Re: [rspec-users] Caveman Questions - how to use mock_model in script/console?
On 10/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/5/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Geoffrey Wiseman wrote: > > > On 9/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems' > > > > => true > > > > irb(main):002:0> require 'spec' > > > > => true > > > > irb(main):003:0> include Spec::Matchers > > > > => Object > > > > irb(main):004:0> 5.should == 5 > > > > => nil > > > > irb(main):005:0> 5.should be < 4 > > > > Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError: expected < 4, > > > got 5 > > > > > > > > > > $ script/console > > > Loading development environment. > > > >> require 'rubygems' > > > => [] > > > >> require 'spec' > > > NameError: undefined method `failure_message' for class > > > `Spec::Matchers::Have' > > > from > > > /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4:in > > > `alias_method' > > > from > > > /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4 > > > from > > > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in > > > `gem_original_require' > > > > > > > > > David - I haven't seen a follow up to this post. Could you guide me on > > > the > > > right direction? > > > > > > I see that in irb I can include Spec::Mocks::SpecMethods, which allows me > > > mock 'something'. How would I get access to mock_model? > > > > huh? I don't see how the except you quoted relates to mock model > > never mind > > gimme a few Well - I see what the error is coming from. When you say require 'spec' in script/console it's loading up files in vendor/rspec_on_rails before vendor/rspec. In this case, that's causing an alias_method call to choke because there's no method to alias. So the trick is going to be to coerce script/console into loading things in the right order. > > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > rspec-users mailing list > > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > > > ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] Caveman Questions - how to use mock_model in script/console?
On 10/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/5/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Geoffrey Wiseman wrote: > > On 9/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems' > > > => true > > > irb(main):002:0> require 'spec' > > > => true > > > irb(main):003:0> include Spec::Matchers > > > => Object > > > irb(main):004:0> 5.should == 5 > > > => nil > > > irb(main):005:0> 5.should be < 4 > > > Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError: expected < 4, > > got 5 > > > > > > > $ script/console > > Loading development environment. > > >> require 'rubygems' > > => [] > > >> require 'spec' > > NameError: undefined method `failure_message' for class > > `Spec::Matchers::Have' > > from > > /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4:in > > `alias_method' > > from > > /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4 > > from > > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in > > `gem_original_require' > > > > > > David - I haven't seen a follow up to this post. Could you guide me on the > > right direction? > > > > I see that in irb I can include Spec::Mocks::SpecMethods, which allows me > > mock 'something'. How would I get access to mock_model? > > huh? I don't see how the except you quoted relates to mock model never mind gimme a few > > > > > Scott > > > > > > ___ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] Caveman Questions - how to use mock_model in script/console?
On 10/5/07, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Geoffrey Wiseman wrote: > On 9/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems' > > => true > > irb(main):002:0> require 'spec' > > => true > > irb(main):003:0> include Spec::Matchers > > => Object > > irb(main):004:0> 5.should == 5 > > => nil > > irb(main):005:0> 5.should be < 4 > > Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError: expected < 4, > got 5 > > > > $ script/console > Loading development environment. > >> require 'rubygems' > => [] > >> require 'spec' > NameError: undefined method `failure_message' for class > `Spec::Matchers::Have' > from > /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4:in > `alias_method' > from > /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4 > from > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in > `gem_original_require' > > > David - I haven't seen a follow up to this post. Could you guide me on the > right direction? > > I see that in irb I can include Spec::Mocks::SpecMethods, which allows me > mock 'something'. How would I get access to mock_model? huh? I don't see how the except you quoted relates to mock model > > Scott > > > ___ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] Caveman Questions - how to use mock_model in script/console?
On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Geoffrey Wiseman wrote: On 9/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems' => true irb(main):002:0> require 'spec' => true irb(main):003:0> include Spec::Matchers => Object irb(main):004:0> 5.should == 5 => nil irb(main):005:0> 5.should be < 4 Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError: expected < 4, got 5 $ script/console Loading development environment. >> require 'rubygems' => [] >> require 'spec' NameError: undefined method `failure_message' for class `Spec::Matchers::Have' from /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/ spec/matchers/have.rb:4:in `alias_method' from /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/ spec/matchers/have.rb:4 from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' David - I haven't seen a follow up to this post. Could you guide me on the right direction? I see that in irb I can include Spec::Mocks::SpecMethods, which allows me mock 'something'. How would I get access to mock_model? Scott ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] Caveman Questions
On 9/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems' > => true > irb(main):002:0> require 'spec' > => true > irb(main):003:0> include Spec::Matchers > => Object > irb(main):004:0> 5.should == 5 > => nil > irb(main):005:0> 5.should be < 4 > Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError: expected < 4, got 5 > $ script/console Loading development environment. >> require 'rubygems' => [] >> require 'spec' NameError: undefined method `failure_message' for class `Spec::Matchers::Have' from /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4:in `alias_method' from /work/workspace/ng/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/matchers/have.rb:4 from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] Caveman Questions
On 9/5/07, sudara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm just a caveman with some caveman questions.
>
> I've been parsing Rspec for quite a while, and I'm writing my first series
> of specs. My initial impressions are "Verbose, but understandable. Helpful
> and intuitive, but so much to digest." I want to congratulate the folks who
> are dedicating a chunk of their lives to writing this, and ask 2 caveman
> questions
>
> My first is "Why lambda in rpsec"? It doesn't strike me as "reads like
> english" or "easily understandable." I understand it's place in ruby (um,
> kind of :), but my thinking is:
>
> lambda { do_something_risky }.should raise_error
>
> would be more understandable (and fun!) written as:
>
> running { something_risky }.should raise_error
That's a great idea. Why don't you add it to the tracker:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?group_id=797
>
> My second question is: For those folks who are getting up to speed with ruby
> and rails AND digesting rspec along the way, there is a lot of incoming DSL.
> As I started with rails before rspec, I found myself using script/console to
> check my code, poking at different ways of expressing myself with ruby.
>
> Is there a way to "poke at my specs"? I can load up my test environment, but
> can I spec things "live" so that I can find out what works and what doesn't?
> I find I'm wasting a chunk of time (as I don't have the DSL even 60% down)
> writing specs and getting it wrong. Am I missing a trick, or I.should_have
> dsl_down_before_trying.else_return(crying)?
irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> require 'spec'
=> true
irb(main):003:0> include Spec::Matchers
=> Object
irb(main):004:0> 5.should == 5
=> nil
irb(main):005:0> 5.should be < 4
Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError: expected < 4, got 5
Cheers,
David
>
> um, thanks for any potential caveman responses - the more caveman
> (pragmatic) the better.
>
> sudara
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Caveman-Questions-tf4384357.html#a12498949
> Sent from the rspec-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
[rspec-users] Caveman Questions
Hello!
I'm just a caveman with some caveman questions.
I've been parsing Rspec for quite a while, and I'm writing my first series
of specs. My initial impressions are "Verbose, but understandable. Helpful
and intuitive, but so much to digest." I want to congratulate the folks who
are dedicating a chunk of their lives to writing this, and ask 2 caveman
questions
My first is "Why lambda in rpsec"? It doesn't strike me as "reads like
english" or "easily understandable." I understand it's place in ruby (um,
kind of :), but my thinking is:
lambda { do_something_risky }.should raise_error
would be more understandable (and fun!) written as:
running { something_risky }.should raise_error
My second question is: For those folks who are getting up to speed with ruby
and rails AND digesting rspec along the way, there is a lot of incoming DSL.
As I started with rails before rspec, I found myself using script/console to
check my code, poking at different ways of expressing myself with ruby.
Is there a way to "poke at my specs"? I can load up my test environment, but
can I spec things "live" so that I can find out what works and what doesn't?
I find I'm wasting a chunk of time (as I don't have the DSL even 60% down)
writing specs and getting it wrong. Am I missing a trick, or I.should_have
dsl_down_before_trying.else_return(crying)?
um, thanks for any potential caveman responses - the more caveman
(pragmatic) the better.
sudara
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Caveman-Questions-tf4384357.html#a12498949
Sent from the rspec-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
