https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6274
Marcus Müller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus_rpmfusion@hostalia.d
||e
--- Comment #1 from Marcus Müller ---
I think the correct way would have been opening a package wishlist issue on
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/fedy/issues/new/choose .
I think you'll need guidance (which I sadly can't offer) on the
"resistributability" field.
You will need a proprietary piece of software to even build this. From the
point of view of SoapySDRPLay3, it's OK to distribute the combined product
(SoapySDRPlay3 is MIT). I don't know under which terms it is OK from an RPM
fusion point of view to depend on a binary package for build (and in which part
– free, nonfree, tainted – of RPM fusion it's OK).
I have no idea what the SDRPLay API (which is really a shared library…) comes
with in terms of license.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org