


Reason: there is some fixes which need to kill FAS server for a short period
to be done.


thanks,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Outage notification

[Xavier Lamien]

the outage is done.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: UADE package for rpmfusion

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.orgwrote:

 Hello Ian,

 I noticed that uade in rpmfusion is still at 2.09 and would also need to
 be rebuilt to pick up ABI changes in rawhide (libao).

 Would you have time to do this? Otherwise, would you mind if I do it?


I don't.
Have at it then.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Cannot commit owners.list

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:

 2010/9/7 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com:
  Am Montag, den 06.09.2010, 21:34 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Chauvet:
  2010/9/4 Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com:
 
 $ cvs commit -m fix my email so bugzilla and owners.list are in
 sync owners.list
 Group gmail is undefined at /cvs/free/CVSROOT/acls line 87,
 AVAIL line 564.
 Group gmail is undefined at /cvs/free/CVSROOT/acls line 87,
 AVAIL line 565.
 Group gmail is undefined at /cvs/free/CVSROOT/acls line 87,
 AVAIL line 566.
  Access denied: cwickert is not in ACL for owners
  This separate issue is tracked here:
  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1341
 
  The Group gmail... errors are indeed gone, however I still cannot
  commit due to the ACLs. Are there plans to fix this?
 As Michael said, you aren't expected to have access to it.
 But you can send him the diff once the you email from fas and bugzilla
 match

 Thx


As a cvsadmin member, you can fix this btw.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Failure in importing ProjectX

[Xavier Lamien]

2010/9/4 Göran Uddeborg goe...@uddeborg.se

 I'm trying to do an initial import of my package ProjectX.  It was
 just created in CVS.  I try to follow the instructions at

 http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-ecd81860c9b7e5192904b03bd0ab6f07980b81a6
 but when I run

  ./cvs-import.sh -b devel .../ProjectX-0.90.4.00-7.20100806cvs.fc14.src.rpm

 it ends with

  cvs commit...
  ? devel/import.log
   Group gmail is undefined at /cvs/free/CVSROOT/acls line 87, AVAIL line
 564.
  Group gmail is undefined at /cvs/free/CVSROOT/acls line 87, AVAIL line
 565.
  Group gmail is undefined at /cvs/free/CVSROOT/acls line 87, AVAIL line
 566.
    Access denied: goeran is not in ACL for rpms/ProjectX/devel
   cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
  cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
   cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsP7xJBh

 Could I do something wrong to make this happen?  On the surface it
 looks like a mistake when the CVS tree was created.  But this it the
 first time I package for RPM Fusion, so I suspect it could be
 something I have misunderstood.  But what?  Is this group gmail
 something I should know anything about?

 The same thing happens trying to import to the F-13 branch.


Your acl has been updated.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: key problem

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:53 PM, solarflow99 solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:

 ya, i've tried everything, I wonderif i'm being blocked?  it says
 connection closed by remote host, I cant connect no matter what I try.
  My IP is: 173.180.57.83 and username is: solarflow99


You are.
Will unblock your host in a few.



 ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host


 2010/8/16 Göran Uddeborg goe...@uddeborg.se:
  solarflow99:
  It still doesn't work.  I think these 2 lines must be a clue:
 
 
  debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type '-BEGIN'
  debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type '-END'
 
  Maybe not.  I get them too when I do ssh -vv.  In addition I see
  lines like
 
  debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type 'Proc-Type:'
  debug2: key_type_from_name: unknown key type 'DEK-Info:'
 
  It seems that ssh will give such a comment for all lines that are not
  actual key data in the file.
 
  Despite these messages, the SSH session opens fine.
 




-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Fix permissions in CVS?

[Xavier Lamien]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Adam Williamson adamw...@shaw.ca wrote:
 Hi, folks.

 I committed a find-provides.sh for the F-11 branch of libdrm-poulsbo and
 mistakenly didn't have the permissions right when I first committed it -
 they were 664, needs to be 775 or 755. Now I can't figure out how to fix
 that. I've tried changing the permissions and cvs -f commit , also tried
 removing the file and re-adding it with correct permissions, but it
 doesn't seem to work: I always get a build failure with 'error: Couldn't
 exec /builddir/build/SOURCES/filter-provides.sh: Permission denied' when
 re-tagging and trying to build it.

 For the F-13 branch, I imported from a .src.rpm with the correct
 permissions, and that build went through fine, but I just can't figure
 out how to make it right for F-11 branch...help, anyone?
 --
 adamw



perm updated.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: ACL error on committing dvdrip

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi, I tried to update dvdrip to the new version but I got

  Access denied: oget is not in ACL for rpms/dvdrip/devel
 cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
 cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!

 Similar error on F-13. I should be on the ACL of this package
   https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126#c21
 , and according to its changelog I did commit in the past.

 Moreover, I think I have provenpackager access, who don't need to be
 on ACL to commit.

ACL also manages provenpackager
So if you're unable to commit from any packages source that just mean you're not
on this list access but standard acl.


 Something is fishy.

 Orcan


For remind, such thing, infra issues or admin extras-request send them
to rpmfusion-admin list
or stop by #rpmfusion-admin

Thx
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: [Bug 569] please gpg-sign repomd.xml files, enable repo_gpgcheck=1 in yum .repo files

[Xavier Lamien]

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun,  4 Apr 2010 21:25:51 +0200, RPM wrote:

 http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569





 --- Comment #10 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2010-04-04 21:25:50 ---
 (In reply to comment #9)
  Is this problem fixed ?

 I would not call it a problem, more a RFE -- for something that even Fedora
 sill doesn't do iirc

 but whatever: seems this is one of the dozens of things in RPM Fusion that
 really would be nice to fix or improved, without anybody working on it :-((
 (and most of the other things that need to get improved are way more 
 important
 IMHO)

 RFEs like this are in need of _somebody_ to make decisions.

 In particular: Is using gpg-agent an option? (I think it is)
 Would using expect be considered acceptable? (I don't like it)

Why not talk about that on rpmfusion-sysadmin list as well?


 As I've mentioned in that bz ticket last year, a repomdsigncmds feature is
 available in the pushscripts. It just needs to be configured _and_
 evaluated. Without using gpg-agent (or expect), one would need to enter
 the key passphrase too often (IMO), however. Has anyone followed the
 development of the signing server (and its requirements)?

I did.


 A fundamental problem with RPMFusion is that at the management level there
 is no work-horse to just do it, i.e. to decide on something and work
 with contributors on feasible solutions. Where something sucks, it needs
 somebody to say we want to improve in that area and to put something
 onto an agenda (or call it wishlist).


That what i used to say to the list and... as usual noone step up
except jeroen, nicolas and anvil to just do it (on the build and CVS side).
AFAIK, we always work that way.
i.e RPM Fusion was looking for help on having a Account system (FAS1
which was running but broken), i did step up and ask for improve
things and dit it with FAS2.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Build Result: 6192 - thunderbird-enigmail on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free

[Xavier Lamien]

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:31 AM, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I encounter an issue when trying to build latest enigmail 1.0.1 for RPM
 Fusion repository.

 Build in mock is ok, as I have build it for my repo (F-8  F-12)

 Build by lisas.de succeed (about 20') but build by rpmfusion64 stay in
 downloading state (SRPM is quite large, about 60Mio) and I must kill
 it after a full night... :(

 Any idea how I can deal with this update ?

Stop by #rpmfusion-admin when you got a moment and we gonna make sure
your job hits another builder to figure out what going on.

lisas builder seems experiencing some timeout this last days and
got disabled/enabled at anytime.



 Regards
 Remi.

  Message original 
 Sujet: Build Result: 6192 - thunderbird-enigmail on
 fedora-development-rpmfusion_free
 Date : Thu,  4 Feb 2010 07:21:25 +0100 (CET)
 De : rpmfusion-build...@lists.rpmfusion.org
 Pour : r...@famillecollet.com

 6192 (thunderbird-enigmail): Build on target
 fedora-development-rpmfusion_free was killed by r...@famillecollet.com.





-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

VirtualBox heads up

[Xavier Lamien]

Hey list,

Just to be sure that you're aware of that below,

Peter is orphaning his package  xerces-c  which required by
VitualBox (at both, [build|run]-time).
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-January/129696.html

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: CVS Admin Request

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jack Neely jjne...@ncsu.edu wrote:
 Folks,

 I've got a CVS permissions problem with the openafs-kmod package:

  Access denied: jjneely is not in ACL for rpms/openafs-kmod/F-11
 cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
 cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!

 This is Bug 803.

 Xavier, can you help me out?


Done. Check out your review request.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Introduction

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl wrote:
 On 01/03/2010 07:40 AM, John Arntz wrote:

 Greetings!

 My name is John S. Arntz I just signed up for this list and would like to
 introduce myself. I have used Fedora since Fedora 5 and love the packages
 that RPMFusion offers (Before RPMFusion I used FreshRPMs). I'm not a
 programmer, but I know enough to make a basic package. I plan to make my
 first package submission to Bugzilla soon, fceux, an NES Emulator based on
 FCE Ultra. My first question, though, where would be a good place to host
 the .spec and .srpm files? I don't have a website anwhere. I'm aware of
 sites like rapidshare, megaupload, qshare, and mediafire. But I'm not sure
 if those would be the best places to host the files. Once I am able to find
 a place to post them, I will take the plunge and file my submission for
 review. Also, the source contains gfceux which is a GTK Glade frontend based
 on GFCE Ultra. How should I handle packaging this? Should I make them two
 separate packages and submissions, since they are actually two builds
 included in
  the same tarball and have to be built separately, or as a sub-package of
 fceux? The .spec files that I have made are based upon fce-ultra and
 gfce-ultra's .spec files so as they exist now, I have them as two unique
 packages. You feedback is greatly appreciated.


 Hi John,

 Welcome!

 About hosting webspace for spec / srpms in review. Let me know when you have
 a solution, I have the same problem :)

 Xavier, Perhaps we can provide some space on rpmfusion infra for rpmfusion
 contributors ?

Yeah, that's something we can work out.



 As for how to handle the bundled gtk front-end, the rule of thumb is 1 tar
 bal one srpm,
 so I would put it in a sub package,

 Regards,

 Hans




-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: CVS Admin request

[Xavier Lamien]

You do have.
What's your fas name again ?

-- 
Xavier.t

On Dec 23, 2009 7:28 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Xavier Lamien laxat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:  On Tue, Dec 22...
I just had time to import it now. Unluckily it fails because it seems
I do not have write access to that CVS module.

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: CVS Admin request

[Xavier Lamien]

I confirm, the acl has been set properly.
Any output ?

-- 
Xavier.t

On Dec 23, 2009 7:41 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Xavier Lamien laxat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:  You do have.  ...
musuruan

Bye,

Andrea.

Re: CVS Admin request

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi!
    I've a CVS admin request pending from almost a week. Is it
 possible to fulfil it? Thanks!

 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1004


Done.
Sorry for the delay.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: CA certificates missing from website

[Xavier Lamien]

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Jack Neely jjne...@ncsu.edu wrote:
 Folks,

 The links on the wiki page PlagueUsage to download the
 .rpmfusion-upload-ca.cert and .rpmfusion-server-ca.cert return HTTP 404
 errors.


The files are back at this url now.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: [RPM Fusion] Update of Configuration by aiyoulove

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
 How can we avoid a spammer changing our wiki?


By setting up acls.
That people said no go at the beginning of RPM Fusion iirc.
So people who sign up for an moinmoin account has rw access.


 Regards,

 Andrea.



 -- Forwarded message --
 From: RPM Fusion Wiki nore...@rpmfusion.org
 Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:12 PM
 Subject: [RPM Fusion] Update of Configuration by aiyoulove
 To: RPM Fusion Wiki nore...@rpmfusion.org


 Dear Wiki user,

 You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on RPM Fusion
 for change notification.

 The following page has been changed by aiyoulove:
 http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration?action=diffrev1=32rev2=33

 --
 - = Installing Free and Nonfree Repositories =
 + 香港六合 彩官方网站六合 彩公司网站http://www.840519.com

 - We have two separate software repositories:
 + 香港六合 彩VIP会员《特码刮刮卡》http://www.840519.com

 + 白小姐今期免费公开一码中特100%准http://www.840519.com
 -  * '''free''' for Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora
 Licensing Guidelines) which the Fedora project cannot ship due to
 other reasons
 -  * '''nonfree''' for redistributable software that is not Open
 Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines); this
 includes software with publicly available source-code that has no
 commercial use-like restrictions

 - Installation can be done either using a web browser, or via the command 
 line.
 + 香港六合 彩今期开奖结果提前大爆光http://www.840519.com

 - == Graphical Setup via Firefox web browser ==
 + 香港六合 彩网站香港六合 彩开奖结果http://www.840519.com

 -  1. First enable access to the '''free''' repository. For users of
 gpk (gnome package kit) or kpackagekit in Fedora that is easy and
 basically only one step: just click on one of the following files,
 depending on what distribution you use and then follow the default
 options that Firefox and Package Kit offer by clicking ''Enter'' a few
 times (¹):
 + 香港六合 彩特码刮刮卡http://www.840519.com

 + 香港六合 彩特码，六合 彩开奖中心http://www.840519.com
 -   * 
 [[http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm|RPM
 Fusion free for Fedora 10, 11 and 12]]
 -   * 
 [[http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-rawhide.noarch.rpm|RPM
 Fusion free for Fedora Alpha, Beta, Preview, Rawhide, RC, Snapshot
 aka. what will become Fedora 13]]
 -   * 
 [[http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/el/updates/testing/5/i386/rpmfusion-free-release-5-0.1.noarch.rpm|RPM
 Fusion free for RHEL5 or compatible like CentOS]]

 + 香港六合 彩公司，六合 彩公司官方网站http://www.840519.com
 -  1. Once that succeeds, you can enable access to the '''nonfree'''
 repositories by clicking on one of the following files, depending on
 what distribution you use and then follow the default options that
 Firefox and Package Kit offer by clicking ''Enter'' a few times(¹):
 -   * 
 [[http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-stable.noarch.rpm|RPM
 Fusion nonfree for Fedora 10, 11 and 12]]
 -   * 
 [[http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-rawhide.noarch.rpm|RPM
 Fusion nonfree for Fedora Alpha, Beta, Preview, Rawhide, RC, Snapshot
 aka. what will become Fedora 13]]
 -   * 
 [[http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/el/updates/testing/5/i386/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-5-0.1.noarch.rpm|RPM
 Fusion nonfree for RHEL5 or compatible like CentOS]]

 - ~-(¹) Once you clicked on above link Firefox will ask you how to
 ''Open the file''. Here you can simply use the default and open the
 file with the default application ''Package Installer''. Then Firefox
 will call Package Kit, which asks ''Do you want to install this file
 ?''. Click ''OK'' to begin install; Package Kit then will complain
 about a ''Missing security signature''; once you tell Package Kit to
 install the package  nevertheless it will move on and install it.
 That's all.-~
 + 香港六合 彩论坛提供《公开特码单双》http://www.840519.com

 - == Command Line Setup using rpm ==
 + 香港六合 彩公司提供《期期必中 一肖》http://www.840519.com

 - To enable access to both the '''free''' and the '''nonfree'''
 repository use the following command:
 + 香港六合 彩公司香港六合 彩官方网站http://www.840519.com

 + 请看香港六合 彩一码中特已连准18期http://www.840519.com
 -  * Fedora 10, 11 or 12: {{{
 - su -c 'rpm -Uvh
 http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm
 http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-stable.noarch.rpm'
 - }}}

 + 香港六合 彩资料香港六合 彩特码资料http://www.840519.com
 -  * Fedora Alpha, Beta, Preview, Rawhide, RC, Snapshot aka. what will
 become Fedora 13: {{{
 - su -c 'rpm -Uvh
 http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-rawhide.noarch.rpm
 http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-rawhide.noarch.rpm'
 - }}}

 + 香港六合 彩官方网站六合 彩公司网站http://www.840519.com
 -  * RHEL5 or compatible like CentOS: {{{
 - su -c 'rpm -Uvh
 

Re: Outage Notification: 2009-12-12 to 2009-12-13

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Xavier Lamien
laxat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 There will be an outage starting at 2009-12-12 08:00 UTC.

 To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto


 Affected Services:
 CVS (including cvsview)
 FAS
 Buildsys

 Unaffected Services:
 wiki
 Bugzilla
 MirrorManager


 Reason for Outage:
 We gonna do a bunch of updates configuration on the servers
 which will require to stop/start RPM Fusion services for some hours


 Contact Information:

 #rpmfusion in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to
 track the status of this outage.


Heads up,

The outage is over on the following services:
FAS
CVS (including cvsview  lookaside cache)

Let us know if you get in any trouble.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Buildsys learning curve

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Jack Neely jjne...@ncsu.edu wrote:
 Folks,

 As I continue to climb the learning curve, I'm trying to figure out my
 certificate problem with the buildsystem.  I get the following:

 [sl...@foghorn F-11]$ rpmfusion-packager-setup
 Setting up RPM Fusion packager environment
 ~/.rpmfusion.cvsuser already exists - skipping
 ~/.rpmfusion-upload-ca.cert already exists - skipping
 ~/.rpmfusion-server-ca.cert already exists - skipping
 ~/.plague-client-rpmfusion.cfg already exists - skipping
 Done!
 [sl...@foghorn F-11]$ make build
 PLAGUE_CLIENT_CONFIG=/home/slack/.plague-client-rpmfusion.cfg
 /usr/bin/plague-client build openafs openafs-1_4_11-9_fc11 f11-free
 Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/plague-client, line 423, in module
    cli = PlagueClient(os.path.expanduser(cfg_file))
  File /usr/bin/plague-client, line 82, in __init__
    self._server = self._get_xmlrpc_server_proxy()
  File /usr/bin/plague-client, line 117, in _get_xmlrpc_server_proxy
    server = XMLRPCServerProxy.PlgXMLRPCServerProxy(addr, certs,
 timeout=20)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/plague/XMLRPCServerProxy.py,
 line 48, in __init__
    self.ctx = SSLCommon.CreateSSLContext(certs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/plague/SSLCommon.py, line 47,
 in CreateSSLContext
    ctx.load_verify_locations(peer_ca_cert)
 OpenSSL.SSL.Error: []
 make: *** [plague] Error 1

 My build host is a F12 box.

 Xavier, thanks for getting my CVS ACLs corrected.  I still have a
 similar problem with bug 803 as well.


Your certificate is either not up-to-date or wrong.
Go to https://fas.rpmfusion.org/accounts/user/gencert



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Outage Notification: 2009-12-12 to 2009-12-13

[Xavier Lamien]

There will be an outage starting at 2009-12-12 08:00 UTC.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto


Affected Services:
CVS (including cvsview)
FAS
Buildsys

Unaffected Services:
wiki
Bugzilla
MirrorManager


Reason for Outage:
We gonna do a bunch of updates configuration on the servers
which will require to stop/start RPM Fusion services for some hours


Contact Information:

#rpmfusion in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to
track the status of this outage.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Review swaps

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Hans de Goede j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl wrote:
 Hi,

 On 11/19/2009 03:30 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:

 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

 2009/11/19 Hans de Goede:

 Hi,

 I've just submitted a review request for Maelstrom (a game) as
 it is being kicked out of Fedora due to issues with the license
 for its data files:
 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=952

 Since this is moving from Fedora it should be an easy review,
 anyone want to swap a review with me ?

 If it was in fedora, it doesn't need to be reviwed again...


 Yeah. Was it reviewed before or was it in the merge review queue?


 It was reviewed before, see:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189375

 So does this mean I can move ahead to ask for CVS module creation?


Correct.
Just add the review link with your CVS request.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: How to move on with infrastructure?

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
 Hi!

 Some of you might be aware of it, other not, but we afaics have a
 (whole) lot of medium-sized and small problems in the infrastructure
 area(¹). The main ones from the top of my head:

 - our infrastructure team basically consists of just one person: Xavier
 Lamien (laxathom/SmootherFrOgZ)

 - multiple people offered to help in the past (²), but not even one of
 those people found its way into the project/the infrastructure team:
 Why? It can't continue like that, as that is a route to fail...

 - it sometimes take a lot of time until cvs requests are done

 - we have a x86-64 builder that isn't used since a few weeks (months?)

 - we afaik were asked to migrate to a different ppc builder but that
 work stalled

The new builder has been configured since a while.
David should move the builder port to the new afaick, any eta on that
if you read us David ?


 - using koji and bodhi for RPM Fusion is something that people are
 asking for every few weeks


As said before. Setup an koji and bodhi instance is not the problem.
We just don't have enough resources right now to build them up.
And those instances have to be part of the infra network.


 - there are multiple small problems (often not in bugzilla) that are
 annoying, but not pressing (no automatic rebuilds, no repoclosure
 scripts, repodata regeneration after push, incomplete delta-rpm support
 are some of them, out-of-diskspace situations, some builders use mock
 caching while others do not, rawhide out of date on of of the builders, ...)


 So how to we fix all of the above to make sure RPM Fusion gets more
 healthy over time?


Well,
At a start, we can update the infrastructure page on the wiki with
right path on how to contribute to infrastructure side or some kind.

That one is on my todo list.
There will be a bunch of changes in the infra in the next weeks.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Prep Error (Job 5236): bsnes-0_053-1_fc12 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
 W dniu 19.10.2009 16:25, Xavier Lamien pisze:
 On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
 Seems like something is wrong with the buildsys. Same failure on F-11
 and F-10.

 -- Wiadomość oryginalna --
 Temat: Prep Error (Job 5236): bsnes-0_053-1_fc12 on
 fedora-development-rpmfusion_free
 Data: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
 Nadawca: rpmfusion-build...@lists.rpmfusion.org
 Adresat: beleg...@gmail.com

 Error: could not check out bsnes-0_053-1_fc12 from
 fedora-development-rpmfusion_free - output was:

 cvs server: cannot find module `bsnes' - ignored
 cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules




 This is normal as bsnes has been moved to nonfree.

 Again? Why? We recently moved it to free, didn't we?


Good point (according to bug #15).
I was confusing with faac which has nothing related :/

I'm looking at it.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Prep Error (Job 5236): bsnes-0_053-1_fc12 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Xavier Lamien
laxat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
 W dniu 19.10.2009 16:25, Xavier Lamien pisze:
 On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
 Seems like something is wrong with the buildsys. Same failure on F-11
 and F-10.

 -- Wiadomość oryginalna --
 Temat: Prep Error (Job 5236): bsnes-0_053-1_fc12 on
 fedora-development-rpmfusion_free
 Data: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
 Nadawca: rpmfusion-build...@lists.rpmfusion.org
 Adresat: beleg...@gmail.com

 Error: could not check out bsnes-0_053-1_fc12 from
 fedora-development-rpmfusion_free - output was:

 cvs server: cannot find module `bsnes' - ignored
 cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules




 This is normal as bsnes has been moved to nonfree.

 Again? Why? We recently moved it to free, didn't we?


 Good point (according to bug #15).
 I was confusing with faac which has nothing related :/

 I'm looking at it.


Ok, it's fixed now.
There's a build job running at
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=5240.




-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: CVS admin request for sonic-visualiser-freeworld

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
michael.silva...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hullo,

 Could this (already reviewed) package be added to CVS?

 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782


Please add your request to bug tracker #33 as required.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Moving bsnes to free repo

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 as of 0.051, bsnes is now GPLv2, so I believe it should be moved to
 rpmfusion-free. What should I do to accomplish that?


File a Change Request against bsnes.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Introduction

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Jack Neelyjjne...@ncsu.edu wrote:
 Greetings,

 I'm Jack Neely and I'm the linux guy at NC State University.  (Where Red
 Hat's corperate HQ is located.)  I maintain our RHEL-based
 customizations, and other tools for managing a couple thousand Linux
 machines around campus.  I helped design the original kmod version 1
 standard and maintain a Yum plugin to do all sorts of evil with those
 kmods.  I'm hoping RPMFusion will make my job easier and have a few
 questions.

 RPMFusion maintains all the kernel modules I'm interested in supporting
 (and more) in RHEL 6 and our Fedora deployments (which really don't
 exist yet).  I would contribute OpenAFS to complete the set.

Hey, welcome Jack


 I assume folks are interested in having OpneAFS, the nVidia drivers,
 Open VM Tools, and other stuff maintained for EL6?

Actually people would. however, some stuff need to be done to get
things work from RPM Fusion

  What will be the
 relationship with EPEL in for EL6-land?

You'll sure have better comment about it at epel@ list.


 What about EL5?  Is there interest in using the older kmod v1 standard
 to add kernel modules there?

 Are the kmod builds automated or must jobs be submitted to rebuild those
 for each kernel?  I plan on extending my yum module to know what to do
 in this case for kmodv2 as well.

Build request for each kernel release.
For EL5, i would stay on kmodv1 and move on to kmodv[1-2] for EL6.




-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Fwd: CVS key

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:09 AM, solarflow99solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:31 PM, SmootherFrOgZ lxt...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:20 PM, solarflow99solarflo...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
  On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
 
  On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:40 +0800, solarflow99 wrote:
   looks like I spoke too soon..  here is the output, does yours
   actually
   work?
 
  Indeed.
 
  Please fund out what the public parts of your SSH keys are:
 
   debug1: Trying private key: /root/.ssh/identity
   debug1: Trying private key: /root/.ssh/id_dsa
 
  $ ssh-keygen -y -f /root/.ssh/id_rsa
  $ ssh-keygen -y -f /root/.ssh/id_dsa
 
  Then visit your FAS page [1] and ensure that your Public SSH Key
  matches either of those.
 
  [1] https://fas.rpmfusion.org/accounts/user/view/solarflow99
 
  I checked and it definitly matches, I even regenerated a new key and
  tried
  again.  same thing, I can log into fedorapeople.org, but not CVS.   I am
  using ssh-keygen -t rsa
 
  ssh -v jzygm...@fedorapeople.org   will succeed
  ssh -v jzygm...@cvs.rpmfusion.org   will fail

 Heh,

 You're trying to authenticate with an unknown FAS_account which is
 jzygmont and thus lead you to be blacklisted from rpmfusion infra.

 Your FAS_login is solarflow99. Please, use that one.

 this is really strange because it always worked to login to
 fedorapeople.org.  Here are my FAS account details:

 Account Name:  jzygmontFull Name:  Justin Zygmont Email:
 solarflo...@gmail.com using solarflow99 like you said doesnt help at all.
 My FAS login isn't even solarflow99 anyways


That's right in Fedora Project Infrastructure side.

Even though, you registered yourself as solarflow99 in RPM Fusion
Account system.

That's two different things. Fedora Project runs their FAS and so does
RPM Fusion.

login solarflow99 didn't work 'cause you look like still blacklisted.
Send me your host IP from where you're trying to authenticate and i'll
fix this up.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Indexing RPM Fusion bugzilla by Google

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Thorsten Leemhuisfed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
 On 20.05.2009 19:17, Alexey Torkhov wrote:
 I noted that RPM Fusion bugs are not indexed by Google.
 Could something similar to solution of bug #427004
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427004 (No RedHat Bugzilla
 bugs are indexed in Google (or other search engines).) be implemented?

 I had hoped somebody would answer, but seems that never happened. I
 don't even know who's the admin of the bugzilla instance, but Xavier
 (CCed) might be able to help.


Right.
That's something we definitively need to include.
You free to file a bug to track down the status of the sitemap.

thanks for pointing this out.
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: repoview at RPM Fusion

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Changelog details in the repoview pages are reverse. Example:

 http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/i386/os/repoview/vlc.html

 :-/

 This is because in createrepo/Yum, someone either still plays with sorting
 the entries by timestamp (bad, since the timestamp accuracy is not high
 enough, they don't contain h:m:s!) or running reverse() on them at least
 once. If they are reverse() in the repo metadata, any tools that read the
 changelog entries need to run reverse() once more to fix the order. That
 is bad, too. Currently, oldest %changelog is at the top in the other
 metadata.

 Yum upstream tickets #6 and #7 fix such issues, which also mess up
 repodiff in the daily Rawhide report. Unfortunately, ticket activity has
 stalled.

 If anyone knows how to help here, that would be appreciated.



Ping ?
Any eta for that fix ?

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: F-10 building for i386 and i686

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mar 29, 2009 5:15 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi,

I have recently noticed that sdlmame (well, at least) on F-10 got built
for i386 and i686:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-10-rpmfusion_nonfree/3179-sdlmame-0131-0.2.0130u2.fc10/
Is that the intended behaviour? Xavier?

Julian

Re: F-10 building for i386 and i686

[Xavier Lamien]

That should be fix now.
Also update build config.

On Mar 29, 2009 5:15 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi,

I have recently noticed that sdlmame (well, at least) on F-10 got built
for i386 and i686:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-10-rpmfusion_nonfree/3179-sdlmame-0131-0.2.0130u2.fc10/
Is that the intended behaviour? Xavier?

Julian

Re: Openmotif in RPMFusion?

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
 Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:

 Just a quick question before I start doing the work involved;

 would RPMFusion ship openmotif? More details on why it's not in Fedora
 (anymore) are on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/openmotif

 It's a good candidate for rpmfusion-nonfree, sure.


+1 for nonfree


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: kmod packages that aren't finished to build for rawhide

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)
kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello!

 There are 3 kmod packages that are still building according to the build
 queue whereas builder aren't working and thoses aren't finished still.
 http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/index.psp

 Anyone have a idea of what's the problem(s) ?

 nvidia-173xx-kmod and kqemu-kmod are only for x86 and x86_64 but only
 build i586 and x86_64 whereas i686 is only provided as kernel-PAE.i686

There was an issue on i686 build packages which messed up with our builders.
This has been fixed now.


 But rt2860-kmod is built for all our arches exept that it doesn't appear
 in succefull built. (hope this is a different issue which just need to
 be resubmitted).

yeah,
you can re-submit your jobs. Actually, i killed a couple of them while
fixing buildsys.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Anonymous CVS access to rpmfusion CVS?

[Xavier Lamien]

Yeah, you can get read access through anonymous.
Just give it a try and let me know if you get any trouble.

On Mar 10, 2009 5:50 PM, Laurent Rineau 
laurent.rineau__fed...@normalesup.org wrote:

On Monday 12 January 2009 13:17:18 Laurent Rineau wrote:  On Monday 12
January 2009 12:49:12 Thorst...
Hi, i am back on that topic. Is there a CVS anonymous access, now?

I have browsed a bit the web site, and I still do not see any explanation
about it.

-- Laurent Rineau http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LaurentRineau

Re: Outage Notication: Build System

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
 On 09.03.2009 21:14, Chris Nolan wrote:

 Big thanks to Xavier and Matthias for getting everything back up and
 running :)

 Don't forget to thank dwmw2 for updating the ppc builder to F10.

 IOW: Many thanks for your help David, much appreciated!

 BTW, I updated the configs on the x86-32 builders to build for i586
 during the outage. One piece was still missing which I just did. I fired
 of a test build and everything looks fine. If anyone want's to check:
 http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/2978-libmad-0.15.1b-10.fc11/i586/build.log


 So we got the new rpm and build for i586 now on x86-32. Are any other
 changes needed? Do we want to do a mass rebuild? How: Manual or
 scripted? And are there any big updates pending that we should do before
 starting the mass rebuild (ffmpeg?)

 CU
 knurd

 I think we should do a mass rebuild, just as fedora did. Does the
 “stronger hashes” feature concern us as well? I'd opt for doing a
 scripted rebuild, it should be overally easier than doing the changes by
 hand.


I'm fine with a mass rebuild



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Anonymous CVS access to rpmfusion CVS?

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Laurent Rineau
laurent.rineau__fed...@normalesup.org wrote:
 On Tuesday 10 March 2009 21:28:36 Xavier Lamien wrote:
 Yeah, you can get read access through anonymous.
 Just give it a try and let me know if you get any trouble.

 What is the repository for anonymous access. I have tried several variants of
 that:
 $ cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs login
 Logging in to :pserver:anonym...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:2401/cvs
 CVS password:
 /cvs: no such repository
 zsh: exit 1

 without success. I am pretty sure I missed something.

Correct.
It's @cvs.rpmfusion.org/cvs/free or @cvs.rpmfusion.org/cvs/nonfree

and you shouldn't need to log in first.

 --
 Laurent Rineau
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LaurentRineau





-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Outage Notication: Build System

[Xavier Lamien]

We're currently getting an outage service on rpmfusion.

Affected Services:
-
Buildsystem: plague-server


Unaffected Services:
-
Account System
CVS / Source Control
Database
DNS
Mail
Bug System
Websites


Reason for Outage:
We're getting issue on plague-server work_dir (which is an nfs share).
Thias is the only one having access to nfs server to fix this and seem
not around for now.
I'll switch plague down until it fix to avoid job queuing and release
nfs busying.


Contact Information:

Please join #rpmfusion in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to
track the status of this outage.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Can't connect to CVS

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Chris Nolan ch...@cenolan.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 I'm having difficulty connecting to CVS: Permission denied. I last connected
 successfully a month or so ago but can't get in now... I have resubmitted my
 RSA public key to FAS and re-downloaded all the certificates but no joy.

 Here's an example session:

 $ export CVSROOT=:ext:cno...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/nonfree
 $ export CVS_RSH=ssh
 $ cvs co common
 Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
 cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
 any)
 $ cvs -t co common
 - main loop with CVSROOT=:ext:cno...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/nonfree
 - safe_location( where=(null) )
 - Starting server: ssh -l cnolan cvs.rpmfusion.org cvs server
 Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
 cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
 any)
 - Lock_Cleanup()

 And the debug output from ssh -vvv -l cnolan cvs.rpmfusion.org cvs server
 is here:

 http://dpaste.com/101652/

 I'm pretty sure that the noise between lines 9 and 38 is a red-herring. The
 real problem seems to be that the server doesn't accept my key.

 I can successfully connect to other servers using publickey auth from the
 same machine.

 Any help?

Could you clean up your know_hosts files and give a new try ?
If it's still falling, send me your ip to track down if you aren't
blocked due to wrong passwd attempt.




-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: VirtualBox for RPM Fusion (was: [Fwd: [RPM Fusion] Update of Wishlist by JonathanHaskins])

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
 Hi!

 I know several people were have VirtualBox packages for Fedora. But none of
 them show up for review in RPM Fusion yet :-((

 What can we do to change that? I'd be willing to help (especially when it
 comes to kmods).

Kmods are really easy specifically for virtualbox ;)
I'll push all eta of packages set the next week if people
don't mind.

Note that packages which will be added to rpmfusion will be
OSE version.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: VirtualBox for RPM Fusion

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
 On Saturday 13 December 2008 11:25:06 Xavier Lamien wrote:

 Kmods are really easy specifically for virtualbox ;)
 I'll push all eta of packages set the next week if people
 don't mind.

 Btw. there is already a review request for kBuild, which you can probably take
 over:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=kBuild-review


tracking...


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: mock config files for rpmfusion

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was trying to build an updated OGMrip package (for eventual
 submission) and I face the need to edit mock config files to add
 rpmfusion repos so dependencies could be added to the buildroot.

 Now, is there any package out there containing preconfigured mock config 
 files?
 if not, would it be a valuable addition?

That should already be the case.
thorsten ?



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: mock config files for rpmfusion

[Xavier Lamien]

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
 On 12.12.2008 10:30, Xavier Lamien wrote:

 On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I was trying to build an updated OGMrip package (for eventual
 submission) and I face the need to edit mock config files to add
 rpmfusion repos so dependencies could be added to the buildroot.

 Now, is there any package out there containing preconfigured mock config
 files?
 if not, would it be a valuable addition?

