Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

[Sérgio Basto]

On Dom, 2016-11-13 at 09:18 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> $subject says it all, not sure what the orphan process
> for rpmfusion is, hence this direct mail.

I'm thinking in give up on Fedora , haven't you notice that F25 is
closed for GA ?  

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2016-11-13 12:00 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
> Hi,
>
> On 13-11-16 11:33, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>> 2016-11-13 10:54 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote:


 Hi Hans,
  you have to retire it (not to orphan it).

 This procedure is up to date AFAIK:
 http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package

 Bye,

 Andrea
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4335
>>
>> I think you should be able to use pkgdb to retire the package.
>> Now I still wonder if we still need mpg123 in 25 GA repo. I think so,
>> so it won't break users that might install with kickstart and only GA
>> repos for both projects.
>
>
> I went here (and logged in):
>
> https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/mpg123/
>
> I can orphan it there, but I don't think I can retire it
> there.

Just a tought, it could need to be provided in epel (until RHEL directly) also.
So we wouldn't have to keep older branches.
Unfortunately the import didn't kept our history, so it's won't be
easy to sync branches.
Anyway, in the mpg123 case, using the latest seems better.



-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 13-11-16 11:33, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

2016-11-13 10:54 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :

Hi,

On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote:


Hi Hans,
 you have to retire it (not to orphan it).

This procedure is up to date AFAIK:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package

Bye,

Andrea



Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4335

I think you should be able to use pkgdb to retire the package.
Now I still wonder if we still need mpg123 in 25 GA repo. I think so,
so it won't break users that might install with kickstart and only GA
repos for both projects.


I went here (and logged in):

https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/mpg123/

I can orphan it there, but I don't think I can retire it
there.

Regards,

Hans

Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2016-11-13 10:54 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
> Hi,
>
> On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hans,
>>  you have to retire it (not to orphan it).
>>
>> This procedure is up to date AFAIK:
>> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package
>>
>> Bye,
>>
>> Andrea
>
>
> Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created:
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4335
I think you should be able to use pkgdb to retire the package.
Now I still wonder if we still need mpg123 in 25 GA repo. I think so,
so it won't break users that might install with kickstart and only GA
repos for both projects.

Thx

-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 13-11-16 09:53, Andrea Musuruane wrote:

Hi Hans,
 you have to retire it (not to orphan it).

This procedure is up to date AFAIK:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package

Bye,

Andrea


Thank you, I've added dead.package files to git and created:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4335

Regards,

Hans

Re: mpg123 is in Fedora 25+ now, should be dropped from rpmfusion

[Andrea Musuruane]

Hi Hans,
 you have to retire it (not to orphan it).

This procedure is up to date AFAIK:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Retiring_a_package

Bye,

Andrea


On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Hans de Goede  wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> $subject says it all, not sure what the orphan process
> for rpmfusion is, hence this direct mail.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans