Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 08:14 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 25.10.2015 o 18:59, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> > 2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede
> >  > >:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > Hello mates
> > 
> > On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 
> > 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede
> >  > >:
> >  Hi All,
> > 
> >  I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer
> > packages to 1.6.x
> >  for Fedora-23:
> > 
> >  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> >  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> >  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
> > 
> >  But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23
> > yet. What
> >  are the
> >  plans here ?
> > Sorry for the lake for answear,
> > 
> > 
> > The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some
> > time
> > after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
> > 
> > development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the
> > f23 key,
> > updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
> > (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
> > 
> > 
> > Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into
> > releases/23
> > later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
> > end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
> > 
> > As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
> > x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild !
> > and I'd
> > like try do it in oneshot ...
> > 
> > Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
> > yesterday for F23 .
> > 
> > I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
> > publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a
> > copy!) ,
> > I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some
> > coordination
> > to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik
> > suggest
> > and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname
> > bump .
> > 
> > 
> > Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would
> > be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for
> > F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite
> > its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg.
> > 
> >  
> > We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not
> > completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent
> > version fit.
> > Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing.
> > 
> > Thx
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > -
> > 
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> Hi,
> 
> I have now pushed mplayer-1.2 to both f22 and master branches. Btw,
> should we switch to github now, or continue using kwizart.net?

Hello, 
Thanks for taking care of mplayer.
What are the developments ? 
- https://github.com/rpmfusion have a mirror of all sources , at least
people could know the state of updates and build in on others arches 
- if spectool -g foo.spec doesn't download the sources , we should
upload sources to old infra with old make new-sources FILES="foo" 
- and, please, do not forget update the sources file on git (md5sum
foo.tar.bz2 > sources)

BTW what is the state of gstreamer (packages to 1.6.x ) for F23 ? you
need help?

Thanks, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ? (sending again)

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-10-29 at 08:14 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 25.10.2015 o 18:59, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> > 2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede
> >  > >:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > Hello mates
> > 
> > On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 
> > 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede
> >  > >:
> >  Hi All,
> > 
> >  I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer
> > packages to 1.6.x
> >  for Fedora-23:
> > 
> >  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> >  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> >  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
> > 
> >  But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23
> > yet. What
> >  are the
> >  plans here ?
> > Sorry for the lake for answear,
> > 
> > 
> > The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some
> > time
> > after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
> > 
> > development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the
> > f23 key,
> > updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
> > (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
> > 
> > 
> > Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into
> > releases/23
> > later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
> > end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
> > 
> > As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
> > x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild !
> > and I'd
> > like try do it in oneshot ...
> > 
> > Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
> > yesterday for F23 .
> > 
> > I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
> > publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a
> > copy!) ,
> > I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some
> > coordination
> > to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik
> > suggest
> > and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname
> > bump .
> > 
> > 
> > Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would
> > be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for
> > F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite
> > its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg.
> > 
> >  
> > We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not
> > completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent
> > version fit.
> > Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing.
> > 
> > Thx
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > -
> > 
> > Nicolas (kwizart)
> Hi,
> 
> I have now pushed mplayer-1.2 to both f22 and master branches. Btw,
> should we switch to github now, or continue using kwizart.net?

Hello, 
Thanks for taking care of mplayer.
What are the developments ? 
- https://github.com/rpmfusion have a mirror of all sources , at least
people could know the state of updates and build in on others arches 
- if spectool -g foo.spec doesn't download the sources , we should
upload sources to old infra with old make new-sources FILES="foo" 
- and, please, do not forget update the sources file on git (md5sum
foo.tar.bz2 > sources)

BTW what is the state of gstreamer (packages to 1.6.x ) for F23 ? you
need help?

Thanks, 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 25.10.2015 o 18:59, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede
>  >:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 
> Hello mates
> 
> On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 
> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede
>  >:
>  Hi All,
> 
>  I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer
> packages to 1.6.x
>  for Fedora-23:
> 
>  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
>  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
>  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
> 
>  But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23
> yet. What
>  are the
>  plans here ?
> Sorry for the lake for answear,
> 
> 
> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some
> time
> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
> 
> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the
> f23 key,
> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
> 
> 
> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into
> releases/23
> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
> 
> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
> x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild !
> and I'd
> like try do it in oneshot ...
> 
> Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
> yesterday for F23 .
> 
> I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
> publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a
> copy!) ,
> I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some
> coordination
> to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik
> suggest
> and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname
> bump .
> 
> 
> Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would
> be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for
> F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite
> its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg.
> 
>  
> We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not
> completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent
> version fit.
> Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing.
> 
> Thx
> 
> 
> -- 
> -
> 
> Nicolas (kwizart)
Hi,

I have now pushed mplayer-1.2 to both f22 and master branches. Btw,
should we switch to github now, or continue using kwizart.net?