 That should already be the case.
 thorsten ?

 I have a lot of things on my todo list already -- due to that and Kwizart
 working on it already (
 http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-October/001589.html
 ) I tried to completely ignore it ;-)

he he :)

kwizart, any eta ?



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: cannot access cvs

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 it seems I can't access the cvs. It has been happening for a few days,
 roughly since the F-10 branching. Any ideas what is wrong here?

Your latest access is from Nov 26.
if I track down connected host, it has been banned from the box at the
same date few hours later.
make sure to use ssh-add tool (or a command-like) to avoid to be
banned due to a typo or something else in your passphrase.

you should now be able to 'cvs co' again.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: cannot access cvs

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Denis Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On that topic, could somebody grant me cvs access ? I'd like to update
 open-vm-tools to the latest version...


I just approve you in packagers group.
your cvs access will be granted within an hours or so.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Introduction

[Xavier Lamien]

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Xavier Lamien wrote:

 (and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).

 Will do.

 Still seem to be blocked:


 removed.

 Thanks. I'm now unblocked but my key's not working.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ export
 CVSROOT=:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/nonfree
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ export CVS_RSH=ssh
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ cvs co common
 Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
 cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
 any)

 My ssh key in RPM Fusion FAS is the same as my ssh key in Fedora FAS, which
 works OK.

Make sure your known_hosts file is cleaned up from rpmfusion hosts id and retry.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB

Re: Introduction

[Xavier Lamien]

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 25.11.2008 12:57, Paul Howarth wrote:

 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 25.11.2008 11:48, Paul Howarth wrote:

 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:

 Orion Poplawski wrote:

 On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:

 After changing my keys and trying to check the new ones, I was
 clobbered by denyhosts on the Fedora system and the symptoms were very
 similar. I'm seeing the same thing as Orion with my own key that I 
 uploaded
 to the rpmfusion account system last week.

 Well, in your case it's something else: You are not sponsored for CVS
 yet. I considered hitting the sponsor button, but you IIRC don't maintain
 any packages, hence I didn't hit it. Or do you plan to help out anywhere?
 Then let me know and I'll sponsor you.

 I'm happy to help out co-maintaining things (e.g. for EL) as there
 isn't actually anything that I'm particularly interested in that's not
 already in rpmfusion. I was going to submit an xv package originally but I
 think from the wiki that there's already one there.

 Yeah. Do you want to take care of that for the EL branch? Then I'll
 branch it.

 Yes, I'm happy to do that.

 One thing before I add your name to owners.epel.list: Can you please mail
 the XV owner (see

 http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/owners/owners.list?root=nonfreeview=markup
 ) what his plans regarding support for EL are? Maybe he wants to take care
 of it himself.

 OK, will do.

 I did struggle to find a comprehensive list of what's available though
 - is there a repoview somewhere?  If there is, I think it would be worth
 adding a link to it
 from the wiki somewhere that casual browsers might find it.

 Yeah, as mentioned some minutes ago in

 http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/002611.html
 There is a lot of things that need improvement. Our docs are one area where
 we really suck.

 OK, I'll try to fix things where I see them; I trust there are no ACL
 restrictions like (parts of) the Fedora wiki?

 No, the Wiki is open to all users that created an account.

 I created a PackageList page with links to the repoview index pages for each
 repo. Some things I noticed:

 1. Repoview for F10 says it's Development rather than Fedora 10
 2. The updates repos for Fedora 10 and EL5 are empty and don't have repoview
 indexes. Does repoview not behave sanely in empty repos?
 3. The main release repos for Fedora 8, Fedora 9, and EL5 are empty, with
 all of the content being in the updates repos. Is this ever likely to
 change?

 As I'm a sponsor in Fedora I thought I may not need separately
 sponsoring for rpmfusion (the wiki isn't clear on this I think), which is
 evidently not the case.

 Yes and no. Yes, someone has to click the sponsor button in FAS (/me
 normally). But that's about it if you are already a sponsor or a normal
 contributor in Fedora.

 OK, please click

 Done.

 Thanks.

 (and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).

 Will do.

 Still seem to be blocked:


removed.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Branching for F-10 (was: Re: CVSROOT modules,1.272,1.273)

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 08.11.2008 00:13, Xavier Lamien wrote:

 Author: laxathom

 Update of /cvs/nonfree/CVSROOT
 In directory se02.es.rpmfusion.net:/tmp/tmps27459/modules

 Modified Files:
modules Log Message:
 Added new branch F-10 for module: xv

 Hmmm. Do we really want to branching packages for F-10?

Yeah, this can be easily done and stay transparent for contributors.


  * We don't have support on F-11 on the builders yet

  * We don't have full support for a F-10 target yet

As you said, not yet. Targets are already set-up and awaiting F-10
official availability (including f10 repo)


  * We have no place where the push scripts could push F-11 packages to

The place will be available once f10 will come out.


 IOW: With our current setup I'd say it makes less work for everyone (and
 especially for those [e.g. me] what would have to adjust the setup on the
 builders) if we wait with branching CVS for F-10 until a few days before
 F-10 really ships.

Actually this branch is due to my work on an mass-branching helper i'm writing .
We have 18 days left.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: cvsextras request

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Michel Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I've been a Fedora package maintainer for quite some time
 (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/), and currently
 maintain Vagalume for Livna/RPMfusion (I do not have commit rights for
 Livna, since Vagalume was reviewed just a couple of months ago, close
 to the transition to RPMfusion).

 I've set up my RPMfusion account, already have a Bugzilla account,
 signed the CLA and requested membership in packagers and bugs. Could
 one of the administrators approve my group membership?

 (note that the owners list does not list the email I use for Bugzilla,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], as I was using my fedoraproject.org email for
 the changelog entries. The package was initially intended for
 inclusion in Fedora, but while it does not contain any infringing
 code, it is useless without an MP3 plugin for Gstreamer and so would
 not have worked out of the box)


Is someone from rpmfusion team tooks care of your request ?



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Fw: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] yum-cron

[Xavier Lamien]

The build server is back now.
I just queued a job for test.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Next steps to get RPM Fusion running (V2)

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Or isn't
 yum smart enough to try the second address if the first one fails ?

it is.
Otherwise seth is the right person who can have more thought on that.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: for users...

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send it
 besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?

 Given my new employer I won't be doing it. So I think either you are Xavier
 should do it.


I'm fine with that. we just need to be agreed about the announcement
content before i push anything.

for the 'where' question :

fedora-{announce,devel,}-list and planet.fp.o could do the trick.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Presto test repositories for rpmfusion

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:03:08 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:

 I would love to see the official rpmfusion repositories become
 presto-enabled, but it would take some love from those who understand
 the build system.

 What are the exact requirements?

 Are presto-utils and deltarpm available for the target platform,
 e.g. EL5?

 The README in presto-utils reads as if all that is needed is the
 path to a normal rpms repository (i.e. the parent of the repodata dir).

 Updating presto repositories is just like creating them for the first
 time?

 It shouldn't be difficult to add another module to the pushscript.
 See bottom 20 lines of

  
 http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/extras-buildsys/utils/pushscript/Push.py?root=fedoraview=markup

 where modules like RepoPrune, RepoView, RepoBuild (createrepo) are
 executed. They have access to configuration parameters so they can
 construct a list of repository paths. A Presto or PrestoBuild module
 would work similarly.


+1



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Reducing bugzilla messages a little bit (was: Re: [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review.)

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi!

 Just FYI

 On 28.10.2008 07:00, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
  http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
 
  Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
 
 What|Removed |Added
 
 

   CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|

 Just FYI, I removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and hence
 this list) from the bugs 2, 3 and 4, as that account is the default
 owner for all review requests. Hence if something changes we'll get a
 mail to this list anyway and the mails from bugs 2, 3 and 4 thus were
 just redundant.

 Note that I added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to some open
 review bugs again to make sure the comments in the lists get send to the
 list (¹), as decided some time ago. Once the bugzilla traffic gets to
 much we can move it to a separate list, but I would prefer to not do
 that, as review bugs with the current scheme get a lot more attention by
 contributors and are in general more visible.


I'm afraid to be disagree with this decision.
By contribute to the RPM Fusion packaging side, contributors
approve to receive notifications about packages status (including new
package review) into RPM Fusion project .
If you won't receive a lot of mails then add filters or remove
yourself from the list.
Even if RPM Fusion isn't a huge project, do (preventing) thing at the
start is better than react on an overloaded or outage state.



 (¹) reminder: if you do a review then reassign the bug to yourself and
 add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CC list.

-1
the best way would be to the reporter to add to the CC the ML to notify
RPM Fusion contributors there's a review request running.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: updated yabause and lxdream specs

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Xavier Lamien pisze:
 On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hans de Goede pisze:
 Julian Sikorski wrote:
 Hi,

 I have noticed that the lxdream and yabause packages are not packaging
 the latest version of these emulators. Since in case of console emus you
 basically always want latest and greatest, I took some time to update
 the specs. Did not test them a lot, but they at least compile and run.

 Thanks!

