Re: [rspec-users] Preconditions
On 9/8/07, Ben Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What was the motivation behind taking that tutorial down, BTW? I really like and benefited from it when I was starting to learn rspec. Was it just a maintenance issue as far as updating the tutorial to the current API (DSL)? That was part of the deal. The other part was that I thought it would be more demonstrative to have something w/ two or more classes dealing w/ interactions. Just never got around to it. We should probably resurrect the Stack tutorial in the mean time. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
[rspec-users] Going beyond the default html formatter/report?
Hi! I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html formatter/report? The current html report is nice and green but what about to go a little silly and enable also user input. For example to let customer to add a new pending spec, comments etc. I feel it might be mentally easier for some customers to jump into spec world when it is possible to give input at the same place. Integrate to trac or very lightweight standalone stuff. However it should not be trac reinventing effort. I haven't use rspec with customer yet but planning to do so with next project, so I might overreact about this matter right now. Priit ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] Failure Messages in RSpec + inline debugging of a spec
On 9/8/07, Jay Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/8/2007 4:19 PM, Scott Taylor wrote: So far it has been a mixed experience - I have found that it doesn't work very well with rails as you end up debugging more of rails then of your own code. Finally, a debugging environment that matches the production environment! I agree. When debug is required, I switch to script/spec and specify the exact file and specification to run, in that way, reduce the problems loading ruby-debug and getting my feet wet with Rails code :) -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] Going beyond the default html formatter/report?
On 9/9/07, Priit Tamboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html formatter/report? The current html report is nice and green but what about to go a little silly and enable also user input. For example to let customer to add a new pending spec, comments etc. I feel it might be mentally easier for some customers to jump into spec world when it is possible to give input at the same place. Integrate to trac or very lightweight standalone stuff. However it should not be trac reinventing effort. I haven't use rspec with customer yet but planning to do so with next project, so I might overreact about this matter right now. This sounds like a fantastic idea. Why don't you give it a shot? Aslak Priit ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