Julian

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 22:51, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 21:43, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2015-10-25 21:12 GMT+01:00 Julian Sikorski :
> [...]
> > > I am back now - but it looks like an f23 ffmpeg has been attempted
> > > already. It failed due to missing deps - I am guessing f23 buildroot is
> > > not completely populated yet.
> > >
> > xvidcore and x265 are failing.
> 
> I'm working on these two.

Fixed and fixes pushed to Git. I don't know how to request builds,
though. NOTE: I haven't tested on armv7hl.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Sunday, 25 October 2015 at 21:43, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2015-10-25 21:12 GMT+01:00 Julian Sikorski :
[...]
> > I am back now - but it looks like an f23 ffmpeg has been attempted
> > already. It failed due to missing deps - I am guessing f23 buildroot is
> > not completely populated yet.
> >
> xvidcore and x265 are failing.

I'm working on these two.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2015-10-25 17:24 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :

> Hi,
>
>
> On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
>> Hello mates
>>
>> On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>
>>> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede :
>>>  Hi All,
>>>
>>>  I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x
>>>  for Fedora-23:
>>>
>>>  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
>>>  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
>>>  https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
>>>
>>>  But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What
>>>  are the
>>>  plans here ?
>>> Sorry for the lake for answear,
>>>
>>>
>>> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time
>>> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
>>>
>>> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,
>>> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
>>> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
>>>
>>>
>>> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23
>>> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
>>> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
>>>
>>> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
>> x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd
>> like try do it in oneshot ...
>>
>> Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
>> yesterday for F23 .
>>
>> I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
>> publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) ,
>> I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination
>> to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest
>> and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump .
>>
>
> Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would
> be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for
> F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite
> its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg.
>

We will probably be using the lastest ffmpeg-2.8.1 altought it's not
completely well known for the amount of work to make that very recent
version fit.
Right now x265 and xvidcore are failing.

Thx


-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote:

Hello mates

On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:

2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede :
 Hi All,

 I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x
 for Fedora-23:

 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796

 But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What
 are the
 plans here ?
Sorry for the lake for answear,


The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time
after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.

development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,
updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
(x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)


Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23
later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)


As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd
like try do it in oneshot ...

Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
yesterday for F23 .

I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) ,
I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination
to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest
and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump .


Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would
be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for
F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite
its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg.

Regards,

Hans

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Julian Sikorski]

W dniu 23.10.2015 o 13:57, Sérgio Basto pisze:
> Hello mates 
> 
> On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede :
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x
>> for Fedora-23:
>> 
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
>> 
>> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What
>> are the
>> plans here ?
>> Sorry for the lake for answear,
>>
>>
>> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time
>> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
>>
>> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,
>> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
>> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
>>
>>
>> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23
>> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
>> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
>>
> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
> x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd
> like try do it in oneshot ... 
> 
> Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
> yesterday for F23 .
> 
> I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
> publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) ,
> I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination
> to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest
> and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . 
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists 
> 
> [2]
> https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419e1ee64ee
>>
> 
>>
> 
I am back now - but it looks like an f23 ffmpeg has been attempted
already. It failed due to missing deps - I am guessing f23 buildroot is
not completely populated yet.

Julian

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Sérgio Basto]

Hello mates 

On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede :
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x
> for Fedora-23:
> 
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
> 
> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What
> are the
> plans here ?
> Sorry for the lake for answear,
> 
> 
> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time
> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
> 
> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,
> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages
> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)
> 
> 
> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23
> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from
> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!)
> 
As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with
x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd
like try do it in oneshot ... 

Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148
yesterday for F23 .

I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had
publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) ,
I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination
to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest
and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . 


[1]
http://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists 

[2]
https://github.com/sergiomb2/x264/commit/01df16222127c265ad7781fc9a1e9419e1ee64ee
> 

> 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Richard Shaw]

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> Lot of work done and still no help.
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023
>
>
There are those that are willing to help but personally I'm not sure I'm
qualified for most of those which also seem to require direct access to
infrastructure...

Richard

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede :

> Hi All,
>
> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for
> Fedora-23:
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
>
> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the
> plans here ?
>
Sorry for the lake for answear,

The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time after
fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen.
development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key,
updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others)

Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23 later,
but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from end-user point of
view at GA time.(1 week delay!)


Lot of work done and still no help.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023



-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Sérgio Basto]

Hello, 

On Qui, 2015-10-15 at 11:43 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Other questions :
> > 
> > - x264 is missing in Fedora 23 devel repo [2] , what happened ?
> Failed
> > to build on ARM ?  I want enable with-asm option (only > F21 )
> 
> I could try and help, but since I have no access to the "new" infra,
> I can't test-build anything for F22+ on ARM.

who could do tests on ARM ? 


> I'd like to update FFmpeg to 2.8.x and MPlayer to 1.2, too.

I'm talking with kwizart (on IRC) to insert x264 on F23 , I'm planning
re-enable asm code on i686 armv5tel armv6l , since upstream said that
should be enabled and add some work on it . 

So x264 0.148,  FFmpeg 2.8.x and MPlayer to 1.2 , have we a way to test
it for F23 before try built it on RPMFusion for F23  


-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-10-15 at 07:29 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:54:28AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Seg, 2015-10-12 at 08:30 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for 
> > > Fedora-23:
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
> > > 
> > > But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the
> > > plans here ?
> > 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > Last 3 of October (the day which I proposed the IRC meeting), the user
> > glamber asked if the repo rpmfusion 22 had stopped. kwizart replied  : 
> > "I've recently restore one of my builder during the last week
> > so I should be able to forward the missing f22-updates.
> > Then I will work on f23, but still on day to day tasks, and way too
> > little on new infra tasks"
> > I deduce f22-updates was stopped, but now it is working again.
> > And checking http://download1.rpmfusion.org I also notice the F23 repo
> > is published in directory development/23/ !
> > 
> > I continue propose schedule a meeting on IRC, I do not know if it will
> > be productive, but to seed some ideas on how to help and what is highest
> > priority. Question in a workday or on weekend ? 
> > 
> > About ideas, over the builders and git server, we must have some layers
> > like packages [1], Bodhi2 , Pkgdb2, cgit, what do you think is the next
> > piece that we should integrated ? 
> 
> I don't think packages should have the priority. At least not until it 
> receives
> the work that we are planning on doing on it and while useful for user it does
> not have an influence on the other tools (bothi2, pkgdb2).

After thinking, pkgdb2 seems to be the most important, because we can
give acls to commit permissions ... 

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:54:28AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Seg, 2015-10-12 at 08:30 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for 
> > Fedora-23:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796
> > 
> > But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the
> > plans here ?
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> Last 3 of October (the day which I proposed the IRC meeting), the user
> glamber asked if the repo rpmfusion 22 had stopped. kwizart replied  : 
> "I've recently restore one of my builder during the last week
> so I should be able to forward the missing f22-updates.
> Then I will work on f23, but still on day to day tasks, and way too
> little on new infra tasks"
> I deduce f22-updates was stopped, but now it is working again.
> And checking http://download1.rpmfusion.org I also notice the F23 repo
> is published in directory development/23/ !
> 
> I continue propose schedule a meeting on IRC, I do not know if it will
> be productive, but to seed some ideas on how to help and what is highest
> priority. Question in a workday or on weekend ? 
> 
> About ideas, over the builders and git server, we must have some layers
> like packages [1], Bodhi2 , Pkgdb2, cgit, what do you think is the next
> piece that we should integrated ? 

I don't think packages should have the priority. At least not until it receives
the work that we are planning on doing on it and while useful for user it does
not have an influence on the other tools (bothi2, pkgdb2).


Pierre

Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

Hi!

On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 03:54, Sérgio Basto wrote:
[...]
> Last 3 of October (the day which I proposed the IRC meeting), the user
> glamber asked if the repo rpmfusion 22 had stopped. kwizart replied  : 
> "I've recently restore one of my builder during the last week
> so I should be able to forward the missing f22-updates.
> Then I will work on f23, but still on day to day tasks, and way too
> little on new infra tasks"
> I deduce f22-updates was stopped, but now it is working again.
> And checking http://download1.rpmfusion.org I also notice the F23 repo
> is published in directory development/23/ !

It's probably a question for Nicholas, but is there any way I can help
with the migration to new infra? What's missing? What tasks are pending?

> I continue propose schedule a meeting on IRC, I do not know if it will
> be productive, but to seed some ideas on how to help and what is highest
> priority. Question in a workday or on weekend ? 

I'd prefer during the week. I'm usually offline during weekends.

> About ideas, over the builders and git server, we must have some layers
> like packages [1], Bodhi2 , Pkgdb2, cgit, what do you think is the next
> piece that we should integrated ? 

I think bodhi2 is the most important of those you mentioned.

> Other questions :
> 
> - x264 is missing in Fedora 23 devel repo [2] , what happened ? Failed
> to build on ARM ?  I want enable with-asm option (only > F21 )

I could try and help, but since I have no access to the "new" infra,
I can't test-build anything for F22+ on ARM.

I'd like to update FFmpeg to 2.8.x and MPlayer to 1.2, too.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

[Hans de Goede]

Hi All,

I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x for Fedora-23:

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796

But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What are the
plans here ?

Regards,

Hans