 Note I'm not the maintainer of these, still I'm going to ask this:
 Maybe you want to co-maintain these ?

 Regards,

 Hans
 My interest in emulation of these consoles is rather occasional. So,
 yes, I could update these emus up to the their latest versions from time
 to time, but I'm not sure I could give these packages a lot more love
 than that ;). So, Xavier, are you interested in such kind of help?


 you have now commit access to those packages.
 Feel free to update them.

 Thanks,

 I assume that means yes ;)

yeah

 BTW, it seems that there is a problem with
 commit mailing system. cvs seems to only email the primary maintainer
 (in case of lxdream, it emailed you but not me). Similar issue is
 present with sdlmame, sdlmess and qmc2, I suppose (and yabause as well,
 I guess).

ok, i'll have a look

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Yet again: Current package status updated

[Xavier Lamien]

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 2008/10/16 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 should be fixed now

 Thanks. I'll try later this evening - I have no svn access from where I am.

 Import worked :-)

 But build failed :-/

 There is no libcapsimage-devel for x86_64, ppc and ppc64. But the
 first two should be available. Probably maintainer just forgot to
 build them. Xavier?

package built but gone to status failed in plague that's why (check
builds status for more details).
i'll rebuild it to check that closer.


 About ppc64, I'm no expert about this arch. Is it possible to use the
 ppc version? Otherwise I'll have to disable libcapsimage support for
 this arch.

not build against ppc64

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Yet again: Current package status updated

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip...]

 ralf_[AT]_skytale.net | audacious-plugins-freeworld | Not found in
 free-devel
 ralf_[AT]_skytale.net | audacious-plugins-freeworld | Not found in
 free-F-8
 ralf_[AT]_skytale.net | audacious-plugins-freeworld | Not found in
 free-F-9
 - I'll ping ralf, but he afaics is waiting for
 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
 to get fixed


 Lets fix that then, Xavier ?

will be ready for official start


 Definitely a MUST fix. Thl, did you ping Ralf? Any answer?


 lxtnow_[AT]_gmail.com | uade | Not found in nonfree-devel
 - patch_fuzz afaics


 Status?

that one should be already fixed. i'll check this one again

[snip]

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora 8 - 2008-10-14

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 14.10.2008 23:30, Michael Schwendt wrote:

DVDAuthorWizard-1.4.6-2.fc8.noarch  requires  soc

 Xavier?

fixed in cvs
build will follow

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: owners.list not entirely right

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I skimmed through owners.list for my packages and it seems the setup is
 not entirely right. Since the packages I maintain in nonfree are also
 comaintained by Chris Stone, I believe for qmc2 and sdlmame* he should
 be added to initialcc, and in the case where Chris is the primary
 maintainer (sdlmess), I should be.
 Could you please also have a look at the cvs acls (if these aren't the
 same). A while ago Thorsten rebuilt sdlmame due to some buildsys issues,
 and I did not get any mail regarding cvs commit.


Co-maintainers are registered in cvs acls from CVS admin requested
(cvs will do its job to mail maintainer and co-maintainer).
initalcc is something else where anybody could request to be added to
track changes in cvs.

I'll have a look on sdlmame


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-10-12

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 12.10.2008 21:54, Julian Sikorski wrote:


 And where is sdlmame for f9?

 Seem one of the rpms build on buil64.livna.org was truncated or something.
 That seems to happens rarely (it should not); don't know if it happens on
 the plague-builder or during transmission to the plague-server.

during the transmissionm yes.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Hosting the live cd

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I would like to start hosting omega as part of rpmfusion infrastructure.  A
 subdomain like omega.rpmfusion.org would be a good space.  Thoughts? Anyone
 testing the rawhide snapshots?

I really appreciate the effort and the work done for this spin but
I'd really see a _clear_ discussion about that project before start
host anything (including the name of the future Official RPMFusion
spin).


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Problem with import script

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 2008/10/5 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hi,
I just tried to import e-uae to nonfree, but I get the following error:

 $ ./cvs-import.sh -b devel
 /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/e-uae-0.8.29-0.10.wip4.fc9.src.rpm
 Checking out module: 'e-uae'
 Unpacking source package: e-uae-0.8.29-0.10.wip4.fc9.src.rpm...
 L e-uae-0.8.29-WIP4.tar.bz2
 A e-uae-0.8.29-execstack.patch
 A e-uae-0.8.29-hardfilefixes.patch
 A e-uae-0.8.29-irqfixes.patch
 A e-uae.png
 A e-uae.spec

 Checking : e-uae-0.8.29-WIP4.tar.bz2 on
 https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
 Module 'e�-uae' does not exist!
 make: *** [upload] Error 1
 ERROR: Uploading the source tarballs failed!

 A note for Thorsten: I still get the same error. I cannot see any
 changes in the common directory. Maybe you applied your patch only
 in the free branch?

I'm working on it.
btw, do you have the src.rpm file hosted somewhere ?



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Yet again: Current package status updated

[Xavier Lamien]

Hm... mine should be already built.
I'll check those one closer today.

Re: Yet again: Current package status updated

[Xavier Lamien]

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Orcan Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 orphaned | KmPg2 | Not found in free-devel
 orphaned | KmPg2 | Not found in free-F-8
 orphaned | KmPg2 | Not found in free-F-9
 orphaned | mamory | Not found in free-devel
 orphaned | mamory | Not found in free-F-8
 orphaned | mamory | Not found in free-F-9
 orphaned | mupen64 | Not found in free-devel
 orphaned | mupen64 | Not found in free-F-8
 orphaned | mupen64 | Not found in free-F-9
 - Anyone interested?


 I can take these over if there's demand.

 If you really want to take them over, please go on and ask for CVS request.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: How to test RPM Fusion

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 30.09.2008 01:37, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 Add-on: We have no fully configured bug tracker yet for RPM Fusion. As
 such: please do *not* further distribute or link to above mail in Blogs,
 Forums or other Mailing lists for now. We'll announce a official testing
 phase for RPM Fusion once we have the important bits in place. tia!

 Is it useful to do a new compose of the live cd by replacing Livna
 development with RPMFusion development repository?

 Please note that the compx.xml file is still in a flux and might complicate
 things a bit for you (e.g. you might need to adjust things again later);
 details in this thread:
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg02615.html

 Not to mention that a whole lot of packages are not in any groups right now.
 But all of that likely is not a big problem.

 I got precious little feedback but a lot of downloads on the last compose
 so I would like to hear more opinions.

 Sorry, but I mostly ignored the whole spins discussions up to now :-/ I
 consider getting rpmfusion running way more important for now, that's why I
 focus on that right now; and the long discussion around a rpmfusion spin
 happened when I was on vacation. :-(


 Hence my questions maybe might have been answered already, but

 - where does the name omeaga come from?

 - will omega become the official RPM Fusion spin or just serve as base for
 one?

 - seems there are other people/groups/projects that have spins based on
 livna already; have any attempts been made to get all of them together at
 one table within the RPM Fusion project to bundle efforts?

 Please don't take those questions as offense -- I like the idea with the
 spin. I just want to understand the long term goals and plans better.

yeah.
To bring a rpmfusion spin out, some discussion and decision need to be
(such as the name of the spin, which packages should be shipped with
the spin, etc).
And all the work must be at rpmfusion.org

However, omega can be a base from where to start.
And if someone wanted to start something around this please, before
create page on the wiki, talk about first for such sub-project.
Feel free to open a new thread then.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: two questions regarding bug handling (was: Re: [Bug 4] Tracker: Accepted packages.; Also was [Bug 51] Review Request: ogre-cg - Cg plugin for OGRE)

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi!

 Just wondered two small details:

 On 28.09.2008 11:38, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
 http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4


 Xavier Lamien [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

What|Removed |Added

  
  Depends on|51  |

 Hmm. For what do we actually need or want to use the Accepted packages
 tracker bug? If we just use it for the create package in cvs case then we
 could directly use the CVS tracker bug directly, can't we? OTOH: If we want
 to keep track of things then we should not remove packages that have been
 accepted.

I'm ok


 On 28.09.2008 10:38, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
 http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51

 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

What|Removed |Added


 

  AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|

 I did something like this myself in the past a few times. But a few days ago
 I thought: Hey, this removes the subscribers to the mailing list out of the
 loop. Do we want that? I tend to say no.

yeah, the right thing to do it's assign the review to the reviewer and
keep mailing list on CC.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: successfully built - awaiting sign v available rpms

[Xavier Lamien]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:36 PM, David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi, I'm not sure if there is a further step I need to do after
 successfully building a package before it gets into:
 http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/i386/os/
 for example.

 This is regarding gcube whose builds recently succeeded. What is the
 procedure, or does a set time passing needed to make it happen ?

You have nothing to do next.
It's to the build system to do its job now.

the update release will be available soonish after all sync step

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Please don't build packages for F8 or F9 over the next few hours

[Xavier Lamien]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 10.09.2008 09:23, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 Please don't build packages for F8 or F9 over the next few hours -- the
 mock configs on the builder need to be adjusted to use the new Fedora update
 repos.

 Done now. I requeued the two packages that nevertheless of above warning had
 been submitted(¹).

 Cu
 knurd

 (¹) which makes me wondering if we need something like
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

surely



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Buildsys

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:58:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:

  It seems that the buildsys fell asleep again. Could somebody please kick
  it and requeue latest 3 sdlmame tags (0.127u2 for F-8, F-9 and devel)?
  Thank you in advance.

 Note to Thorsten: Attached patch might apply.
 Else you could send me /usr/share/plague/server/BuildMaster.py



Adapted to match with our current version (i'll update that soon).
I'll do some test today.

Thanks Micheal,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: mirrors

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Adrian Reber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:44:23PM +0200, Xavier Lamien wrote:
  On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Adrian Reber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   There is, however, still a small rsync error:
  
   rsync: opendir free/fedora/updates/testing/9/ppc64/.pushGlav_t (in
   rpmfusion) failed: Permission denied (13)
 
  You shouldn't be bugged about that any more.

 I still can see the rsync error. Do I have to wait a bit longer?


This has been fixed in master repo.

Download1 surely needs to be synced again.
Thorsten feel free to do it.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: mirrors

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Adrian Reber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 08:55:12PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
  On 19.08.2008 22:07, Adrian Reber wrote:
  On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:02:01PM +0300, manuel wolfshant wrote:
  On 08/19/2008 09:35 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
  A few people offered to become a mirror. That's great! Everyone
  normally can create a mirror, as the rsync access to the master
  repo  normally is public ( rsync://download1.rpmfusion.org ). the
  rsync  server is just down right now :-/ Hopefully it's available
  again soon.
  So if you would like to become a official mirror then I'd say this
  is  the best way forward:
  Could you please give a rough estimate of the space needed ?
  my last snapshot (when rsync was still working) is currently 5GB.
 
  rsync ( rsync rsync://download1.rpmfusion.org/rpmfusion/ )  should be
  available again. Thx for fixing pix!

 Yes, it works again. My mirror is again up to date.

 There is, however, still a small rsync error:

 rsync: opendir free/fedora/updates/testing/9/ppc64/.pushGlav_t (in
 rpmfusion) failed: Permission denied (13)



You shouldn't be bugged about that any more.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: cvs.rpmfusion.org not working for me (ssh keys?)

[Xavier Lamien]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Michel Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've been fighting trying to get access to cvs.rpmfusion.org the past 2
  days, without luck.  Maybe I'm doing something fundamentally wrong.
 
  I import my public keys into fas, then follow instructions on
 
 http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-014c352d2815a61a3a0583acc3819fc50bd1ade7
 
  and alter my ~/.ssh/config to use the proper private key.  I tried both
  using the same key I use for fedora, as well as generate a separate
  rpmfusion-only key.  Neither seems to work.  I only get:
 
  $ echo $CVSROOT
  :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs
 
  $ echo $CVS_RSH
  ssh
 
  $ cvs co free
  Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic).
  cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages
 if
  any)
 
  ??

 Same here. Thorsten is on vacation, so we might have to wait for a while.


Check your ~/.ssh config



 One possibility: is CVS access restricted to people who are members of
 cvsextras? I just applied, and I suppose the process will be more or
 less perfunctory for existing Fedora packagers.


I supposed you had a look to http://rpmfusion.org
If you just applied for the packager group you need first to be sponsored to
have cvs access.



 A curious thing is that the CLA for RPMfusion is exactly the one for
 the Fedora project. I suppose this is intentional, but I'm not sure
 whether this gives the impression that we are an official Fedora
 project or not.


Yeah, this cla version should be move away



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: RPM Fusion for EL/EPEL 5

[Xavier Lamien]

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 On 11.08.2008 19:09, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
  

 More and more people talk to me and ask when will RPM Fusion for EL/EPEL
 5 start. As a big junk of the livna import is now done I might over the
 next few weeks slowly start to do the same work for EPEL. But I need to know
 which of the package owners actually is willing to maintain their packages
 in RPM Fusion's EL-branch.

 So if you want to maintain all or some of you packages for EL drop me a
 line please. Then I'll create branches for them sooner or later and help
 with the initial build round just like I do for Fedora now.


 Branch for EL-5 please:
 akode-extras
 amarok-extras-freeworld
 k3b-extras-freeworld
 kdemultimedia-extras-freeworld
 libtunepimp-extras-freeworld
 xine-lib-extras-freeworld

 (heck, feel free to add anything else that I maintain to that list too). :)


Done.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: make new-sources fails

[Xavier Lamien]

On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 8:05 PM, David Juran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 19:48 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

 
  Wild guess: Can you update your common checkout and try again?

 Not a bad guess at all (-:


Checkout the devel branch and cat your source file, you'll see an uploaded
test.tar file that i just uploaded from
make new-source rule.


Make sure your CVSROOT is properly set to @cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free


Regards,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Problems with fas

[Xavier Lamien]

Login issue has been fixed.

FAS is now runnig on fas version 0.8.4.1.
Addtionnal features that you can see as fas registered user :
- from your Edit Account, a country field description.
- from group lists, an url related link on @rpmfuison.org
- an irc channel field as well.

If you encountered any problems on fas usage, just let me know.

Regards,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Notification: Dribbles CVSsync done

[Xavier Lamien]

Hello folks,

Due to hardware problem on rpmfusion boxes, all services was unavailable.
That's why i couldn't fix acls for many of you.

As belegdol, could you send me which package you currently maintain to fix
acls on you.

Thanks,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Notification: Dribbles CVSsync done

[Xavier Lamien]

 Hans

 Still no go:


 Try using -t non-free (my bad).

  Btw, the cvs-import.sh script says there is a deault value for tree, but
 it is set to free for non-free tree (hope it is clear :):




tree values is free or nonfree

Just tried and it's works well as above.

===

[EMAIL PROTECTED] common]$ ./cvs-import.sh -t nonfree -b F-9
sdlmame-data-0125-1.fc8.src.rpm
Checking out module: 'sdlmame-data'
Unpacking source package: sdlmame-data-0125-1.fc8.src.rpm...
L Mameinfo0125.zip
L catveren.zip
L cheat117.zip
L mamehistory125.zip
L sdlmame-ctrlr.tgz
A sdlmame-data.spec

Checking : Mameinfo0125.zip on
https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
Uploading: Mameinfo0125.zip to
https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
File Mameinfo0125.zip size 1248532 MD5 a33fb89cbe40c8004d5ba9302a014547
stored OK


Checking : catveren.zip on https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
Uploading: catveren.zip to https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
File catveren.zip size 72590 MD5 f841fabad853de73ad460b45e36fa934 stored OK


 Checking : cheat117.zip on https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi.
..
Uploading: cheat117.zip to https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
File cheat117.zip size 1360654 MD5 2c463b2bb8b5e24b1c265a877a350a05 stored
OK


Checking : mamehistory125.zip on
https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
Uploading: mamehistory125.zip to
https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
File mamehistory125.zip size 2218174 MD5 3cabe93209eba25c0a1b1678ee001bb8
stored OK


Checking : sdlmame-ctrlr.tgz on
https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
Uploading: sdlmame-ctrlr.tgz to
https://cvs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi...
File sdlmame-ctrlr.tgz size 2944 MD5 22d7e6bfa793351a8297f173c9f3ba77 stored
OK

Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the new ./sources file

? F-9/import.log
cvs commit...
? F-9/import.log
 Access allowed: laxathom is in ACL for rpms/sdlmame-data/F-9.
Checking in F-9/.cvsignore;
/cvs/nonfree/rpms/sdlmame-data/F-9/.cvsignore,v  --  .cvsignore
new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1
done
RCS file: /cvs/nonfree/rpms/sdlmame-data/F-9/sdlmame-data.spec,v
done
Checking in F-9/sdlmame-data.spec;
/cvs/nonfree/rpms/sdlmame-data/F-9/sdlmame-data.spec,v  --
sdlmame-data.spec
initial revision: 1.1
done
Checking in F-9/sources;
/cvs/nonfree/rpms/sdlmame-data/F-9/sources,v  --  sources
new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1
done
Running syncmail...
Mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
...syncmail done.
Commit Complete
cvs tag  -c sdlmame-data-0125-1_fc9
Enter passphrase for key '/home/laxathom/.ssh/id_dsa':
? import.log
cvs tag: Tagging .
T .cvsignore
T Makefile
T branch
T sdlmame-data.spec
T sources
Tagged with: sdlmame-data-0125-1_fc9

Tagging 'sdlmame-data-0125-1_fc8' complete.

===



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Notification: Dribbles CVSsync done

[Xavier Lamien]

2008/6/2 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi All,

 I just tried to import a (new) version of stella, but it fails with an ACL
 error:

 ? devel/import.log
  Access denied: jwrdegoede is not in ACL for rpms/stella/devel
 cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
 cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
 cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsaR0sId



 Notice how it does not mention free in the path: not in ACL for
 rpms/stella/devel, not sure if thats relevant

 I used this command todo the import:
 common/cvs-import.sh -t free -b devel
 ~/dribble/stella/devel/stella-2.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm


Do you have time to come on irc ?
Thx.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Notification: Dribbles CVSsync done

[Xavier Lamien]

Hello folks,

All dribbles packages are now branched into cvs repository with following
branches : F-8, F-9  EL-5



List of packages which have been branched :
===
** free **:
arcem   Highly portable Acorn Archimedes emulator
bubbros Bub and Brothers game inspired by the classic Bubble and
Bobble
desmume A Nintendo DS emulator
dvd-slideshow   Command line programs for creating slideshow style DVDs
DVDAuthorWizard Create a video DVD from MPEG-2 files
DVDRipOMaticSimple DVD to XviD ripping application
fakenes Nintendo Entertainment System emulator
fceultraA portable NES/Famicom emulator
gcube   Nintendo Gamecube emulator
gfceu   GFCE Ultra Nintendo Emulator frontend
gnuboy  Nintendo GameBoy Color emulator
KmPg2   A user friendly MPEG2 encoding wizard
lxdream Sega Dreamcast emulator
mamory  ROM management API and commandline ROM manager for MAME
megamario   Well known platform game clone
mupen64 A Nintendo 64 emulator
nes_ntscProvides NES NTSC video filtering
NestopiaA portable open source NES/Famicom emulator
osmose  A Sega Master System / Game Gear emulator
pangzeroA clone and enhancement of Super Pang
plus4emuPortable emulator of the Commodore 264 family of computers
scottfree   Interpreter for Scott Adams format text adventure games
smc Secret Maryo Chronicles
smc-music   Additional music for Secret Maryo Chronicles
sms_ntscProvides SMS NTSC video filtering
snes_ntsc   Provides SNES NTSC video filtering
stella  Atari 2600 Video Computer System emulator
wormsofprey Team based bomb / scorched like game
wormsofprey-data Data for worms of prey
xroar   A Dragon 32, Dragon 64 and Tandy CoCo emulator
yabause A Sega Saturn emulator
zsnes   ZSNES is a Super Nintendo emulator


** non-free **:
dega-sdlDega is a Sega Master System emulator
dgen-sdlDGen/SDL is a Sega Genesis (MegaDrive outside the US)
emulator
doc Diagnose unhealthy DNS domains
e-uae   A powerful Amiga Emulator, based on UAE
Frodo   Commodore 64 emulator
fuse-emulator-roms Spectrum ROM files for use with the Fuse emulator
gensGens is a Sega Genesis / Sega CD / Sega 32X emulator
gnome-video-arcade GNOME Video Arcade is a MAME front-end for GNOME
lha Archiving and compression utility for LHarc/lha/lzh archives
libcapsimageProvides IPF support, primarily for UAE/E-UAE
mednafenA multi-system emulator utilizing OpenGL and SDL
mupen64-ricevideo OpenGL based graphics plugin for Mupen64
qmc2M.A.M.E. Catalog / Launcher II
raine   Arcade emulator focused on Taito and Jaleco games hardware
sdlmame SDL Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator
sdlmame-dataData files for the SDLMAME package
sdlmame-data-artwork Artwork used by the SDLMAME package
sdlmame-data-roms ROMs used for the SDLMAME package
sdlmame-data-samples Sound samples for the SDLMAME package
sdlmess SDL Multiple Emulator Super System
sidplay-libsA software library for playing back C64 SID files
sl  Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls'
uadeUnix Amiga Delitracker Emulator
viceEmulator for a variety of Commodore 8bit machines
xcpcA portable Amstrad CPC464/CPC664/CPC6128 Emulator
yapeSDL YAPE, yet another plus/4 emulator


Regards,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Notification: Dribbles CVSsync done

[Xavier Lamien]

2008/6/1 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Xavier Lamien
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello folks,
 
  All dribbles packages are now branched into cvs repository with following
  branches : F-8, F-9  EL-5

 Hi,

 I tried checking out sdlmess in the nonfree repo, and it was not
 there.


here's mine :

[EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ cvs co sdlmess
cvs checkout: Updating sdlmess
U sdlmess/Makefile
U sdlmess/import.log
U sdlmess/pkg.acl
cvs checkout: Updating sdlmess/F-8
U sdlmess/F-8/.cvsignore
U sdlmess/F-8/Makefile
U sdlmess/F-8/branch
U sdlmess/F-8/sources
cvs checkout: Updating sdlmess/F-9
U sdlmess/F-9/.cvsignore
U sdlmess/F-9/Makefile
U sdlmess/F-9/branch
U sdlmess/F-9/sources
cvs checkout: Updating sdlmess/devel
U sdlmess/devel/.cvsignore
U sdlmess/devel/Makefile
U sdlmess/devel/sources
cvs checkout: Updating common
U common/Makefile.common
U common/branches
U common/cvs-import.sh


Is your cvsroot path correct ?



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Notification: Dribbles CVSsync done

[Xavier Lamien]

2008/6/1 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Xavier Lamien
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  2008/6/1 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Xavier Lamien
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hello folks,
  
   All dribbles packages are now branched into cvs repository with
   following
   branches : F-8, F-9  EL-5
 
  Hi,
 
  I tried checking out sdlmess in the nonfree repo, and it was not
  there.
 
  here's mine :
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] nonfree]$ cvs co sdlmess
  cvs checkout: Updating sdlmess
  U sdlmess/Makefile
  U sdlmess/import.log
  U sdlmess/pkg.acl
  cvs checkout: Updating sdlmess/F-8
  U sdlmess/F-8/.cvsignore
  U sdlmess/F-8/Makefile
  U sdlmess/F-8/branch
  U sdlmess/F-8/sources
  cvs checkout: Updating sdlmess/F-9
  U sdlmess/F-9/.cvsignore
  U sdlmess/F-9/Makefile
  U sdlmess/F-9/branch
  U sdlmess/F-9/sources
  cvs checkout: Updating sdlmess/devel
  U sdlmess/devel/.cvsignore
  U sdlmess/devel/Makefile
  U sdlmess/devel/sources
  cvs checkout: Updating common
  U common/Makefile.common
  U common/branches
  U common/cvs-import.sh
 
 
  Is your cvsroot path correct ?

 I get that output as well, but the sources files are empty.


That normal, it's just a branched action.
You have then to import your module.
I'll be on irc by tomorrow, if you still in trouble.



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

CVS notification: Dribbles packages branches

[Xavier Lamien]

hello folks,

i started populate the CVS repository with Dribbles packages.
This action will be a bit long.

A next message (with more details) will be send once done.

Regards,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Infrastructure status

[Xavier Lamien]

2008/5/28 Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 07:02 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
  Right now it's me -- I'm heavily swamped with work at work and thus
  couldn't update/adjust the builders when CVS was made ready by Xavier
  last week. But I should find time for that over the next few days. But I
  won't make any promises when the builder/the repo will be available --
  maybe other problems show up over the next few days.

 Two weeks have passed now and I haven't seen any status updates to the
 mailing list or wiki.  I'm currently a Dribble exile with no place to
 push package updates.

 Any news, or is this repo still dead in the water?


Sorry, i'm currently in displacement profesionnel and back on Saturday.

I plan to populate the cvs repository with all dribbles's packages this
week-end.
I'll mail the list once done.
So then, you and others dribbles maintainers will be able to import srpms
files for first.



Regards,
-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re: Infrastructure status

[Xavier Lamien]

2008/5/29 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Xavier Lamien
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  2008/5/28 Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 07:02 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
   Right now it's me -- I'm heavily swamped with work at work and thus
   couldn't update/adjust the builders when CVS was made ready by Xavier
   last week. But I should find time for that over the next few days. But
 I
   won't make any promises when the builder/the repo will be available --
   maybe other problems show up over the next few days.
 
  Two weeks have passed now and I haven't seen any status updates to the
  mailing list or wiki.  I'm currently a Dribble exile with no place to
  push package updates.
 
  Any news, or is this repo still dead in the water?
 
  Sorry, i'm currently in displacement profesionnel and back on Saturday.
 
  I plan to populate the cvs repository with all dribbles's packages this
  week-end.
  I'll mail the list once done.
  So then, you and others dribbles maintainers will be able to import srpms
  files for first.

 Smooth, I've already tried importing my package into the nonfree repo
 and I got ACL errors, will these be taken care of as well?


If you still have trouble on ACL, feel free to reach me this week-end to fix
this.


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

Re : rpm confusion? :)

[Xavier Lamien]

I already did this.
Check the rpmfusion mailling list archive for that.

Regards,

2008/5/13, Valent Turkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I googled for rpm fusion and googled asked me Did you mean: confusion?
 :)
 I busted out laughing because I am confused regarding RPM Fusion.

 I don't see any announcement regarding RPM Fusion and Fedora 9. I'm
 not asking you to release RPM Fusion for Fedora 9 if you aren't ready
 but please post something that explains what is currently going on
 with RPM Fusion and should users still use other repositories or do
 you recommend waiting for RPM Fusion and Fedora users use only that
 repository.

 Cheers,
 Valent.

 --
 http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
 linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
 registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
 ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic



-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB